Brighton's Palace Pier is off the market

Brighton's Palace Pier is off the market Brighton's Palace Pier is off the market

Brighton's Palace Pier has been taken off the market after 16 fruitless months for sale.

The decision by owners Noble Organisation effectively ends chances of the Grade II listed structure reverting to its historic name, the Palace Pier.

The Argus reported in January this year that there had been no serious potential bidders since it was first marketed in June 2011.

But David Biesterfield, of group development director at Noble, said they had received a “huge amount of interest and a number of substantial offers.” However, he said the pier was now part of a new company strategy and had therefore been taken off the market.

And Mr Biesterfield said it meant the old Palace Pier name, which is still used by many locals and The Argus, will remain consigned to history.

He said: “It is known throughout the world as Brighton Pier.

“I know how strongly some people feel about it but we have to appeal beyond the parochial market.”

Tourist attraction

The pier has enjoyed a good year despite the bad weather this summer, according to Mr Biesterfield.

It has seen an increase of 50% in filming and functions from TV pilots to adverts for PlayStation and Doritos. And it has held functions for Sony and Apple, the latter saying it was their favourite venue.

Some £35million has been invested in the pier since the Noble Organisation took control in 1984.

Mr Biesterfield said it was looking to invest further in retail outlets on the historic structure.

He added: “We are always looking to refresh and improve ourselves.”

Work started on the construction of the 1,760ft (533.3m) pier in 1891 at a cost of £27,000 and it was officially opened in May 1899.

In May 1940 part was dismantled as it was seen as being of potential use to forces invading from the sea.

During a storm in 1973, the pier was damaged by a barge and it suffered limited damage in a fire in 2003.

At the height of the tourist season, the pier, one of the south coast’s most famous landmarks, employs about 300 people.

See the latest news headlines from The Argus:

More news from The Argus

Follow @brightonargus

Daily Echo on Facebook - facebook.com/southerndailyecho Like us on Facebook

Google+ Add us to your circles on Google+

Comments(7)

Dealing with idiots says...
11:01am Fri 26 Oct 12

We want the theatre back as was promised by the Noble organisation when they took over. Did'nt think they owned the pier but leased it? Please correct me if I am wrong.

leobrighton says...
11:50am Fri 26 Oct 12

Mr. Biesterfield is absolutely right about the name. This company have made a great success of the pier and its in good hands

gmgc81 says...
12:27pm Fri 26 Oct 12

Biesterfield should realise word of mouth is a powerful tool. "Brighton Pier" is Palace Pier to Brightonians as "Sports Direct Arena" is St. James' Park is to Geordies. CHANGE THE NAME BACK!

Fight_Back says...
12:34pm Fri 26 Oct 12

Mr Biesterfield clearly doesn't think his customers are intelligent enough to understand that the Palace Pier is in Brighton then. Using his bizarre logic we should rename Buckingham Palace to London Palace just so people know where it is.

As someone else has pointed out, Noble should be forced to rebuild the theatre. Indeed The Argus should have asked him about it.

Flippin Burghers says...
12:45pm Fri 26 Oct 12

You lot can say what you like, it won't make any difference. You're parochial according to Mr Biesterfield

Uncle_Meat says...
2:47pm Fri 26 Oct 12

How are those terrible bunch of crooks still allowed to run (and ruin) the Palace Pier? I'm not surprised they insist on calling it the Brighton Pier after the various acts of vandalism on the West Pier have all but destroyed it. I wonder if they know anything about the culprits?!
If this council had any backbone they would fine Nobels for the amount of damage they have done to a LISTED building.

Cash Cow says...
4:41pm Sat 27 Oct 12

I am delighted the Argus insist on calling it the Palace Pier, because that is what it is called, always has been and always will. It really irritates me that people buy there way into this "town" thinking the rich heritage is theirs to do with as they please. Imagine how Brightonians would feel, if for example, a powerful French organisation bought the Royal Pavillion then changed the name to something ridiculous like "Ecovert House"!

Perhaps the Argus could also run a story explaining there are no such places as The North Lanes or The South Lanes in Brighton, although for a couple of centuries at least we have wonderful historic areas called The Lanes and North Laine.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree