TEXT your pictures, videos and messages to 80360. Start your message with SUPIC or email your tip-offs »
8:25pm Wednesday 8th August 2007
A council has come under fire for its controversial decision to ban The Argus from a public meeting to discuss the proposed Falmer stadium.
Falmer Parish Council has pledged to hold a secret meeting to debate whether to launch a High Court appeal against the Government's decision to grant Brighton and Hove Albion planning permission for the £50 million development.
The matter was set to be discussed during a parish council meeting at the village hall in Falmer on Tuesday, but was adjourned once officials realised The Argus was present.
Councillors then said the meeting would eventually take place "in someone's house" and "not in a public place". A villager also physically blocked reporter Simon Barrett's path back into the public building.
The move has sparked outrage among stadium campaigners, Albion fans and MPs who have all urged the council not to oppose the plans.
Paul Samrah, the chairman of the Falmer For All campaign, said the clandestine nature of the meeting brought back memories of the "cloak and dagger" David Bellotti and Bill Archer regime during the club's final years at the Goldstone Ground before it was sold.
He said: "Falmer Parish Council is behaving like a trapped rabbit with nowhere left to turn. The councillors are not making it easy for themselves and are fast losing any credibility they once had.
"All we want is to work together with these people, but secret meetings and the like just raises the temperature and inflames opinion. It is ludicrous and they really are playing with fire.
"It reminds me of the Archer era when there were numerous meetings like this and confusion reigned. It has been eight years now, and the time has come to accept the decision and make it work for everyone."
Opponents have until September 4 to try to derail the development and the decision of the parish council is seen as the final hurdle in Albion's marathon journey for a new home.
The parish council has a duty under two Government acts to hold meetings in public, unless the matter is deemed confidential and a resolution to exclude the public is put forward. The law does not allow councils to remove any particular member of the press or public - even if they don't like them.
There were celebrations among stadium supporters last week when Lewes District Council announced it would not appeal. Lewes MP Norman Baker, who opposed the scheme, has also called for opponents to accept the Government's verdict.
David Lepper, the MP for Brighton Pavilion, said: "This behaviour is certainly not in the spirit of democracy. This is a matter of great public concern, not just for those who live in the Falmer parish but for people in Brighton and Hove and right across Sussex.
"I think to discuss such an important matter in private is a mean-minded and silly decision. The district council have accepted the stadium is going to be built and it is now time for the parish council to follow suit."
Parish councillors say they could ballot villagers on whether to appeal. They have also mooted the possibility of forming a coalition alongside the Campaign to Protect Rural England and the South Downs Society.
Communities Secretary Hazel Blears approved plans for the 22,500 seat arena last month. If no appeal is brought, Albion hope to kick off the 2010/11 season in their new home.
The original decision to grant permission, made by John Prescott in 2005, was quashed in the High Court after it was revealed he made a mistake in the wording of the document.
Edith, Rottingdean says...
8:47pm Wed 8 Aug 07
Cap'n Pugwash, Behind Closed Doors says...
9:16pm Wed 8 Aug 07
Drizzlecake, Brighton says...
9:24pm Wed 8 Aug 07
Paul, Brighton Seafront says...
9:31pm Wed 8 Aug 07
Veritas, Sussex says...
9:31pm Wed 8 Aug 07
Paul, Brighton Seafront says...
9:35pm Wed 8 Aug 07
Stevie, Brighton says...
9:47pm Wed 8 Aug 07
stop eating crap, Hove says...
11:03pm Wed 8 Aug 07
Cap'n Pugwash, End of Me Tether says...
11:53pm Wed 8 Aug 07
Drizzlecake wrote:It doesn't matter if they are or are not able to report in an objective and disassociated manner. They had a right to be there but were stopped by a thug on the door.
Possibly when the Argus reporters are able to report in an objective and disassociated manner, rather than being the Falmer Stadiums biggest ra-ra supporter, will they be allowed in.
Sue, Hove says...
6:54am Thu 9 Aug 07
Kit Napier, Hove says...
7:16am Thu 9 Aug 07
Darren, Out on a Limb says...
7:21am Thu 9 Aug 07
Dave, Woolwich says...
7:22am Thu 9 Aug 07
Daniel, A Proper Downland Village says...
8:09am Thu 9 Aug 07
colin, brighton says...
8:48am Thu 9 Aug 07
Paul, West Hoathly says...
8:51am Thu 9 Aug 07
Dave wrote:Dignity in victory? I think BHA have shown the uptmost dignity all through this campaign and so have the majority of supporters, of course you always get one or two idiots but if you are looking for undignified behaviour look no further than the undemocratic coucils that have opposed this stadium.
I am as much for this satdium as anyone you will find, I have said so on here before. But, it looks like we have won now, regardless of any appeal. Can we not show a little dignity in victory. This bullying of Falmer Council, no matter what you think of them, does us no credit at all. We have waited this long, so let them make their decision as any undue pressure may also make them determined to fight longer.
Royster, Southwick says...
8:53am Thu 9 Aug 07
Dave, Hove says...
9:27am Thu 9 Aug 07
Arnold, Brighton says...
9:28am Thu 9 Aug 07
forfars, says...
10:21am Thu 9 Aug 07
darren stuart, Brighton says...
10:40am Thu 9 Aug 07
Arnold wrote:The only reason The Argus was banned (unlawfully) is because they have a lot of clout on this issue, and supports all of our football clubs and other local sports. It's not biased towards the Stadium issue. That's just you being short-sighted, Arnold. It's a local paper, not a rubbish tabloid like the Mail or the Sun. Talk sense.
Hardly a surprise they banned the Argus. The Argus is hardly objective and unbiased, is it? In fact its coverage has been shameful. That's why the real news is how appalling the Argus's behaviour is, nothing to do with the so-called "community" stadium.
Andy R, Hove says...
12:53pm Thu 9 Aug 07
Scorpion, Newhaven says...
1:10pm Thu 9 Aug 07
Cap'n Pugwash, All at Sea says...
2:18pm Thu 9 Aug 07
Arnold wrote:I'll say it again for you Arnold because you obviously aren't paying attention-or is it that you simply cannot stand the truth?
Hardly a surprise they banned the Argus. The Argus is hardly objective and unbiased, is it? In fact its coverage has been shameful. That's why the real news is how appalling the Argus's behaviour is, nothing to do with the so-called "community" stadium.
Cap'n Pugwash, All at Sea says...
2:27pm Thu 9 Aug 07
Sue wrote:Maybe the people on this board are tired of seeing the same old lies being rolled out time after time after time after time after time?
Maybe they were tired of The Argus biased reporting with respect to proposed stadium at Falmer.
Look at the bullying and name calling on this board because someone has dared to say they are not happy with the proposed stadium.
alastair, lewes says...
10:12pm Thu 9 Aug 07
Cap'n Pugwash, All at Sea says...
10:25am Fri 10 Aug 07
alastair wrote:Some very good points raised Alastair. Many of us just want this business to end-FPC are the ones that have been behind ALL of the delays with LDC originally tugging their forelocks towards Cuttress and going along with disgraceful tactics and lies. Thankfully, they can now see they were wrong and have said they will not support any further action. Cuttress and a handful of snobs, however, are still acting with total disregard for everybody, resorting to less than legal actions at council meetings, even resorting to having a thug on the door issuing threats to a member of the press who had every right to attend their meeting.
regardless of whether you want the stadium built or not, secrecy and democracy are incompatible.
falmer council are doing themselves no favours. if they persist with their bad faith approach, they deserve to be hauled before the high court.
personally, i would have preferred waterhall, but at least the football club and many of its supporters have operated with decorum.
i may not like forfars doughnuts and i may not be a big fan of boycotts, but i understand the sentiments of those calling for direct action.
melanie cutress of all people should understand democracy and the rule of law.
if she insists on playing secret squirell, she deserves everything she gets!
Steve Barnard, Woodingdean says...
4:23pm Fri 10 Aug 07
Darren Wilson, Oxford says...
5:06pm Fri 10 Aug 07
Steve Barnard wrote:How, exactly, does that constitute grounds for appeal?
I hope that Falmer Parish Council do decide to appeal against the proposed stadium. It's all very well for so called Albion fans and others to say that the stadium would be good for everybody but they won't have to live with it on their doorstep and be subjected to the increased traffic etc that it will undoubtedly bring to an area that is already subject to very heavy traffic almost every weekend.
Cap'n Pugwash, Back on Land says...
7:24pm Fri 10 Aug 07
Steve Barnard wrote:We are talking about the stadium being used every other weekend with an occasional mid-week game.
I hope that Falmer Parish Council do decide to appeal against the proposed stadium. It's all very well for so called Albion fans and others to say that the stadium would be good for everybody but they won't have to live with it on their doorstep and be subjected to the increased traffic etc that it will undoubtedly bring to an area that is already subject to very heavy traffic almost every weekend.
tadge72, Burgess Hill says...
12:35am Sat 11 Aug 07
Kit Napier wrote:i love the sussex countryside but Falmer is hardly an area of natural beauty! Come on!!!Its a bit of a dump really.
When you have the local rag in bed with Brighton council who both nailed their colours to The Falmer mast its no wonder Falmer Parish council will fight back. Please please oppose this proposed massive eyesore on our beautiful Sussex countryside
Cap'n Pugwash, All at Sea says...
4:37pm Sat 11 Aug 07
Kit Napier wrote:And when you have the Sussex Express in bed with the Parish Council, LDC and all of the crackpot Preservation Societies, it's no wonder Albion fans get annoyed. Please please approve the plans and while we're at it, please concret over the village pond so the Falmer Pond rats don't invade our nice new stadium.
When you have the local rag in bed with Brighton council who both nailed their colours to The Falmer mast its no wonder Falmer Parish council will fight back. Please please oppose this proposed massive eyesore on our beautiful Sussex countryside
Add your comment
Register for a FREE The Argus account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.
Please register now or sign in below to continue.
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Search for Jobs in Brighton, Hove, Lewes, Worthing, Crawley and more...
Search Now »
Find the right person in Brighton, Hove, Lewes, Worthing, Crawley...
Search Now »
Search for Homes in Brighton, Worthing, Hove, Lewes...
Search Now »
Search for Cars in Brighton, Hove, Lewes, Worthing, Crawley...
Search Now »
rob, Mile Oak says...
8:42pm Wed 8 Aug 07