Jo Chipchase RSS Feed


You've Been Fraped?

Photograph of the Author By Jo Chipchase - Letting off steam »

I see that some Sussex police officers have landed themselves in trouble for using Facebook to make “inappropriate comments” about suspects, et al. Why doesn’t this surprise me? The one thing that does surprise me is that the police are only using Facebook to discuss their cases, as opposed to using it for snooping purposes and, hence, ensnaring the suspects good and proper, Sonny Jim!

In my opinion, despite being an avid personal user of social media, Facebook has a lot to answer for these days. We complain about CCTV, store loyalty cards tracking our shopping habits, the prospect of national identity cards and anything else that might monitor our movements, yet we sign up to Facebook in our droves. Once we’ve joined, we willingly post our personal information up there: date of birth, birthplace, current location and what we are doing at any given moment of the day or night. What better tool for the CIA, tax authorities and police officers to look us up and monitor our activities, if they want to do so?

And did you know that Facebook owns the copyright to all the photos you’ve ever uploaded to its server? That’s right, if you become rich and famous in the future, a third party owns those embarrassing pictures of you getting drunk and falling over in the past.

The upside of Facebook is the opportunity to see what our oldest and newest friends are doing, regardless of their location. And, yes, it’s pretty ‘cool’ to see photos of people’s kids, their holiday shenanigans and whatever else they’re doing that might entertain us. However, there’s a major downside to all this accessibility. Before the advent of Facebook, we could, for example, split up with a partner and remain “just good friends”, and then get on with our own life. We most certainly did not have their every activity fed to us by social media 24/7. I have a friend who split up with a long-term girlfriend and was pretty cut up about it, and then heard, via Facebook, about the presence of a new boyfriend, complete with lots of public aahing and cooing from the recent ex’s friends. How horrible: it wouldn’t have happened like that when we were simply using pens and paper to communicate! And I have female friends who have compulsively checked their ex’s page every night for the presence of new “hot chicks”, and then been completely devastated if they spotted one. On a need to know basis, do we really need to know? I would say that the answer is “no”.

Although Facebook is intended as a tool for connecting with one’s friends and associates (as well as making oneself visible to authorities, hah hah!), I believe that most users have people they’ve never even met on their friends list. I’ve been at a party and someone I’ve never seen before has walked up to me and said “oh I know you from Facebook – you’re always chatting away about (insert trivial matter here)”. The girl could have been one of those Sussex police officers having a good snoop at local residents, for all I knew, and I wouldn’t have been any the wiser.

Then there’s the rise of “fraping” (Facebook rape, for the uninitiated). Fraping occurs when somebody posts slanderous and defamatory comments all over another person’s Facebook profile page. I’ve been fraped in the past by a best friend’s psychotic boyfriend. He thought I disapproved of the relationship so he retaliated by pasting extremely dubious material all over my profile page, which went out on the Facebook news feed to 300+ people, including some business contacts. And I’m fairly convinced that I’m not the only Facebook user who, after a few vinos, has considered or even acted upon the “amusement value” of posting some “funny” comments on an ex’s page at 2am. Facebook is an ideal tool for psychotic exes and “bunny boilers” worldwide, and we have all signed up for it willingly!

There's already a website called ‘Best Frapes’ (www.bestfrapes.com), which is advertising for “more frapes needed”. Before long, TV programmes based on showing video ‘funnies’ - such as ‘You’ve Been Framed’ – will be defunct. I’m pretty sure that the next generation of this show will be called ‘You’ve Been Fraped’ and it will screen the most witty and droll examples of fraping from around the world, with full sign-off from and payment to the Facebook users first, of course. Meanwhile ‘Crimestoppers’ will show how Facebook was cunningly used to entrap hapless criminals who went online and let slip some trivial detail about their nefarious activities. Won’t that be ‘fun’?

Readers who submit articles must agree to our terms of use. The content is the sole responsibility of the contributor and is unmoderated. But we will react if anything that breaks the rules comes to our attention. If you wish to complain about this article, contact us here


Comments(14)

Cap'n Flint says...
9:28am Mon 25 Jul 11

Still drinking too much Vino eh? Jo.

Jo Chipchase says...
10:23am Mon 25 Jul 11

Another day, another pseudonym! Do you not have anything else to do!?

Squire John Trelawney says...
2:12pm Mon 25 Jul 11

Jo Chipchase wrote:
Another day, another pseudonym! Do you not have anything else to do!?
Astonishing piece of irony Jo, considering your output on this Blog...

Jo Chipchase says...
2:28pm Mon 25 Jul 11

Oh, I like my irony.

I don't spend all day on there, y'know. And Facebook does have another upside of being quite useful for researching features, etc., making contacts. It isn't all mindless frivolity... honest, gov!

Squire John Trelawney says...
2:36pm Mon 25 Jul 11

Jo Chipchase wrote:
Oh, I like my irony.

I don't spend all day on there, y'know. And Facebook does have another upside of being quite useful for researching features, etc., making contacts. It isn't all mindless frivolity... honest, gov!
Yea! RIGHTO THERE Jo!.. Plus.. If you WERE to spend all day on it, there would not be time for all the lunchtime Vino eh? Or the holidays with the LITTLE PEOPLE!..

Jo Chipchase says...
3:37pm Mon 25 Jul 11

Actually, I don't tend to drink vino at lunchtime. It doesn't go overly well with work in the afternoon.

How many different aliases do you have on here, I wonder?

Squire John Trelawney says...
4:11pm Mon 25 Jul 11

Jo, if you cannot be honest about the drinking and poorly behaved kids at least be consistent... God knows the Blogs have been....

"I once left a pub in Rottingdean because the manager said my two year old was “allowed if he’s quiet and doesn’t run around”. I decided that a cheap bottle of Chardonnay in my own back patio was a preferable option"

Oh! and in answer to your query..

"Nomen mihi Legio est, quia multi sumus."

Jo Chipchase says...
4:24pm Mon 25 Jul 11

Hey! Never mind a quiet glass of middle class Chardonnay! Stuff family holidays! That's not what my sort of "ASBO" 'types' are into, is it Squire, hey? This is more like it - PARTAY! Mag-a-loof! Mag-a-loof!

http://www.viceland.
com/wp/2011/07/pr-ho
lidaybrits-abroad-we
-went-to-a-foam-part
y-in-magaluf/

Squire John Trelawney says...
4:31pm Mon 25 Jul 11

Crying babies cause us all anguish, whether they belong to us or not. In a waiting room, a shop, an aeroplane – the appearance of a red-faced little squealer has us all wincing and grimacing. But in a quiet restaurant it can just about tip us over the edge, surely this is the one place you can be free from the wailing of your offspring or anyone else’s? Nothing causes more debate amongst the socialising classes than the presence of children and babies in traditional ‘adults only’ environments such as pubs and restaurants.

A man was jailed this week for smashing a wine bottle over the head of a fellow diner at a London Indian restaurant for suggesting that he took his crying 7-month-old baby home to bed! Well if I had been in that restaurant I too would have been in danger of a bottle attack because I’d also have suggested that over half an hour of wailing was more than enough for anyone, little one included.

Now, I also have a small child and am well aware of the problems facing parents in hostile environments not set up for kids - no room for pushchairs, the unfriendly glances from childless couples and lets not get started on the breast-feeding in public debate… But I have always been well aware of my responsibilities - to myself, my child and the public. I’ve both complained about a noisy child and taken my own noisy child outside. I believe only subject others to what you would feel acceptable if you were in their position. And there is certainly no need to be aggressive to anyone who complains about the cries that you yourself might find so endearing and healthy.

So many parents try to carry on their lives as normal after labour day, carrying on with the drinking, dining out and socialising they did before little Johnny or Ella came on the scene. I used to love frequenting cocktail bars, hotel bars, café bars, just bars in general really, before I had my son and I still do today when I get the chance, but I would not dream of taking him with me. I’m not sure he would get a lot of it and I’m **** sure my fellow drinkers wouldn’t either? Of course new parents don’t want to feel as if their lives are over and they can’t do things they previously enjoyed or be seen out in public, but the fact remains their lives have changed, therefore changes need to be made (even if its just investing in a good babysitter).

If we want a meal or a drink out with our son, (and I do believe it is important to get youngsters eating out early) my husband and I have a huge rota of all the local family-friendly pubs and restaurants in the area, there are loads of them and no one minds a bit of screaming or running around. If they did there would be little cause for complaint, unless of course the children were being badly behaved (which is a whole different ball game all together). There is however, cause for complaint if a quiet evening meal out with your loved one - which you too are paying for and have a right to enjoy - is ruined by a screaming baby who’d much rather be at home anyway. Just watch out who you complain to, maybe approach the manager as opposed to the angry looking diner with a wine bottle!

From your fellow Blogger...

Succinct ain't it...

Jo Chipchase says...
4:41pm Mon 25 Jul 11

Now that's altogether more reasonable but I'm getting very confused as to who is a blogger and who is a flamer who switches identity!

Jo Chipchase says...
4:45pm Mon 25 Jul 11

They also appear as "beaver hunter". It is all too confusing... almost enough to send me out for a cold glass of... agua mineral con gas!

Tom Redruth says...
12:27pm Tue 26 Jul 11

Having just read your last three blogs.. and subsequent comments, may I humbly beseech you to reduce your consumption anything with more 'gas' in it.. It is for yours and everyone's sake, Josephine.

Also I was impressed with the Latin quote.

"Nomen mihi Legio est, quia multi sumus."

JIm Hawkins says...
10:08pm Tue 26 Jul 11

Tom Redruth wrote:
Having just read your last three blogs.. and subsequent comments, may I humbly beseech you to reduce your consumption anything with more 'gas' in it.. It is for yours and everyone's sake, Josephine.

Also I was impressed with the Latin quote.

"Nomen mihi Legio est, quia multi sumus."
As was I actually! It is not something you see in the Argus very often, if at all! I was even more surprised to find it was grammatically correct, something you also very seldom see in the Argus.
Credo nos in fluctu eodem esse

Israel Hands says...
6:38pm Sat 30 Jul 11

HA HA! Excellent Stuff.

Fraping is on the increase... Fraping is on the increase...

Our Bloggers


RSS







About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree