News RSS Feed


Plans to demolish Victorian building submitted

10:51am Sunday 12th August 2007

comment Comments (9)   Have your say »


Plans to demolish a Victorian building to make way for flats and a GP surgery have been submitted.

The "landmark" Royal Alexandra Hospital for Sick Children, Dyke Road, Brighton, would be knocked down under proposals submitted to Brighton and Hove City Council by Taylor Wimpey.

While conservationists and residents' associations have claimed the current much-loved building must be saved, architects employed by the builders say the structure is of little value.

David Lewis Associates, which provides expert witnesses for building disputes and planning appeals, have drawn up a conservation impact study which concludes that the site is of little architectural merit or value.

It reads: "I have concluded without doubt that the proposal will result in a development that both removes an untidy and redundant hospital complex of little architectural merit or value that detracts from the appearance and character of the conservation area and its setting on Dyke Road and will result in a vastly enhanced environment including proposed buildings and gardens that will respect its setting and very considerably and significantly enhance the appearance, character and quality of the conservation area."

But in a council document, the site is described as "an important part of Brighton life and a well known local landmark".

And last night, Roger Amerena, chairman of the Montpelier and Clifton Hill Association, which is the conservation group for the Montpelier and Clifton Hill Conservation Area, said he could not support the proposal.

He said: "It is a landmark building and it could be made into a housing development.

"Instead they want to remove it without that option having been given a chance.

"The building that is being proposed would be more appropriate for a smoke infested town in Eastern Germany."

He added that he hoped Wimpey would help fund the restoration of a nearby, listed coach house, which is a community project called the Clifton Hill Coach House, owned by the City of Brighton and Hove Historic Buildings Conservation Trust with 64 partners.

Just over 150 homes, a GP surgery, pharmacy and community green are planned for the Dyke Road site, sold for £10 million.

A consultation run by the builders found that 98 per cent supported the surgery, 95 per cent the green, 19 per cent support the project as it is and 39 per cent backed the scheme with changes.

But an earlier survey carried out by the Montpelier and Clifton Hill Association and West Hill Residents' Association last year, found two out of three people living nearby wanted the buildings to be saved.

An application was submitted to English Heritage to list the hospital but it was turned down because much of the exterior and internal features had been altered.

The new development will include a mix of one, two and three-bedroom apartments, with affordable housing including key worker homes, shared ownership schemes and low cost housing to help first time buyers.

Richard Matthews, of George Wimpey, said the GP surgery had been enlarged after resident feedback.

He said: "The consultation feedback provided useful suggestions about the design of the new buildings, which have been taken on board.

"The result is a revised proposal that incorporates feedback from the local community and will secure the future of this important site, providing new homes and community benefits."

He added that the design of the building had been changed to create more of a landmark and align the three blocks along Dyke Road to mirror the Victorian villas.

The architects, PRC, have designed the Van Allen Building on Marine Parade, Brighton, and the Berkeley Homes project opposite Preston Park.

Plans to lock the community green at night and include discreet lighting have also been added.

What do you think of the plans? Tell us below.


Your Say YourArgus

Paul, Clifton Hill - Brighton says...
9:51pm Sun 12 Aug 07

Just received the developers blurb through the post, what a dismal development it is, another bland shoe box with a few curved balconies! This development could have been plopped out anywhere, it does not respect the local area in it's design.

The only reason the building is being knocked down is because it would cost too much to convert it and not make the required profit margin for them! It has nothing to do with it's architectural merit and all to do with the potential profit!

Paul, Brighton Seafront says...
8:56am Mon 13 Aug 07

I wholeheartedly agree, Paul.

The architects and builders of the 50s and 60s come in for a lot of stick with their drab designs during the building boom, but we seem to be making exactly the same mistakes, albeit with different materials!

gary, hove says...
12:24pm Mon 13 Aug 07

£10M for the land. 150 homes, even if they are sold at (a very conservative estimate £150K) each thats £22.5M. I'm sure the reason for knocking the place down (and not preserving) had nothing to do with money lol.

still if it does actually provide homes, and i mean really provide homes for people (rather than the buy to let brigade)that are trying to get on the poperty ladder (if that is still possible with BN prices) then all weel and good... my two pennies. feel free to slate me

vicky, dyke road says...
3:42pm Mon 13 Aug 07

If it isn't flat-pack homes, they want to knock down decently made buildings that will stand longer than anything built today. These new designs are nothing new: You can see them everywhere in the country. Surely if you are to build in a conservation area, you should be forced to make it in keeping. Just as everyone else has to if they want to fiddle around with the outside of their homes. Why is it one rule for Developers and another for others? The same man designed the old warehouse in Hove that has been converted into flats, so why not this one?
This though is not the least of my worries: what about the noise and dust that'll be produced in demolition? The impact of such building sites on a main road? We've already had the waterworks.
Another thing is that somewhere down the line, the government will complain there are not enough hospitals! This beggars belief. Why make affordable keyworker housing if there are no jobs for these people?

kate, dyke road says...
3:03pm Mon 20 Aug 07

3 words to say ' a total disgrace'....how can this beautiful building be demolished , for that pathetic attempt of wimpey's new proposed housing ...in keeping with the conservation area??? are the architects/ council barking mad???? if this goes ahead it's a total tragedy.

TOBY, DYKE ROAD says...
1:45pm Wed 22 Aug 07

THE DESTRUCTION OF A LANDMARK BUILDING LIKE THE ROYAL LEXANDRA HOSTITAL WOULD BE AGAINST THE WISHES OF THE PEOPLE,A HUGE LOSS TO BRIGHTON, AND A COMPLETE DISGRACE IF THE COUNCIL DO NOTHING. THE PROPOSEDF PLANS HAVE STEEL AND GLASS BUILDING THAT IS TOTALLY NOT IN KEEPING WITH THE SO CALLED CONSERVATION AREA IT STANDS PROUD IN. THIS WOULD BE THE BIGGEST MISTAKE THAT BRIGHTON AND HOVE COUNCIL COULD MAKE SINCE THEY PROPOSED KNOCKING DOWN THE PAVILLION TO WIDDEN THE ROAD, BACK IN THE 1960 S !

helen, dyke road says...
1:54pm Wed 22 Aug 07

the destruction of this fine ,in keeping, building would be a tradegy to brighton and the area, it is against the wishes of local people !

Ian, Dyke road says...
6:48pm Mon 27 Aug 07

Nearly every development taking place today in the centre of London consists of the external facade being preserved and buttressed while the internal structure is demolished and rebuilt.
With the hook of "affordable housing" thrown in, the developers hope to slide their way past an apathetic council, destroy a genuinely interesting and historic local building and pocket a very tidy profit.
Not that I'm against the developers making a huge fat profit, just as long as they do it by building a development which is in sympathy with the local area and retains the essential charm and quirkiness of the existing old hospital. i am also very suspicious of the developers consultation process as i have not been consulted and my address is not even listed on the circulation of consultations on the council website...yet I live virtually opposite the old hospital!
This development needs to be stopped and the planning application thrown out. can we rely on the Argos to launch a campaign in support of Brighton's heritage??

toby Benjamin, Seven Dials says...
5:45pm Fri 31 Aug 07


Please someone save us from yet another souless, money spinning central development.The Royal Alexandra have some amazing architectural details, and must be saved.

I am setting up a website, with drawings and photos of the buildings. Anyone who wants to help by submitting drawings, paintings or photos, please mail me at toby @softwearindustries.
com

Your sayYourArgus

comment Add your comment

Register for a FREE The Argus account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in below to continue.




Forgotten your password?

Local Services


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »