LUCAS has confirmed that its AUL subsidiary in the US is under
investigation by the Pentagon in respect of its launch systems for the
American Maverick missile and hand-held radios for ground communication.
The investigations, which have been going on for 18 months, have been
reportedly linked to the ''friendly-fire'' events in the Gulf war in
1991, which resulted in British soldiers being killed by American
aircraft.
However, Lucas strongly denied that there was any connection between
the components supplied by AUL and the incidents.
''This is confirmed by the US authorities who advise that the
investigations into Lucas AUL are not linked to any 'friendly-fire'
incidents,'' a spokesman said.
The investigations are looking into inadequate testing of and faults
in equipment supplied to the American army by AUL. They have been under
way for 18 months and Lucas has already made provisions in its accounts
for an out-of-court settlement.
Sources close to the group indicated that a settlement of between $15m
and $20m was likely. AUL's sales are $15m a year.
Lucas played down the long-term effects of the problem and hoped that
its speedy response would mean that its reputation with the Pentagon
would not be damaged. Nevertheless, it is a blow for the group which is
currently restructuring its North American interests.
The spokesman said that investigations of this sort were relatively
common in the US and no specific charges had been made against the
company. Many of the inadequate testing procedures were in place before
the group bought AUL in 1988 and have subsequently been improved.
The spokesman commented: ''With civil customers you are talking about
issues of quality all the time but with government it takes on official
aspects which involve the launch of investigations such as this.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article