Care homes help disabled to access sex surrogates (From The Argus)
Get involved: Send your news, views, pictures and video by texting SUPIC to 80360 or email us.
Care homes help disabled to access sex surrogates
1:10pm Monday 28th January 2013 in News Exclusive By Bill Gardner
The Chaseley care home in South Cliff, Eastbourne
The Argus can today lift the lid on the use of “sex surrogates” in Sussex care homes. Our revelations have prompted East Sussex County Council to launch an urgent investigation. But health workers argue helping disabled people to access sex workers is a matter of meeting their basic human rights. Bill Gardner reports.
Care homes are inviting prostitutes through their doors to offer sexual services to their disabled residents, The Argus can reveal.
One local authority said it would launch an urgent investigation into the possible “exploitation and abuse” of vulnerable people following our findings.
But some health experts and sex workers defended the practice as “therapeutic” – and said it had been happening in some homes across Sussex for years.
“Sex surrogacy” is now in the spotlight following the release of a new Hollywood film, The Sessions.
The film confronts the sexual needs of the disabled and the controversial role sometimes played by surrogates in order to fulfil them.
Often dismissed as prostitutes, the ‘surrogates’ claim they are actually therapists. But critics dismiss the work as morally dubious, degrading and of no therapeutic benefit.
One care home manager said staff who helped disabled people access prostitutes were defending basic human rights.
Helena Barrow is the ex-manager of Chaseley, a nursing home in Eastbourne for 55 people with neurological problems and learning difficulties.
'Sexually enable people'
She told The Argus that prostitutes were regularly contacted by staff, welcomed into the building and provided with a room to meet residents.
She said: “The fact is, sex workers are allowed by law to sexually enable people but care workers are not.
“So, if someone asked, we would often call in a professional, someone trained to do that. It’s known as the resident’s ‘special visit’.”
The act of paying for sex is not in itself illegal – but a string of laws criminalises activities around it.
Mrs Barrow, who left Chaseley a year ago to manage another care home in St Leonards, insisted residents always paid for the call girls themselves through their pensions, savings or benefits.
'Resolving problem'
She said staff at her former workplace would often telephone sex workers and invite them to the home.
When possible, they would dial the number and hold the phone to the disabled person’s ear so they could make the call themselves.
She said: “If you have a resident who is groping staff, one way of resolving that problem is to get a sex worker in who is trained to deal with that situation.
“But most of the time, these are people who feel frustrated by a primeval need they cannot fulfil.
“So we would help them with the phone, dial the number, or use the computer to contact someone who could help.
“If we refused, we would not be delivering a holistic level of care.”
'Special red sock'
When the call girl arrived, they were welcomed into the building and escorted by a member of staff to a room where a resident was waiting.
Staff would then put a “special red sock” on the door handle to make sure the couple were not disturbed before checking on them every 15 minutes.
On one occasion, local strippers were invited into the home to perform a “special show” for residents.
Sue Wyatt, Chaseley’s current manager, confirmed prostitutes were still welcomed to the home but insisted staff were no longer making the calls directly.
Instead, she said a “third party consultant” was now used to contact the sex workers.
'Here to help'
She said: “People have needs, so sometimes we might need to set up a room in a certain way. We are there to help.
“We use a private consultant who arranges everything. They are an independent person who works in the home. She puts people in touch with people.
“We respect our residents as individuals so that’s why we help this to happen.”
Chaseley is an ex-military nursing home which now houses a mix of residents whose places are funded by private arrangements or by social services.
A spokesman for East Sussex County Council said the local authority had been unaware of Chaseley’s policy of inviting prostitutes on site and “did not welcome” the idea.
Abuse concern
He said: “We will examine our concerns through the Pan-Sussex Multi-Agency Policy and Procedures for Safeguarding Adults at Risk.
“This has the potential to place vulnerable East Sussex residents at risk of exploitation and abuse.”
But other senior health workers welcomed Chaseley’s decision to actively help its residents have sex.
Denise Banks is director of social care provision at Chailey Heritage Foundation, East Sussex, where disabled adults are cared for as part of the Futures@Chailey Heritage project.
She revealed the foundation had contacted Chaseley to help develop a policy where prostitutes could be found for residents if needed.
Pleasing work
Mrs Banks said: “The work they [Chaseley] are doing is certainly pleasing.
“If someone asked us to contact a sex worker for them, we would have to be open to that. If we resisted we would be going against the Human Rights Act.
“We would try to facilitate that somewhere else to protect that individual’s privacy and dignity. It’s a much nicer way to do it. But we need to develop a proper policy.
“We do have to be very careful because when you are working with very vulnerable people you have to make sure they are not being pushed in a certain direction.”
Mrs Banks said the Chailey Foundation had been working with the Sexual Health and Disability Allliance, a national group that campaigns for disabled people to be allowed access to sex workers.
'Perpetual frustration'
She said: “It’s really down to an individual approach. We want to allow people to express their sexuality.
“It’s completely within the law but of course there has to be boundaries.”
Dr Tuppy Owens, convenor of the Sexual Health and Disability Allliance, visits care homes across Sussex to give them advice on sexual issues.
She said prostitutes were already operating freely in many care homes across the county.
She said: “Many disabled people are living in perpetual frustration.
“If someone wants to access a sex worker and they can’t make the phone call then they should be allowed to do that. There’s nothing illegal about it.
“What’s illegal is for disabled people to be denied their human rights.”
Proper checks
But other experts raised health and safety fears around allowing vulnerable people access to sex workers without proper checks.
Nick Tapp, chief executive of East Sussex Disability Association, said he thought the approach was “broadly a good idea” but that it posed “certain problems”.
He said: “People are body fascists, which means disabled people lack opportunities.
“Allowing them release in this way would appear to be a good thing. However, there’s always an issue of risk which is for local authorities and health authorities to look into.
“How do you know the sex workers are not carrying infections? There are certainly safety issues there.”
Lorna Couldrick is a lecturer at Brighton University, specialising on issues related to sexuality. She has worked with care homes across the county to help them deal with the sexual needs of their residents.
'Under the radar'
According to her, many have been inviting prostitutes into the homes on a regular basis for years.
She said: “It’s underground, not out in the open, because it has to be. It’s under the radar.
“The thing is, if you have a severe disability it can affect your ability to have sex. But why should that mean you should be stopped from having sex for the rest of your life?
“It makes sense to me to legally employ a prostitute to resolve that problem, rather than a member of staff.”
The Care Quality Commission (CQC), the care watchdog, refused to reveal whether it was aware of prostitutes being invited into care homes.
A CQC spokeswoman said: “Where an individual care need is identified, we expect care plans to reflect that, and for all the appropriate safeguards to be in place to ensure that the individual concerned and others potentially affected are protected against the risk of abuse.”
Secretive world of sex surrogacy
So-called ‘sex surrogacy’ is now in the spotlight thanks to a new Hollywood film, The Sessions.
Released in the UK a week ago, the film confronts two taboos – the sexual needs of the disabled and the controversial role sometimes played by surrogates in order to fulfil them.
Often dismissed as prostitutes, the ‘surrogates’ claim they are actually therapists. But critics dismiss the work as morally dubious, degrading and of no therapeutic benefit.
One agency in Brighton and Hove offers disabled people the chance to lose their virginity in exchange for cash.
‘Velvet Venus’ is an older lady who runs a private brothel for disabled people near Brighton station.
John Hawkes and Helen Hunt star as Mark O'Brien and sex surrogate Cheryl Cohen-Greene in The Sessions.
She said: “It’s a very secretive world. I have to live a complete double life. If I was exposed that would be awful.
“But there’s nothing wrong with what I’m doing. My clients all leave happier than when they walked in.
“It should all be made completely legal. The law is a complete ass and that’s how it is.”
Another sex worker, Anika Mae, said some disabled people found it difficult to find a partner.
She said: “A lot of people haven’t had sex for a long time, if ever. It’s good for people to have some relief sometimes.
“I have worked with people with Parkinson’s and missing limbs. I also dealt with a guy who was completely paralysed after being in a car crash.”
Sex worker's regular visits to care homes
One sex worker told The Argus she was “regularly” called to care homes across Sussex.
She said staff members usually escort her up to a room where a disabled resident is waiting.
She said: “I go to one particular nursing home in West Sussex at least once a month, more often once or twice every two weeks, but others too.
“The staff know what is happening, they lead us to the room – it’s embarrassing really.”
The call girl revealed there was usually a “mutual understanding” between sex workers and care staff.
She said: “It’s like, you know why I’m here, I know why I’m here.
“In hotels you sometimes get awkward questions from hotel receptionists but nothing like that happens in a care home because the members of staff always know exactly why you’re there.
“Obviously every client has the same colour money and the job isn’t done for enjoyment’s sake.
“Having said that, aside from the initial embarrassment of being led to a room, it’s an easy job.”
See the latest news headlines from The Argus:
- Author Peter James 'lucky to be alive' following 70mph racing crash
- Hove murder: wanted man phones The Argus
- Shoreham Rugby Club holding charity barbecue and fun day
- Police investigate spate of car crime across Sussex
- Sussex Police get Chinese book of sayings as thank you gift
Add us to your circles on Google+
Comments(35)
Jimmy Stewart's Imaginary Rabbit
says...
2:05pm Mon 28 Jan 13
Take it Personally
says...
2:29pm Mon 28 Jan 13
Jimmy Stewart's Imaginary Rabbit wrote:Exactly!
If the 'sex workers' are doing it of their own free will (i.e. not being controlled by pimps) I'm struggling to see any problem with this at all.
Brightonlad86
says...
2:31pm Mon 28 Jan 13
Many of them are stuck in their room 24 hours a day with only a TV and get the occasional bit of "attention" from care staff. Prisoners get more than these law abiding citizens.
As long as they do not come to any harm and/or not giving money to pimps etc where is the problem?
They deserve to have something to smile about!!! ;-)
mimseycal
says...
2:49pm Mon 28 Jan 13
Provided there is no coercion involved, on either side, I don't see the problem. In fact, I heartily applaud the care homes that facilitate this.
MuammarQaddafi
says...
2:50pm Mon 28 Jan 13
PaulOckenden
says...
3:00pm Mon 28 Jan 13
alice1
says...
3:24pm Mon 28 Jan 13
censored
says...
3:39pm Mon 28 Jan 13
Well done to the Argus for ruining one of the few bits of pleasure that disabled people stuck in a home might get.
pitb
says...
3:47pm Mon 28 Jan 13
For goodness sake leave it alone it is only happening because it is needed. Well done to the home and the carers for ............ well caring!
Anika Mae
says...
4:48pm Mon 28 Jan 13
I already knew standards at The Argus were bad, but I'm going to have to refuse to say anything to the next person who calls from there. Maybe I'll make the news even so!
Bill_Gardner
says...
5:21pm Mon 28 Jan 13
Anika Mae wrote:Anika Mae,
The reporter who called me claimed to be doing background research and never mentioned printing my name, and apparently it's just there for padding anyway since my disabled clients have primarily been people living independently, and I've never been to care home in my life. The bit about missing limbs came straight out of the reporter's imagination, as did the reason for my client's paralysis. I didn't say anything about disabled people who've never had sex before as I have no experience of this, and my argument was that my clients have the same range of reasons for visiting me whether they have a disability or not.
I already knew standards at The Argus were bad, but I'm going to have to refuse to say anything to the next person who calls from there. Maybe I'll make the news even so!
Unfortunately you are wrong. I've looked back through my notebook and everything quoted in the article is verbatim, including the part about missing limbs and disabled people who have never had sex before.
Your name is readily available on an escort website. And there is no suggestion that you have ever visited care homes. Your quotes appear as part of a wider section about sex surrogacy.
Regards
Bill
saraman
says...
5:46pm Mon 28 Jan 13
Anika Mae
says...
5:58pm Mon 28 Jan 13
I might have said something like, "A lot of people haven’t had sex for a long time, if ever. It’s good for people to have some relief sometimes", but that would be as a reason for people in general to pay for sex, not specifically disabled people, so quoting it as you did is misleading.
Yes of course it's not like you've outed me, and my birth certificate doesn't say "Anika", but there was nothing to stop you from telling me that you wanted to print this stuff after all, and I think most people would consider it a poor reflection on you that you prefer to operate opaquely.
leobrighton
says...
6:25pm Mon 28 Jan 13
anubis
says...
6:48pm Mon 28 Jan 13
Clearly the 'Argus' story is flawed -- but the chances are it's the editors rather than the reporter who need to be rebuked (reporters usually submit their copy in good faith, but rarely know, in advance, what gets printed!)
Nitrous_McBread
says...
6:54pm Mon 28 Jan 13
As long as the POVA (Protection of Vulnerable Adults) scheme is in place, what's the story here? (Apart from the same old prurient, ill-researched Argus drivel...)
Dirk Von Roden
says...
7:39pm Mon 28 Jan 13
Fair play to the staff for beng so acomodating in helping their charges full fill their urges! and while I am here can they pass me the number and a Price list!!??? cheers!! lol I am disabled and I still get the urge!after all we are still human! and For petes sake it the 21st century !Perhaps as one f the earlier comments stated "the authorities would be better spending any investigation monies on catching the Paedophiles who are more than likely still operating around the country Sussex included!!
hubby
says...
8:18pm Mon 28 Jan 13
668 The neighbour of the beast
says...
10:09pm Mon 28 Jan 13
Morgyn the Mighty
says...
12:04am Tue 29 Jan 13
Bill_Gardner wrote:Hang your head in shame, Bill Gardner. It's you who've been outed, in all your prurience, by Brighton's brainiest hooker.
Anika Mae wrote:Anika Mae,
The reporter who called me claimed to be doing background research and never mentioned printing my name, and apparently it's just there for padding anyway since my disabled clients have primarily been people living independently, and I've never been to care home in my life. The bit about missing limbs came straight out of the reporter's imagination, as did the reason for my client's paralysis. I didn't say anything about disabled people who've never had sex before as I have no experience of this, and my argument was that my clients have the same range of reasons for visiting me whether they have a disability or not.
I already knew standards at The Argus were bad, but I'm going to have to refuse to say anything to the next person who calls from there. Maybe I'll make the news even so!
Unfortunately you are wrong. I've looked back through my notebook and everything quoted in the article is verbatim, including the part about missing limbs and disabled people who have never had sex before.
Your name is readily available on an escort website. And there is no suggestion that you have ever visited care homes. Your quotes appear as part of a wider section about sex surrogacy.
Regards
Bill
lillylou
says...
9:03am Tue 29 Jan 13
lillylou
says...
9:04am Tue 29 Jan 13
lillylou
says...
9:06am Tue 29 Jan 13
Andy R
says...
9:15am Tue 29 Jan 13
alice1 wrote:It is mentioned in the article, and don't worry, it isn't you!
Who is paying the call girls to give them sexual relief could not see it mentioned in the argus article ?
mhaiti
says...
1:27pm Tue 29 Jan 13
Anika Mae wrote:Bill seems to have gone a bit quiet.
Bill, your notes are wrong and the quotes certainly aren't verbatim. You asked me what sort of disabilities I'd dealt with and I said something like "various things, from parkinson's to a man who was paraylsed from the neck down". I wouldn't have said anything about missing limbs because I've never seen anyone with that sort of condition. The bit about the "car accident" came later, because you thought it would be very difficult to have sex with someone who's that paralysed and I said he was a lot of fun and knew what he was about sexually. You were still confused, so I said that if he was vanilla before his accident, he'd broadened his horizons since. It was then that you suggested he'd been in a car accident. I might have said something like, "A lot of people haven’t had sex for a long time, if ever. It’s good for people to have some relief sometimes", but that would be as a reason for people in general to pay for sex, not specifically disabled people, so quoting it as you did is misleading. Yes of course it's not like you've outed me, and my birth certificate doesn't say "Anika", but there was nothing to stop you from telling me that you wanted to print this stuff after all, and I think most people would consider it a poor reflection on you that you prefer to operate opaquely.
Flippin Burghers
says...
2:02pm Tue 29 Jan 13
RickH
says...
2:19pm Tue 29 Jan 13
mhaiti wrote:I am aware that one other person "quoted" in this article has issued a public statement indicating issues around being quoted out of context. Good job you've those 'verbatim' notes!
Anika Mae wrote: Bill, your notes are wrong and the quotes certainly aren't verbatim. You asked me what sort of disabilities I'd dealt with and I said something like "various things, from parkinson's to a man who was paraylsed from the neck down". I wouldn't have said anything about missing limbs because I've never seen anyone with that sort of condition. The bit about the "car accident" came later, because you thought it would be very difficult to have sex with someone who's that paralysed and I said he was a lot of fun and knew what he was about sexually. You were still confused, so I said that if he was vanilla before his accident, he'd broadened his horizons since. It was then that you suggested he'd been in a car accident. I might have said something like, "A lot of people haven’t had sex for a long time, if ever. It’s good for people to have some relief sometimes", but that would be as a reason for people in general to pay for sex, not specifically disabled people, so quoting it as you did is misleading. Yes of course it's not like you've outed me, and my birth certificate doesn't say "Anika", but there was nothing to stop you from telling me that you wanted to print this stuff after all, and I think most people would consider it a poor reflection on you that you prefer to operate opaquely.Bill seems to have gone a bit quiet.
clubrob6
says...
4:33pm Tue 29 Jan 13
Take it Personally wrote:I cant understand why a story like this is front page news in the argus,disabled people have their needs.I think its picking on disabled prople .
Jimmy Stewart's Imaginary Rabbit wrote:Exactly!
If the 'sex workers' are doing it of their own free will (i.e. not being controlled by pimps) I'm struggling to see any problem with this at all.
lillylou
says...
9:00pm Tue 29 Jan 13
racehill
says...
9:46pm Tue 29 Jan 13
Perhaps her need for gratification is as great as that of the clents.
Flippin Burghers
says...
1:40pm Wed 30 Jan 13
Dirk Von Roden wrote:Herr Von Rodeo speaks the truth.
as the Patients/service users are paying and making arrangements themselves its got beggar all to do with anyone else!
Fair play to the staff for beng so acomodating in helping their charges full fill their urges! and while I am here can they pass me the number and a Price list!!??? cheers!! lol I am disabled and I still get the urge!after all we are still human! and For petes sake it the 21st century !Perhaps as one f the earlier comments stated "the authorities would be better spending any investigation monies on catching the Paedophiles who are more than likely still operating around the country Sussex included!!
alice1
says...
4:56am Thu 31 Jan 13
lillylou
says...
8:44am Thu 31 Jan 13
Prince of Mince
says...
10:14pm Thu 31 Jan 13
lillylou wrote:Yes of course, if they want to...nowhere does it say it's exclusively for blokes!
Do the female patience get to have some with male prostitutes ???
PorkBoat says...
1:58pm Mon 28 Jan 13