|
| |
DOWNLOAD OF THE WEEK |
 | |
| | WHAT'S ON | | | | |
| | GOING GREEN | | |
| | LETTERS TO THE EDITOR | | | | |
| | COMMENT AND ANALYSIS | | |
|
|
|
Wealthy barber is paedophile
A wealthy barber who set his mistress up in a detached house has been found guilty of sexually assaulting young girls.
A judge said Robert Coulson had "lived a lie", deceiving his wife and two sons while abusing four girls in 35 years.
Coulson, 74, of Crawley Lane, Pound Hill, Crawley, faces a possible life sentence after a jury unanimously found him guilty yesterday.
He is already behind bars after he was remanded in custody at the end of a three-week trial at Hove Crown Court . He will be sentenced on April 24.
Judge Anthony Niblett said: "For at least 35 years you have been living a lie. Your life has been a lie.
"You have been lying to your wife, lying to your mistress and lying to your own sons.
"Those lies have now been exposed and the truth spoken by your victims has been revealed.
"You can expect to receive a lengthy sentence of imprisonment." Dianne Chann, prosecuting, said Coulson had started an affair with a colleague's wife while running a barbershop business in Crawley.
Between 1984 and 1986 he regularly visited her at a detached country house he bought for her near Haywards Heath.
During that time he began sexually abusing two sisters who were then aged 13 and 14.
One of the victims, now in her 30s, told the jury he touched her breasts after showing her pornographic magazines.
Coulson's mistress, who cannot be named for legal reasons, said he bought the house for her because he wanted her to leave her husband.
She said she continued the relationship even after the sexual abuse came to light in 1993.
She told the jury: "I was foolish enough to be controlled by this man. I regret now I did not listen."
Coulson owns a barber shop in London Road, Northgate, Crawley, and once owned another shop in Three Bridges.
He was arrested in August 2006 after a child told a teacher he had been abusing her.
The sisters and a fourth victim came forward after Coulson was charged with sex offences which took place in 1986 and 2006.
Coulson had denied 14 charges of indecent assault, sexual assault indecency with a child and sexual assault of a child by penetration.
He told the jury: "I don't understand why the girls are accusing me of these offences.
"What pleasure could a man get out of what they are saying?"
The court heard the maximum sentence of assault by penetration of a child is life.
Do you have a picture of the sex fiend? Call the newsdesk on 01273 544519 or email news@theargus.co.uk
2:21pm Thursday 27th March 2008
Print 
Email this 
CommentPosted by: Me, here on 2:39pm Thu 27 Mar 08
Now these are the sort of 'vile and ungodly practises' Mr.Steven Stevens should be concentrating on...that goes for T.Ruth also.
Now these are the sort of 'vile and ungodly practises' Mr.Steven Stevens should be concentrating on...that goes for T.Ruth also.
Posted by: John, Cyberspace on 2:49pm Thu 27 Mar 08
I'm surprised that there isn't a "Demon Barber of London Road" reference in this article.
I'm surprised that there isn't a "Demon Barber of London Road" reference in this article.
Posted by: Stevens supporter, on the right on 2:54pm Thu 27 Mar 08
[quote][bold]Me[/bold] wrote:
Now these are the sort of 'vile and ungodly practises' Mr.Steven Stevens should be concentrating on...that goes for T.Ruth also.[/quote] No, Mr Stevens and T.Ruth obviously favour prevention over cure. And I'm right with them!!
Me wrote:
Now these are the sort of 'vile and ungodly practises' Mr.Steven Stevens should be concentrating on...that goes for T.Ruth also.
No, Mr Stevens and T.Ruth obviously favour prevention over cure. And I'm right with them!!
Posted by: T.Ruth on 3:36pm Thu 27 Mar 08
I have always made it quite obvious that in my book paedophilia is the worst crime/sin that man can commit, because as I have stated before that paedophiles unfortunately do infiltrate the Church and various other organisations in order that they can get access to vulnerable children and abuse them, I also agree with you that man has used religion as a reason to put their enemies to the sword even though Christ opposed all wars.
But Christ isn’t guilty of any of these crimes in fact he led by example and died simply because he would not fight his enemies, but instead he forgave them, he didn’t judge or condemn sinners, he simply said that there but for the grace of God go I, the only exception being when he said that, suffer unto him he that harm the little children.
I have always made it quite obvious that in my book paedophilia is the worst crime/sin that man can commit, because as I have stated before that paedophiles unfortunately do infiltrate the Church and various other organisations in order that they can get access to vulnerable children and abuse them, I also agree with you that man has used religion as a reason to put their enemies to the sword even though Christ opposed all wars.
But Christ isn’t guilty of any of these crimes in fact he led by example and died simply because he would not fight his enemies, but instead he forgave them, he didn’t judge or condemn sinners, he simply said that there but for the grace of God go I, the only exception being when he said that, suffer unto him he that harm the little children.
Posted by: Fred, brighton on 3:42pm Thu 27 Mar 08
Please tell me. In parts of Pakistan a girl can marry at 12yrs old. Does the husband become a paedophile?
Please tell me. In parts of Pakistan a girl can marry at 12yrs old. Does the husband become a paedophile?
Posted by: Decency on 3:51pm Thu 27 Mar 08
In Pakistan woman and girls are forced into marriage with dirty old men against their will, but that doesn't make it right does it.
In Pakistan woman and girls are forced into marriage with dirty old men against their will, but that doesn't make it right does it.
Posted by: Brian, Hove on 4:13pm Thu 27 Mar 08
No comment from roger tilbury yet
No comment from roger tilbury yet
Posted by: Clarify, Hove on 4:13pm Thu 27 Mar 08
T Ruth expressed concern about the dangers the proposed new Lap Dance Club in Worthing posed for women and girls.
Where is the Crawley lap dance club and was it open in 1986?
T Ruth expressed concern about the dangers the proposed new Lap Dance Club in Worthing posed for women and girls.
Where is the Crawley lap dance club and was it open in 1986?
Posted by: Me, here on 4:27pm Thu 27 Mar 08
[quote][bold]Brian[/bold] wrote:
No comment from roger tilbury yet [/quote] Yes, haven't heard from him since his recent comments on the school govenor story. How very strange!
Brian wrote:
No comment from roger tilbury yet
Yes, haven't heard from him since his recent comments on the school govenor story. How very strange!
Posted by: Paul, Brighton Seafront on 4:29pm Thu 27 Mar 08
The Vatican list Genetic Modification as a deadly sin. Paedophilia did not make the cut, seemingly. Perhaps it is just frowned upon in those circles.
The Vatican list Genetic Modification as a deadly sin. Paedophilia did not make the cut, seemingly. Perhaps it is just frowned upon in those circles.
Posted by: Dave, Hove on 4:36pm Thu 27 Mar 08
[quote][bold]T.Ruth[/bold] wrote:
I have always made it quite obvious that in my book paedophilia is the worst crime/sin that man can commit, because as I have stated before that paedophiles unfortunately do infiltrate the Church and various other organisations in order that they can get access to vulnerable children and abuse them, I also agree with you that man has used religion as a reason to put their enemies to the sword even though Christ opposed all wars. But Christ isn’t guilty of any of these crimes in fact he led by example and died simply because he would not fight his enemies, but instead he forgave them, he didn’t judge or condemn sinners, he simply said that there but for the grace of God go I, the only exception being when he said that, suffer unto him he that harm the little children. [/quote] Waffle waffle waffle.
Blah blah blah.
T.Ruth wrote:
I have always made it quite obvious that in my book paedophilia is the worst crime/sin that man can commit, because as I have stated before that paedophiles unfortunately do infiltrate the Church and various other organisations in order that they can get access to vulnerable children and abuse them, I also agree with you that man has used religion as a reason to put their enemies to the sword even though Christ opposed all wars. But Christ isn’t guilty of any of these crimes in fact he led by example and died simply because he would not fight his enemies, but instead he forgave them, he didn’t judge or condemn sinners, he simply said that there but for the grace of God go I, the only exception being when he said that, suffer unto him he that harm the little children.
Waffle waffle waffle.
Blah blah blah.
Posted by: T.Ruth on 4:53pm Thu 27 Mar 08
[quote][bold]Dave[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]T.Ruth[/bold] wrote: I have always made it quite obvious that in my book paedophilia is the worst crime/sin that man can commit, because as I have stated before that paedophiles unfortunately do infiltrate the Church and various other organisations in order that they can get access to vulnerable children and abuse them, I also agree with you that man has used religion as a reason to put their enemies to the sword even though Christ opposed all wars. But Christ isn’t guilty of any of these crimes in fact he led by example and died simply because he would not fight his enemies, but instead he forgave them, he didn’t judge or condemn sinners, he simply said that there but for the grace of God go I, the only exception being when he said that, suffer unto him he that harm the little children. [/quote] Waffle waffle waffle. Blah blah blah.[/quote] I take from your posting that you support paedophiles then, how sad is that and God forgive you.
Dave wrote:
T.Ruth wrote: I have always made it quite obvious that in my book paedophilia is the worst crime/sin that man can commit, because as I have stated before that paedophiles unfortunately do infiltrate the Church and various other organisations in order that they can get access to vulnerable children and abuse them, I also agree with you that man has used religion as a reason to put their enemies to the sword even though Christ opposed all wars. But Christ isn’t guilty of any of these crimes in fact he led by example and died simply because he would not fight his enemies, but instead he forgave them, he didn’t judge or condemn sinners, he simply said that there but for the grace of God go I, the only exception being when he said that, suffer unto him he that harm the little children.
Waffle waffle waffle. Blah blah blah.
I take from your posting that you support paedophiles then, how sad is that and God forgive you.
Posted by: chris holden, worthing on 4:59pm Thu 27 Mar 08
I was raised a catholic, and have no time for the religious security blanket No the God botheres worry about the unborn but the poor blighters that are here to 'suffer' can go hang detest all christians they are the cause of so much hurt yuk
I was raised a catholic, and have no time for the religious security blanket No the God botheres worry about the unborn but the poor blighters that are here to 'suffer' can go hang detest all christians they are the cause of so much hurt yuk
Posted by: Dave, Hove on 5:00pm Thu 27 Mar 08
[quote][bold]T.Ruth[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]Dave[/bold] wrote: [quote][bold]T.Ruth[/bold] wrote: I have always made it quite obvious that in my book paedophilia is the worst crime/sin that man can commit, because as I have stated before that paedophiles unfortunately do infiltrate the Church and various other organisations in order that they can get access to vulnerable children and abuse them, I also agree with you that man has used religion as a reason to put their enemies to the sword even though Christ opposed all wars. But Christ isn’t guilty of any of these crimes in fact he led by example and died simply because he would not fight his enemies, but instead he forgave them, he didn’t judge or condemn sinners, he simply said that there but for the grace of God go I, the only exception being when he said that, suffer unto him he that harm the little children. [/quote] Waffle waffle waffle. Blah blah blah.[/quote] I take from your posting that you support paedophiles then, how sad is that and God forgive you.[/quote] Don't presume anything of the sort, you bible thumping oddball and if I want forgiveness, I'll ask real people, not imaginary beings.
T.Ruth wrote:
Dave wrote: T.Ruth wrote: I have always made it quite obvious that in my book paedophilia is the worst crime/sin that man can commit, because as I have stated before that paedophiles unfortunately do infiltrate the Church and various other organisations in order that they can get access to vulnerable children and abuse them, I also agree with you that man has used religion as a reason to put their enemies to the sword even though Christ opposed all wars. But Christ isn’t guilty of any of these crimes in fact he led by example and died simply because he would not fight his enemies, but instead he forgave them, he didn’t judge or condemn sinners, he simply said that there but for the grace of God go I, the only exception being when he said that, suffer unto him he that harm the little children.
Waffle waffle waffle. Blah blah blah.
I take from your posting that you support paedophiles then, how sad is that and God forgive you.
Don't presume anything of the sort, you bible thumping oddball and if I want forgiveness, I'll ask real people, not imaginary beings.
Posted by: sm on 5:11pm Thu 27 Mar 08
[quote][bold]T.Ruth[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]sm[/bold] wrote:
T. Ruth had the audacity to write: [bold]because as I have stated before that paedophiles unfortunately do infiltrate the Church[/bold] What do you mean \\\'infiltrate\\\' ? Paedos ARE the church. Catholic AND Prodestant. Barbers just shave their pubes for them. Then join in.[/quote] Are you sure you are not a paedophile, because I find your comments very offensive indeed.[/quote] Positive.
And I find your religion very offensive that that sort of behaviour is tolerated. Welcomed even.
Vile creatures the lot of you.
And as for you, you're just a cassock short of a fiddler yerself.
T.Ruth wrote:
sm wrote:
T. Ruth had the audacity to write: because as I have stated before that paedophiles unfortunately do infiltrate the Church What do you mean 'infiltrate' ? Paedos ARE the church. Catholic AND Prodestant. Barbers just shave their pubes for them. Then join in.
Are you sure you are not a paedophile, because I find your comments very offensive indeed.
Positive.
And I find your religion very offensive that that sort of behaviour is tolerated. Welcomed even.
Vile creatures the lot of you.
And as for you, you're just a cassock short of a fiddler yerself.
Posted by: pewbasher, Brighton on 6:03pm Thu 27 Mar 08
It seems that anyone who has the temerity to disagree with T.Ruth is branded a paedophile. Oh well, that's all of us then...
It seems that anyone who has the temerity to disagree with T.Ruth is branded a paedophile. Oh well, that's all of us then...
Posted by: Brian, Hove on 6:09pm Thu 27 Mar 08
[quote][bold]Me[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]Brian[/bold] wrote:
No comment from roger tilbury yet [/quote] Yes, haven't heard from him since his recent comments on the school govenor story. How very strange![/quote] He's popped up today on the article about a gun on the train at East Grinstead. Slagging off the Police as usual.
Me wrote:
Brian wrote:
No comment from roger tilbury yet
Yes, haven't heard from him since his recent comments on the school govenor story. How very strange!
He's popped up today on the article about a gun on the train at East Grinstead. Slagging off the Police as usual.
Posted by: Elle Prohette, Cumbria on 6:55pm Thu 27 Mar 08
And so the Lord said ' Choppeth off the nadgers and let the hellbound mupp bleed '
And so the Lord said ' Choppeth off the nadgers and let the hellbound mupp bleed '
Posted by: The Terminator, Behind you. on 8:21pm Thu 27 Mar 08
All paedophiles should be terminated.I am working on the most painful way this could possibly be done.I will need help though come the glorious day.
All paedophiles should be terminated.I am working on the most painful way this could possibly be done.I will need help though come the glorious day.
Posted by: Atheist Fascist, Hellbound on 10:09pm Thu 27 Mar 08
No need to get angry, N Gree!
"Why not admit you don't know what you are talking about and that you are just a bigot?"
Funny, I thought my screen name kind of did just that!
The Sun? No thanks - obviously as a trendy lefty liberal I wouldn't be caught dead giving money to nasty ol' Rupert M! The Guardian's obviously much more my style!
Oh, and I hate to shatter YOUR ignorant illusions but I'm afraid the majority of Christians probably DO agree with a literal interpretation (that was what you meant to write instead of "translation", wasn't it?) of Genesis once you venture outside the UK. Let's just take, at random, a poll taken by CBS in America [italic]in late 2006[/italic] that showed that 55% of US Adults believe that "God created humans in [their] present form". Check it out yourself, there's some fairly horrifying statistics on there... http://www.religious
tolerance.org/ev_pub
li.htm
Just one more thing; if you can pick and choose which of the most blatantly ridiculous bits of the bible you can believe and which you are free to reject, why not just have done with the whole thing and turn to good ol' science?
No need to get angry, N Gree!
"Why not admit you don't know what you are talking about and that you are just a bigot?"
Funny, I thought my screen name kind of did just that!
The Sun? No thanks - obviously as a trendy lefty liberal I wouldn't be caught dead giving money to nasty ol' Rupert M! The Guardian's obviously much more my style!
Oh, and I hate to shatter YOUR ignorant illusions but I'm afraid the majority of Christians probably DO agree with a literal interpretation (that was what you meant to write instead of "translation", wasn't it?) of Genesis once you venture outside the UK. Let's just take, at random, a poll taken by CBS in America
in late 2006 that showed that 55% of US Adults believe that "God created humans in present form". Check it out yourself, there's some fairly horrifying statistics on there... http://www.religious
tolerance.org/ev_pub
li.htm
Just one more thing; if you can pick and choose which of the most blatantly ridiculous bits of the bible you can believe and which you are free to reject, why not just have done with the whole thing and turn to good ol' science?
Posted by: Claude Back, Sussex on 11:17pm Thu 27 Mar 08
[quote][bold]Atheist Fascist[/bold] wrote:
No need to get angry, N Gree! "Why not admit you don't know what you are talking about and that you are just a bigot?" Funny, I thought my screen name kind of did just that! The Sun? No thanks - obviously as a trendy lefty liberal I wouldn't be caught dead giving money to nasty ol' Rupert M! The Guardian's obviously much more my style! Oh, and I hate to shatter YOUR ignorant illusions but I'm afraid the majority of Christians probably DO agree with a literal interpretation (that was what you meant to write instead of "translation", wasn't it?) of Genesis once you venture outside the UK. Let's just take, at random, a poll taken by CBS in America [italic]in late 2006[/italic] that showed that 55% of US Adults believe that "God created humans in [their] present form". Check it out yourself, there's some fairly horrifying statistics on there... http://www.religious tolerance.org/ev_pub li.htm Just one more thing; if you can pick and choose which of the most blatantly ridiculous bits of the bible you can believe and which you are free to reject, why not just have done with the whole thing and turn to good ol' science?[/quote] Idiot.
Atheist Fascist wrote:
No need to get angry, N Gree! "Why not admit you don't know what you are talking about and that you are just a bigot?" Funny, I thought my screen name kind of did just that! The Sun? No thanks - obviously as a trendy lefty liberal I wouldn't be caught dead giving money to nasty ol' Rupert M! The Guardian's obviously much more my style! Oh, and I hate to shatter YOUR ignorant illusions but I'm afraid the majority of Christians probably DO agree with a literal interpretation (that was what you meant to write instead of "translation", wasn't it?) of Genesis once you venture outside the UK. Let's just take, at random, a poll taken by CBS in America in late 2006 that showed that 55% of US Adults believe that "God created humans in present form". Check it out yourself, there's some fairly horrifying statistics on there... http://www.religious tolerance.org/ev_pub li.htm Just one more thing; if you can pick and choose which of the most blatantly ridiculous bits of the bible you can believe and which you are free to reject, why not just have done with the whole thing and turn to good ol' science?
Idiot.
Posted by: J.B., Hove on 11:23pm Thu 27 Mar 08
[quote][bold]chris holden[/bold] wrote:
I was raised a catholic, and have no time for the religious security blanket No the God botheres worry about the unborn but the poor blighters that are here to 'suffer' can go hang detest all christians they are the cause of so much hurt yuk [/quote] What absolute rubbish and tired old cliches you talk. True Christians do not hurt anyone and are responsible for most of the charitable and worthwhile organisations around the world. Nothing worthwhile ever founded by atheists.
chris holden wrote:
I was raised a catholic, and have no time for the religious security blanket No the God botheres worry about the unborn but the poor blighters that are here to 'suffer' can go hang detest all christians they are the cause of so much hurt yuk
What absolute rubbish and tired old cliches you talk. True Christians do not hurt anyone and are responsible for most of the charitable and worthwhile organisations around the world. Nothing worthwhile ever founded by atheists.
Posted by: King Carl Johan, Sweden on 11:28pm Thu 27 Mar 08
Sorry to interrupt your fight people, but what's the point talking ab priests and religion? A barber was plead guilty of sexual assault, thus he will be sentenced to a long time in prison, right? I'd let that stand alone, cause it's facts. No need to drag in religion and politics, nor gossip. Peace people. KCJ[italic]italic[/italic]
Sorry to interrupt your fight people, but what's the point talking ab priests and religion? A barber was plead guilty of sexual assault, thus he will be sentenced to a long time in prison, right? I'd let that stand alone, cause it's facts. No need to drag in religion and politics, nor gossip. Peace people. KCJ
Posted by: FRED, worthing on 10:16am Fri 28 Mar 08
God is an insurance. Take out a policy(belief} when you are about 60yrs old. Untill then enjoy your self.P.S. Go to barrys lap top dancing club.
God is an insurance. Take out a policy(belief} when you are about 60yrs old. Untill then enjoy your self.P.S. Go to barrys lap top dancing club.
Posted by: macca, brighton on 10:30am Fri 28 Mar 08
no comment from rodger tillbury,why, has he changed his mind on these issues or getting the medical help he needs
no comment from rodger tillbury,why, has he changed his mind on these issues or getting the medical help he needs
Posted by: todd, seaford on 11:20am Fri 28 Mar 08
[quote][bold]macca[/bold] wrote:
no comment from rodger tillbury,why, has he changed his mind on these issues or getting the medical help he needs[/quote] right on the spot macca well said
macca wrote:
no comment from rodger tillbury,why, has he changed his mind on these issues or getting the medical help he needs
right on the spot macca well said
Posted by: nigel on 9:05pm Fri 28 Mar 08
as an ex-employee of the man i would like to say he was always good to his staff ..as for the argus asking for pictures of "the sex feind"i think its out of order for a supposedly reputable newspaper to ask such a thing your editor should be ashamed!
as an ex-employee of the man i would like to say he was always good to his staff ..as for the argus asking for pictures of "the sex feind"i think its out of order for a supposedly reputable newspaper to ask such a thing your editor should be ashamed!
Posted by: macca, brighton on 10:51am Sat 29 Mar 08
[quote][bold]nigel[/bold] wrote:
as an ex-employee of the man i would like to say he was always good to his staff ..as for the argus asking for pictures of "the sex feind"i think its out of order for a supposedly reputable newspaper to ask such a thing your editor should be ashamed![/quote] well he was nice to his adult staff, thats nice but he is a evil sex pervert who prays on young children .the argus should print a phto to warn any other parent and chil to stay clear of this sicko still he was nice toy you, you pratt
nigel wrote:
as an ex-employee of the man i would like to say he was always good to his staff ..as for the argus asking for pictures of "the sex feind"i think its out of order for a supposedly reputable newspaper to ask such a thing your editor should be ashamed!
well he was nice to his adult staff, thats nice but he is a evil sex pervert who prays on young children .the argus should print a phto to warn any other parent and chil to stay clear of this sicko still he was nice toy you, you pratt
Posted by: macca, brighton on 10:56am Sat 29 Mar 08
[quote][bold]Dave[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]T.Ruth[/bold] wrote: I have always made it quite obvious that in my book paedophilia is the worst crime/sin that man can commit, because as I have stated before that paedophiles unfortunately do infiltrate the Church and various other organisations in order that they can get access to vulnerable children and abuse them, I also agree with you that man has used religion as a reason to put their enemies to the sword even though Christ opposed all wars. But Christ isn’t guilty of any of these crimes in fact he led by example and died simply because he would not fight his enemies, but instead he forgave them, he didn’t judge or condemn sinners, he simply said that there but for the grace of God go I, the only exception being when he said that, suffer unto him he that harm the little children. [/quote] Waffle waffle waffle. Blah blah blah.[/quote] you are also suspect pal if you support this sicko start a club with rodger tillbury pal the one thing that truth said that is wrong is god forgive you , no god would you ****
Dave wrote:
T.Ruth wrote: I have always made it quite obvious that in my book paedophilia is the worst crime/sin that man can commit, because as I have stated before that paedophiles unfortunately do infiltrate the Church and various other organisations in order that they can get access to vulnerable children and abuse them, I also agree with you that man has used religion as a reason to put their enemies to the sword even though Christ opposed all wars. But Christ isn’t guilty of any of these crimes in fact he led by example and died simply because he would not fight his enemies, but instead he forgave them, he didn’t judge or condemn sinners, he simply said that there but for the grace of God go I, the only exception being when he said that, suffer unto him he that harm the little children.
Waffle waffle waffle. Blah blah blah.
you are also suspect pal if you support this sicko start a club with rodger tillbury pal the one thing that truth said that is wrong is god forgive you , no god would you ****
Posted by: andy, seaford on 11:24am Sat 29 Mar 08
no comment from rodger tillbury.
dave are you a person that needs to talk to the doctors as your post sounds rather sus get help before you offend
no comment from rodger tillbury.
dave are you a person that needs to talk to the doctors as your post sounds rather sus get help before you offend
Posted by: Kelly, Worthing on 12:29pm Sat 29 Mar 08
I dont understand what him being wealthy has to do with him being a peadophile?
I dont understand what him being wealthy has to do with him being a peadophile?
Posted by: Derek, UK on 2:15am Sun 30 Mar 08
If an underage teenage boy has sex with an underage teenage girl what are they labelled? Who would be charged?
If an underage teenage boy has sex with an underage teenage girl what are they labelled? Who would be charged?
Posted by: t w, crawley on 7:00am Fri 25 Apr 08
you silly people with you're naive comments you haven't got a clue.
you silly people with you're naive comments you haven't got a clue.
Posted by: Emma Humphrey on 9:28pm Mon 28 Apr 08
10 years i believe he got... Not nearly enough!! He'll be out in 5.. it's disgraceful.Where's the justice for our innocent children?[italic]italic[/italic]
10 years i believe he got... Not nearly enough!! He'll be out in 5.. it's disgraceful.Where's the justice for our innocent children?
What are these links for?
If you liked this article and would like to share it with others on the web who might be searching for good content we've made it easy for you to do it.
At the bottom of all articles, you'll see links to six sites. These sites - commonly called 'social bookmark' or 'social news' sites - have large communities of web users who share and rate interesting, useful and fun things on the web.
Clicking the links will automatically add the address of the story you are reading to one of these sites, letting you share it with others. Each site will ask you to register to share stories. Registration is free and once a member, you can store, recommend and search for stories that interest you.
More on Digg
More on del.icio.us
More on Furl
More on reddit
More on NowPublic/
More on Yahoo!
