Brighton hospital staff threaten to walk out over potential job losses

Royal Sussex County Hospital in Brighton Royal Sussex County Hospital in Brighton

Hundreds of hospital workers could stage a walk out next month in a row over potential job losses.

Ballot papers are expected to be sent out just after Christmas to catering, cleaning, portering and maintenance workers at Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust.

Private company Sodexo took over the contract for providing the non-clinical services on December 1.

Around 700 staff are employed by the company to provide the services at the Royal Sussex County Hospital in Brighton and Princess Royal Hospital in Haywards Heath.

Sodexo has launched a 30-day consultation with staff as part of changes to its workforce.

The GMB union says this could lead to the loss of up to 96 jobs as well as changes to rotas and working hours which could force more employees to leave.

It is calling for the consultation to be extended to 90 days and is balloting its 300 members who work for Sodexo.

If members vote for industrial action, a strike could take place by as early as the middle of January.

GMB regional organiser Gary Palmer said: “Sodexo’s decision to engage in redundancy consultations is devastating news for services and staff, particularly over the Christmas period.

“We are calling on Sodexo to withdraw their 30 day consultation and to come back to the table for tripartite discussions with GMB and Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals Trust to see if a resolution to this situation can be found.”

Wide disruption

Sodexo’s four year contract, worth £15million a year, is one of the largest of its kind issued this year.

If strike action does go ahead, the trust will be expecting Sodexo to provide enough cover.

Services that could potentially be disrupted include catering, cleaning and collecting blood samples.

A Sodexo spokesman said: “We can confirm that we are in consultation with union representatives following a staffing review.

“No definite decisions have been made and none will be made until that consultation is completed, but our intention is to explore every option available to minimise any potential redundancies.

“We appreciate that this is a difficult time with the holiday period approaching, but unfortunately the timing is unavoidable as our contract began this month and must be operating optimally as soon as possible.

“We understand that the GMB has expressed concern that patient safety will be put at risk, however, patient safety is our number one priority and we are working hard to ensure that services are not only maintained but improved.”

See the latest news headlines from The Argus:

More news from The Argus

Follow @brightonargus

Daily Echo on Facebook - facebook.com/southerndailyecho Like us on Facebook

Google+ Add us to your circles on Google+

Comments(19)

Fairfax Sakes says...
3:31pm Wed 19 Dec 12

Go ahead and walk out, but dont come back. There's plenty of people desperate to get work who will be happy to take their place.

Fairfax Sakes says...
3:32pm Wed 19 Dec 12

Go ahead and walk out, but dont come back. There's plenty of people desperate to get work who will be happy to take their place.

John Steed says...
4:02pm Wed 19 Dec 12

go on strike, no shortage of reliable migrant workers who will work for minimum wage and be pleased to have a job. judging by previous comments about the poor standards overseen by current staff the best thing that could happen is get shot of the lot of them and start again with a clean sheet and new staff who will take pride in what they do. meanwhile I assume that all relevant managers fron the nhs trust wil be made redundant with a nice big payoff as a reward for achiving such low standards

single mum says...
6:42pm Wed 19 Dec 12

John Steed wrote:
go on strike, no shortage of reliable migrant workers who will work for minimum wage and be pleased to have a job. judging by previous comments about the poor standards overseen by current staff the best thing that could happen is get shot of the lot of them and start again with a clean sheet and new staff who will take pride in what they do. meanwhile I assume that all relevant managers fron the nhs trust wil be made redundant with a nice big payoff as a reward for achiving such low standards
most of the staff are already migrant workers......!!!!!!

Morpheus says...
7:09pm Wed 19 Dec 12

This shows how the unions fail everybody. When strikes cause problems for the people that the strikers are paid to serve then something is wrong. The unions have to negotiate. Strikes never produce good results for anybody.

Serf says...
7:17pm Wed 19 Dec 12

Morpheus wrote:
This shows how the unions fail everybody. When strikes cause problems for the people that the strikers are paid to serve then something is wrong. The unions have to negotiate. Strikes never produce good results for anybody.
And if the employer does not want to negotiate ?

qm says...
7:37pm Wed 19 Dec 12

An awful lot of opinionated ignorance on the loose today . . . . . . might be a bit different if you understood how overworked, under-resourced and badly managed they are - therein lie the problems with inefficiency and the spread of nasties!!!

Serf says...
7:39pm Wed 19 Dec 12

qm wrote:
An awful lot of opinionated ignorance on the loose today . . . . . . might be a bit different if you understood how overworked, under-resourced and badly managed they are - therein lie the problems with inefficiency and the spread of nasties!!!
Well said !

Maxwell's Ghost says...
8:28pm Wed 19 Dec 12

Every job lost is another person claiming benefit, housing benefit and other freebies, so as a tax payer I would rather people stay in jobs not claim benefits and also pay tax.
A double benefit.
However, as some people above state, we could just put migrants in the jobs and then keep the British sat at home claiming freebies then moan about mirgants taking jobs.

HJarrs says...
9:10pm Wed 19 Dec 12

I have to laugh at the union knockers. ALL your rights are the result of the struggle of ordinary people against the powerful, much of which was achieved by members of trade unions. As trade unions have been weakened, so have we raced to the bottom in terms of conditions and wages. Many people today reading this should be worried by the goings on in the hospital and by the reduction of the consultation periods for redundancy announced today. You can be the victim of a gungho manager at any time now. No job security and few alternative jobs doesn't make for a happy life.

Spurs1 says...
9:12pm Wed 19 Dec 12

Again, why do you give this GMB person any sort of publicity. He, and they, are completely useless. The ignorant comments on here about the workers are offensive and borderline racist. I work there, am English, like many there, and we are all sick of this unions scaremongering at every opportunity. I don't know one person in the GMB at work that has anything good to say about them. Stop printing his ramblings and report the facts as they happen. I thought that is what journalists were SUPPOSED to do. Thanks.

fredaj says...
10:14pm Wed 19 Dec 12

Maxwell's Ghost wrote:
Every job lost is another person claiming benefit, housing benefit and other freebies, so as a tax payer I would rather people stay in jobs not claim benefits and also pay tax.
A double benefit.
However, as some people above state, we could just put migrants in the jobs and then keep the British sat at home claiming freebies then moan about mirgants taking jobs.
Public sector workers do not add to the economy by paying tax because they are paid out of taxes.

And if they receive less in benefits than they received in wages, that is a net gain to the tax payer.

I am not passing judgement or assigning worth - just explaining how it is.

Maxwell's Ghost says...
11:12pm Wed 19 Dec 12

You will find that these jobs are usually low paid so the likelihood is that they will receive more benefits than pay so may be better off out if work financially but workmis not just bout pay. Also it's proven that long term unemployed people suffer more health and mental health issues than those in work so also add to the NHS budget.
Applauding job losses is a strange attitude to take particularly when companies pay low wages and then get their staff to claim working tax benefits and housing benefit etc so tax payers end up supporting companies making vast profits many based overseas also not paying full tax.
That's no different to the public sector
Being paid from taxes.

Achoo! says...
6:27am Thu 20 Dec 12

No, this is a private sector company. Sorry.

Maxwell's Ghost says...
6:40am Thu 20 Dec 12

I find it odd that people applaud job losses. Managing poor performers out of jobs and replacing them with better ones, yes, but applauding and cheering jobs being axed is a strange attitude.
Do you remember when we closed the UK coal mines down and some people cheered at the job losses.
A few years after that we were importing coal and gas from abroad and now being held to financial ransome by these countries.
Beware of what you wish for.

HJarrs says...
8:04am Thu 20 Dec 12

fredaj wrote:
Maxwell's Ghost wrote:
Every job lost is another person claiming benefit, housing benefit and other freebies, so as a tax payer I would rather people stay in jobs not claim benefits and also pay tax.
A double benefit.
However, as some people above state, we could just put migrants in the jobs and then keep the British sat at home claiming freebies then moan about mirgants taking jobs.
Public sector workers do not add to the economy by paying tax because they are paid out of taxes.

And if they receive less in benefits than they received in wages, that is a net gain to the tax payer.

I am not passing judgement or assigning worth - just explaining how it is.
Maxwell is on the money with this and as to what does and doesn't generate revenue is far more complex then public or private sector. From your line of reasoning the staff transfered to Sodexo were a burden on the tax payer until 1st December, there transfer suddenly made them contributers to the economy. Take mining coal as another example, was this a drain on the public purse suddenly to magically become a contributer upon privitisation? I think not.

Spurs1 says...
8:07am Thu 20 Dec 12

Most of the staff transferred to Sodexo from a company called ISS, not the NHS.

Fight_Back says...
9:16am Thu 20 Dec 12

WOW !!!!! There's some ignorant ivory tower dwellers on this thread !

I'm guessing not one of them has worked for a big government outsourcer ? You know, the ones that just slash and burn such as G4S and Capita. It's awful and they treat staff like poo.

I'm no fan of the Unions but companies such Sodexo and Capita don't care about either their workers or the service they deliver to their customers. They cynically use the law to ensure they can get their way. Look at how Sodexo have picked a number just below 100 redundancies - it's so they only have to consult for 30 days instead of 90. Hands up any of those on this thread who think they could currently find a new job in 30 days - virtually impossible.

The Unions should fight tooth and nail on this one - and I bet a couple of posters on here would never expect me to type that !

Tailgaters Anonymous says...
9:20am Thu 20 Dec 12

Perhaps the Argus will follow up with a FOI request to find how many management roles have disappeared and with what savings!
Ward/patient contact workers always seem to face the pressure of cuts and never the carpet-baggers at the most senior level!!

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree