Panel hits out over Sussex Police draft budget

The Argus: Sussex Police and Crime Commissioner Katy Bourne, under fire from county crime panel Sussex Police and Crime Commissioner Katy Bourne, under fire from county crime panel

Members of the panel which is supposed to hold the new Sussex Police and Crime Commissioner to account say they are powerless to scrutinise her decisions.

Councillors sitting on the Sussex Police and Crime Panel spoke out after Katy Bourne’s proposal to freeze the police’s share of council tax was voted through on Friday.

They criticised the single sheet of A4 which set out the “draft revenue budget” for the next financial year.

When Sussex Police Authority – the panel of councillors which was replaced by the police and crime commissioner in November – considered the precept for the current year it was provided with a 41-page report.

Her office said it has not yet received the Government’s final grant figures, so could not issue a detailed budget and the full budget would be published later.

This comes as Mrs Bourne is also facing criticism for failing to come up with a plan to put a special constable in every village.

The promise was a key pledge in Katy Bourne’s election manifesto, but critics claim a draft plan for 2013/2014 does not say how it will be achieved.

However Mrs Bourne said she planned to increase the number of specials over her full term of office.

Freeze precept

At a meeting at County Hall, Lewes on Friday morning, Mrs Bourne’s proposal to freeze the police’s proportion of council tax at £138.42 for a Band D property was voted through.

By freezing that precept, the force will qualify for a Government grant of the equivalent of a 1% rise After the meeting councillors complained that the panel had not done its job properly because it did not have enough information.

Liberal Democrat councillor Andrew Smith, who represents West Sussex County Council on the panel, wrote on his blog: “Despite the targets section of the Police and Crime Plan being blank, the absence of any information on the reserves and balances, the absence of any medium term financial plan and no capital programme, the panel approved both the plan and nil increase in the precept.”

He added: “Clearly, this panel is not capable of subjecting the commissioner (who remains a district councillor for Mid Sussex) to any effective scrutiny. Let’s hope the fourth estate steps up to the mark.”

No budget information

Green councillor Ben Duncan, representing Brighton and Hove City Council, said: “We had to approve the precept without knowing anything about the budget.

“We were given one side of A4 about the budget.”

But Conservative David Elkin, representing East Sussex County Council, said he agreed the budget outline was a bit lightweight but added: “I think we had the opportunity to question as rigorously as we wanted.”

A spokeswoman for the commissioner’s office said: “The panel only has the role or duty to approve the precept, but not the budget.

“We are not able to put the final settlement figures in yet because we do not have the final settlement.

“We will be publishing the full budget on our website.”

See the latest news headlines from The Argus:

More news from The Argus

Follow @brightonargus

The Argus: Daily Echo on Facebook - facebook.com/southerndailyecho Like us on Facebook

The Argus: Google+ Add us to your circles on Google+

Comments (7)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

2:47pm Mon 14 Jan 13

risingphoenix says...

It didn't take long to show the PCC elections as simply an expensive 'jolly'...

Well into 5 figures of her salary paid already, and an A4 report is all there is to show for it!
It didn't take long to show the PCC elections as simply an expensive 'jolly'... Well into 5 figures of her salary paid already, and an A4 report is all there is to show for it! risingphoenix

3:32pm Mon 14 Jan 13

still waiting says...

What is surprising is that people are surprised. The Police & Crime Panel was always going to be more of a rubber stamp for the P&CC's decisions rather than a seriously challenging body that demanded accountability. This, dare I say it, may well be one reason why much of the "guidance" from the Home Office about how things were going to run after the Police Authority was disbanded was always a bit lightweight. Put another way, there were an awful lot of obvious bits missing. And, here we are not many weeks into the P&CC's tenure and already things are splitting down party political lines. Curious that....
What is surprising is that people are surprised. The Police & Crime Panel was always going to be more of a rubber stamp for the P&CC's decisions rather than a seriously challenging body that demanded accountability. This, dare I say it, may well be one reason why much of the "guidance" from the Home Office about how things were going to run after the Police Authority was disbanded was always a bit lightweight. Put another way, there were an awful lot of obvious bits missing. And, here we are not many weeks into the P&CC's tenure and already things are splitting down party political lines. Curious that.... still waiting

4:32pm Mon 14 Jan 13

Crystal Ball says...

risingphoenix wrote:
It didn't take long to show the PCC elections as simply an expensive 'jolly'...

Well into 5 figures of her salary paid already, and an A4 report is all there is to show for it!
Perhaps a single A4 sheet is directly proportional to her ability, interest, knowledge, enthusiasm and desire to improve the service? Clearly inversely proportional to her wages expectation...
[quote][p][bold]risingphoenix[/bold] wrote: It didn't take long to show the PCC elections as simply an expensive 'jolly'... Well into 5 figures of her salary paid already, and an A4 report is all there is to show for it![/p][/quote]Perhaps a single A4 sheet is directly proportional to her ability, interest, knowledge, enthusiasm and desire to improve the service? Clearly inversely proportional to her wages expectation... Crystal Ball

4:45pm Mon 14 Jan 13

martyt says...

just another waste of our money ,but she was voted in ,so who s the fools ?
just another waste of our money ,but she was voted in ,so who s the fools ? martyt

4:45pm Mon 14 Jan 13

martyt says...

just another waste of our money ,but she was voted in ,so who s the fools ?
just another waste of our money ,but she was voted in ,so who s the fools ? martyt

5:42pm Mon 14 Jan 13

RottingdeanRant says...

The fools are the few who voted for her or any of them.
The fools are the few who voted for her or any of them. RottingdeanRant

7:09pm Mon 14 Jan 13

mimseycal says...

And so it starts ...
And so it starts ... mimseycal

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree