News RSS Feed


PC claims she was tormented by colleagues

6:34am Wednesday 29th August 2007

comment Comments (23)   Have your say »

By Sam Underwood »

A police firearms officer was hounded from her job by sexist cops who poked fun at her breasts and littered the station with topless magazine pictures, a tribunal heard.

PC Barbara Lynford said she was belittled by male colleagues while serving at Gatwick where she was the only woman in a team of 18 men.

And the officer told how she was left so upset by the abuse she has been off sick for more than two years.

The PC described one incident in which she said a colleague told her, "I promise not to look at your chest" after asking her to sit at the front of a classroom.

On a separate occasion a male colleague is alleged to have shouted, "Go on Barbara" as they exercised as a group and stretched their arms out from their chests.

Ms Lynford, 38, from Lewes, was serving as a firearms officer in D Section at Gatwick when the alleged incidents happened.

She told the Brighton tribunal that as the only woman in her section and as someone who was willing to work hard, her male colleagues had singled her out and made her life a misery.

She claims she was called a "daisy" a "whoopsy" and a "lipstick" by male officers and said: "I didn't have a motorbike, I didn't have an Alsatian dog. I was not in their little club. They just didn't want a woman around.

"They couldn't do all their blokey stuff in the van with me there."

She said that lads' magazines such as FHM and Maxim were often left around the station, open at pages showing topless women which she found offensive.

She said: "I felt sick every time I went to work and cried every time I got home."

Ms Lynford told the tribunal that she had wanted to be a police officer since she was a little girl and had written to Sussex Police to ask for a job when she was just ten.

She joined the force in August 1993 serving at Haywards Heath before transferring to Hove.

In August 2002 she moved to Gatwick to work in the firearms unit and was trained to use a self-loading pistol and an MP5 sub-machine gun.

On August 24 2005 she was signed off sick by her GP with work-related stress and prescribed anti-depressants.

Before this, she had only had one day off sick in the previous four years.

She has not returned to duty since and remains on full pay.

Speaking for Sussex Police, barrister Kathleen Donnelly put it to Ms Lynford that her impression of what she alleges to be sexism was affected by her self-doubt about failing two ongoing firearms assessments.

In a statement Ms Lynford told the tribunal: "It was never my intention to bring proceedings but in the end I felt that what had happened to me was wrong and that no other officer should go through what I have experienced.

"I have been fortunate that the Police Federation is supporting me in my case."

Brian Stockholm, the chairman of the Sussex Police Joint Branch Board, said: "It's always sad when we are unable to resolve workplace problems within the organisation and have to come outside to do so.

"Clearly that is a sign of failure."

The hearing continues.

Your Say YourArgus

Me, Shoreham says...
9:15am Wed 29 Aug 07

What sort of woman aspires to be in a Police Tactical Firearms Unit? Surely when putting yourself forward for this type of unit, you must realise it's going to be a 'macho' environment. Still I suppose 2 years off sick on full pay(at taxpayers expense) is good work if you can get it.

steve, Hove says...
9:27am Wed 29 Aug 07

What silly comments by the 1st commentor. Anybody is entitled to work in an environment free from the sort of treatment which seems to have been meted out. Just as important -
I don't think we shouls have a load of macho idiots running around gatwick airport or anywhere else with loded guns - pit them back on traffic duty!

Me, Shoreham says...
12:21pm Wed 29 Aug 07

Silly comments eh? How about men who work in factories where 99% of the work force are women. A friend of mine used to work at the Parker Pen factory and the harassment, groping and sexist comments he endured were every bit as bad as that reported by this policewoman. But who would listen to a man who complained of sexism?

qm, Hove says...
1:22pm Wed 29 Aug 07

Well . . . . did wonder why thy call them pigs . . . as for the Shoreham miscreant . . . . words fail me . . . . no they don't . .. ignorant pig!!

Someone, Hove says...
1:38pm Wed 29 Aug 07

'Me' of Shoreham is absolutely right in my opinion. The silly comments come from 'Steve' and 'qm' who obviously cannot recognise a 'try-on' when they see it. This woman may have had some stress related problem but surely from the nature of her work, and not from the trivial comments she alleges. She is just trying to get compensation and hanging it on the old cliche of male harassment. She elected to work at that type of unit and therefore the maxim 'Volenti non fit injuria' should apply (a willing man suffers no injury. Hence the lame harassment allegation.

Feminist, Brighton says...
1:46pm Wed 29 Aug 07

Someone wrote:
'Me' of Shoreham is absolutely right in my opinion. The silly comments come from 'Steve' and 'qm' who obviously cannot recognise a 'try-on' when they see it. This woman may have had some stress related problem but surely from the nature of her work, and not from the trivial comments she alleges. She is just trying to get compensation and hanging it on the old cliche of male harassment. She elected to work at that type of unit and therefore the maxim 'Volenti non fit injuria' should apply (a willing man suffers no injury. Hence the lame harassment allegation.
I have to agree with 'Someone'. A simply brilliant riposte.

Jus, says...
1:59pm Wed 29 Aug 07

work is like being at school in so many respects... no matter what the profession - building site/office/police, there's no difference - banter is meted out on a daily basis, those who don't take it well and dish it out again in equal measure are seen as easy prey... and can be hounded out.. any workplace requires the personalities to get on with each other, it's a subtle chemistry at play... the natural tendency for the 'majority' is for equilibrium to be maintained - however as one woman in a presominantly male environment, (same would apply in reverse) the odds were stacked against her from the start... if she could have seen this coming maybe a transfer request may have been the best course of action...

Andy R, Hove says...
2:19pm Wed 29 Aug 07

You do have to wonder why the Argus has put an ongoing case out for comment on the basis of one brief report. Predictably every male chauvanist relic has been drawn out of the woodwork to comment upon that of which they know nothing. Must be a Latin phrase for that as well.......

Dibble, Hove says...
3:20pm Wed 29 Aug 07

It does seem strange that it took her 4 years to come to the conclusion that she doesn't like working in a male-oriented environment... just after failing her exams.
The trouble is that if she loses this case, it will set back people's attitudes towards genuine cases of sexism by several years. Way to go, Barbara.

Dibble, Hove says...
3:22pm Wed 29 Aug 07

I meant 14 years, not 4.

Nick, Brighton says...
4:14pm Wed 29 Aug 07

She claims she was called a "daisy" a "whoopsy" and a "lipstick" .... How ridiculous. How about,a 'Rosser', 'Plod', 'Pig' or 'Filth'..?

bob, lewes says...
4:17pm Wed 29 Aug 07

If the allegations are true then why was she not moved to a different area of teh forcein the interim, at least she could continue to work whilst being paid. Instead we are all paying for her paid leave whilst she does nothing..

Me, Shoreham says...
4:59pm Wed 29 Aug 07

qm wrote:
Well . . . . did wonder why thy call them pigs . . . as for the Shoreham miscreant . . . . words fail me . . . . no they don\'t . .. ignorant pig!!
Micreant, ignorant pig. Hmmmm, seems like you're in the minority with those well informed little gems of yours.

acab, acab says...
7:08pm Wed 29 Aug 07

acab

expc, says...
10:12pm Wed 29 Aug 07

this was an officer without one day sick in 5 years, how many of us can say that... do you not think something happened to change this excellent record... ignorant comments based on so little evidence and knowledge should perhaps be kept to one's self.

sam, brighton says...
12:45am Thu 30 Aug 07

Andy R wrote:
You do have to wonder why the Argus has put an ongoing case out for comment on the basis of one brief report. Predictably every male chauvanist relic has been drawn out of the woodwork to comment upon that of which they know nothing. Must be a Latin phrase for that as well.......
presumably the argus believes in the concept of free speech - thevery same free speech you have chosen to exercise.

Andy R, Hove says...
8:33am Thu 30 Aug 07

The difference of course being that I have not commented upon the merits of this case because I know nothing about it.

My point was that the Argus does not generally invite comment on these sorts of proceedings until they have concluded.

"Free speech" doesn't come into it. It's about protecting the interests of the parties concerned.

Violetta, Brighton says...
6:16pm Thu 30 Aug 07

The commentors above seem not to be able to imagine what it is like to be in an environment where you are harrassed by everyone around you on a daily basis.
Whether you support the work of the anti-terror police or not, you will have to admit that it is a difficult job, and to have your workmates abusing you in this manner will grind even the strongest person down in the end.
As the only woman in the unit it's obvious that she is a strong woman, and standing up against these bullies must be terribly difficult.
I hope that she is successful in making the lowlifes that disrespected her pay.

pc plod, Hove says...
11:09am Fri 31 Aug 07

What about the Pink Policeman , how much grief do you think he or she gets snide marks her and there and all the other little presents left !!!

HF99, Lewes says...
8:54pm Fri 31 Aug 07

Everybody prejudging... Lets just wait and see, I hope this dedicated officer gets a fair crack at the whip.

Im sure that justice will prevail.


MC, Lewes says...
3:52pm Sat 1 Sep 07

This woman is just after a payout. She cannot handle the fact that she was useless at the job so she has to bring everyone else down with her.

SJH, Australia says...
1:46pm Wed 5 Sep 07

A shame that The Argus doesn't go into greater detail about the WPC. The fact that MS Lynford is an outstanding officer, has dealt with things that most people couldn't deal with in a lifetime. Very easy to suppose that she is trying to get money - I am quite sure that she would rather be at work doing a job that she was excellent at.

D Hill, Milton Keynes says...
3:53pm Wed 28 Nov 07

What an over sensitive silly cow! When will these people grow up and stop trying to lay blame where there is none. She cannot handle a bit of banter from the lads! Worse case she gets a new job, but has she never heard of a transfer?

Your sayYourArgus

comment Add your comment

Register for a FREE The Argus account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in below to continue.




Forgotten your password?

Hot Jobs

Local Services


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Sponsored Adverts