News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Developers plan eviction of Lewes Road Community Garden

Friends and supporters of Lewes Road Community Garden held an all-day party yesterday as developers for Tesco prepared to deliver an application for possession of the site.

Garden facilitator Ron Evans said that once an application for vacant possession has been lodged it will start a legal process which will create a framework for opponents of the developer’s plans to put forward their own arguments. Evans now lives on the site permanently. He said: “This garden is my life and I will use every legal means possible to keep it alive.”

The developers have announced plans for flats, a betting shop and a Tesco Express outlet on the formerly derelict land. In May last year local residents began work changing the site into a place for meeting neigbours, reflection and relaxation and growing food.

Local resident and garden supporter Ruth Herbert said: “We are providing a much needed space for everyone in the area – including local schools – to use. We want schoolchildren to come down and grow their own food. Today’s party shows how well supported the garden is.”

Supporters of the garden are working on their own plans to buy the site.

A day of Cuban and other music will be held at the garden on Sunday July 4, organised by Gemma Williams, Ruth Herbert and Blondie tribute performer Chalisa Greogory.

Comments(38)

caeos says...
11:22am Wed 9 Jun 10

""Evans now lives on the site permanently.""" so isnt that against the law?

PaulOckenden says...
11:28am Wed 9 Jun 10

"We want schoolchildren to come down and grow their own food."

Yes - let's teach them the perils of eating food which has been grown on a site laden with nasty toxins. It'll be a valuable life lesson.

This 'garden' really saddens me. The owners of the land were quite accommodating, saying that the gardeners could use it for a while, as long as they moved out once the development was due to start. That struck me as a good compromise - they could have just thrown the gardeners out from day one, but instead they tried to work WITH the community. It was a generous gesture.

And what has that community done, now that it's time to move on? Reneged on their original agreement. It's not just two faced, it's also incredibly stupid and short sighted.

I'm sure land owners will think twice next time, before consenting to projects like this eco garden. The gardeners, in being so unreasonable, will have shot themselves in the foot.

I don't know why they are acting like this - perhaps those nasty petro-chemical toxins have got to them, too.

mark by the sea says...
11:29am Wed 9 Jun 10

caeos wrote:
""Evans now lives on the site permanently.""" so isnt that against the law?
exactly these people dont own the land, pay rent or have any legal right to make stupid statements.. if tesco want to biuld some flats and a store that will produce jobs then great.. after all this land was concrete petrol station ! and not a park or open land.

cheezburger says...
12:09pm Wed 9 Jun 10

Completely one sided, this doesn't deserve to be under the banner 'news'. Support it by all means as long as you give voice to the other side too.

Rostrum says...
12:10pm Wed 9 Jun 10

"Friends and supporters of Lewes Road Community Garden held an all-day party yesterday" -- On a Tuesday .. A Work day ... About says it all .. Jobless feckless crusties.. with nothing better to do than be a blot on the planet.

cheezburger says...
12:28pm Wed 9 Jun 10

Do they all pay rent on their bed sits or do they squat there too?

bob_from_brighton says...
12:32pm Wed 9 Jun 10

I feel very differing emotions regarding this. Clearly Lewis Rd has more than enough shops, and not enough green spaces.
But I completely agree with all the negative comments added so far..

cheezburger says...
12:50pm Wed 9 Jun 10

Not enough green spaces? There's The Level at one end and Saunders Park at the other.

Rostrum says...
1:09pm Wed 9 Jun 10

bob_from_brighton wrote:
I feel very differing emotions regarding this. Clearly Lewis Rd has more than enough shops, and not enough green spaces. But I completely agree with all the negative comments added so far..
How many 'green spaces' do you want.. There's The Level as the South end of Lewes Road and Saunders Park at North. no more that 10 minutes walk apart...

Murgatroyd says...
2:09pm Wed 9 Jun 10

Rostrum wrote:
bob_from_brighton wrote:
I feel very differing emotions regarding this. Clearly Lewis Rd has more than enough shops, and not enough green spaces. But I completely agree with all the negative comments added so far..
How many 'green spaces' do you want.. There's The Level as the South end of Lewes Road and Saunders Park at North. no more that 10 minutes walk apart...
How many supermarkets do YOU want? There's Sainsbury's at the gyratory, the Co-op next door to the site, Spar over the road, the Turkish supermarket 2 minutes walk away. And betting shops? we really need more betting shops don't we? They reaaallly raise the tone of an area.

You lot really make me laugh - all this frothing at the mouth about a bunch of people who, motivated by something other than profit, have created something good. Why don't you buy a nice bottle of wine, get down there tonight, chill out and talk to some of the people involved. And if, after all that, you still think Tescos is a better idea, then at least you're talking from a position other than complete ignorance

PaulOckenden says...
2:23pm Wed 9 Jun 10

@Murgatroyd, it's not about whether we need a new betting shop or not (although the shops and the construction will provide much needed local employment - at least for those people that want to work). But it's about the site owner allowing a community project for a limited time period, and then that community going back on their original agreement to vacate at the appropriate time.

StrangerPassingBy says...
2:25pm Wed 9 Jun 10

usual tosh from the comedy trolls...
people worked hard on the place, what the hell do you want another supermarket for,

soil for children to grow things in is non toxic as it is in raised beds and soil donated by well wishers.

How about sticking the garden caretakers on the council wages list, could be paid for by sacking a few over paid execs who just take backhanders off developers,

You Daily Mail cliches are behind the times with your unimaginative resonses, New Govt announced today they going to cut back on building on gardens in brownfield sites squatted or otherwise...

get with the programme of your own Tory Governent u idiots

Andy R says...
2:35pm Wed 9 Jun 10

Yes...I never knew Tesco fanboys existed.....

Paul Ockenden does not appear to know what he's talking about. His unsubstantiated claims about poisoned soil have been trashed and as far as I can see the garden folk haven't "gone back" on anything. There's a legal process to be followed.

PaulOckenden says...
2:48pm Wed 9 Jun 10

The contamination problem of ex-petrol stations is well known - that's why there are so many of them sitting vacant - the decontamination costs are quite significant.

As for the agreement, I'm sure the search function on this very website will find the story about Keith Taylor securing an agreement between the land owners and the guerilla gardeners, allowing them to stay on the site but only until it was required for development. It was quite well publicised at the time.

Tesco fanboy? Hardly! But I am a fan of local employment and housing. And of sticking to agreements.

Murgatroyd says...
2:49pm Wed 9 Jun 10

PaulOckenden wrote:
@Murgatroyd, it's not about whether we need a new betting shop or not (although the shops and the construction will provide much needed local employment - at least for those people that want to work). But it's about the site owner allowing a community project for a limited time period, and then that community going back on their original agreement to vacate at the appropriate time.
It is all about whether we need another Tesco! That is precisely the issue in the minds of the community gardeners. Had the development been for housing or even shop units which might be let to independent traders then there would not be so much objection. And as for the occupiers breaching the terms of the agreement - well boo hoo. If it helps to make a clear point that community should come before the financial interests of a few fat-cats then more power to them. They're not hurting anybody and they're doing a lot of good. Do you honestly think that the big corporations involved are above bending a few rules themselves?

In sincerely hope that the people who have given so much to creating the garden win their battle.

mark by the sea says...
2:53pm Wed 9 Jun 10

Andy R wrote:
Yes...I never knew Tesco fanboys existed..... Paul Ockenden does not appear to know what he's talking about. His unsubstantiated claims about poisoned soil have been trashed and as far as I can see the garden folk haven't "gone back" on anything. There's a legal process to be followed.
you clearly know nothing about garage sites either.. even to build on this tesco will have to remove about 2.5 metres of soil or lower once soil has been examined, and tested.. i for one would not eat anything from a site thats had chemical toxins .

PeteBrighton says...
3:34pm Wed 9 Jun 10

I thought the 'gardeners' were going to move out once the site was needed to be redeveloped. The site belongs to the pwners. not the squatters. The 'garden' is a tip and whenever ther's a hot day the noise from their impromptu concerts is deafening to nearby residents. The sooner they're out the better. I don't particularly like Tesco but would prefer them to the Co-Op where you get shoddy service, surly staff and a grubby understocked store. At least Tesco know about Customer Service so the sooner we get rid of the 'garden' and the Co-Op the better Lewes Road will look. Maybe the squatters can go take over the drug ridden Franklin Arms!

Rostrum says...
3:42pm Wed 9 Jun 10

Murgatroyd wrote:
Rostrum wrote:
bob_from_brighton wrote: I feel very differing emotions regarding this. Clearly Lewis Rd has more than enough shops, and not enough green spaces. But I completely agree with all the negative comments added so far..
How many 'green spaces' do you want.. There's The Level as the South end of Lewes Road and Saunders Park at North. no more that 10 minutes walk apart...
How many supermarkets do YOU want? There's Sainsbury's at the gyratory, the Co-op next door to the site, Spar over the road, the Turkish supermarket 2 minutes walk away. And betting shops? we really need more betting shops don't we? They reaaallly raise the tone of an area. You lot really make me laugh - all this frothing at the mouth about a bunch of people who, motivated by something other than profit, have created something good. Why don't you buy a nice bottle of wine, get down there tonight, chill out and talk to some of the people involved. And if, after all that, you still think Tescos is a better idea, then at least you're talking from a position other than complete ignorance
So are you saying that if it were ANY OTHER kind of retailer you'd be happy?

Oh ... And I would NOT go to a 'community garden' or park with a bottle of booze ...

Rostrum says...
3:42pm Wed 9 Jun 10

Murgatroyd wrote:
Rostrum wrote:
bob_from_brighton wrote: I feel very differing emotions regarding this. Clearly Lewis Rd has more than enough shops, and not enough green spaces. But I completely agree with all the negative comments added so far..
How many 'green spaces' do you want.. There's The Level as the South end of Lewes Road and Saunders Park at North. no more that 10 minutes walk apart...
How many supermarkets do YOU want? There's Sainsbury's at the gyratory, the Co-op next door to the site, Spar over the road, the Turkish supermarket 2 minutes walk away. And betting shops? we really need more betting shops don't we? They reaaallly raise the tone of an area. You lot really make me laugh - all this frothing at the mouth about a bunch of people who, motivated by something other than profit, have created something good. Why don't you buy a nice bottle of wine, get down there tonight, chill out and talk to some of the people involved. And if, after all that, you still think Tescos is a better idea, then at least you're talking from a position other than complete ignorance
So are you saying that if it were ANY OTHER kind of retailer you'd be happy?

Oh ... And I would NOT go to a 'community garden' or park with a bottle of booze ...

albion seagull says...
4:13pm Wed 9 Jun 10

Its about time they got rid of the tree huggers off the site.

All they do is cause trouble holding up traffic with their bike train this is a thriving city go to the countryside and hug your trees.

MoreMikey says...
4:13pm Wed 9 Jun 10

Well said, Paul Ockenden.

NotGreen says...
6:12pm Wed 9 Jun 10

When this site is redeveloped it will provide something the illegal squatters have no interest in.

Jobs.

I can't wait for the tougher welfare state we are going to have. Some people are in for a hell of a shock.

stan bailey says...
9:40pm Wed 9 Jun 10

Quirky yes, great gardening skills no.
Probably more akin to street art than Chelsea. Look at allotments if you want to see ordinary people gardening well

puddingandpi says...
9:54pm Wed 9 Jun 10

I think the garden is lovely & a cheering sight. I think the area has no need for a betting shop or a Tesco Express.

However, everyone has always known that the site was not intended for this use, that they were, in effect, squatting & that it would all have to come to an end.

We do need more housing (*affordable*. So affordable that the employees of the Tesco Express can afford to live there) so although it is a shame that the garden will go, I do hope there won't be too much fuss about it.

mjlf says...
11:29pm Wed 9 Jun 10

I'm wilting... the site was always going to be developed and its owners have a right to get the most out of it. food store competition brings down food prices. jobs will be created. get real.

caeos says...
12:20am Thu 10 Jun 10

still think the suggestion of the site oppsite freehold terrace is worth considering hers a street view of it http://bit.ly/9sNQYb

dixie normous says...
6:46am Thu 10 Jun 10

im sure that if the council, or some other company offered these so called "gardeners" employment, they would poo their pants. you wouldnt see these useless giro lovers for dust. the place is just an excuse for them to go and get lushed up. rather than spent time dossing down there, they should be using that time to actively seek employment.

Thumper Hove says...
9:11am Thu 10 Jun 10

It was agreed at the start that the garden would only be temporary until the site could be developed - I'm pretty sure any agreement wasn't to include squatters living there! By now taking legal and other action will only discourage every other land owner to give up their land temporarily for future community schemes - it is clearly not worth the hassle.

Thumper Hove says...
9:13am Thu 10 Jun 10

David Cameron's coalition needs to reduce the welfare state bill. It should start by going to the site and seeing how many of the 'workers' on the site are claiming incapacity benefit.

Boris D says...
9:41am Thu 10 Jun 10

Its not a garden , its a mess,

Uncle_Meat says...
2:02pm Thu 10 Jun 10

StrangerPassingBy you seem to know a lot about the growing process used in this garden, do you also know various agencies have declared Lewes Road to be one of the most toxic areas in Brighton. I'm not sure I'd want to eat the fruits of your labours!

RottingdeanRant says...
12:27pm Fri 11 Jun 10

The 'gardeners' do not own the site and are therefore acting as thieves. They were offered the temporary use of the site and have now decided to try to keep. They are clearly not trustworhty and should be evicted immediately.

Nyberg says...
8:18pm Fri 11 Jun 10

It's simple. We have existed perfectly fine for the last year, without another supermarket in Lewes Rd.
However, a lot of people's lives have been enhanced by this garden, and the garden has become a focal point for the community.
We don't need another supermarket. We could do with a 'legal' community garden.
Perhaps the council should compulsorily purchase the land to keep it in perpetuity as a green space for the community.
Would it be that hard? Don't forget, they managed to find £500,000 to pay a chief executive an ex gratia payment not that long ago.

PaulOckenden says...
9:04pm Fri 11 Jun 10

I agree that we don't need another supermarket. But neither do we need another garden, what with The Level, Saunders Park, and The Patch all within a short distance.

What the area is desperately short of though is both jobs and housing, and whether you like the proposed development or not, it will provide both.

And if the Guerilla Gardeners vacate the site nicely it might also mean that short-term projects such as this are allowed on future sites. If they renege on the original agreement (negotiated by Keith Taylor of The Green Party) though, they are likely to cause problems not only for now, but also for the future. They'll kill any chance of projects like this ever happening again.

I really can't believe how short sighted some of them are being. They talk about doing things to protect the future, but by their very actions they are doing the opposite.

Mr Lahey says...
12:51am Sat 12 Jun 10

Without reading any of the above comments, I think I can reasonably assume the following opinions have been expressed;

i) Everyone who uses the garden should get jobs, pay taxes and contribute to society.
ii) Despite there being about 5 shops within the square mile, some people actually still believe Tesco will provide healthy competition.
iii) Users of the garden should get jobs IN the tesco.

yawn.

Mr. Logical says...
10:06am Mon 14 Jun 10

Is that the Tesco customer service that would let a blind lady starve??
They will do whatever they can get away with to make PROFIT.
Stop kidding yourself.

Mr_Tom says...
1:16pm Mon 14 Jun 10

Hold on a moment.. 'much needed jobs'? so where are these extra customers going to come from? It's just going to redistribute what is already there, which is barely enough for the current grocery stores in that location! and as for all this 'giro scrounging squatters' malarkey, I work a 9-5 monday to friday for a large american engineering company and I fully support the garden, I'd rather see that there then a supermarket and a betting shop (both of which we have a few doors away!) how about redeveloping further up lewes road where there is currently a load of run-down old shops and a pizza hut! and as for the Franklin being drug-riddled, that's tosh as well.. and although I probably wouldn't eat anyhting grown in the community garden personally, if the topsoil is seperated from the concrete underneath (for that is what the old petrol station left behind) then there should be very little risk of contamination, no more than your fruit and veg being driven hundreds of miles by road and then pushed about in the street and handled by Everyone and their dog.. (or did you not know about food production and distribution in the uk) It sounds like a few people could do with a few facts before grabbing the keyboard and typing knee-jerk 'get a job you scroungers' statements.. :) if they should get a job, perhaps you should get an education.. . (and by the way before someone pipes up again, I am a Lewes road resident and a neighbour of the garden)
my final point children.. what about the leaked plans for the Tesco's where the current sainsburys is situated? as I believe Tesco are looking to buy the site out and put a petrol station and Megastore in it's place..

Spreadly says...
10:53pm Tue 15 Jun 10

The scum squatting on this site are as low as gypsies.
The original agreement was that the garden was handed back when the land was needed.
Behave or developers will refuse access to other plots.

click2find

Most popular






About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree