Worthing and Adur councillors to get iPads

Councillors could get iPads at a cost to the taxpayer of more than £20,000.

Members representing areas on Worthing Borough Council and Adur District Council could soon be accessing town hall agendas and planning papers from tablet computers as part of a widespread plan to go “paper-free”.

iPads, which are designed for people to read documents, watch videos and access the internet while on the move, are favoured by technology geeks and youngsters.

But town hall bosses claim the move, which it believes will save money on paper and postage costs, is essential to meet the “desire for a portable office”.

Adur District Council leader Neil Parkin said: “If it’s saving money I should think the taxpayers will be pleased.

“The police have done something similar and they think it will save them over £1 million.”

Worthing council leader Paul Yallop said some agendas were more than 200 pages long.

He added: “I can understand that people will have their concerns but it’s important this is not seen as some kind of junket. They will be encrypted so they can only be used for council business.

“If it’s helping our green credentials then that’s even better.”

From February, all 66 members on the two local authorities will be given the chance to get either a laptop computer and bag or an iPad. Both will be Wi-Fi enabled so the councillors can access the internet in the council chamber but will not have access to 3G.

However the local authority admitted iPads are not as secure as laptops because information cannot be encrypted.

The council said a laptop with a case would cost £450 compared to £290 for an iPad.

This will increase to £320 if it is an iPad3, the latest model to be released by Apple. It claims the maximum cost will be about £27,000 for both councils combined.

However there are no details on how much it would save the local authorities.

Sarah Gobey, the executive head of financial services for Adur and Worthing councils, said: “It is important to appreciate that it is important for members to have access to new technology to perform their duties.”

A decision will be made at the council’s joint strategic committee in Worthing Town Hall on Thursday.

Some Brighton and Hove councillors use iPads in the council chamber although these are paid for by themselves.

Comments(12)

Fight_Back says...
10:51am Tue 23 Oct 12

As the iPad can't be encrypted then they shouldn't be used for council business regardless of price. Can't wait for the first story to appear about a councillor losing an iPad and the contents being published in the press !!!!! As usual, local council employees and councillors jumping on the bandwagon without understanding the risks.

Spanners says...
11:14am Tue 23 Oct 12

Fight_Back wrote:
As the iPad can't be encrypted then they shouldn't be used for council business regardless of price. Can't wait for the first story to appear about a councillor losing an iPad and the contents being published in the press !!!!! As usual, local council employees and councillors jumping on the bandwagon without understanding the risks.
sorry - this is not quite true. We use them at work and they can be passwordprotected. Not only that each PDF can be password protected and encrypted. Finally the IT guys have a remote wipe tool in event of loss

All protection is breakable if a person is both skilled and determined enough but to say an ipad cannot be protected isnt really true

rfairweather@tiscali.co.uk says...
11:29am Tue 23 Oct 12

Why? when care services are being cut and we are all being told to tighten our belts should taxpayer's money be squandered on ipads - I'm sure most councillors, with their featherbedded expense accounts, could afford to buy their own. I suppose they all voted for this perk without asking taxpayers for their comments / permission first. It seems to me that if you are in government, be it local or national, those in power take the rest of us for idiots who are prepared to allow the criminal misuse of public money.

Fight_Back says...
11:32am Tue 23 Oct 12

Spanners wrote:
Fight_Back wrote:
As the iPad can't be encrypted then they shouldn't be used for council business regardless of price. Can't wait for the first story to appear about a councillor losing an iPad and the contents being published in the press !!!!! As usual, local council employees and councillors jumping on the bandwagon without understanding the risks.
sorry - this is not quite true. We use them at work and they can be passwordprotected. Not only that each PDF can be password protected and encrypted. Finally the IT guys have a remote wipe tool in event of loss

All protection is breakable if a person is both skilled and determined enough but to say an ipad cannot be protected isnt really true
The point is that the hard disk of an iPad can't be encrypted like a PC one. This means it's very easy to remove data from, even if the device itself is password protected.

These devices will hold council data and that data should be protected to government guidelines and that means encryption for mobile devices.

Spanners says...
12:23pm Tue 23 Oct 12

Fight_Back wrote:
Spanners wrote:
Fight_Back wrote: As the iPad can't be encrypted then they shouldn't be used for council business regardless of price. Can't wait for the first story to appear about a councillor losing an iPad and the contents being published in the press !!!!! As usual, local council employees and councillors jumping on the bandwagon without understanding the risks.
sorry - this is not quite true. We use them at work and they can be passwordprotected. Not only that each PDF can be password protected and encrypted. Finally the IT guys have a remote wipe tool in event of loss All protection is breakable if a person is both skilled and determined enough but to say an ipad cannot be protected isnt really true
The point is that the hard disk of an iPad can't be encrypted like a PC one. This means it's very easy to remove data from, even if the device itself is password protected. These devices will hold council data and that data should be protected to government guidelines and that means encryption for mobile devices.
you are half right - the hard drive cant be encrypted wholesale but each document can be both encrypted and password protected. On top of password protection for the device itself

Fight_Back says...
12:32pm Tue 23 Oct 12

Spanners wrote:
Fight_Back wrote:
Spanners wrote:
Fight_Back wrote: As the iPad can't be encrypted then they shouldn't be used for council business regardless of price. Can't wait for the first story to appear about a councillor losing an iPad and the contents being published in the press !!!!! As usual, local council employees and councillors jumping on the bandwagon without understanding the risks.
sorry - this is not quite true. We use them at work and they can be passwordprotected. Not only that each PDF can be password protected and encrypted. Finally the IT guys have a remote wipe tool in event of loss All protection is breakable if a person is both skilled and determined enough but to say an ipad cannot be protected isnt really true
The point is that the hard disk of an iPad can't be encrypted like a PC one. This means it's very easy to remove data from, even if the device itself is password protected. These devices will hold council data and that data should be protected to government guidelines and that means encryption for mobile devices.
you are half right - the hard drive cant be encrypted wholesale but each document can be both encrypted and password protected. On top of password protection for the device itself
Quite possibly but do you really think EVERY councillor will encrypt and password protect EVERY document they hold on their iPad ?

PorkBoat says...
12:38pm Tue 23 Oct 12

I've already written a headline for 6 months in the future. "Councillor suspended for downloading **** during council meetings"

Wiggsy says...
1:06pm Tue 23 Oct 12

rfairweather@tiscali
.co.uk
wrote:
Why? when care services are being cut and we are all being told to tighten our belts should taxpayer's money be squandered on ipads - I'm sure most councillors, with their featherbedded expense accounts, could afford to buy their own. I suppose they all voted for this perk without asking taxpayers for their comments / permission first. It seems to me that if you are in government, be it local or national, those in power take the rest of us for idiots who are prepared to allow the criminal misuse of public money.
Per article "A decision will be made at the council’s joint strategic committee in Worthing Town Hall on Thursday."

So not done and dusted........though I'm sure it will!

However, it would have been useful to have the statistics on how much paper is being used on an annual basis and at what cost in order to see how long it'd take for the savings benefit to kick in.

jimbobmaginty says...
1:07pm Tue 23 Oct 12

Don’t agree with this. Cheaper alternatives are available that have more features than the IPAD. Again the local council wasting money!

Morpheus says...
10:53pm Tue 23 Oct 12

Don't they all have computers at our expense already?

secretsanta1960 says...
1:53am Wed 24 Oct 12

Clueless as always. I bet they haven't even discussed this with their IT department because they would advise them it's a bad idea & will be more expensive not cheaper. We had similar issues in our company, but being the IT department we are, we said no. They aren't secure (the encryption isn't proper encryption). The remote wipe would require 3G (more expense) if it's just over the net then it will stay off the grind, be jail broken and the remote wipe deactivated. Wrapping it in tin foil then removing the 3G SIM would stop a 3G remote wipe. The software it would require to manage the devices would also need to be taken into account on price. They don't like Windows domains, can't be easily managed, can't be easily audited and being popular are a big target for theft.

If they are locked down, expect a councillor to complain they want it unlocked. Guarantee they won't just use them for council work.

If it's just for meetings a cheaper notebook would do. Not only that but surely they already have IT kit, laptops which they can view the 200 page PDFs on.

Some people just want toys to play with and to **** away £20k yet still getting rid of staff.

Fairfax Sakes says...
1:21pm Wed 24 Oct 12

I would like to see what analysis the council has done to asess it is "saving money" -I'm positive it is flimsy and innacurate at best! As for Sarah Gobey claiming it is "important to have access to new technology"...on what basis is it important?? I wonder how many pot holes fixed or meals for the homeless £20000 would allow...
It boils down to the age old problem that spending other people's money is easy. The council doesnt care, who can make them? The councillors? Talk about turkeys voting for christmas...

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree