HANDS frantically grasping bananas across a crumbling Berlin Wall was
the most unreal of symbols for the end of the Cold War. Bananas became
the symbol of all that was western in the eyes of the easterners --
representing the things they wanted most but could not have.
Guatemala, the original banana republic and the most vicious little
regime in central America, is now reaping the benefits of the fall of
the wall. Banana sales are booming, but more importantly, the longest
running civil war in Central America may be drawing to a close.
More than 130,000 people have been killed and one million refugees
created in Central America's most persistent confrontation between
peasants demanding freedom from repression and the US's fear of
Communism in its back-yard. Now, the fear of Communism has been replaced
by a drift towards regional trading blocs and a need to tie Canada,
Mexico, and central America into a bloc to rival the European Union and
Japan.
The fundamental shift in international politics may therefore herald
relief for Guatemala's long-suffering peasants and native Indians. Last
week's MON 10/1/94 announcement that peace talks are to be resumed
between the newly-democratic government of President Ramiro de Leon and
the leftist Guatemalan National Revolutionary Unit (URNG) will be
welcomed by human rights activists.
Guatemala has been at war with itself for more than 30 years. In 1954
a CIA-sponsored military coup brought an end to democratic government
and ushered in an era of unrivalled terror and cruelty. Guatemala became
victim to America's paranoia and its test bed for counter-insurgency
techniques.
After the coup, a peasant rebellion came to nothing until the soldiers
rebelled in 1962 forming Guatemala's first guerrilla force. That revolt
was quickly crushed, the military becoming all powerful -- even setting
up its own bank and insurance company.
The linchpin of the military's campaign to maintain control was the
forced movement of the native Indian population from their homelands
into the so-called model villages. These allowed a close watch to be
kept on the population and separated men from their families.
The men were then drafted into civilian patrols -- essentially an
extension of the army. Anyone who refused would be regarded as a rebel
and beaten or tortured along with his family. However, in spite of
ruthless repression, the native Indian population has refused to give up
hope of a peaceful end to their struggle.
In 1992 Rigoberta Menchu, a Guatemalan Indian, was awarded the Nobel
peace prize -- effectively bringing the government's human rights
violations to international attention.
Ms Menchu symbolised the long-suffering people of Guatemala, having
seen her family systematically tortured and then murdered by death
squads.
Since Ms Menchu was awarded the prize, international attention has
focused on Guatemala and the appalling privations of the peasant
population. However, more than international attention is required to
bring a fundamental change.
Next month's Mexico City talks between the Guatemalan government and
the URNG will be a welcome step forward for many central American human
rights monitors. The Government and URNG have been talking sporadically
since April 1991. Negotiations between the rebels and the Government
broke down in May 1993 after failing to agree on who was to blame for
the atrocities during the military regime.
Last October a new peace plan was presented by the Guatemalan
president to the URNG. It aimed to limit the talks to purely military
matters and to confine social issues to a Guatemalan-based public forum
-- the rebels wanted independent monitors -- and was therefore rejected
by the rebels.
Even before the two sides reached the negotiating table to agree an
agenda for the February talks, disagreements began to emerge. The URNG
objected to the Government's insistence that social and military
negotiations be separated. The Government subsequently abandoned this
position and allowed the talks to proceed.
''There won't be any separation,'' Pablo Mansanto, URNG commander,
said. Under the preliminary agreeement, signed by both sides, the talks
will be moderated by one UN observer.
Despite the outstanding disagreements, the government hopes the talks
will succeed. Edmundo Nanne, Guatemalan ambassador to the UK, said: ''I
think for a long time there has been the will -- I can't speak for the
URNG -- but certainly the Guatemalan Government wants peace.''
MEMO
I'm fairly certain photographs are available from The Independent by a
photographer called Craig Easton. They were taken in August/September
1992.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article