News RSS Feed


Harbour is site of huge homes plan

10:54am Saturday 14th July 2007

comment Comments (30)   Have your say »

By Lawrence Marzouk »

An ageing port is to be transformed into one of the South East's biggest building projects, creating the equivalent of a new town on the Sussex coast.

The huge brownfield development will bring up to 6,000 homes along with offices, shops and a marina to Shoreham Harbour, The Argus can reveal.

Land stretching from Shoreham to Hove will become home to up to 14,000 new inhabitants - the same number of people who live in Southwick or Uckfield - under plans drawn up by the South East England Development Agency (Seeda) and the Shoreham Port Authority.

The revelation comes as Prime Minister Gordon Brown announced an increase in house building targets.

But politicians last night warned that the proposal will fail unless millions of pounds are poured into infrastructure.

The Shoreham Maritime project was first mooted nine years ago and was expected to deliver 6,400 jobs, 1,200 homes and 120,000 square metres of new commercial floorspace to the area.

The working part of the port was to be concentrated at Southwick, with a 'media village' at the Hove end and a mile of new homes, shops and restaurants in a waterfront development at Shoreham.

The entire regeneration was expected to cost £300 million and take up to 30 years to complete.

But the project ran into trouble in 2003 when Brighton and Hove City Council found the costs of road improvements were almost £200 million.

Adur District Council rejected the Shoreham end of the development last year, although the port has appealed against the decision.

These plans have now been shelved for an entirely new project.

Seeda and the port authority last night refused to reveal what was included in the plans and where the homes were to be built but confirmed that 4,000 to 6,000 high-quality, sustainable homes were planned for the site in the next 15 years.

The development agency is leading the project and has begun a feasibility study into the costs and economic viability of the plan.

The report, which will be published in September, will tackle the thorny issue of public sector investment.

Up to £30 million will be needed in the next three to five years alone and Seeda will fund a significant proportion of this.

Rod Johnstone, the chief executive of the port authority, said the new scheme would be more "comprehensive" than the previous.

He said: "This is at a very embryonic stage and we are taking it forward as fast as we can.

"This project reflects a step change in the thinking about the port and is a totally different approach.

"It is so embryonic that nobody can say what it is going to include but there is an element of all of these things - businesses, shops, marina.

"We need to work in partnership with the local authority to see how we can develop it together with them, the highways authority, the Government Office for the South East and others."

Adur District Council leader Neil Parkin said he backed a proposal for thousands of new homes but was concerned about infrastructure.

He said: "We have been trying to get going for ten years and other development is going on at the port.

"Without the infrastructure improvements to the whole area the scheme is a nonsense.

"I will want to see funding for schools, water, sewage and road infrastructure and they are still talking about closing Worthing Hospital's A&E."

Brighton councillor Garry Peltzer Dunn, the chairman of the city's major projects committee, said any scheme would have to address improvements to the road network.

Tony Mernagh, the chief executive of Brighton and Hove Economic Partnership, said: "It is a hugely important site because we are running out of brownfield land where there is the potential to build this number of houses.

"Shoreham port has had a long history of people trying to redevelop it and it is an area that is in desperate need of it."

What do you think of the proposals? Leave your comments below.

Your Say YourArgus

orson, Hove says...
11:41am Sat 14 Jul 07

Shoreham has the potential to be a mini docklands, with high quality homes, restaurants, offices etc. If it could generate a unique character as a media centre and attract film/web/arts businesses alongside attractive residential buildings, it would make our city even more amazing than it already is.

steve, Brighton says...
12:29pm Sat 14 Jul 07

Am I getting this right.....upto 14000 new inhabitants !!! The roads are not capable of carrying the traffic we have now. The NHS wants to close the local hospitals we have, and not even a mention of extra school places. We need new houses, but how many will be snapped up for "buy to let" ? The infrastructure needs to grow with the population but there is no profit in that.

Mick, Southwick says...
1:31pm Sat 14 Jul 07

I live right by the harbour and welcome the plans despite the disruption it will cause. As long as the probloem with trhe infrastructure roads etc are dealt with, although its difficlut to see how that could be done. I would think that a high speed transport link into brighton must be incorporated in to the plan if it is not to cause Chaos.

Peaved of Shoreham, Shoreham says...
1:48pm Sat 14 Jul 07

orson wrote:
Shoreham has the potential to be a mini docklands, with high quality homes, restaurants, offices etc. If it could generate a unique character as a media centre and attract film/web/arts businesses alongside attractive residential buildings, it would make our city even more amazing than it already is.
No thanks, Shoreham is not part of your city, it is in West Sussex and is a town on its own, not a borough of your scrawling puss filled metropolis. If it as asset to anywhere, it certainly wont be Brighton.

Stan B, 985-234 says...
1:51pm Sat 14 Jul 07

There are not enough school places, Hospital beads, A+E departments, or decent jobs as the ares stands at the moment. I would welcome the development, but there must be a massive investment in these basic elements of infrastucture before there can be any viable increase in local population.

T.Ruth, brighton says...
2:09pm Sat 14 Jul 07

BUILDING HOUSES IN SHOREHAM is an absolute madness, why on earth is anyone considering building homes in an area which is without any doubt going to be submerged by rising sea levels in our life time, according to details recently leaked by Nasser. Talk about not learning a lesson, especially with the extensive flooding of Sheffield and Hull fresh in our memories, but this obviously doesn't bother SEEDA, because just like Brighton and Hove councils, they will first vote to indemnify themselves against any future insurance claims which might blame them for the reckless and negligent planning decisions they took that will definitely result in disaster for all those foolish enough to invest in any of these houses. It seems to me that we are suffering a lack of development land to build on and being forced to accept these sorts of brainless schemes, purely because the decision makers are part of the NIMBY squad, who’s only concern when deciding where houses should be build, is that they aren’t built near them or in the countryside that they want to keep just for themselves.
We are being conned into believing that the whole country is under threat from housing development, whilst only 12% is the true amount, but this propaganda is being used to prevent the majority of us from demanding a decent house in a decent location at an AFFORDABLE PRICE.
WHY SHOULDN’T THE ORDINARY PERSON HAVE THE RIGHT TO LIVE IN A BETTER ENVIRONMENT, AWAY FROM HIGH DENSITY, HIGH CRIME AREAS, HORRIBLY DEPPRESSING AREAS

chris, seafront says...
2:16pm Sat 14 Jul 07

They are pinning a lot on a so-called "media village"!

The Nineties were a decade ago. The world has changed.

G Brown, Saltdean says...
2:18pm Sat 14 Jul 07

Well said, T.Ruth, every word you have posted has hit the nail on the head and its time SEEDA and the planners listened to the people. But I know that as long as we are at the mercy of NIMBY planning committees, there isn't much hope for the average person.

Lisa S, Southwick says...
3:15pm Sat 14 Jul 07

I am as aware as everyone that more houses are going to be built whether we like it or not, and I'd sooner see that area developed than losing any more of our beautiful downs. However I am very concerned about the fact that we are potentially going to lose Southlands Hospital and that Worthing Hospital could soon be down-graded, resulting in us losing A & E. I am also concerned with the fact that all of the schools in the area are reducing the amount of classes they have per year group next year, which makes me wonder where all of the extra children be go? Not very good forward planning I feel!

richard, Hove says...
7:43pm Sat 14 Jul 07

Sorry but Shoreham, Southwick and the rest of the Adur district is effectively just a suburb of Brighton & Hove, there are many other cities in the country that have suburbs outside of the city council boundary. Nottingham for example has suburbs like hucknall, clifton, beeston etc outside of its boundary, Manchester has salford, trafford, tameside etc also suburbs outside the city boundary.
Cities expand and eat up their surrounding villages/small towns, that's just how it goes, it is nothing new.

Noah, Shoreham says...
7:50pm Sat 14 Jul 07

Have you a link to this evidence that Shoreham will flood?

sm, says...
10:28pm Sat 14 Jul 07

Noah wrote:
Have you a link to this evidence that Shoreham will flood?
here it is www.treehugginghippy

crap.com

Whatever they do with the Port area, it can't look any worse than the pit that is Shoreham currently is.

Dave, Woolwich says...
10:42pm Sat 14 Jul 07

orson wrote:
Shoreham has the potential to be a mini docklands, with high quality homes, restaurants, offices etc. If it could generate a unique character as a media centre and attract film/web/arts businesses alongside attractive residential buildings, it would make our city even more amazing than it already is.
being a high class city boy I have to say you are having a laugh. I've been to Shoreham and Docklands it ain't! That is no bad thing. Docklands is a soulless hell whole.

Alex, says...
6:41am Sun 15 Jul 07

I heard something once that said Shoreham will become one of the most dangerous places in the country as far as flooding is concerned. Probably best to start building the flood wall along the coast now.
Besides, maybe people don`t want soem `media village` in Shoreham, or over priced shoe box apartments that no-one can afford or fit more than a bed into. Those are not homes, those are prison cells.

Alex, says...
6:46am Sun 15 Jul 07

Brighton councillor Garry Peltzer Dunn, the chairman of the city's major projects committee, said any scheme would have to address improvements to the road network.


And provide decent parking for people visiting the people who can afford to live there. They don`t really think they`ll use public transport, do they?

flood risk, Brighton says...
10:42am Sun 15 Jul 07

I never realised the risk the Shoreham has to floods. Check here:

http://www.environme
nt-agency.gov.uk/sub
jects/flood/

Neil, Lancing says...
11:08am Sun 15 Jul 07

Priority must be sorting out the traffic excess through Shoreham and Lancing, plus hospitals. Developing the harbour with more housing and less scrap metal and tin sheds would be a big improvement!

richard, says...
1:07pm Sun 15 Jul 07

it's a commercial port and should remain one. i love the scrap metal and tin sheds as they bring employment. houses just bring mainly strangers and i hate strangers.

Sampson Scoble, says...
2:04pm Sun 15 Jul 07

Thank god, that by the turn of the century Brighton will be a memory, due to raising sea-levels, a possible nuclear power station, and the seemingly unstoppable increase in chavs and media-whores...

hottram, brighton says...
2:14pm Sun 15 Jul 07

infrastructure is always a problem. why not build a coastline tram from newhaven to worthing - our 'region' is in desperate need of public transport that works!

Big Bertha, says...
6:37pm Sun 15 Jul 07

steve wrote:
Am I getting this right.....upto 14000 new inhabitants !!! The roads are not capable of carrying the traffic we have now. The NHS wants to close the local hospitals we have, and not even a mention of extra school places. We need new houses, but how many will be snapped up for "buy to let" ? The infrastructure needs to grow with the population but there is no profit in that.
Steve

Dont worry mate - I'm sure that Hawkes and Hawker can somehow, through the relocation of the museli triangle to these wonderful houses, be pestered into putting this area into the Stringer/Varndean catchment area.

Schools - there's no problem in Brighton and Hove - it's official - according to Hawkes.

Rob, Shoreham says...
10:11am Mon 16 Jul 07

Alex wrote:
I heard something once that said Shoreham will become one of the most dangerous places in the country as far as flooding is concerned. Probably best to start building the flood wall along the coast now. Besides, maybe people don`t want soem `media village` in Shoreham, or over priced shoe box apartments that no-one can afford or fit more than a bed into. Those are not homes, those are prison cells.
Excellent - if there is one thing the country is agreed on it's that there are not enough prison cells.

Lat's put all the sex offenders in there and then no-one will mind if it floods either!

vicky, brighton says...
1:56pm Mon 16 Jul 07

Alex wrote:
I heard something once that said Shoreham will become one of the most dangerous places in the country as far as flooding is concerned. Probably best to start building the flood wall along the coast now.
Besides, maybe people don`t want soem `media village` in Shoreham, or over priced shoe box apartments that no-one can afford or fit more than a bed into. Those are not homes, those are prison cells.
too late - they've already started building those overpriced, shoebox appartments in shoreham already.
i only know this because i went to look at one last month. quite glad i didn't move to the area if it's going to turn into a building site for the next 15 years...

Adam, Brighton says...
5:29pm Mon 16 Jul 07

SEEDA are an unelected quango, who have a huge budget from tax payers money, but are accountable to.....no one!

Sean, Lancing says...
6:16pm Mon 16 Jul 07

I hope that any land reclamation will not destroy one of our areas few remaining surf breaks. The hot pipe and surrounding beaches provide a great attraction to a very large surfing community. Please keep the sea free and fun for the future groms.

G.Brown, Saltdean says...
10:15pm Mon 16 Jul 07

flood risk wrote:
I never realised the risk the Shoreham has to floods. Check here: http://www.environme nt-agency.gov.uk/sub jects/flood/
Thanks for that, I checked the environment site as you suggested and it is quite worrying, Shoreham is at great risk from flooding even before the sea levels start to rise, God knows what will happen when the sea levels rise by as much as18 feet, which is the amount of sea level rise that’s predicted to happen within the next 20 years. I advise anyone thinking of moving to Shoreham, to think again, do what those in the know are doing and that is, move to the high ground of Brighton or anywhere along the coast road from Brighton to Newhaven, which includes Ovingdean, Woodindean, Rottingdean, Saltdean, Telscoombe, Peacehaven and even most of the high ground in Newhaven, because very soon these places will be very sought after.

Tim Williams, Portslade says...
2:27pm Tue 17 Jul 07

Really, for local people most of you don't have a clue where this development will be. It WONT be in Shoreham, but the Aldrington to Southwick beach area, half of which is in East Sussex and the other half in West Sussex. The boundary is the Kings Head pub on Brighton road - the development will be directly opposite there. It's rare to find someone who lives in Brighton to have been as far west as the King Alfred, let alone Hove Lagoon! Really, learn some geography.

Homer Less, Saltdean says...
6:01pm Tue 17 Jul 07

Tim Williams wrote:
Really, for local people most of you don't have a clue where this development will be. It WONT be in Shoreham, but the Aldrington to Southwick beach area, half of which is in East Sussex and the other half in West Sussex. The boundary is the Kings Head pub on Brighton road - the development will be directly opposite there. It's rare to find someone who lives in Brighton to have been as far west as the King Alfred, let alone Hove Lagoon! Really, learn some geography.
That area is even more in danger of flooding, talk about building in the wrong place, this takes the biscuit.

T.Ruth, Brighton says...
6:13pm Tue 17 Jul 07

A new law should be introduced which makes it illegal for any authority to permit the building of residential properties on land by the sea that is less than 25 feet above sea level, unless they are prepared to insure the purchasers of these new properties for a period of at least 50 years and the same law should apply to the developers as well.

Tim Williams, Portslade says...
12:15am Sat 21 Jul 07

Ok - so you don't bother to find out where the development will happen and you don't bother to read that the development will include reclaiming land from the sea - a la Brighton Marina (which hasn't flooded in my lifetime) and all sorts of flood defences which would be more efficient than what's there at the moment. Incase you hadn't noticed there are properties there at the moment!! Tell Fatboyslim to pull his house down because it might flood.... quit the speculation and learn facts. It should be a new law for stupid people not to post on here.

Your sayYourArgus

comment Add your comment

Register for a FREE The Argus account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in below to continue.




Forgotten your password?

What's On Live Travel YourArgus

Last updated 22.55 with 0 incidents

Full Traffic Report »

Hot Jobs

Local Services


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Sponsored Adverts
Sponsored Adverts