Drivers could use mobiles to pay for their parking in Brighton and Hove (From The Argus)
Get involved: Send your news, views, pictures and video by texting SUPIC to 80360 or email us.
Drivers could use mobiles to pay for their parking in Brighton and Hove
1:50pm Wednesday 9th January 2013 in News By Tim Ridgway, Local government reporter
Brighton and Hove City Council is considering introducing mobile phone parking payment
Motorists could soon pay for parking by mobile phone as part of radical plans.
Brighton and Hove City Council believe the move, which could see people pay by making a call, sending a text or using an app, would make it quicker for motorists when leaving their vehicles in its 25,000 spaces.
However it would see drivers paying up to an extra 20p a time to cover the cost of providing the service.
Ian Davey, the chairman of the council’s transport committee, said: “Paying by phone can be simple and quick and the system is already established in many parts of the country.
“Following requests from residents, visitors and local traders we hope to be able to roll this out in the city by early summer.”
Similar schemes already operate in areas of London, Manchester and Birmingham, as well as Brighton Station.
Drivers have to register their vehicle and card payment details with the service provider.
When parking, the driver sends the location code displayed on a sign and the length of time they wish to stay.
Extend time
This information is logged on the system and checked remotely by civil enforcement officers on patrol.
Drivers using the scheme can also extend their parking time remotely without having to return to their car.
Other services such as reminder texts sent ten minutes before their ticket expires will also be available for a small fee.
Currently, only 61 of the council’s 1,119 Pay and Display machines can accept both card payments and cash.
Councillors will agree next week if they want to join the four year scheme being set up by the London Borough of Lambeth and also including the City of Westminster, Transport for London and the City of London Corporation.
'Convienent'
It comes after 45 per cent of motorists canvassed in the local authority’s parking review said they would probably pay by phone.
Conservative councillor Graham Cox said he fully supported the plan, adding: “It will make parking much more convenient for residents and visitors and should also reduce operational costs.
“I hope that some of these cost savings will be used to reduce parking charges rather than going straight into the council’s coffers.
“I’m also glad to see that the administration is embracing Eric Pickles’ vision of working with other councils to reduce overheads and back office costs.
“I would like to see this happen much more regularly on a whole range of other services in the future.”
Talking point: How likely are you to pay for parking using a mobile phone? Would you rather pay cash?
Share your views with Argus reader by commenting below or write to the letters editor or email letters@theargus.co.uk
See the latest news headlines from The Argus:
- Victim "fabricated" sex assault story - day eleven of Albion players' trial
- Dad-of-two was visiting brother and nephew when he was gunned down in Hove
- UPDATE: A27 closed in both directions near Worthing after serious accident
- Sussex artists put their skills on show
- Sussex's sewage will become drinking water under new plans
Add us to your circles on Google+
Comments(12)
BagelCat
says...
2:16pm Wed 9 Jan 13
Bubs wrote:The cost of having the system operating. The cost of developing the software. The cost of the card transaction (they aren't free).
Wonderful, and an extra 20per transaction?
How is it possible that the cost will be higher to collect the parking fee by text or app when you take into account not having to supply or maintain any parking meters, nobody needs to collect or bank the cash from meters any more and the money goes straight to the council immediately? There may well be a fee for using a text, but surely the saving will be significant.
It even costs money having the app approved on the apple store. Not 100% sure for the Android version.
Surely not!
says...
2:20pm Wed 9 Jan 13
Fight_Back
says...
2:21pm Wed 9 Jan 13
bug eye
says...
2:45pm Wed 9 Jan 13
Frank28
says...
3:44pm Wed 9 Jan 13
Mark63
says...
4:24pm Wed 9 Jan 13
Mark63
says...
4:26pm Wed 9 Jan 13
menowhere
says...
4:57pm Wed 9 Jan 13
upsidedowntuctuc
says...
10:49pm Wed 9 Jan 13
If it didn't pay more they would not be thinking of introducing it.
How about charging for bicycles?
StyleCop
says...
7:40am Thu 10 Jan 13
upsidedowntuctuc wrote:Yeah, adding an extra way to pay for parking in case you haven't got change... sounds like a stupid idea...
Cash Cow full stop! If it didn't pay more they would not be thinking of introducing it. How about charging for bicycles?
And as for bikes... yeah... let's charge them, and all the pedestrians... they just clog up everything - have you tried walking down western road on a Saturday? It's full of them, like they've got nothing better to do than get in my way.
StyleCop
says...
7:59am Thu 10 Jan 13
It's crazy to think that in the 21st century I can't use a bank card or cellphone to pay for parking in a supposed 'digital' city.
As for the amount that's charged, is there not an element of basic rules of economics? I parked in my parents village in a municipal carpark for 30p (for the day) recently - granted it was the middle of nowhere and empty... and a Sunday.
But transpose that to a Brighton street, where we find ourselves victims of our own attraction - therefore more cars (consumers) looking for limited spaces (product) - supply, demand.
Simple, economics.
Add into that a Green led agenda and voila... one heady mix of controversy.
It's a no brainer the costs will be higher than average. Striking the right balance though is the problem and clearly last years charges were a bridge too far.
Providing options to pay however, for those who are willing and not deterred by the fees, is, on the whole, a good thing.
I just wish they'd take steps to provide the flexibility so that each denomination of coin, added time to the clock relevant to its value. Rather than have this inflexible £3 1hr - £6 2hrs etc... what if I could put in 50p and get 1/2hr? Or £1.05p and get 1hr 3mins... or something like that... I've often found myself 10p shy of the amount required for 2hrs and then.forced to just take 1hr - which is a ball-ache.
Bubs says...
2:08pm Wed 9 Jan 13
How is it possible that the cost will be higher to collect the parking fee by text or app when you take into account not having to supply or maintain any parking meters, nobody needs to collect or bank the cash from meters any more and the money goes straight to the council immediately? There may well be a fee for using a text, but surely the saving will be significant.