Why have road deaths shot up across Brighton and Hove? (From The Argus)
Get involved: Send your news, views, pictures and video by texting SUPIC to 80360 or email us.
Why have road deaths shot up across Brighton and Hove?
2:30pm Tuesday 13th November 2012 in News By Emily Walker, Chief Reporter
Sussex Police attend an accident in Bates Road, Brighton, in October
The number of people killed or seriously injured on the roads of Brighton and Hove soared last year, but officials do not know why.
The latest figures from the Department for Transport show that the city bucked the national trend of a reduction in the number of serious crashes.
Overall in England and Wales the number of people killed or seriously injured in crashes fell by 2% in 2011.
But Brighton and Hove saw a 26% increase.
Across Sussex, 5,240 people were injured in traffic accidents in 2011, of whom 70 were killed.
Brighton and Hove suffered 1,106 casualties, the highest of any council area in the county.
There were 172 people killed or seriously injured in accidents in the city, including 16 children.
In total, six people died on the roads in Brighton and Hove during the year, slightly less than the average each year from 2005 to 2009.
Sussex Safer Roads, the police and council partnership set up to reduce accidents, said it could find no clear explanation for the rise and that it was most likely an “unfortunate year”.
It stressed that although the number of people killed or seriously injured had risen, overall accident levels had fallen.
Reduction this year
A spokesman for the partnership said: “There are no clear-cut reasons for the increase.
“We are fortunate in that Brighton and Hove sees relatively low casualty numbers, compared to the size of population, both residential and visiting, and traffic on the roads.
“However we will continue to enforce and educate as appropriate |to bring the number of people killed or seriously injured on the roads down.”
He added that figures for this year appear to show a reduction compared to 2011.
Mid Sussex had the second highest number of children seriously injured on the roads, but its total of eight was half that of Brighton and Hove.
There were 8.4 crashes per 1,000 licensed vehicles in the city compared to a rate of less than half that across East and West Sussex.
A quarter of accidents in East Sussex took place on wet or flooded roads but just a tiny proportion of accidents across the county took place on snowy and icy roads.
Across Sussex 70 people died on the roads during the year.
Traffic police described June 2011 as the bloodiest month on the county’s roads for five years, with 13 deaths during the month.
See the latest news headlines from The Argus:
- Political coup to oust Brighton and Hove council leader fails
- Open day at well-being centre in Hove
- Sussex Boat owners urged to carry out safety checks
- Sussex mum of eight guilty of £350,000 benefit fraud
- Plans for rooftop gardens in Brighton and Hove
Add us to your circles on Google+
Comments(36)
CharlotteP
says...
2:48pm Tue 13 Nov 12
Crystal Ball
says...
2:54pm Tue 13 Nov 12
Natural selection of the human race really.
StyleCop
says...
3:00pm Tue 13 Nov 12
I often hear/see cars and motorcycles hammering it down my street doing excessive speeds - it's simply unecessary - all it is is thrill seeking, willy waving, idiots who think they have a god given right to be so ignorant of other citizens...
I'm sure deaths mostly occur due to this kind of incompetent driving...
I'd call for nationwide 20mph within urban areas.
At that speed drivers get where they want to go reasonably quickly, pedestrians are safer and can cross (pretty much anywhere) without fear of being mown down, decent cyclists can keep up with traffic putting them on equal footing...
No brainer if you ask me.
The faster you go in a car the more stressfull it is. I used to be one of those thrill seeking idiots I mention - I've chilled out and driving is a much more pleasurable experience - I give way to as many as I can, leave nice big gaps, for others to pull in to, or pedestrians to cross in front of me, I'll always allow pedestrians to cross if appropriate and keep my speed down to 20/30 when it's not a hindrance to other road users...
You should try it...
And for those who whine about not being able to get to where they want to be fast... trust me - in a city this big, I can cycle quicker from one side to the other than you can in a car...
Gary Baldy
says...
3:07pm Tue 13 Nov 12
bogs
says...
3:28pm Tue 13 Nov 12
ruberducker
says...
3:35pm Tue 13 Nov 12
accidents involving car with car or is it the im sorry im stupid,i didnt see you"i was not looking"before i just walked in the road,"im on a bike so i super human powers that prevent me from being squashed"so i can take on all traffic and lights are just for "the others"
stlyle cop:il take on your bet, you on your non insured/untaxed bike--and me in a taxi.
RickH
says...
3:42pm Tue 13 Nov 12
SGK2000
says...
3:44pm Tue 13 Nov 12
Then there are those who jump off a bus then cross right ionfront of it, out into the road where any overtaking car could not see them.
Whatever happened to road safety education.?
leedsnowfan
says...
3:47pm Tue 13 Nov 12
ruberducker
says...
3:54pm Tue 13 Nov 12
leedsnowfan wrote:its called the green cross code!
I really do apologise if Ive missed this important fact, but does this just include vehicle v vehicle collisons or vehicle v pedestrian / cyclist etc too?? If the cause of the increase is poor road awareness by pedestrians etc then surely something can be done???
stop,look,listen.
or it could be your last mistake.
Algeria Touchshriek
says...
3:58pm Tue 13 Nov 12
1. Too many PCSOs and not enough proper cops
2. Too much cheap drink available (affecting both driver and pedestrian)
3. Drugs (same as above)
4. Too many cyclists due to the Greens hatred of anything mildly car-like
5. Inconsiderate parkers
6. Too many loose dogs on the roads due to the Greens hatred of working people and love of travelers.
7. Too many loose children on the roads due to the Greens hatred of normal parenting.
Rectify the above and we will save lives. Keep the snot-Greens in and you will murder more children.
Your choice.
SGK2000
says...
4:09pm Tue 13 Nov 12
hovian
says...
4:28pm Tue 13 Nov 12
Andy R
says...
4:35pm Tue 13 Nov 12
Algeria Touchshriek wrote:Were you dropped on your head as a baby?
Why has this increased in Brighton (in no particular order) 1. Too many PCSOs and not enough proper cops 2. Too much cheap drink available (affecting both driver and pedestrian) 3. Drugs (same as above) 4. Too many cyclists due to the Greens hatred of anything mildly car-like 5. Inconsiderate parkers 6. Too many loose dogs on the roads due to the Greens hatred of working people and love of travelers. 7. Too many loose children on the roads due to the Greens hatred of normal parenting. Rectify the above and we will save lives. Keep the snot-Greens in and you will murder more children. Your choice.
brighton6
says...
4:39pm Tue 13 Nov 12
All lefties Smell
says...
4:51pm Tue 13 Nov 12
JollyRoger
says...
5:03pm Tue 13 Nov 12
Phani Tikkala
says...
5:26pm Tue 13 Nov 12
ft.gov.uk/statistics
/releases/road-accid
ents-and-safety-annu
al-report-2011/rrcgb
2011-04.pdf
"Failed to look properly" reported in 42% of all accidents reported to police (most frequently reported contributory factor);
"Loss of control" the reason for 34% of fatal accidents (most frequently
reported contributory factor);
"Pedestrian failed to look properly" reported in 59% of accidents where a pedestrian was injured of killed;
"Pedestrian careless, reckless or in a hurry" reported in 25% of accidents where a pedestrian was injured or killed;
"Exceeding the speed limit" reported in 5% of accidents, accounting for 14% of fatalities
"Exceeding the speed limit" or "travelling too fast for the conditions" reported in 12% of accidents, accounting for 25% of fatalities
Fight_Back
says...
5:34pm Tue 13 Nov 12
Get the councillors and employees wizzing around purposely knocking people down and all of a sudden people will want more 20mph zones and cycle lanes.
funkyyoyo
says...
5:48pm Tue 13 Nov 12
fredflintstone1
says...
6:17pm Tue 13 Nov 12
Plus they're allowed out to roam the streets at lunchtimes and end up in trouble, larking around on the streets - as per the case of the photo illustrating this article.
Thirdly, the major contributing factor is the lack of road safety training of cyclists. All road-users should be compelled to pass a test, before being allowed on the roads.This should include cyclists.
nocando
says...
6:35pm Tue 13 Nov 12
I'd put it all down to people not looking where they're going...stupidity basically.
davyboy
says...
7:04pm Tue 13 Nov 12
inadaptado
says...
8:40pm Tue 13 Nov 12
fredflintstone1 wrote:Because passing a test has made all motorists good drivers, right?
Why? Firstly,because children have no respect of the dangers of roads, and just walk out in front of cars coming towards them, expecting them to stop - you can see it every day of the week on the Ditchling Road as groups come out of Varndean.
Plus they're allowed out to roam the streets at lunchtimes and end up in trouble, larking around on the streets - as per the case of the photo illustrating this article.
Thirdly, the major contributing factor is the lack of road safety training of cyclists. All road-users should be compelled to pass a test, before being allowed on the roads.This should include cyclists.
Maxwell's Ghost
says...
8:59pm Tue 13 Nov 12
There are also mobile phones and Ipods.
More distractions, more accidents.
I wonder if the availability and widespread use are linked to the increase in accidents.
Take it Personally
says...
9:34pm Tue 13 Nov 12
BenUk
says...
2:14am Wed 14 Nov 12
BenUk
says...
4:08am Wed 14 Nov 12
Cash Cow
says...
4:49am Wed 14 Nov 12
Tailgaters Anonymous
says...
7:59am Wed 14 Nov 12
Example - 6 months to create a roundabout on A272 east of Haywards Heath at the top of the southern relief road that connects to nowhere currently.
Oh, and by the way, the bridge over the London - Brighton line hasn't even reached planning stage!!
I rest my case.
Nosfaratu
says...
9:43am Wed 14 Nov 12
hovian wrote:Late reply, but I have to agree. As a casual pedestrian I have found it strange that these new lights are not user friendly.
Could it be anything to do with the new style traffic signals where there is no longer a green man lantern facing you to tell you when to cross the road? This council is doggedly installing these new signals all over the city claiming they REDUCE accidents... hmmm. Wonder how that works? Despite the fact that nowhere in mainland Europe or America do you see this type of signal - this arrogant council insists they are safer. The way of using these lights is totally counter-intuitive and you can see people looking all over the place at these crossings to see if it is safe to cross. Once you start to cross the road you have no way of knowing if the light has changed...these crossings are accidents waiting to happen...but of course the highways department knows best....
whereisthe...?
says...
10:05am Wed 14 Nov 12
Nosfaratu
says...
11:58am Wed 14 Nov 12
Cash Cow wrote:'Vlad', not our 'Vlad'. I was just a hobby.
If, when turning right, I knocked over and killed every pedestrian who saw me coming, but just decided they would cross in front of me anyway, then I would be responsible for more deaths than Adolf Hitler, Vlad the Impaler and Tony Blair combined.
StyleCop
says...
12:48pm Wed 14 Nov 12
But based on these stats, the focus needs to be on pedestrians surely!? - The green cross code, STOP LOOK & LISTEN... drummed into us in the 70's - I don't recall the last time I saw such infomercial?
thevoiceoftruth
says...
3:33pm Fri 16 Nov 12
Ray b says...
2:46pm Tue 13 Nov 12