Alan Phillips RSS Feed


Fukushima, Off the map.

Photograph of the Author By Alan Phillips - Life with Lottie »

Fukushima…off the map?

Fukushima Daiichi was unknown to almost all the world a week ago. So too was the thought of a set of nuclear power reactors being abandoned in a major industrial country as fires rage, casings crack and radio-active steam pours out. When will we ever learn,...... when will we ever learn?

This issue seems to me to be so important and yet there is little coverage locally that it reminded me of "think Globally act locally" and the need to put up a second posting to the one on Tuesday..

At one stage I used to wonder why nuclear power stations were on the coast, in France there are a battery of them facing us in southern England.

Was it to help cool the system, like Shoreham?

or to allow fuel to come by sea , so necessary for coal powered stations?

Was it to be less visible avoiding the noise of the Nimbys?

or to provide jobs in more remote areas like Dungeness?

Was it for staff to have a beautiful outlook?

or to give the power station a beautiful natural image like the change of the name From Windscale to Sellafield. , sometime after the long forgotten fire in 1957?

Twelve Miles Island

The disaster at Fukushima nuclear power stations is apparently considerably worse already than the infamous Twelve mile island (USA) melt down though less horrific at present than Chernobyl (Soviet Union)catastrophe. The Japan experience shows why nuclear power stations do love to be beside the seaside.

If there is an explosion only half the radius of 20 Km/12 Miles has inhabitants. Placing it in a more remote area crucially reduces numbers significantly, while if the wind is blowing in the right direction the radio-active pollution may be blown out to sea and not across densely populated areas.

This seems to be one of the few glimmers of good news in Japan for their remarkably stoical and practical people surviving the Tsunami.

Gravelines

Its not so good news for Sussex facing French nuclear power stations in Gravelines (Yes its real name!), Penly, Paluel or even Flamanville. Would they be as stoical and well organised as the Japanese? I love their cuisine but not this kind of french cooker. The earth may not move for them, but their bureaucracy is quite capable of blundering and bungling in a crisis.

Priorities

Next week there is the budget, where every interest group will be looking at its specific concern, its specific priorities for the next year or two. Where will global warming be ranked?

Am I a cynic to believe that there will be little thought to the next decade or two and the importance of massive investments needed in wind farms and safe renewable energy? When will we ever learn? Don Quixote is alive and well.

I know what my organic Lottie would prefer to face from the sea and what I would prefer to be off the map.

Readers who submit articles must agree to our terms of use. The content is the sole responsibility of the contributor and is unmoderated. But we will react if anything that breaks the rules comes to our attention. If you wish to complain about this article, contact us here

Readers who submit articles must agree to our terms of use. The content is the sole responsibility of the contributor and is unmoderated. But we will react if anything that breaks the rules comes to our attention. If you wish to complain about this article, contact us here


Comments(4)

The Brighton Bear says...
9:03pm Sat 19 Mar 11

A very nice twist of the facts.

armyeng1 says...
9:54am Sun 20 Mar 11

We have a serious problem here and that is that the earth has final say on how and for how long we live on this planet. We seam to be a people that learn hard from our past experiences. So today we have one chernobyle on our hands and the plan is to bury it!? My question is; how many nuclear power plants can we bury? How many disasters of nuclear reactors can we handle before it wipes us out? I think that this is a clear example of how unprepared we are to deal with even a small wrath of mother nature. If I weree the people of Japan, I would immediately push to dismantle all nuclear reactors for good, this Island country cannot afford not to learn from this scenario and I hope that they will make wise choices. Japan has plenty of green power resources like wind, sea and hydro electric. Natural Gas is an abundant resource that is cheap and under used and should be exploited for electricity by this country.

Made In Sussex says...
11:03am Mon 21 Mar 11

When will we ever learn,...... when will we ever learn?
-
All very easy to make such comments but we all use nuclear energy (such as powering the computers used to make the posts maybe!?) whether we know it or not.
-
Do I or the articles author rely completely on renewable energy or would we be willing to give up the comforts we get from our energy supply at home etc..I think not!
-
Like the americans that bemoan the effects of the deep horizon oil spill yet also rely on the same oil for their transport ,home and livelihoods I'm afraid there is still far too much hipocracy in this debate..

anubis says...
6:18pm Sat 26 Mar 11

Not quite sure what point you are making, Alan -- Don Quixote is not dead, you say; surely the Don was well known for his tilting at ‘imaginary’ friends (i.e. windmills) but most of your post seems to suggest mankind is playing with probable self-destruction in a total disregard of possible future nuclear ‘holocausts’, minimally a continual series of ‘accidents’ arising from carelessness vis-à-vis dangerous, accidental ‘side-effects’ of harnessing nuclear energy.

Japan was unfortunate, being a densely populated country which has just suffered a 9+ earthquake. Readers of your ‘warning’ (?) need be aware the Richter scale is logarithmic; translated into everyday language, that means a Quake measuring 9 is ten times as powerful as one measuring 8 and a hundred times greater than a quake measuring 7 …. and so on. In other words, the Japanese earthquake was 100,000 times more powerful than the one that struck Christchurch, in New Zealand, a few weeks previously. THERE HAVE ONLY EVER BEEN THREE OTHER EARTHQUAKES OF THE FUKUSHIMA MAGNITUDE SINCE RECORD-KEEPING BEGAN.

Hardly evidence for 'lack of care for population safety' that a 40-year old reactor was able to cope as well as it did! Not arguing we shouldn’t always remain conscious of the need to check and re-check safety measures; admittedly, Fukushima management SHOULDN'T HAVE STACKED SPENT FUEL RODS SO CLOSELY TOGETHER NEAR REACTORS; the reactor buildings containing the core of nuclear fuel, however, remain intact.

Nuclear energy is still the only readily available, reliable and cheap, low-carbon-energy source, and we clearly need move beyond fossil fuels to supply energy for the growing global population – favoured alternatives, wind, solar, tidal, geothermal are, at the moment, unable to fill the gap remaining as we move away from coal, oil and gas as our main energy sources.

You need provide more evidence if you wish justify your resurrection of the Spanish Don. There is no reason to share your implied pessimism; of course there are ‘lessons being learned’ – the Japanese of all peoples remain conscious of the dangers associated with nuclear power…..

Power melt down in progress Wind power Don Quixote tilting at windmills Dungeness in a natural setting?

Power melt down in progress

A beautiful view.

Don Quixote tilting at windmills

Dungeness in a natural setting?




Our Bloggers


RSS