TEXT your pictures, videos and messages to 80360. Start your message with SUPIC or email your tip-offs »
10:54am Saturday 14th July 2007
An ageing port is to be transformed into one of the South East's biggest building projects, creating the equivalent of a new town on the Sussex coast.
The huge brownfield development will bring up to 6,000 homes along with offices, shops and a marina to Shoreham Harbour, The Argus can reveal.
Land stretching from Shoreham to Hove will become home to up to 14,000 new inhabitants - the same number of people who live in Southwick or Uckfield - under plans drawn up by the South East England Development Agency (Seeda) and the Shoreham Port Authority.
The revelation comes as Prime Minister Gordon Brown announced an increase in house building targets.
But politicians last night warned that the proposal will fail unless millions of pounds are poured into infrastructure.
The Shoreham Maritime project was first mooted nine years ago and was expected to deliver 6,400 jobs, 1,200 homes and 120,000 square metres of new commercial floorspace to the area.
The working part of the port was to be concentrated at Southwick, with a 'media village' at the Hove end and a mile of new homes, shops and restaurants in a waterfront development at Shoreham.
The entire regeneration was expected to cost £300 million and take up to 30 years to complete.
But the project ran into trouble in 2003 when Brighton and Hove City Council found the costs of road improvements were almost £200 million.
Adur District Council rejected the Shoreham end of the development last year, although the port has appealed against the decision.
These plans have now been shelved for an entirely new project.
Seeda and the port authority last night refused to reveal what was included in the plans and where the homes were to be built but confirmed that 4,000 to 6,000 high-quality, sustainable homes were planned for the site in the next 15 years.
The development agency is leading the project and has begun a feasibility study into the costs and economic viability of the plan.
The report, which will be published in September, will tackle the thorny issue of public sector investment.
Up to £30 million will be needed in the next three to five years alone and Seeda will fund a significant proportion of this.
Rod Johnstone, the chief executive of the port authority, said the new scheme would be more "comprehensive" than the previous.
He said: "This is at a very embryonic stage and we are taking it forward as fast as we can.
"This project reflects a step change in the thinking about the port and is a totally different approach.
"It is so embryonic that nobody can say what it is going to include but there is an element of all of these things - businesses, shops, marina.
"We need to work in partnership with the local authority to see how we can develop it together with them, the highways authority, the Government Office for the South East and others."
Adur District Council leader Neil Parkin said he backed a proposal for thousands of new homes but was concerned about infrastructure.
He said: "We have been trying to get going for ten years and other development is going on at the port.
"Without the infrastructure improvements to the whole area the scheme is a nonsense.
"I will want to see funding for schools, water, sewage and road infrastructure and they are still talking about closing Worthing Hospital's A&E."
Brighton councillor Garry Peltzer Dunn, the chairman of the city's major projects committee, said any scheme would have to address improvements to the road network.
Tony Mernagh, the chief executive of Brighton and Hove Economic Partnership, said: "It is a hugely important site because we are running out of brownfield land where there is the potential to build this number of houses.
"Shoreham port has had a long history of people trying to redevelop it and it is an area that is in desperate need of it."
What do you think of the proposals? Leave your comments below.
steve, Brighton says...
12:29pm Sat 14 Jul 07
Mick, Southwick says...
1:31pm Sat 14 Jul 07
Peaved of Shoreham, Shoreham says...
1:48pm Sat 14 Jul 07
orson wrote:No thanks, Shoreham is not part of your city, it is in West Sussex and is a town on its own, not a borough of your scrawling puss filled metropolis. If it as asset to anywhere, it certainly wont be Brighton.
Shoreham has the potential to be a mini docklands, with high quality homes, restaurants, offices etc. If it could generate a unique character as a media centre and attract film/web/arts businesses alongside attractive residential buildings, it would make our city even more amazing than it already is.
Stan B, 985-234 says...
1:51pm Sat 14 Jul 07
T.Ruth, brighton says...
2:09pm Sat 14 Jul 07
chris, seafront says...
2:16pm Sat 14 Jul 07
G Brown, Saltdean says...
2:18pm Sat 14 Jul 07
Lisa S, Southwick says...
3:15pm Sat 14 Jul 07
richard, Hove says...
7:43pm Sat 14 Jul 07
Noah, Shoreham says...
7:50pm Sat 14 Jul 07
sm, says...
10:28pm Sat 14 Jul 07
Noah wrote:here it is www.treehugginghippy
Have you a link to this evidence that Shoreham will flood?
Dave, Woolwich says...
10:42pm Sat 14 Jul 07
orson wrote:being a high class city boy I have to say you are having a laugh. I've been to Shoreham and Docklands it ain't! That is no bad thing. Docklands is a soulless hell whole.
Shoreham has the potential to be a mini docklands, with high quality homes, restaurants, offices etc. If it could generate a unique character as a media centre and attract film/web/arts businesses alongside attractive residential buildings, it would make our city even more amazing than it already is.
Alex, says...
6:41am Sun 15 Jul 07
Alex, says...
6:46am Sun 15 Jul 07
Brighton councillor Garry Peltzer Dunn, the chairman of the city's major projects committee, said any scheme would have to address improvements to the road network.
flood risk, Brighton says...
10:42am Sun 15 Jul 07
Neil, Lancing says...
11:08am Sun 15 Jul 07
richard, says...
1:07pm Sun 15 Jul 07
Sampson Scoble, says...
2:04pm Sun 15 Jul 07
hottram, brighton says...
2:14pm Sun 15 Jul 07
Big Bertha, says...
6:37pm Sun 15 Jul 07
steve wrote:Steve
Am I getting this right.....upto 14000 new inhabitants !!! The roads are not capable of carrying the traffic we have now. The NHS wants to close the local hospitals we have, and not even a mention of extra school places. We need new houses, but how many will be snapped up for "buy to let" ? The infrastructure needs to grow with the population but there is no profit in that.
Rob, Shoreham says...
10:11am Mon 16 Jul 07
Alex wrote:Excellent - if there is one thing the country is agreed on it's that there are not enough prison cells.
I heard something once that said Shoreham will become one of the most dangerous places in the country as far as flooding is concerned. Probably best to start building the flood wall along the coast now. Besides, maybe people don`t want soem `media village` in Shoreham, or over priced shoe box apartments that no-one can afford or fit more than a bed into. Those are not homes, those are prison cells.
vicky, brighton says...
1:56pm Mon 16 Jul 07
Alex wrote:too late - they've already started building those overpriced, shoebox appartments in shoreham already.
I heard something once that said Shoreham will become one of the most dangerous places in the country as far as flooding is concerned. Probably best to start building the flood wall along the coast now.
Besides, maybe people don`t want soem `media village` in Shoreham, or over priced shoe box apartments that no-one can afford or fit more than a bed into. Those are not homes, those are prison cells.
Adam, Brighton says...
5:29pm Mon 16 Jul 07
Sean, Lancing says...
6:16pm Mon 16 Jul 07
G.Brown, Saltdean says...
10:15pm Mon 16 Jul 07
flood risk wrote:Thanks for that, I checked the environment site as you suggested and it is quite worrying, Shoreham is at great risk from flooding even before the sea levels start to rise, God knows what will happen when the sea levels rise by as much as18 feet, which is the amount of sea level rise thats predicted to happen within the next 20 years. I advise anyone thinking of moving to Shoreham, to think again, do what those in the know are doing and that is, move to the high ground of Brighton or anywhere along the coast road from Brighton to Newhaven, which includes Ovingdean, Woodindean, Rottingdean, Saltdean, Telscoombe, Peacehaven and even most of the high ground in Newhaven, because very soon these places will be very sought after.
I never realised the risk the Shoreham has to floods. Check here: http://www.environme nt-agency.gov.uk/sub jects/flood/
Tim Williams, Portslade says...
2:27pm Tue 17 Jul 07
Homer Less, Saltdean says...
6:01pm Tue 17 Jul 07
Tim Williams wrote:That area is even more in danger of flooding, talk about building in the wrong place, this takes the biscuit.
Really, for local people most of you don't have a clue where this development will be. It WONT be in Shoreham, but the Aldrington to Southwick beach area, half of which is in East Sussex and the other half in West Sussex. The boundary is the Kings Head pub on Brighton road - the development will be directly opposite there. It's rare to find someone who lives in Brighton to have been as far west as the King Alfred, let alone Hove Lagoon! Really, learn some geography.
T.Ruth, Brighton says...
6:13pm Tue 17 Jul 07
Tim Williams, Portslade says...
12:15am Sat 21 Jul 07
Add your comment
Register for a FREE The Argus account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.
Please register now or sign in below to continue.
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Search for Jobs
Search Now »
Find the right person for you
Search Now »
Search for Homes
Search Now »
Search for Cars
Search Now »
orson, Hove says...
11:41am Sat 14 Jul 07