Water bills go up – again

Southern Water annnounced its 2.8million customers can expect an average bill increase of 5.3% Southern Water annnounced its 2.8million customers can expect an average bill increase of 5.3%

Millions of Southern Water customers are facing inflation-busting price rises in April – despite the firm announcing pre-tax profits of £271m last year. Ben Leo reports.

Southern Water yesterday announced its 2.8million water and wastewater customers can expect an average bill increase of 5.3% – the third highest increase out of all 22 water companies in the UK.

The firm’s chief executive Matthew Wright – last year paid £632,000 in salary, bonuses and expenses – revealed yesterday the new average bill for customers will rise for the third year running from £427 to £449 a year from April 1.

Mr Wright’s financial package is almost 25% more than his predecessor’s.

National water regulator Ofwat said any price rise was “unwelcome”.

The National Debtline said it took a record 19,667 calls for help with water debts last year, up from 12,226 in 2010 and 597 in 2003. The figure has increased by 251% since 2007.

But while millions of customers struggle to pay for increasing water costs, the Worthing-based company announced their operating profit rocketed by 18% last year.

They said the increase in customers’ bills is helping to pay for an investment programme worth around £1.8 billion from 2010 to 2015.

This includes the replacement of 23km of water mains to reduce the risk of bursts, leaks and supply interruptions.

But the company has one of the worst records in the country when it comes to managing and hitting leak targets set by Ofwat.

Leak reduction

In 2010-2011 they missed their leak reduction target by 16%, resulting in the loss of 96 million litres of water per day. As a result they were forced to pay back £5 million to their customers.

Darren Bentham, Southern Water’s Chief Customer Officer, said: “By ensuring investment in our communities we are able to support thousands of jobs, while delivering improved services and a wide range of environmental improvements such as cleaner rivers and seas.

“Our five-year spending programme includes more than 330 environmental projects.

“That’s more than any other water company and makes up a large part of our investment.

“These projects are in response to new European legislation and will have many environmental benefits.

“However, it’s a fine balance. While our charges must rise to meet the enormous cost of our investment, we have a duty to our customers to keep our increases to a minimum.”

Higher increases

Regina Finn, chief executive of Ofwat, claimed the national average bill increase of 3.5% wasn’t as high as the water companies wanted.

Southern Water had asked for 10%.

She said: “Back in 2009, companies wanted bills rises of 10% above inflation. That didn't chime with what customers told us they wanted, so we said they could only increase bills in line with inflation.

We understand that there is huge pressure on household incomes, and any rise is unwelcome. Inflation is driving these increases.

“We will make sure customers get value for money and if companies fall short in delivering their investment promises, we will take action.”

Price challenge

Ofwat announced proposals last week to change the way it regulates water and sewerage with the aim of developing more efficient, customer-focused companies.

Ms Finn added: “There are longer term challenges if we are to continue to keep bills down.

“Unpredictable rainfall, and population growth in areas where water is already stretched, means we need to get better at managing and sharing our water. If we don’t, customers will lose out.”

Tony Smith, chief executive of the Consumer Council for Water, said it was important Southern Water demonstrated they were committed to providing value for money to their customers.

Water meters

He added: “Customers’ will expect excellent levels of service at an affordable price.

“The company will need to demonstrate that they are putting their customers’ priorities first.”

The Argus reported last week how Southern Water plans to install nearly 500,000 water meters at every home across Kent, Surrey and Sussex by 2015, including up to 75,000 in Brighton and Hove.

The majority of installations in Worthing were completed last year and the company has already started installing meters in Hove, working from west to east.

For customers struggling to pay their water bill, call Southern Water on 0845 272 0845 for advice.

Southern Water

Southern Water employs nearly 2,000 staff across their operational area of Sussex, Kent, Hampshire and the Isle of Wight.

Its headquarters is based in Durrington, near Worthing, and its parent company is called Greensands Holdings Limited. The main shareholders of Greensands Holdings Ltd are infrastructure funds and pension companies.

These are represented on the Board of Southern Water Services by non-executive directors from UBS Global Asset Management and JP Morgan Asset Management.

They say none of their shareholders take dividends from either Southern Water or the Greensands group of companies as they are “committed to the company for the long term.”

The company has two executive directors, an independent non-executive Chairman and five non-executive directors.

The total amount paid to the group of directors last year was £1.225m.

South East Water

South East water, which is only responsible for water supply and not waste water, announced a below-average increase of 3%.

Because it doesn’t supply waste water services, some customers receive fresh water from South East water and waste water services from another.

For example, customers in Burgess Hill receive fresh water from South East Water and wastewater services from Southern Water.

South East water supplies drinking water to more than 2m properties in Kent, Sussex, Surrey, Hampshire and Berkshire.

In Sussex they reach homes in Uckfield, Burgess Hill, Haywards Heath, Seaford, Eastbourne, Crowbrough and everywhere inbetween. Steve George, Customer Services Director at South East Water, said: “We believe that an average cost for drinking water of just 55 pence per day remains excellent value for money, but we do appreciate that some of our customers may be experiencing financial difficulties and so we have measures in place to help those customers facing real hardship.”

Thames Water recorded the second highest increase with an average combined water and waste water bill increase of 5.5%.

Wessex Water, which covers areas including Dorset, Somerset, Bristol, announced an increase of 4.9%, while South West Water was the only company to record a saving of 7.3%.

This is because customers served by South West Water will benefit from a Government contribution which will reduce the bill for all households by £50 per year.

Your Views

Laura Marcinkiene

Laura Marcinkiene, 31, Brighton “I hadn’t heard about the price increase until now but it doesn’t surprise me. If they’re increasing the prices for the reasons they say they are, then great. But I can’t help but worry it’s all about profit. My bill is around £200 a year at the moment and I suppose an increase would be manageable, but when you consider everything else is going up it’s hard not to worry.”

Tejna Kahn

Tejna Kahn, 53 from Brighton “I heard they need the money for infrastructure and investment, which if true is good news. But there’s always a part of you that thinks when someone is being paid £600,000 a year it’s all a bit unnecessary. I pay £35 a month at the moment so I’m guessing that’s going to go up. It’s worrying.”

Patricia Moore

Patricia Moore, 64, Uckfield “It’s disgusting. This is from a company that bans people using their hose pipe despite watching people come home to floods in their houses, towns and villages.

John Moore

John Moore, 68, Uckfield “Luckily I’m only here about three months of the year so I don’t have to contend with it all. But in Spain our water comes from a tanker that’s replaced twice a year and it’s much easier like that. In England people are always having to compromise the way they live to reduce their bills. As a pensioner it’s terrible news.”

Natasha House

Natasha House, 39, Hove “I’m not impressed at all. I’ve just had a water meter fitted and I already wasn’t convinced my bills were going to go down, but now they have an increase coming I’m quite sure they won’t. If they do I’ll be very surprised. There’s always a reason for an increase, whether its water, gas or electricity, and I think it’s unnecessary.”

Your chance to quiz Southern Water boss after price hike

Millions of Southern Water customers are facing above-inflation price hikes in April – despite the company announcing operating profits of £271m last year.

Southern Water today announced their 2.8m water and wastewater customers can expect an average bill increase of 5.3% – the third highest increase out the 24 water companies in the UK.

We're putting Southern Water's director of communications, Geoff Loader, in the Your Interview hot seat to answer your questions.

What would you like to ask? Send in your questions today to ben.leo@theargus.co.uk

See the latest news headlines from The Argus:

More news from The Argus

Follow @brightonargus

Daily Echo on Facebook - facebook.com/southerndailyecho Like us on Facebook

Google+ Add us to your circles on Google+

Comments(25)

risingphoenix says...
1:37pm Wed 6 Feb 13

This rise is nothing - wait until the variable/seasonal tariffs are brought in after the metering has been completed...

Pay more when you need it, and less when you don't...

But of course the profits will continue to rise...

The water mafia are laughing all the way to the bank!

MuammarQaddafi says...
2:01pm Wed 6 Feb 13

For customers struggling to pay their water bill, just send it to Matthew Wright. He can afford it.

vogon1 says...
2:19pm Wed 6 Feb 13

Blatant profiteering. Profits still going up, bonuses and big pats on the back for all management. Fleecing the customer, pure and simple.

rubberflipper says...
2:19pm Wed 6 Feb 13

"These projects are in response to new European legislation"

Says it all really.

Solution: Leave the EU and re-nationalise water and sewage. Then do the same for electricity and gas.

Utilities are essential services for humans to live and profit should not come before pensioners freezing to death.

RickH says...
2:32pm Wed 6 Feb 13

rubberflipper wrote:
"These projects are in response to new European legislation" Says it all really. Solution: Leave the EU and re-nationalise water and sewage. Then do the same for electricity and gas. Utilities are essential services for humans to live and profit should not come before pensioners freezing to death.
But are they really? Or is it because "...due to health and safety requirements...." somehow doesn't quite sound right and so Southern Water are reverting to the second favourite scape-goat that such companies use.

rolivan says...
3:06pm Wed 6 Feb 13

Not only are they charging to extract the urine but selling it back to you as well

Tallywhacker says...
3:21pm Wed 6 Feb 13

"They said the increase in customers’ bills is helping to pay for an investment programme worth around £1.8 billion from 2010 to 2015."....... So am I investing in the company or are they borrowing money from me? Either way why am I paying for a company to invest in itself with no return on my investment. Surely they should be getting their cash needs from a bank or by a share issue to raise funds. How insulting to their paying customers to say it is for investing in company assets and infrastructure on the money they are taking but offering no return. Imagine if other industries like say the gas companies or electricity suppliers took money off customers and said it was for infrastructure investment and then announced record profits.....oh they do....I'm starting to feel like a reverse sex worker cause I'm being scr*wed and then paying for it myself.

Falmer Wizard says...
5:19pm Wed 6 Feb 13

The way charges are rising it will soon be cheaper to drink wine

saraman says...
5:41pm Wed 6 Feb 13

risingphoenix wrote:
This rise is nothing - wait until the variable/seasonal tariffs are brought in after the metering has been completed... Pay more when you need it, and less when you don't... But of course the profits will continue to rise... The water mafia are laughing all the way to the bank!
You're dead right. When we are all on meters and cutting our consumption to the bare minimum the shareholders will complain about loss of dividend. And then what happens? They will put the price up again and again to maintain the revenue stream. I went on a meter last November and my projected metered bill will be in the region of £400 as opposed to previous water rates of £600. Southern water is not going to be too happy with that, are they? There is no way that we are going to win on this one.

PorkBoat says...
6:13pm Wed 6 Feb 13

But you'll still pay it, and whinge about paying it, and you'll carry on paying and whinging every time they put it up in the future. Stop paying them, and tell Southern Water to go **** themselves, and why.

Arronsmum says...
6:24pm Wed 6 Feb 13

how i agree with porkboat, ive NEVER paid a water bill and dont intend to. you cant be cut off supply,they'r not allowed to do that.Be strong and ignore threatening letters,court letters etc as ive done.they soon give up. THERE COMES A POINT WHEN WE ALL HAVE TO MAKE A STAND +REBEL,OR CARRY ON BEING TREATED LIKE DIRT. dont complain on this site about yiur huge bills.JUST STOP PAYING!

saraman says...
6:28pm Wed 6 Feb 13

PorkBoat wrote:
But you'll still pay it, and whinge about paying it, and you'll carry on paying and whinging every time they put it up in the future. Stop paying them, and tell Southern Water to go **** themselves, and why.
Like it PorkBoat.

vogon1 says...
7:29pm Wed 6 Feb 13

I'm not happy with the price of fuel at the pump. Do you think BP would mind if I filled my car and left the forecourt without paying?

PorkBoat says...
8:02pm Wed 6 Feb 13

vogon1 wrote:
I'm not happy with the price of fuel at the pump. Do you think BP would mind if I filled my car and left the forecourt without paying?
They'd probably hate it. But who gives a ****? Go for it. Put false plates on. The more you take it, the more they'll dish it out. You have to draw a line and say "ENOUGH!" Where's your tipping point?

Hove Actually says...
8:05pm Wed 6 Feb 13

Oh I do hope the poor MPs can award themselves a 30% payrise to offset the cost of claiming this increase on their expences.

I truly dispair of the lying, out of touch bar stewards we have in government now and the saddest thing is, they are all the same. Civil unrest cannot be our only option, surely someone is on our side?

a person says...
8:11pm Wed 6 Feb 13

Arronsmum wrote:
how i agree with porkboat, ive NEVER paid a water bill and dont intend to. you cant be cut off supply,they'r not allowed to do that.Be strong and ignore threatening letters,court letters etc as ive done.they soon give up. THERE COMES A POINT WHEN WE ALL HAVE TO MAKE A STAND +REBEL,OR CARRY ON BEING TREATED LIKE DIRT. dont complain on this site about yiur huge bills.JUST STOP PAYING!
If everybody stopped paying their bills there would be no money
For the water companies to use to pay their bills ,
Then there would be no water at the taps.

So it’s a bit daft to think that everyone should stop paying their bills.

a person says...
8:12pm Wed 6 Feb 13

Arronsmum wrote:
how i agree with porkboat, ive NEVER paid a water bill and dont intend to. you cant be cut off supply,they'r not allowed to do that.Be strong and ignore threatening letters,court letters etc as ive done.they soon give up. THERE COMES A POINT WHEN WE ALL HAVE TO MAKE A STAND +REBEL,OR CARRY ON BEING TREATED LIKE DIRT. dont complain on this site about yiur huge bills.JUST STOP PAYING!
If everybody stopped paying their bills there would be no money
For the water companies to use to pay their bills ,
Then there would be no water at the taps.

So it’s a bit daft to say that everyone should stop paying their bills.

keswick says...
8:42pm Wed 6 Feb 13

Blatant exploitation by a monopoly supplier whose sole interset is in awarding fat-cat salaries to people who are a waste of space and increasing dividend payments to shareholders. I'm with a mass withholding of payment because they CANNOT cut you off.

Pebbles says...
2:43am Thu 7 Feb 13

And as this country grows.. as more people come here.. the more water.. and processing of water we will need.

HJarrs says...
9:18am Thu 7 Feb 13

I wonder how much has been creamed off by shareholders and bloated pay and bonuses of senior management since privatisation? Must be a few hundred million. This is a highly regulated zero risk industry and if they could, they would double the bills tomorrow.

Staggering that our local Tories are so keen to privatise almost all the council when southern water demonstrate what happens when you sell a monopoly.

Morpheus says...
9:24am Thu 7 Feb 13

I find it difficult to understand the views expressed here. We want clean water on demand and treatment of sewerage and yet we do not want to pay for it. When the government talks about infrastructure projects there is support but when a company talks about spending on infrastructure nobody wants to pay the price. Our electricity supplies are now at risk because of failure to invest in new generating plant and customers do not want to pay for that either. No wonder the country is in the mess it is.

vogon1 says...
12:20pm Thu 7 Feb 13

Morpheus wrote:
I find it difficult to understand the views expressed here. We want clean water on demand and treatment of sewerage and yet we do not want to pay for it. When the government talks about infrastructure projects there is support but when a company talks about spending on infrastructure nobody wants to pay the price. Our electricity supplies are now at risk because of failure to invest in new generating plant and customers do not want to pay for that either. No wonder the country is in the mess it is.
Not so. Most of us are quite happy to pay for the service and investment in the infrastructure required. What we're not happy to pay for is bonuses, over-inflated salaries and greedy shareholders. Why should the hard up - who are struggling to make even basic ends meet - pay for someone else to ride the utility gravy train?

Tallywhacker says...
3:37pm Thu 7 Feb 13

Morpheus wrote:
I find it difficult to understand the views expressed here. We want clean water on demand and treatment of sewerage and yet we do not want to pay for it. When the government talks about infrastructure projects there is support but when a company talks about spending on infrastructure nobody wants to pay the price. Our electricity supplies are now at risk because of failure to invest in new generating plant and customers do not want to pay for that either. No wonder the country is in the mess it is.
The difference is that the water is taking more than I would have to pay so as to invest in itself. It would be like when doing the weekly shop I find that the store has added £10 at the end so they can build another store. So not only have I paid for my goods with a profit built in I have been taxed by that store for its own benefit. And it is the only store I am permitted to shop in because it is against the law for me to shop anywhere else and no other store is permitted to build here for me to choose where to shop.

redwing says...
10:06am Fri 8 Feb 13

Morpheus wrote:
I find it difficult to understand the views expressed here. We want clean water on demand and treatment of sewerage and yet we do not want to pay for it. When the government talks about infrastructure projects there is support but when a company talks about spending on infrastructure nobody wants to pay the price. Our electricity supplies are now at risk because of failure to invest in new generating plant and customers do not want to pay for that either. No wonder the country is in the mess it is.
Er, I think you'll find that the argument for privatisation at the time was along the lines of "this'll increase investment and get the antiquated system up to scratch". Dream on.
Where there's a captive market for an essential 'product' and profits to be made by what's effectively a cartel, the business is not run for the benefit of consumers and efficiency, but for those paid the dividends instead.
Nationalise it. Along with the similarly corrupt gas and electricity suppliers.

mimseycal says...
10:47am Fri 8 Feb 13

I remember it well. A primary claim was that privatisation would bring about a renewal of the antiquated infrastructure, a quicker response to leaks and a better conservation of collected water.

So far it has proved to be anything but. However it has been pretty good at increasing the cost of water to the final consumer.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree