Home page
Site Map
Search Advanced Search
EDITOR'S CHOICE
DOWNLOAD OF THE WEEK

WHAT'S ON
Maxie, Pavilion Theatre, Brighton, July 3-5
Paul Heaton, Komedia, Brighton, July 8

GOING GREEN
Rebels without a cause?

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
Don't ignore flood risk warning
HIV charity closing when its services are needed most

COMMENT AND ANALYSIS
Pub smoking areas have not helped people quit
GET OUR NEWS BY E-MAIL
Most read Comments
Scientology is not a church or charity. It is, in fact, a cult

BBC reporter John Sweeney was last week seen losing his temper at the end of a sixmonth investigation into scientology. In 1994, The Argus published a damning exposé of the East Grinsteadbased "religion".

Former chief reporter Paul Bracchi, who secretly infiltrated the cult, remembers how its followers relentlessly threatened and pursued him in revenge for criticising their deceptive and manipulative methods. Here Mr Bracchi, who now lives in London, tells the chilling story of how he was stalked and intimidated for months afterwards, even receiving a bullet in the post at The Argus headquarters in Hollingbury.

The voice at the end of the line was trembling. "Is that Mr Bracchi?"

"Yes, it is," I replied. The caller could not have been more relieved. I was supposed to be dead. Someone had started a rumour that I had been killed in a fire.

The same people who had tried to obtain my ex-directory phone number, handed out pamphlets attacking me and dispatched an American private detective - an ex-Los Angeles police officer - to Britain to frighten and smear the source who had helped me expose their activities.

Almost daily threatening letters arrived by fax and post at The Argus where I used to work.

Messages were left on the answer machine at the home of the managing director. Strangers turned up in his village asking questions about him.

And the culprits behind this campaign of intimidation? Step forward the church of scientology.

The Guardian and The Mail have exposed disturbing apparent links between the "church" and the City of London Police.

Last week in a Panorama programme, reporter John Sweeney was seen losing his temper with a scientologist, claiming afterwards that he had been driven over the edge by a concerted campaign of harassment by the group.

I, more than anyone, could understand why.

Sweeney spent six months investigating this so-called religion. I had spent more than a year doing so when stories of my "unfortunate demise" began circulating. By the time you read this article, the church of scientology will no doubt be unleashing its attack dogs - sorry, officials from the Office of Special Affairs - on me again.

The founder of the "religion" - science fiction writer L Ron Hubbard - himself issued directives on how "to handle the Press", including tips on how to get a reporter "fired and discredited". Well, they have tried and failed with me once already.

My first report - The Secrets Of Saint Hill - was published more than ten years ago. Saint Hill is the castle in East Grinstead where the UK headquarters of scientology is based.

The backlash was swift. The first principle of scientology, you see, is "shoot the messenger".

Critics who had contributed to the articles were also targeted. Some of them found Eugene Ingram - who had been branded an "insidious individual" in a court case in the US - on their doorstep.

He "visited" the 77-year-old mother of one of my sources as well as his parents' former home in Staffordshire and his wife's family.

Ingram knew that the man's relatives would not "dish the dirt" on my source. That was not the point.

He just wanted to let me - and everyone else who had helped me - know he was in town. In the parlance of scientology, this is called a "noisy investigation". It has only one purpose - to intimidate.

The real victims of scientology, of course, are not journalists but the parents who have lost sons or daughters to these deluded fanatics.

Their harrowing stories - of which more below - help explain why, in Britain, scientology is recognised neither as a church nor a charity.

It is, in fact, a cult. Scientologists do not like that word so let me repeat it - CULT.

Hubbard, the man who created scientology in 1952, has an unusual CV for a religious and spiritual leader. As well as being a writer, he was a congenital liar. Quite simply a charlatan. That was the view of a High Court judge in 1984, who said Hubbard's theories were "corrupt, sinister and dangerous".

If nothing else, the movement's survival is proof that with money - scientology is worth billions worldwide - you can make some people, even intelligent people, believe almost anything.

Stars such as Tom Cruise and John Travolta have given scientology a profile and showbusiness gloss it simply does not deserve.

Indeed, those who are not familiar with its tactics and history regard scientologists - who are convinced we are all descended from a race of aliens called thetans - as weird, not wicked.

This ignorance has been ruthlessly exploited in Britain. In October, a £24 million scientology centre opened in the heart of London's Square Mile and is now one of 30 "missions" in the country.

Narconon, a scientology group which claims it can get people off drugs, has been invited into schools and colleges. How many teachers and parents know of Narconon's links to the cult?

"Community volunteers" from Saint Hill - could there be a more ironic name for the HQ of a cult? - have been enthusiastically lobbying politicians, police officers and businesses in the City.

The recruitment drive was part of Hubbard's "master plan".

It is spelled out in scientology documents - namely to infiltrate and convert key institutions in society.

The process, so the thinking goes, will eventually lead to a scientology government.

And the "church" has succeeded in cultivating contacts. Up to 20 officers in the City of London Police - from constables to superintendents - have accepted hospitality worth thousands from scientologists.

This included free invitations to a £500-a-head charity dinner where the guest of honour was Tom Cruise.

He is now reported to have bought a home near Saint Hill.

One senior police officer appeared in a church of scientology video and another, Chief Superintendent Kevin Hurley, spoke at the opening of the new "mission" near St Paul's Cathedral, saying the cult was "raising the spiritual wealth of society".

Here's a question for Chief Superintendent Hurley. What kind of church, back in the Seventies, implemented a series of covert operations in America which culminated in the bugging of the US Justice Department?

His ringing endorsement was a triumph for the spin doctors of Saint Hill.

The "church's" cramped, old London base in Tottenham Court Road could not be more different from its magnificent new home in EC4. Could there be a better place to woo influential new friends?

Among them is Sebastien Sainsbury, one of the heirs to the Sainsbury dynasty and European executive director at Lakeshore Capital, which has almost one billion dollars under management.

Scientologists with brochures and leaflets have also descended on investment bank Bridgewell Group, law firms Eversheds, Dechert LLP, Shadbolt and Co and PR consultants Merlin.

The organisation is believed to have a huge expense account to wine and dine contacts but then it can afford to be generous.

Scientology is worth millions in Britain alone and much of its wealth is derived from members paying for courses.

The scientologists, it now emerges, secured relief of £281,344 on the full rates of £351,680 on their London base - a discount of 80 per cent.

The City of London Corporation said the group had been entitled to the huge reduction because it carried out "charitable works". A member of the corporation, Alderman Ian Luder, a partner with leading City accounting and consultancy firm Grant Thornton, spoke at the building's grand opening of the "effective"

help scientology provided for drug users.

In 2003 the Advertising Standards Authority upheld a complaint by the Church of England over unsubstantiated claims that the scientologists' Narconon programme, a combination of vigorous exercise, vitamin therapy, counselling, and sauna sessions to sweat out toxins, had saved "250,000 people from drug abuse".

Scientology's promotional drive is said to be spearheaded by the group's Office of Special Affairs.

Officially, this department is responsible for public relations and legal matters. But OSA operatives are also, it is claimed, scientology's secret service.

Those who undermine the mores and beliefs of scientology - including journalists - must be ruthlessly dealt with.

Hubbard said they were "fair game" and could be "tricked, sued or lied to or destroyed".

That policy, the cult claims, no longer exists. The following account reveals a different story.

A woman, who we shall call Sarah, claims she and her husband, who briefly joined the "church" a few years ago, received death threats after he was wrongly suspected of stealing scientology documents from Saint Hill.

She said: "One day two well-built men in dark suits from Saint Hill arrived at my door. I told them my husband wasn't in but they forced their way in and started rifling through the bookshelves. When my husband returned they bundled him into the car.

"Finally he came back shaking from head to toe. He told me they'd threatened to kill him if he didn't tell him the whereabouts of some stolen documents."

Later, a typed note arrived in the post branding him a "suppressive person" (an enemy of scientology) and informing him he was now fair game. Other notes followed.

Sarah said: "For months after, we had anonymous notes delivered in the post almost daily. They said, You bastard,' You're dead,' Nothing will save you.' It was terribly frightening.

After three months we moved and didn't tell anyone where we were going."

Where does the organisation get the money to hire these goons?

Well, organised religions can be very lucrative - as L Ron Hubbard himself recognised.

Giant photographs of Hubbard adorn the new London headquarters, and his many pronouncements - such as "Man is basically good and it is this basic goodness we want to set free" - are stencilled on walls.

A comment you won't find displayed, though, is the one Hubbard made to an authors' convention before he invented scientology.

"Writing for a penny a word," he said, "is ridiculous. If a man really wants to make a million dollars he should start his own religion."

Basic introductory sessions for scientology cost up to £80. Then there is another course which costs £300, then another.

Indeed, passing all the stages to scientology "enlightenment" - the so-called Bridge To Total Freedom - can cost hundreds of thousands of pounds and has left some people with inheritances frittered away, remortgaged homes and debt.

One elderly couple "lost" their daughter Emily when she married a scientologist in 2002.

Her father said: "My wife noticed it straight away but I tried to dismiss it.

But it became obvious she wasn't the loving, caring daughter we had nurtured.

"We sat her down and tried to discuss my findings and what I saw shocked me to the core. After a few minutes of talking rationally and reasonably to her, Emily erupted, How dare you question my religion?

What you have read is all lies. If you raise this issue one more time I will never contact you.' I think to say she had been brainwashed would be too simplistic.

"This was mind manipulation at the highest level. If she chooses to come back to us we would welcome her with open arms but I can't just live with it. I can't bear the thought of that happening to my beautiful daughter."

What was the phrase Chief Superintendent Hurley used to describe his new neighbours in the City? Ah yes, they were "raising the spiritual wealth of society".

For those, like me, who have faced the wrath of this cult, they are words which ring as hollow as the baloney on which the church of scientology itself is founded.

Do you think scientology is a harmless religion or a sinister cult? Have your say below.

10:51am Thursday 24th May 2007

Print   Email this   Comment
Posted by: mark, dublin on 11:44am Thu 24 May 07
Found this article to be full of venom. I've been involved with Scientology for more than 10 years and I'm doing well. The above article reminds me of something that could have been said about minorities in Germany in the 1930's. Honestly I doubt the veracity of much of this rant. Many points can be easily proven incorrect. I feel the intention of this person is purely to incite hatred against a religious group by protraying them in a evil fashion.
Posted by: chewyandbert on 12:55pm Thu 24 May 07
The intention of the author is to incite hatred and nothing else. It's not a news story. Look at the video/DVD produced by the Scientologists on Sweeneys actual activities and it'll explain alot.
Posted by: Chaz, Brighton on 1:03pm Thu 24 May 07
Its probably important to point out at this stage i'm a christian, but i'm also someone who is willing to accept other peoples views on the world and happily coexist with other religions.

I do not claim to have a vast depth of knowledge of the bible, but generally i have a good sense of what is right and what is wrong, and i'm a big believer in do unto others and you would do to yourself.

Both of the documentaires, the BBCs version of events and the scientologists version of events proove interesting viewing. Whilst i have the opinion of the BBC that some of their reporting is biased, dont get me started on politics, i do believe they try to show both sides of the story, more or less without bias.

I find it hard to disagree with the bbc on this matter however. My biggest bug bear about scientology is the fact that they charge its members to, for want of a better expression, cure them. Whereas with christianity theres one book, free to all who would choose to follow that religion.

I'm not saying it has all the right answers, but in essence it does good. Then i look at scientology.

Why does an organisation have to a) document everything by video/photo/notation
; b) employ security services around its buildings to question anyone who is standing outside (for example taking photos).

I'm starting to ramble so this post is going to end here, and i'm glad now i've written something on it because all this stuff has been running around in my head for a while now, but hopefully people will see the point i'm making.
Posted by: maggie, usa on 1:11pm Thu 24 May 07
Scientology uses religion as a distraction away from its policy-driven abuses of people and the law. It would supplant established systems of justice with its own version, that calls for the elimination of those who actively disagree with or report on its abusive actions and policies.
I guess it's fair to ask why a religion needs so many lawyers, too. but Scn, Inc. wouldn't se that as fair, and would threaten those who ask with character assassination. It is Scientology's written view that anyone who opposes it for any reason MUST have "crimes" in their pasts, that need to be dug up and broadcast. The policy goes on to say that if there are no "crimes" to be found, it's ok to make them up.
Ad hominem attacks like that just distract from the issues, which they are carefully trained to never address.
I think Germany, the country that should recognize the kinds of dangers posed by Nazis better than anyone, got it right in its treating Scientology as a threat to democracy.
What happened to Sweeney and Bracchi are not isolated incidents; rather, these actions are church policy.
So it's not the religion that bugs me; its' the policy-driven abuses of people and the law.
Posted by: Tom on 1:19pm Thu 24 May 07
Please sign these petitions on the Prime Minister's government website:

1) petitions.pm.gov.uk/
-Scientology/


We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to Refuse any application submitted by the ‘Church’ of Scientology for recognition as a Religious Organisation.


2) http://petitions.pm.
gov.uk/scientologyba
n/


We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to place a ban on recruitment centres for Scientology or any of its puppet organisations operating in this country.
Posted by: Grace, London on 1:32pm Thu 24 May 07
The number of times that scientologists invoke WWII and the Holocaust IN THEIR FAVOUR is really alarming -- hands off, scientologists! Quite indicative, though -- pick an emotional button and push push push. Familiar conversational style as well.

Apparently the scientologists have a saying that amounts to "what's true is true for you" or some such rubbish. To which I would point out -- if you're saying that in a self-help manner, as this Dianetics stuff was initially intended, okay. But it's been twisted into this belief that just by saying something (ie -- "there's no proof you got Fair Gamed by us"), it's true. Tom Cruise does not know the "history of psychiatry", Tommy Davis does not get to have his freedom of religion and then deny another's freedom of speech, and you can't invalidate someone's personal experience just because you don't like the way it makes your cult look.

The tech's been squirrelled, people. Before DM, but most obviously since the mid-80s too. Any Big Brotherish religion that requires you to pay for confession, makes you file something called a "Knowledge Report" on your peers, and then bars you from even discussing your religious experiences with anyone else per "Keeping Scientology Working"? Is a sick group. Blow while you still can.
Posted by: walter on 1:45pm Thu 24 May 07
The thing to realize in this debate is that scientologists DON'T KNOW what their church is like. Sounds bizarre, but it is quite true. If they don't want to be kicked off of "the bridge" (scientology's road to salvation), they must NEVER read anything negative about their church. So they obediently don't. So they really don't know what's going on. If they hear anything (accidentally) they are taught that it MUST be a lie. In my experience, most scientologists are good people, trying to help others. If they knew the truth, they would stop supporting the church, which is why they are not allowed to know the truth. They, too, are victims of the church of scientology.
Posted by: David, United States on 1:49pm Thu 24 May 07
By the way, Scientology pays people to log in to websites like this and post supportive comments about itself. I bet our "Christian" is in reality a Scientologist.
Posted by: Grace on 2:00pm Thu 24 May 07
By the way, Scientology pays people to log in to websites like this and post supportive comments about itself. I bet our "Christian" is in reality a Scientologist.

Actually, it's apparently a volunteer group. They all get a round-robin email about news stories, then pile on and try to fill the first handful of slots with pro-scientology natter.

And I don't particularly blame the scientologists for this -- I know that a huuuge part of the cult is that they think they're saving the planet, and they're certainly not in it for the money (as they're the ones paying), so it's bound to attract positive people. But I'd hope that governments and news organizations start paying attention, because without truthful, comprehensive coverage, more good-hearted people will get sucked in without having been prewarned.

Does anyone know if that Scientologist Sitter software still gets installed on their computers, to screen out stuff like xenu.net? Because the number of people who've read the OTIII levels at this point alone should start causing scientologists to think twice -- I read them ages ago, for instance, and according to Hubbard I should be dead by now, having read them totally unprepared?

Scary, to see how easily critical thinking can get brainwashed right out of you.
Posted by: arthur pewty, London on 2:51pm Thu 24 May 07
scientology should be banned from our shores, its a scam.

Why would our government allow this US criminal organisation to take advantage of vulnerable people in our country?
Posted by: Willa, Brighton on 3:03pm Thu 24 May 07
I was a member of a scientology group in Brighton and it is a cult. I was a member for 6 months and the scientology that celebrities like Katie Holmes and Tom Cruise do is not the real scientology. Not the fraking scary scientology anyway. People should be pulled away from Scientology, because its a dangerous cult.
Posted by: Chaz, Brighton on 4:06pm Thu 24 May 07
David wrote:
By the way, Scientology pays people to log in to websites like this and post supportive comments about itself. I bet our "Christian" is in reality a Scientologist.
Actually chief i'm a big believer in searching the net for what i like and am proud to support activities such as xenu.net who have some awesome, funny, yet disturbing people bandying around their cult!
Posted by: Chaz, Brighton on 4:09pm Thu 24 May 07
Now look at the two comments before mine, ****!
Posted by: Thomas Fletcher, Hove on 4:32pm Thu 24 May 07
My girlfriend and I some years ago took up the Churchill Square Scientologists' invite for a chat. We sat down and watched a video which basically explained that everything in your personality that's negative, like anger, can be attributed to early memories. I didn't fully understand all of this and when I asked for more literature to read up on I was offered several books and videos to BUY!
Any religion that prevents its message from reaching others by charging for it is simply not a religion.
It all seemed a pile of psuedo-science rubbish, but then the founder of this 'religion' was a sci-fi writer after all.
Posted by: tran, US on 7:53pm Thu 24 May 07
mark wrote:
Found this article to be full of venom. I've been involved with Scientology for more than 10 years and I'm doing well. The above article reminds me of something that could have been said about minorities in Germany in the 1930's. Honestly I doubt the veracity of much of this rant. Many points can be easily proven incorrect. I feel the intention of this person is purely to incite hatred against a religious group by protraying them in a evil fashion.
It seems like every scientologist responds like this to any article that states the truth about the cult. Anything that goes the opposite direction from sappy church propaganda is labeled as bigotry and "anti-religious extremism." I don't blame the lay people of scientology... their supposed religion is punishment enough. Blame L. Ron Hubbard for bringing this ridiculous cult into existence.
Posted by: andy d, brighotn on 8:45pm Thu 24 May 07
Absolutely Scientology Is a cult-and a very dangerous one at that!Unfortunately,m
any of it's believers are tricked into thinking they are helping humanity.Their best defence against critcs is to accuse us of being 'Nazis','Bigots' and even
baby rapers!Scientology creates it's own bad press with it's unethical treatment of it's critics and ex-members,as well as they way it treats it's own staff,particularly in the Sea Org and on the RPF.The celebrities in it get a very different view as they are pampered and protected at the Celebrity Centres.Scientology must never be acknowledged as a religion in this country-it is a manipulative,greedy mind control CULT!!
Posted by: Andrew, SLC utah on 9:04pm Thu 24 May 07
Scientologists are brainwashed. It is amazinf to watch the videos of what they do to people who disagree with them. They will lie about them, scream inthier faces, follow them, badger them, anything they can think of to force them to even bump into the scientologist. At that point they call the police and have the protester arrested for assult. In fact I saw one video of a scientologist screaming in a protesters face from about 5cm away daring him to hit him. To all those scientologists out there:
What is your crime???
All hail XENU!!!
Posted by: Mary, USA on 10:56pm Thu 24 May 07
I was a member of Scientology for over 18 years and I appreciate Paul Bracchi and the UK media for allowing his story to be told.

Resident of the UK should sign the petition to prevent this cult with obtaining charity and religious status because here in the USA the citizenry has no say in the matter.
It's not a charitable organization and it's 'religious tenets' include mafia-like policies that grant members the right to do all the terrible things Paul Bracchi mentions, and then some. Scientology divides families and has a plan to take over large spheres society via approval by and or infiltration of governments in order to gain a position of international control over their perceived enemies. This group is hostile to the disabled, the mentallly ill, and protends to 'cure' homosexuality because Hubbard deemed it as and affliction. Hubbard was a pathological liar and his organization is no different. Sign the petition that another gave link to here earlier. Think of it as a vaccination against an preventable plague the USA lost it's grip on.

Posted by: Jake, Manchester on 11:02pm Thu 24 May 07
mark wrote:
Found this article to be full of venom. I\'ve been involved with Scientology for more than 10 years and I\'m doing well. The above article reminds me of something that could have been said about minorities in Germany in the 1930\'s. Honestly I doubt the veracity of much of this rant. Many points can be easily proven incorrect. I feel the intention of this person is purely to incite hatred against a religious group by protraying them in a evil fashion.
If you feel this article is so full of venom and inaccuracy then why not point some of it out? The fact is that Scientology is an insidious cult with a documented history of underhanded behaviour. More people like John Sweeny and Paul Bracchi need to come out and expose this unscientific nonsense for what it is. Excellent work.

Go to www.xenu.net for more information about the cult of Scientology.
Posted by: Touchstone, USA on 11:49pm Thu 24 May 07
By the time Mr. Cruise 'jumped the couch', I had already been studying up on Scientology beliefs and practices for at least two years. Before the Oprah incident, journalism exposing the facts about Scientology was only sporadically seen. Since then, the frequency with which I've come across articles like this have increased dramatically. Journalists are less and less intimidated by Scientology's strong-arm efforts to impose silence or propaganda-version-o

nly. I am greatly heartened by this shift, although I remain concerned for those poor souls still stuck in the cult, or at risk of being conned into joining.
Posted by: mike, Canada on 12:15am Fri 25 May 07
Scientology is retarded. it was created by a drug addict. How much money have the scientologists givig to this cult anyway? good thing its on the decline. There is at most 50,000 of them. and they are dropping like flies. people are waking up. Scientology has a 95% + turnover rate. I'm surprised that your censorship software lets you even read this article.

No I think it is Scientology that is brainwashing people. its the 1 person in the room full of thousands calling the rest stupid, then finding out where they live and phone them in the middle of the night.

So good luck, and work really hard for that cash to give away. I'll choose to go on a vacation somewhere warm. :)
Posted by: Ivan, Tampa, FL on 2:22am Fri 25 May 07
Stop spreading the hate. Scientologists have the human right to follow their religion. Their claims are as valid as the claims of any other religion. Hundreds of thousands of Scientologists believe that their religion is helping them. You can't deny that.
Posted by: Edwardo, London on 2:27am Fri 25 May 07
I was in the cult, and trained very highly in their thought-reform methodology. It's a dangerous, paranoid, parasitic organisation, from which I was lucky to escape. Many don't make it out with their sanity, and some don't even come out alive. This cult should be dismantled, and its assets should be sold off and disbursed as damages to its victims.
Posted by: Terryeo, California, USA on 2:32am Fri 25 May 07
In a recent court case before the European Court of Human Rights, the Church of Scientology was recognized as a religion. The UK is within that jurisdiction, so one would expect venom spitters to emerge from the woodwork. Because it is likely the Court of Human Rights' finding will stand for associated countrys.
Posted by: Lisa, U.S.A. on 2:32am Fri 25 May 07
Scientology is truly a scam. A pseudo religion dreamed up by a less-than-average science fiction writer with severe emotional problems. Delusional would describe Hubbard correctly. His phony self history, rabid letters he wrote to the US FBI and rampant paranoia all speak of an unbalanced mind. He invented this cult to make money and nothing more. Sad that so many can be deluded into the "outer space alien" genisis. The violence committed verbally and physically against anyone that dares speak out against scientology's horrific practices knows no bounds. Tom Cruise and other Hollywood stars that latch on to this cult lack something fundamental in their lives...common sense. Pay as you go salvation, suspicious deaths, overt stalking, insane litigiousness, family exclusion, etc...all these things scream cult. It would be funny if it weren't for the fact that so many have been damaged do deeply. Steer clear of this cult for your own safety. I believe everything the reporters say was done as it was done to me also. Those of us that speak out KNOW what scientolgy is capable of doing in it's attempts to destroy. Exposing this menace to the sunlight of truth will hopefully result in it's ultimate demise.
Posted by: Techno on 2:41am Fri 25 May 07
"Cult" is simply hate speech for anyone whose chosen beliefs you disagree with. Judging by the sheer number of paid shills for the pharmaceutical industry posting to this board, I would say that that psychiatry and big pharma sure feel threatened. Yes, Scientology is not a harmless little religion. It is one with the guts to do something positive about the conidtions of the world, even in the face of the most disgusting opposition to world betterment. To those who wish to force their beliefs on us you will never be successful. We can think for ourselves and choose are own beliefs, and we choose Scientology. Get used to it.
Posted by: Alex Tsalolikhin, Sydney on 3:30am Fri 25 May 07
I've been in Scientology for 11 years and have found it extremely helpful personally. It has also helped a family member get off drugs.
Posted by: John, USA on 4:30am Fri 25 May 07
Reporters that will tell the absolute truth about this cult must be admired.

To those scientologists that believe this crap: You are wasting your life and your money, you will be remembered as a fool. I am all for freedom of religion, but not when that religion files frivilous lawsuits, plans and executes espionage, and harrasses all those that disagree with them.
Posted by: John, USA on 4:43am Fri 25 May 07
Techno wrote:
"Cult" is simply hate speech for anyone whose chosen beliefs you disagree with. Judging by the sheer number of paid shills for the pharmaceutical industry posting to this board, I would say that that psychiatry and big pharma sure feel threatened. Yes, Scientology is not a harmless little religion. It is one with the guts to do something positive about the conidtions of the world, even in the face of the most disgusting opposition to world betterment. To those who wish to force their beliefs on us you will never be successful. We can think for ourselves and choose are own beliefs, and we choose Scientology. Get used to it.
On the contrary sir, it is scientology that forces it's beliefs on others.

Also, the term "cult" is not used because your religion is different than mine. It is called a cult because of people such as yourself. All those that disagree with scientology are "paid shills for the pharmaceutical industry" are you serious? And "psychiatry and big pharma sure feel threatened." is not an accurate statement at all. Psychiatry is afraid of a bunch of zealots that buy 100 or so copies of a psychiatry -bashing scientology book?

I know that it is pointless to argue with someone such as yourself, but I cannot help myself.
Posted by: Jeremy, New York on 4:44am Fri 25 May 07
The Scientologists here covering there ears and going "la la la" and attacking the article are only confirming what people know to be true about Scientology. It is a cult. It is a cult that does not like criticism. It is a cult that will resort to personal attacks rather than address the subjects being addressed. Here we have a story about a reporter that was harassed by your church management and you are not questioning the methods of your church... Why?

are you convinced that all critical material are lies made up by the "Evil psychiatrists"? What is then, to happen, when a member of your family is abused by your "church" and you feel like speaking out about it... You will come to realize how truly wrong you were to not have listened to the critics before. I pray that you will be able to get out soon and when you do, I hope that you are able to do it with less hell than some former Scientologists have received...
Posted by: Teresa on 4:50am Fri 25 May 07
"Cult" is defined, at its most negative, thusly: "religion regarded as unorthodox or spurious"

Colloquially I'd say it's something along the lines of "shifty religion with negative aspects that are potentially harmful to the adherent".

I'd just add "cult" to the "Nazi/bigot/enemy" list of words scientologists twist out of all usability.
Posted by: Mary, USA on 6:11am Fri 25 May 07
Ivan, of course
"Scientologists believe that their religion is helping them." No one is denying that. I, myself, would not have stayed in scientology for as many years as I did if I had not thought it was helping me. The problem was that I thought wrong. My thoughts were not solely my own. My thoughts were what Hubbard wanted them to be and they were what Scientology management wanted them to be. And when it came down to being in a situation where I needed to think for myself, my thoughts had to be dictated by what my 'church' wanted them to be because if they were not what the church wanted, I would then have be at risk of losing all my scientology friends, family and work associates. All for just having a different point of view on something as simple as not wanting to give my savings over to the registrar. Or wantng to spend more time with my children instead of helping the org get student point stats up by going on course on a saturday.

Scientologists cannot even apply their own code of honor when it comes to being able to inspect the internet, because you will never be able to get answers from your 'church' for the many questions you have. Never. But once a scientologist begins to find out by a search of the internet that Hubbard was actually NOT all that he said he was, that, for example, he was not a nuclear physicist and that he actually FAILED physics in school, the mysteries begin to unravel and being true to oneself becomes more meaningful and less controlled by scienbtology. Your church does not want you reading these documents. Scientologists are not being told thge facts and truth. As long as scientologists keep the blinders on, the harder it is to remove them. I pity you because you prefer to keep the blinders on. Scientology is a con game: all smoke and mirrors. You'll never know that as long as you keep wearing the blinders and defending the indefensible.
Posted by: PT, Australia on 7:32am Fri 25 May 07
Any organisation that attempts to control how its members read and hear information about it is inherently suspect. It has been divulged by ex-members of the "church" that the few members allowed unfettered access to the internet are only given this "privilige" to attack critics on line.

It's symtomatic of the Co$'s delusions that they seem to think they are above criticsism, yet retain the right to harrass, threaten and intimidate anyone who scrutinises them.

Scientology is all about duplicity. They say "think for yourself" when they really mean "think only as we do". They say they are the "most enthical group on the planet", yet employ cruel and unethical tactics to scam money out of members. They promise a "bridge to total freedom", but they actually seek to take control of your mind and (especially) your finances.

The sooner more media outlets investigate this evil, mendacious CULT, the better.
Posted by: marcus, bangkok on 7:36am Fri 25 May 07
Scientology's prime goal is to "clear the planet" . This is the talk of a doomsday cult ...... not a religion.
Posted by: mel, Brighton on 7:37am Fri 25 May 07
They are like the Jehovahs witnesses - extremely controlling, they play on the concept that everything is for your own good, they surround you with love then if your "naughty" that being you do something that they disagree with then they take it away, I have had dealings with both "Cults" and they are both very dangerous, Only recently a dear friend of mine had to choose which way of life she prefered, the way of the "cult" or the normal day to day way of living, she chose the later, her family (mum,dad ect)and "friends" never spoke to her after that,they disowned her,because they believe depriving you of love will make you return and show you the error of your ways, unfortunately after her mum disowned her,her mum died,how is a person supposed to live with that? you call that loving religion? thats a controlling sect/cult, on the outside they have this front that they are family orientated and show love to all, but once your in thier grasps ? it takes a seriously strong person to break free, I always believed Gods love is unconditional, but these cults have conditions, and in no way is that godly or loving.
Posted by: Roger Gonnet, Lyon, France on 7:54am Fri 25 May 07
Scientology, the cult whose founder hubbard has been sentenced for fraud and extortion in France, 1978, and from which many executives have been sentenced to jail for fraud, extortion, homicide? Even Hubbard's wife was cinvicted for the largest US affair of domestic spying, together with 10 other execs of the cult... Scientology has won some few trials by ruse, false witnessings under oath, and many other such Hubbardian tricks. It's a shame that democratic countries have not yet been able to get rid of this cult.
Posted by: Chaz, Brighton on 9:30am Fri 25 May 07
Techno wrote:
"Cult" is simply hate speech for anyone whose chosen beliefs you disagree with. Judging by the sheer number of paid shills for the pharmaceutical industry posting to this board, I would say that that psychiatry and big pharma sure feel threatened. Yes, Scientology is not a harmless little religion. It is one with the guts to do something positive about the conidtions of the world, even in the face of the most disgusting opposition to world betterment. To those who wish to force their beliefs on us you will never be successful. We can think for ourselves and choose are own beliefs, and we choose Scientology. Get used to it.
And i suppose its too much to ask for you to stop forcing your beliefs on unsuspecting members of the public in the form of a 'stress test'.

Also, what other religion (and i'm talking of the proper ones here - christianity, buhdism, islam, hindu) makes their members BUY 'self-betterment' books? None so far i can think of, i'm pretty sure i can go anywhere and pick up a bible without paying for it.
Posted by: Tom Landon, paris, France on 10:41am Fri 25 May 07
This excellent article simply underlines the fact that Scientology is a scam disguised as a religion which is prepared to hound its critics into silence. Thank you very much for publishing the truth.
Posted by: William, Brighton on 11:32am Fri 25 May 07
Religion is essentially about truth, the underlying principle being that the truth will set you free. Considering Scientology’s history of misdirection, spreading of lies, preventing people from being free… If they really are teaching the truth, why the need for all the propaganda, braingwashing and intimidation?
Posted by: Mike, London on 11:46am Fri 25 May 07
As a Scientologist for almost 10 years I can categorically state that I have never experienced anything quite like what some people are describing here. I am a 'public' Scientologist, an auditor and volunteer, and I am proud to support the CoS. The fantastic work they are doing in society rarely gets any publicity simply because the juicy bits involving some pesky aliens and <clap of thunder> the cost of courses (oh my GOD! they cost money!!???) sells far more papers.
Posted by: Alex, Brighton on 11:48am Fri 25 May 07
I find it so difficult to comprehend how people can choose to follow the word of a pathological liar! It is well documented that Mr Hubbard was a self involved fool, he had all the makings of a Narcasist yet he is put on a pedestal by these poor misguided fools. When will common sense prevail?
I understand that a lot of people need something to believe in, it keeps them going when life is tough but Scientology does not even have the positive, forgiving and understanding facade of age old religions! So again why??
They make no secret of the fact that they abuse people who simply have a adverse opinion!
Without even contemplating the BBC's position, the actions of the cult on Panorama were a disgrace. The crew were followed, harrased (criminal activity may I add) and not permitted to speak with out it being drowned out by Tommy Davis!
For this vile individual to be chosen to represent this organisation is frankly laughable, he seemed inable to complete an objective adult conversation. At one point when John Sweeny was interviewing someone, trusty old Mr Davis rolls up with this mans criminal record. This hypocrisy was unbelievable, so it is ok for Scientology to use criminal tactics when they are scared of a bit of negativity but this man must be completly discredited for his criminal activities. Well surely then Scientology has discredited itself??
'Fair Game' they say is no longer used...(of course it is) but for it to be there in the first place, does that not say anything??? Scientology is a complete joke and it has been ever since Mr Hubbards 'epiphany' for his fail safe to power, notoriety and money! Im sure he is having a good laugh at their expense up there on the mother planet!
Posted by: Danny D, Philadelphia PA on 1:16pm Fri 25 May 07
ROFL! Talk about "mine is the only true belief and if you don't believe in Jesus, you're doomed to eternal damnation." Brainwashed pathetic idiots.
Posted by: Jeremy, New York on 1:26pm Fri 25 May 07
To Scientologists here, answer the following questions please.

True or false.

- Does Scientology sometimes refers to non-scientologists as "raw meat" and "wogs"?

- Were 11 members of Scientology, including Hubbard's wife arrested for infiltrating the IRS in the USA?

- Does Scientology believe that psychiatry caused the rise of hitler?

- Does Scientology refer to journalists as "merchants of chaos"?
Posted by: Jeremy, New York on 1:31pm Fri 25 May 07
Nice dance Danny. You are a Scientologist, I presume?

For the record, I am an atheist so you can shove off with the "dur, stoopid christians picking on Scientology" act.
Posted by: Chaz, Brighton on 1:49pm Fri 25 May 07
Re: Danny

Roll on the floor laughing danny? Someones been watching Tom Cruise too much
Posted by: Alex, Brighton on 1:54pm Fri 25 May 07
Danny D wrote:
ROFL! Talk about "mine is the only true belief and if you don't believe in Jesus, you're doomed to eternal damnation." Brainwashed pathetic idiots.
I feel sorry for you, you cannot see whats right in front of your eyes! It is you that is brainwashed. No im not a christian nor do I belong to any other religion!
I dont have a problem with religons though as they generally promote good kind considerate people. I am however deeply offended by cults such as Scientology, cults where it is acceptable to destroy family relationships and publicly abuse and harrass those with objective opinions to their faith! This I have seen with my own two eyes, not from the word of "merchants of chaos" as im sure you would describe them, so please dont blame bad press.
Im sure most Scientologists are good people searching for some sort of enlightenment. Unfortunatly they stumbled when they found Scientology!
Posted by: Peter/Navy, Vierlingsbeek, Holland on 4:00pm Fri 25 May 07
Techno wrote:
\"Cult\" is simply hate speech for anyone whose chosen beliefs you disagree with. Judging by the sheer number of paid shills for the pharmaceutical industry posting to this board, I would say that that psychiatry and big pharma sure feel threatened. Yes, Scientology is not a harmless little religion. It is one with the guts to do something positive about the conidtions of the world, even in the face of the most disgusting opposition to world betterment. To those who wish to force their beliefs on us you will never be successful. We can think for ourselves and choose are own beliefs, and we choose Scientology. Get used to it.
May I ask whether you did some research about scientology before you joined? Or is all you know about this cult information by the cult itself?
You see, scientology is the only "church" convicted for crimes, and I mean as a "church", not crimes commited by individuals.
Did you ever hear the name Paulette Cooper? She wrote a book about scientology after she left the cult and found herself framed by the cult and woke up in jail. Luck for her the FBI raided the cult and found all the evidence about framing Paulette Cooper. It even has a name: "Operation Freak Out". Is this a religion, a church? No, scientology's behaviour makes it a CULT, in capitals. Not the critics, not reports in newspapers or on television, no, it is scientology itself that makes it a cult. Do you know the story of Raul Lopez? The cult took away millions, while the man was mentally disabled! Only a cult does that.
Posted by: John, New Jersey, USA on 4:16pm Fri 25 May 07
As an American I would like to apologize to the world for L. Ron Hubbard. Please do not judge us too harshly for his insanity.

Posted by: Happy on 5:09pm Fri 25 May 07
Scientology is a horrible relgion. I never knew they tried to get back at people who slagged of their relgion. These people are messed up and SICK. Anyone who joins are weak minded people who are EVIL. If you like to stalk people and follow rules by an man who used to lie ALL THE TIME. Well go ahead
Posted by: jez mcarthur, hove on 8:16pm Fri 25 May 07
why do you print such rubbish about scientology same old thing every couple of years same story different reporter if the things you said were true scientology would have been closed down years ago if the argus believes theses stories take us to court but you will not because you know you would lose lies always lose truth always win take a look at history great things always get attack i wonder why invested intrests maybe
Posted by: a friend of Xenu, Brighton on 8:32pm Fri 25 May 07