Blogs RSS Feed


Me, my son and I: Why I'm only having the one!


With a toddler nearing two years old I find that I am being asked more and more when will I be having my second child. Why? Why is it assumed absolutely that I will be having another? I don’t say I am stopping at one to get a kick out of seeing the shock on people’s faces, I say it because I mean it!

As much as I idolise Baby, and believe me when I say I do, I know completely that he will be our only child. I’m aware that for many this does seem unusual and I find myself having to explain to friends, family, passers-by, the lady that waxes my eyebrows that no we are not trying again because we just don’t want another. Many assume I am playing a kind of game and acknowledge that ‘Yes its hard, I agree - who would go through it again?’ and insist that very soon, if not already, I’ll be back in the family way. I mean – who wouldn’t want to have another? You have to try for the set, the pair, the girl, the 2.4, it’s unfair not to, what about the effect you’ll be having on your son?

Well isn’t that rather unfair to assume that my son will somehow be missing out by not having a sibling? I know a few adult only-children; more well adjusted people you couldn’t hope to meet - they always share and play nice! Baby goes to nursery, has friends, has a dog, has me and his father, goes everywhere with us and to every happening we can think of taking him to. Brighton & Hove is bustling with brilliant kid friendly events and places that will expose him to the world.

I’ll admit to a certain amount of selfishness and the fact that I am not a natural mother, it hasn’t come easy to me and I don’t enjoy it all of the time so why would I feel the need to go through it again? I can already see over the hump of childhood to a time when I won’t be needed continuously 24 hours a day, to a time when I might be able to think about Husband and I more. Baby grows rapidly and beautifully and as time goes by we’ll be able to communicate better and soon lift ourselves out of the chaos of babyhood. A few mothers in my son's soft play group are pregnant again and one already has a newborn strapped to her while her toddler races about - I am exhausted just looking at them. I still believe I already have a baby to look after and that needs all of my attention! Another child would just send us back to that mad time from which you raise your head to find two years have disappeared. Husband and I came to marriage and parenthood quite late and I don’t want to think that the time we have left together is going to be earmarked for children we don’t yet have.

Everyone vouches for the fact that the second child is a lot easier because you apparently know what you are doing the next time round. Well our experience of parenthood has been exactly that – our experience. We spun the wheel, took our chance, had our ups and downs but thankfully seem to be getting on ok. I feel no reason to go back and do it again just to try and change what our experience has been – have a better birth, enjoy pregnancy more, relax during the first six months, buy cuter clothes etc. All the things that people tell me will happen with the second and of course things I wish I had done with Baby, but there we go, why bring another life into the world just because I have learned to knit my own booties and would like a water birth this time?

Another thing that apparently happens with the second is that they easily fall into your already established routine – well if I can’t cope with the everyday chaos believe me when I say I find the routine almost as difficult. The lack of spontaneity in your day is almost claustrophobic – no lie ins, no after work drinks, no quick coffee catch ups, no extended shopping trips. Your life is dictated by the constant striving to meet your child’s needs before they are vociferously announced! Call me callous if you like (and admittedly the routine has worked for us) but I will be glad to cast it off when Baby is older and be able to just say yes to something spontaneously again. If you think I am shallow because I don’t want another child in order to have coffee and go shopping then please believe me when I am talking more about personal freedom – before I had Baby I lived a life I considered to be open and exciting, one that has been curtailed by my child’s arrival. Not his fault - I asked for him to be born - and nothing I would ever reproach him for, but it doesn’t follow that I would go through it again?

As happy and excited as I am about Baby’s future I don’t want my life to now be lived vicariously through my children, there is still plenty that I want to do. I am not saying that having children necessarily stops you doing whatever you like but that first novel, that dirty weekend, that music festival, that new pet, that motorbike, those singing lessons all have to take a back seat when you have a child, as is only right. I hope when Baby is older we can start sharing things that all of us want to do and I certainly don’t want to be a mother that has no interests of her own (or indeed a mother that can only talk about her children).

Now I don’t want you to think me heartless, I am not, I know how lucky we are and we are alive with love for our boy (believe me when I say I get incredibly broody! I have kept Baby in babygros far too long and am always desperate to get my hands on a newborn for a cuddle). But as life-changing as they are, our lives aren’t only about children, and I don’t understand the need to automatically have more than one. We’ve tried parenthood out and found that although we love our child deeply, we haven’t fallen deeply for having children. I know that this will seem odd to some and invite question, but I think that any opinion you have about parenthood, pregnancy and childbirth will be controversial to someone? So despite opinions to the contrary we think it’s a responsible move to stick with yes - just the one - our Number One (and only) Son!

Comments(8)

mcnorton says...
1:00pm Tue 9 Feb 10

Couldn't have put it better myself! There does seem to be a bit of competitive second-child thing - who's going to get pregnant with the second one soonest. I'm too busy enjoying this one to think about another. And too tired!

elainepkils says...
4:06pm Tue 9 Feb 10

Well said. My husband and I decided that in our circumstances having one child was for us. This was 47 years ago. My son and I could not be closer. He rings or emails me every day. I was able to give him my time most of his waking time. The early years the best time of my life. I had plenty of time, although when he started school I had a part time job but made sure I was there to take him and pick him up from school. I have a wonderful granddaughter.
Still we all make our choices and I did just what I thought was right for me.

emmalondon says...
7:10pm Tue 9 Feb 10

Well said and very honest. I feel all the same things as you, but it doesn't always feel easy to say them without being judged.

I have two a year apart (not planned that way!) and can certainly see the benefits of having only one both for the child and parents.

There is way too much pressure to meet certain expectations e.g. breastfeed forever, stay home for at least a year, have at least 2 kids.... it goes on. I think we all just need to do what's right for us and our family and support each other in that.

Just think your little one will not have to deal with hideous sibling rivalry, never getting any attention and having a mum who is permanently knackered (for even longer!)

xx

abbyc77 says...
7:27pm Tue 9 Feb 10

My hubby emailed me this article, and now that my cheeky 15 month old has gone to bed, I've had time to read it. Very thoughtfully written - and frank. Some aspects I feel as if I could have written myself. I feel there's a sort of silent pressure to have more than one child, and also fairly quickly...not sure if it's rather a 'middle-class' thing to get the timing 'just right' in terms of suitable age gaps (I'm so sorry if I'm offending anyone!). A few acquaintances of mine have got pregnant again with their second, and I feel possibly - just possibly - their reasons may be questionable. As if they're ticking boxes within their five-year plan, rather than thinking along more spiritual or heart-felt lines. As for me, my son is EVERYTHING. He consumes me when I'm with him, and I can't help but grin from ear to ear whenever he enters my thoughts (sorry for the cheese!!). But I definitely need quite a lot, still, for myself - to give me some sense of achievement in a day, and some mental and creative stimulation. It is so hard to get the balance right, and I've never got more frustrated than I do some days because the balance hasn't been right. As with everything, it boils down to personal choice. But I found this article brilliant - I loved reading such a frank personal experiences, especially one I can relate to so well. As for whether me and my hubby with give our son a bro/sis, I've no idea....but one thing I do know is that it's not as simple as ticking a box, or feeling just clucky again. In having another child, I feel I may lose out on so much with my current son...and myself...so I'm really not sure.... Thanks Alice!

LimpWristed says...
10:20am Wed 10 Feb 10

Bravo, couldn't agree more. Here's an idea though, why not try having no children thereby relieving pressure on an already heavily overpopulated country?

anubis says...
12:00pm Wed 10 Feb 10

You’re right, RH, ‘whatever one says about parenthood is sure to prove controversial to someone!’

Each of us is the product of differing experiences, hopes, aspirations and expectations – there is no ‘general rule’ applicable to all…. having said that, I felt there were aspects missing from your small ‘dissertation’, which struck me as an exercise in self-justification; could it really be true, I wondered, that RH is faced with a constant barrage from friends, associates, even passers-by in the street (?), demanding you justify your decision not to have a second (even third?) child? Reading through your carefully written piece, it seemed to me there was something very important missing – that ‘missing element’ was ‘Baby’.

I have three daughters, differing from each other personality-wise as the proverbial chalk and cheese … each of them having their own three offspring. The nine grandchildren’s ages range from seven to twenty years – the striking characteristic of each family unit is the extreme closeness of the children within the three family units. In every case, the families from top to bottom are extremely extravert, the kids are well integrated into their respective schools and classes, all heavily involved in everything to do with school activities, sports, amateur theatre productions, music (middle daughter is a music teacher) etc., etc --- visit any of their homes and half the neighbourhood children seem to be residence every late afternoon; yet always evident is the really deep relationship amongst the three kids within each family unit -- so much more exclusively binding that within their wider associations.

My own childhood was very different. I grew up on a small sheep farm in South Australia – just my two parents along with dogs, cats, horses, pigs, cows/bulls and sheep. The nearest neighbours were three miles away along a dirt road – a few miles further, a kindergarden where I interacted with a small group of childhood friends. Yet, my early childhood memories are very positive – my parents were very attached (they had to be! Living in a home with no electricity or gas, water from the well --- always alone, at home, I played games with the unripe pomegranates, pretending they were people). Two brothers came later, much later … I lacked totally what my grandchildren have – brothers and sisters of their own age, within the family. Please don’t misunderstand me. I am not claiming the social deprivation of my own childhood matches that of your own ‘Boy’ – but I am saying that I do not believe that the lack of other children, within the family, to ‘grow up with’ can be fully compensated by a city “bustling with kid-friendly events”, accompanied by dedicated, even besotted, parents. (It might be argued the ‘only child’ is more likely to result in ‘spoiled’ individual --- it’s good for a young child to learn, at a very early age, he is not always the ‘centre of attention’, there are others who, at times, must have priority consideration!)

You fear the reader (and people generally) might find you ‘shallow’ because of your reluctance to multiply further. I can’t imagine anyone would think that (however, they might feel, as I do, you are thinking of yourself rather than “Boy’). You say it’s your ‘personal freedom’ that’s the issue; “before Baby” life was open and exciting, the implication being that ‘Baby’ put paid to all that. I’m sure I’m not the only one who would agree regarding the prime importance of ‘personal freedom’ – lack of ‘freedom’ arguably makes life meaningless. To inform us what your ‘open and exciting’ life consisted of, you provide a list: morning ‘lie ins’, after work drinks, coffee catch ups, extended shopping trips, dirty weekends, music lessons & festivals, getting a new pet, motor bikes. Your itemization leaves one very puzzled – is this really how you would depict an ‘open, exciting, and free’ fulfilled life? Perhaps it’s this list, rather than your lack of enthusiasm for “going through it again”, that could suggest to an outsider, it’s the view of a rather shallow person who defines a ‘fulfilled life’ in this way.

You say, quite rightly, ‘everyone’ insists “the second one is easier” --- and indeed, physiologically speaking, that was certainly the case with us (I was there!) … but it’s also much easier in another sense that seems to have been forgotten. If you were to have second thoughts, RH, you’d be surprised how much lighter your work load would be (in all senses of the expression) by the excitement, enthusiasm and positive physical help ‘Baby’ would be in the new situation. Think about it!

Never forget, we are all different, our lives vary on so many levels. I am NOT one of those telling you, ‘you SHOULD have another child’. When it comes to the proverbial crunch, only you can take that decision. Only you know all the relevant facts. BUT, if you are eventually persuaded one or two more in the family seems ‘a great idea’, do it NOW. If another one is destined to come, it is important he/she and ‘Baby’ ‘grow up’ together.

Txa says...
5:25pm Wed 10 Feb 10

I respect everyone else choice.
You're right anubis every experience in life it's so different for everybody, how can we judge?. We didn't want to deprive our eldest of a brother/sister and I lost the count of how many miscarriages I had, even if I had wonderful pregnancies (the ones who came to term) and births afterwards and I'm very grateful to be bless with 3 wonderful and healthy children. If one lesson I learn it's not to take life for granted.

And what's wrong if your children add meaning to your life. It's their time now and I'm more than happy to dedicate it to them, every moment spend with them it's really precious. They grow so fast and but the time you realise they'll be in full-time at school and then they'll be gone or perhaps I will have the good fortune like anubis to enjoy grandchildren too.
I was more definitively born to be a proud mother! and as I type I've got my youngest on my arms ....

ReluctantHousewife says...
1:35pm Fri 12 Feb 10

Hello everyone, thanks so much for your comments, all so honest and interesting. I love hearing them!

I did try to convey the suspicion people had of me when I explained I only wanted one, people feel more comfortable with you when you have two - like its more 'normal'.
And of course the pressure to conform and 'tick boxes' is a big part of this arguement - I wonder sometimes about people's reasons for carrying on...

Emma - I don't know how you do it love, but I know your boys give you joy!

Abby, Elaine, Mcnorton - thanks for sharing your happy tales of only having one child with me. Its not always a popular decision and you are obviously brave and contented mothers who are proud of their families.

LimpWristed - there is much in what you say. But I for one couldn't have known I would only want one child until I had tried - maybe I would have wanted more - again that would have been my choice. But I do despair at the amount of unwanted children out there, or the families that keep expanding without a thought for upkeep, time, money etc.

Anubis - as I wrote I did feel myself getting more and more defensive as I was answering the smirking questioners in my head who insist that I will have at least one more!

Talking of a life that was open and exciting refers to career and lifestyle - not the interests listed in the next paragraph - these are just things I can't do at the moment. I don't think its shallow to hanker for a fulfilling career?

Husband and I both come from smaller families and have no experience of the large, bustling group you describe now. I can't change the way I feel for the hope that in the future Baby will have siblings to be close to. He might not even like them! But we will bring him up to be close and affectionate and not live a solitary life. And yes we might spoil him too sometimes, but I see nothing wrong with this.

Txa - sorry to hear of your experiences. I know that its rarely an easy road to parenthood, ours was a difficult one too. Which yes makes it more precious (but for me also makes the decision to not go ahead with more easier) and means you get so much happiness from the ones you hold in your arms!

What a debate. As Emma says - its important that we support each other in our own personal choices, there are reasons for all of them and as Txa agrees none of us can judge.

I will kiss Baby tonight and be thankful for him.
Until next time... RH xxx


ME, MY SON AND I: Our one and only boy ME, MY SON AND I: Our Prince

Most popular






Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses