Colin Houlson RSS Feed


Why do parents teach their kids to cycle on the pavement?

Photograph of the Author By Colin Houlson - Life, Hove and everything »

I may be going out on a limb here, but I'd be prepared to bet that most parents reading this wouldn't dream of taking their kids to the local supermarket for a shoplifting spree.

And I'd also wager a tidy sum that the vast majority of responsible mums and dads would baulk at the idea of letting their offspring weigh in as they vandalise a bus shelter.

So I'm at a loss to understand what possesses those parents who let their children join them as they breezily break the law and ride their bikes through the No Cycling area on Brighton & Hove seafront.

I should make it clear here that I'm not a Clarksonesque petrolhead with stick-shift for brains who hates cyclists.

I am a cyclist. I don't own a car. What's more, I actually believe it would be a good thing if the council lifted the restrictions on cycling along the seafront. If everyone was fully aware that while strolling along that beautiful stretch of coastline they could expect bikes to be travelling in both directions, it wouldn't be difficult to avoid collisions.

In Japan, for example, cyclists are allowed to ride on the pavement. Everyone knows the rules, so there's a skilled dance between pedestrian and cyclist that seems to work very well.

Several other countries are looking into introducing the same system. But when, as I did on Hove seafront over the Easter weekend, you see an elderly woman suddenly and unexpectedly - and those are the key words - confronted by the sight of a man and his tweenie son bearing down on her at speed, that's a totally different matter.

Like some sort of anti-Batman and Robin, flaunting the law rather than upholding it, this hefty adult and his youthful sidekick showed no concern for her distress as they whizzed by with inches to spare on either side.

This wasn't an isolated incident. Over the same weekend I witnessed what I assume was a textbook nuclear unit of mum, dad, son and daughter come very close to upending a male OAP. Seconds later, the mother brayed at her kids: “Ring your bells and people will get out of the way.”

I just looked up the word 'arrogant' in my dictionary and, yep, there was her face staring out at me.

This is happening at a time when there have been a number of new initiatives for cyclists in the area.

It's now possible to follow a bike lane from the seafront to Devil's Dyke, while Shoreham-by-Sea's Downs Link offers miles of traffic-free pedalling. So it's no excuse to argue there's nowhere else you can take your kids if you want to introduce them to the joys and benefits of cycling.

But while I'm all for promoting harmony between man and machine (take a bow Kraftwerk, pioneeers in this field), my main point is that I can't grasp why someone would encourage their children to join them in ignoring the law and cycle in a banned area.

If you're one of the guilty parties, I'm sure you're already aware that your kids copy you during their formative years. You're the closest thing they have to a role model.

So next time you show them that it's OK to do something because Mum or Dad did it, maybe you should remember this. Sure, you probably won't get caught because the police presence on the seafront is minimal at the best of times and non-existent most of the time. But don't be too surprised when your children grow up without any respect for the law. Or other people... Or you.


Comments(35)

puddingandpi says...
7:12pm Fri 1 May 09

I feel exactly the same!
I thought I was the only person who was annoyed about this. It's not just on the seafront, it's all over the place & it's wrong.
And we wonder why older kids are going feral...

Valerie Paynter says...
12:20am Sat 2 May 09

....and God forbid a cyclist on the pavement should be challenged! In Goldstone Villas a girl did just this to the cyclist who had just whizzed by me. Cycling handsfree, he turned his body round to face her whilst still peddling and shouted with real venom: "SHUT UP !!!!"

smalltowngirl says...
5:51am Sat 2 May 09

The policeman, who gave a talk to my grand daughters class, told the children to cycle on the pavement until they were fully capable of riding safely. This was before they had taken their cycling proficiency tests. I suppose the reasoning is that a 7 year old cycling on a road is a danger to themselves, vehicles and pedestrians as they are often unable to stay in cycle lanes (which are obstructed by 'parkers' etc) and do not have the skills or speed to cycle amongst the traffic. The parents on pavements should know better but I'm not sure what the solution is for small children.

John Rambo. says...
8:53am Sat 2 May 09

On 1st August 1999, new legislation came into force to allow a fixed penalty notice to be served on anyone who is guilty of cycling on a footway. However the Home Office issued guidance on how the new legislation should be applied, indicating that they should only be used where a cyclist is riding in a manner that may endanger others. At the time Home Office Minister Paul Boateng issued a letter stating that:

"The introduction of the fixed penalty is not aimed at responsible cyclists who sometimes feel obliged to use the pavement out of fear of traffic and who show consideration to other pavement users when doing so. Chief police officers, who are responsible for enforcement, acknowledge that many cyclists, particularly children and young people, are afraid to cycle on the road, sensitivity and careful use of police discretion is required."

Almost identical advice has since been issued by the Home Office with regards the use of fixed penalty notices by 'Community Support Officers' and wardens.

"CSOs and accredited persons will be accountable in the same way as police officers. They will be under the direction and control of the chief officer, supervised on a daily basis by the local community beat officer and will be subject to the same police complaints system. The Government have included provision in the Anti Social Behaviour Bill to enable CSOs and accre

Acheron says...
10:46am Sat 2 May 09

Colin,

No idea if you read the comments etc. I've no issue with your views in terms of older children who can cycle well enough. However you've left things rather muted on the issue of much younger children who are just learning to cycle (probably with stabalizers and for those who have just taken stabalizers off). I'm assuming you aren't suggesting that they should be learning by cycling in the road and that the pavement with a parent by their side is acceptable. Afterall they aren't going to be going at a breakneck speed.

Could you just follow up about that side of things to give a more complete picture!

jonathon says...
11:02am Sat 2 May 09

What about the idiots on electric scooters on the pavement?

Crashtest says...
1:09pm Sat 2 May 09

But don't be too surprised when your children grow up without any respect for the law. Or other people... Or you.
Get a life Colin Houlson and write about a real crime or some poor kid that’s been knocked down by a bus because
they are scared or riding on a pavement just in case some Nazi attacks them for being children.

Colin Houlson says...
1:17pm Sat 2 May 09

Acheron, thanks very much for your comments. You're absolutely right that a young child tootling along on a knee-high tricycle isn't going to cause anyone any great danger. But even then, I don't see why it needs to happen in a restricted area. As I mentioned, there are various places parents can take their kids to cycle. Just a short distance back from the seafront, for example, there's a designated bike lane. There's also a cycle route running through more than one park in Hove. But probably the best way for them to learn would be via an official cycle proficiency test. These are often organised by schools in a traffic-free environment, such as a playground. As for Jonathon's question: 'What about the idiots on electric scooters on the pavement?' - I haven't seen that happening, but if people are doing it then yes, I agree, they're idiots.

Colin Houlson says...
1:49pm Sat 2 May 09

Crashtest: Nazis attacking children in Hove? Really? If you've seen this happening I'd encourage you to take your own advice and write about it. Thanks for your 'unusual' point of view.

cing says...
2:52pm Sat 2 May 09

What is this huge hang-up people have about cycling thoughtfully on pavements. Brighton prom, in particular, is so wide that is could accommodate cyclists, skaters, roller-bladers and walkers with no problem, just so long as people take care and keep a lookout for others. It's those who are reckless and selfish that are the problem, not the average sensible cyclist.

jonathon says...
3:42pm Sat 2 May 09

Colin Houlson wrote:
Acheron, thanks very much for your comments. You're absolutely right that a young child tootling along on a knee-high tricycle isn't going to cause anyone any great danger. But even then, I don't see why it needs to happen in a restricted area. As I mentioned, there are various places parents can take their kids to cycle. Just a short distance back from the seafront, for example, there's a designated bike lane. There's also a cycle route running through more than one park in Hove. But probably the best way for them to learn would be via an official cycle proficiency test. These are often organised by schools in a traffic-free environment, such as a playground. As for Jonathon's question: 'What about the idiots on electric scooters on the pavement?' - I haven't seen that happening, but if people are doing it then yes, I agree, they're idiots.
Colin, I suggest you walk around Brighton and Hove and witness these people on electric scooters travelling on the pavement at about 15 mph. George Street in Hove is the best place I think they think it is a race track. What with people on electric scooters and idiots jumping out at you wanting you to enrol with some charity, the place is like a mad house. Next time you write your piece, write about these charity people. The person to contact is David Leppard MP for Brighton he is trying to get them stopped I believe.

Guerrero says...
9:05pm Sat 2 May 09

How many people in Brighton Hove and surrounding areas have been killed by cyclists?
How many have been kiled by motor vehicles?
I know what I'd rather be hit by.
Here in Spain cyclists are treated with far more respect than in Britain.

wolfieb says...
9:39am Sun 3 May 09

Think yourself lucky that you don't live in Eastbourne, where - on a seafront much narrower than that of Brighton - cyclists are the least of our worries. Instead, we have the Dotto Train which follows no set path, has been known to go much faster than most cyclists, and manages to knock people down on a regular basis.

Personally, I'd prefer the cyclists any day.

fretlessbass says...
10:28am Sun 3 May 09

I am father of a girl knocked off her bike by a car in the road two days ago. I have now told to ride on the pavement at all times!

willynillyuk says...
5:44pm Sun 3 May 09

Quite simple, Colin! The percentage of motorists that observes the speed limit along the seafront is virtually zero. Nobody in his right mind would allow a child on to a main road these days. If parents take their children out for a ride along the esplanade, what are they supposed to do, walk with their bikes or chain them up? I believe a bigger problem along the seafront involves the meathead local pedestrians. If they would move out of the legal cycle lanes when a cyclist approaches, then all of us, not just children, would be able to keep from swerving through the pedestrian areas. But of course they are too ignorant to understand that, just because you don't have wheels, you are not exempt from etiquette or the law.

However, if I am with children, they will ride on the pavement. I prefer that they clash with brain-dead pedestrians than sociopathic motorists.

Philepa says...
9:57am Mon 4 May 09

Has any body ever thought that if it is too dangerous to ride on the road - they can walk or take public transport! Its not a God given right to cycle on pathways and break the law. The man who has told his daughter to ride on the path because she got knocked down - what nest? Are you going to give her agun in case someone molests her. Brainless and proud has to be the worst combination.

Chobot says...
11:27am Mon 4 May 09

Yeah, let the children mix it up on the roads with the trucks like the rest of us, then everyone's happy.

Just look at those menaces to society in the photo - kids getting excercise on a lovely Brighton evening harming absolutely no one. This must be stopped!

Why don't you just throw your copy of the Daily Mail through the spokes of the next under-12 who dares cycle past you? That'll learn 'em. And they'll grow up to be infinitely better citizens as a result, I'm sure.

Fercri Sakes says...
11:37am Mon 4 May 09

Colin, I don't know how old you are (48?) but you must realise that there are now three times as many cars on the road today as there were when you were learning to cycle.

Yes, let's fine cyclist who are a danger to pedestrians, but to those of us who have to occasionally cycle responsibily on a pavement to avoid death by car, please leave us alone.

Colin Houlson says...
2:07pm Mon 4 May 09

Thanks, Philepa, I agree. Chobot, I've never read the Daily Mail in my life - actually, it seems like a Tory viewpoint to me to be selfish and disregard the needs of other people. I've never suggested that people should cycle on the road if they find it too dangerous. That's what bike lanes are for - until cycling on the pavement is legal (which I've also stated my support for). It's odd that some people are ignoring the option of riding in a bike lane and think that pedalling along a pedestrian walkway is the only alternative. Whatever your viewpoint, thanks for sharing it.

green-griffin says...
3:29pm Mon 4 May 09

1. too dangerous on the road.
2. bloody f***ing pedestrians walk in the cycle lane so there's no way to avoid them other then going into their lane!
this stupid article could be one of the reasons everyone drives cars! cos they know they're gonna get bashed for cycling.
I expect people to move out of my way when I ring my bell especially when on narrow paths with big groups all in a line taking up all the space for me to pass them.
also there aren't enough cycle lanes anyway in brighton so we go on the paths to avoid getting run over.
people ride bikes for entertainment, 'cos public transport is slow and expensive and because walking is slow and not for the unfit especially from moulscomb to the centre. using a bike is quickish, costs nothing and healthy. people should be urged to ride bikes.

drewboy30 says...
5:04pm Mon 4 May 09

cing wrote:
What is this huge hang-up people have about cycling thoughtfully on pavements. Brighton prom, in particular, is so wide that is could accommodate cyclists, skaters, roller-bladers and walkers with no problem, just so long as people take care and keep a lookout for others. It's those who are reckless and selfish that are the problem, not the average sensible cyclist.
I totally agree with this sentiment. The pavement is the safest place to be when riding a cycle. The roads are very crowded and dangerous. Removing the hazard of a cycle to the less problematic pavement area makes complete sense. In my area you have the stupid instance (where they exist) of cycle lanes on pavements just ending and then starting again further along the street. One moment you are within the law the next outside it. In all, the whole issue is typical of attitudes in this country which at the best of times would not be able to manage there way out of a paper bag !!!!

Guerrero says...
10:34pm Mon 4 May 09

Child on bike on pavement.Pretty safe.Unlikely to be killed.
Child on bike in road.I'm worried.Not safe at all.Much higher risk of nasty injury and possible death.
Am I wrong?

BN3 says...
11:13pm Mon 4 May 09

Common sense is needed. Cycling slowly and considerately on the pavement is not a problem, intimidating old people is.

I have more of an issue with the vast swathes of pedestrians (especially on the seafront) who singularly fail to understand what the red cycle lane with illustratons of bikes could possibly be for and routinely wander into the path of cycles correctly using the designated path.

Colin Houlson says...
12:14am Tue 5 May 09

Green-griffin, I don't think you read the 'stupid article' properly. If you had, you'd see I agreed with several of your comments. Thanks.

bravebeth says...
7:55am Tue 5 May 09

Deaf people do not hear cycle bells. It is about respect - the promenade is for pedestrians. There is a cycle path for families to use. Parents who encourage cycling along the promenade or on the pavement are teaching their children that they do not have to obey the law. The pavements are not safe for pedestrians due to bullies on bikes on pavements. They are bullies nothing less.

puddingandpi says...
9:15am Tue 5 May 09

I shout at them. I'll say "the road is just there" or "the cycle path is ". Or I used to, now I just shout "Get off the pavement!" with the F-word if there's no kids around.

Silverwing says...
11:35am Tue 5 May 09

Cyclists have plenty of cycle lanes which most use but a few don't. They also do NOT seem to know the "road signs" painted on nthe cycle lane prior to pedestrian crossings, like "Give Way" They are becoming a breed of their own without regard to pedestrians and i for one refuse to give way to these self centred people

Mooo says...
11:36am Tue 5 May 09

I agree with Colin.

The decision isn't seafront vs road, its seafront vs safe cycle lane a couple of hundred metres away.

If going through the city or areas with no cycle lane, I cycle on the road, whilst my partner and child will go on the pavement (and cycle sensibly with respect for pedestrians.

For me, this tries to give the notion that its fine to cycle on the path when unable to be safe on the road, but also that there is a progression to roads once capable, and is something that should be desired.

I do think though, that there is space, and there should be a cycle lane where people are currently cutting through though!

Having 2 routes in Brighton (Shoreham/Devils Dyke) isn't good enough. How often do most cyclists want to go there ?

Redbeard says...
11:38am Tue 5 May 09

Children are allowed to ride on the pavement until they are able to ride on the road or about 13 years old. I ride on the pavement sometimes as the roads in this country are very bad for cyclists and I do not always feel safe. If we had better cycle lanes and more space I would not mind. I have never hit anyone on the pavement but have been hit by a few cars...the seafront however is fair game, we should have access to it all, it is big enough.

green-griffin says...
5:45pm Tue 5 May 09

puddingandpi wrote:
I shout at them. I'll say "the road is just there" or "the cycle path is ". Or I used to, now I just shout "Get off the pavement!" with the F-word if there's no kids around.
I hate it when people shout at people on the pavements. I myself have been yelled at for going on the pavement by people like you. I swear I could have got off my bike and smashed her face in. (I know. violent right?)
but it pissess me off because you want us to get off the pavement, where are we suppose to go? on the road?
like to see you get run over on your bike, I was nearly hit by a bus! not to mention the countless times I have been beeped at by inconsiderate drivers making me jump which only causes more delay as I regain myself.
bad city to cycle in. just dont bother, everyone can just get fat using buses instead.

davyboy says...
7:43pm Tue 5 May 09

here in oxford, where we have lots of cycles, i personally, diliberately walk into any of them cycling where they shouldn't. either on the pavement or pedestrianised streets, it doesn't bother me. if they fall off, tough.

Colin Houlson says...
8:56am Wed 6 May 09

Redbeard, I'm afraid that's incorrect. If you visit the Bike For All website (a joint initiative by the UK's cycling body and the Department of Transport) it outlines the legal position. In a nutshell: 'Cycling on footways (a pavement at the side of a carriageway) is prohibited by Section 72 of the Highway Act 1835, amended by Section 85(1) of the Local Government Act 1888. This is punishable by a fixed penalty notice of £30 under Section 51 and Schedule 3 of the Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988.'

pancaker says...
5:01pm Wed 6 May 09

Agree with you all the way Colin. I'm also a cyclist and nothing annoys me more than cyclists on the pavement when a cycle path is nearby or cyclists jumping red lights.

If the police fined the pavement cyclists and red light jumpers like they should they'd have made 300 quid in less than 5 minutes just by the traffic lights at Elm Grove at 8.30am this morning.

Teila82 says...
2:31pm Thu 7 May 09

I think the point is being missed here. He is not saying ride on the roads. What he is saying is don;t ride where it's not legal to do so. There are plenty of places where you can ride on pavements which is allowed and doesn't endanger both pedestrian or cyclist.

Carl Bugenhagen says...
9:02am Fri 8 May 09

So many cyclists are selfish and self-righteous, they don't obey road signs or cycle lanes, don't have little bells on their handlebars any more because they've learnt it's just easier to shout f*** off. I've seen them careering down the slopes into the marina at speeds where they would easily kill a child in their path. The country wasn't built for cyclists, use the lanes where they exist, or the road or get on a bus.

IRRESPONSIBLE: Pavement cyclists IRRESPONSIBLE: Pavement cyclists

Our Bloggers


Recent entries

May 2012 »
S M T W T F S
29 30 01 02 03 04 05
06 07 08 09 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 01 02

RSS