Brighton students left uneasy over ‘Spotted’ webpage (From The Argus)

While I do think that this idea is daft I couldn't help notice this input:

"A member of the university’s Women’s Group"

Surely they mean, a member of the University's feminine, Marxist, Communist or lesbian group.

If such a group existed called the University's Men's Group, it would be labelled as sexist!

So the only place someone will be spotted is the library? What a bunch of sensitive little flowers they are.

Precious people ... for pity's sake. The only difference is that they are not just thinking it but posting it, anonymously, on some website. How sad is that!

If I saw a young lady that I fancied, I would go over and talk to her, face to face. What's love on a website?
(Not now,of course!)

rubberflipper wrote:
While I do think that this idea is daft I couldn't help notice this input:

"A member of the university’s Women’s Group"

Surely they mean, a member of the University's feminine, Marxist, Communist or lesbian group.

If such a group existed called the University's Men's Group, it would be labelled as sexist!

A university Women's Group is a group designed to try and support specifically women at a university, seeing as many consider them to be discriminated against. No need to try and slur them with your misconceptions on politics or sexual preferences.

theleftygiraffe wrote:

rubberflipper wrote:
While I do think that this idea is daft I couldn't help notice this input:

"A member of the university’s Women’s Group"

Surely they mean, a member of the University's feminine, Marxist, Communist or lesbian group.

If such a group existed called the University's Men's Group, it would be labelled as sexist!

A university Women's Group is a group designed to try and support specifically women at a university, seeing as many consider them to be discriminated against. No need to try and slur them with your misconceptions on politics or sexual preferences.

Well that told you, consider yourself a very naught little boy.

Do it to other Metro-reading commuters, it's cute & romantic: do it to other Facebook-using students, it's oppressive and stalky. Funny old world...

What an oversensitive, pathetic bunch of...students. "Oooh, I daren't go in the library in case someone sees me!". Turn the hoses on them!

This is called "missed connections" in the Metro and other newspapers and local radio worldwide, get over it and stop moaning

Bad enough that such a thing as the "University’s Women’s Group" exists, let alone the Argus went to them for comment.

I like the quote concerning the "university’s zero tolerance policy on discrimination and harassment." That is the first time I have heard of this policy from a University notorious for discriminating and harassing any person, company or organisation that doesn't subscribe to their militant, ultra-left agenda.

theleftygiraffe wrote:

rubberflipper wrote:
While I do think that this idea is daft I couldn't help notice this input:

"A member of the university’s Women’s Group"

Surely they mean, a member of the University's feminine, Marxist, Communist or lesbian group.

If such a group existed called the University's Men's Group, it would be labelled as sexist!

A university Women's Group is a group designed to try and support specifically women at a university, seeing as many consider them to be discriminated against. No need to try and slur them with your misconceptions on politics or sexual preferences.

What a pathetic attempt to try and hide the blatant sexist attitude of a bunch of Marxists.

The University has always had a very active female proportion of students who have always been inclusive. That's what the University has stood for since its conception back in the 1960's.

I entirely agree with the top comment because women are NOT discriminated against at Sussex. So stick that in your nickers!

rubberflipper says...

and

medianscore says..


Absolutely spot on. Nice to see some common sense come back to the boards, and see people not afraid to say it too. Seems almost impossible to debate issues surrounding women openly, and frankly, without childish attacks in response.


Lately, feminism seems to have become a front for some rather bitter, damaged people to lash out and tell everyone to do everything their way. The definition of feminism is EQUALITY. Its getting harder and harder to find ANY feminists who understand this, and instead want favouritism for EVERYTHING.

rubberflipper wrote:
While I do think that this idea is daft I couldn't help notice this input:

"A member of the university’s Women’s Group"

Surely they mean, a member of the University's feminine, Marxist, Communist or lesbian group.

If such a group existed called the University's Men's Group, it would be labelled as sexist!

I think your post is at least as daft.

So all women who object to being sexually harrassed or subjected to lewd comments by boorish men must be 'Communists' or 'Lesbians'?

I think you reveal far more about yourself and your narrow-minded views with such a ridiculous comment.

The type of men who slag of Feminism are precisely the kind of men who make Feminism necessary - an irony which, I suspect, most such men don't have the wisdom to appriciate!

theleftygiraffe wrote:

rubberflipper wrote:
While I do think that this idea is daft I couldn't help notice this input:

"A member of the university’s Women’s Group"

Surely they mean, a member of the University's feminine, Marxist, Communist or lesbian group.

If such a group existed called the University's Men's Group, it would be labelled as sexist!

A university Women's Group is a group designed to try and support specifically women at a university, seeing as many consider them to be discriminated against. No need to try and slur them with your misconceptions on politics or sexual preferences.

Well said!

whereisthe...? wrote:
rubberflipper says...

and

medianscore says..


Absolutely spot on. Nice to see some common sense come back to the boards, and see people not afraid to say it too. Seems almost impossible to debate issues surrounding women openly, and frankly, without childish attacks in response.


Lately, feminism seems to have become a front for some rather bitter, damaged people to lash out and tell everyone to do everything their way. The definition of feminism is EQUALITY. Its getting harder and harder to find ANY feminists who understand this, and instead want favouritism for EVERYTHING.

You claim that it is 'almost impossible to debate issues surrounding women openly, and frankly, without childish attacks in response.'

Yet surely 'rubberflipper's' post (which you are defendig) is a classic example of such attacks - any woman who wants equality, and not to suffer sexual abuse, must be a 'Communist', 'lesbian or 'man-hater'.

Peteinblack wrote:

rubberflipper wrote:
While I do think that this idea is daft I couldn't help notice this input:

"A member of the university’s Women’s Group"

Surely they mean, a member of the University's feminine, Marxist, Communist or lesbian group.

If such a group existed called the University's Men's Group, it would be labelled as sexist!

I think your post is at least as daft.

So all women who object to being sexually harrassed or subjected to lewd comments by boorish men must be 'Communists' or 'Lesbians'?

I think you reveal far more about yourself and your narrow-minded views with such a ridiculous comment.

The type of men who slag of Feminism are precisely the kind of men who make Feminism necessary - an irony which, I suspect, most such men don't have the wisdom to appriciate!

What "men" like you don't realise, is that you think you will make women like you, by sucking up to them and grovelling and toadying to their every whim. In reality, women detest wimps like you, they laugh at you and your pathetic attempts to ingratiate themselves. What they really want, even if they won't admit it themselves, is a **** who treats them like ****. They'll go back time and time again to men like this,and when they are all shagged out, in 20 years time, they'll click their fingers, and someone like you will come scurrying along, like a faithful puppy that's been waiting for it's master. Then they'll settle down, get fat, and nag you til you die.

PorkBoat wrote:

Peteinblack wrote:

rubberflipper wrote:
While I do think that this idea is daft I couldn't help notice this input:

"A member of the university’s Women’s Group"

Surely they mean, a member of the University's feminine, Marxist, Communist or lesbian group.

If such a group existed called the University's Men's Group, it would be labelled as sexist!

I think your post is at least as daft.

So all women who object to being sexually harrassed or subjected to lewd comments by boorish men must be 'Communists' or 'Lesbians'?

I think you reveal far more about yourself and your narrow-minded views with such a ridiculous comment.

The type of men who slag of Feminism are precisely the kind of men who make Feminism necessary - an irony which, I suspect, most such men don't have the wisdom to appriciate!

What "men" like you don't realise, is that you think you will make women like you, by sucking up to them and grovelling and toadying to their every whim. In reality, women detest wimps like you, they laugh at you and your pathetic attempts to ingratiate themselves. What they really want, even if they won't admit it themselves, is a **** who treats them like ****. They'll go back time and time again to men like this,and when they are all shagged out, in 20 years time, they'll click their fingers, and someone like you will come scurrying along, like a faithful puppy that's been waiting for it's master. Then they'll settle down, get fat, and nag you til you die.

Meanwhile, for those of us who have evolved, left the cave behind, and progressed to the 21st Century..........

PorkBoat wrote:

Peteinblack wrote:

rubberflipper wrote:
While I do think that this idea is daft I couldn't help notice this input:

"A member of the university’s Women’s Group"

Surely they mean, a member of the University's feminine, Marxist, Communist or lesbian group.

If such a group existed called the University's Men's Group, it would be labelled as sexist!

I think your post is at least as daft.

So all women who object to being sexually harrassed or subjected to lewd comments by boorish men must be 'Communists' or 'Lesbians'?

I think you reveal far more about yourself and your narrow-minded views with such a ridiculous comment.

The type of men who slag of Feminism are precisely the kind of men who make Feminism necessary - an irony which, I suspect, most such men don't have the wisdom to appriciate!

What "men" like you don't realise, is that you think you will make women like you, by sucking up to them and grovelling and toadying to their every whim. In reality, women detest wimps like you, they laugh at you and your pathetic attempts to ingratiate themselves. What they really want, even if they won't admit it themselves, is a **** who treats them like ****. They'll go back time and time again to men like this,and when they are all shagged out, in 20 years time, they'll click their fingers, and someone like you will come scurrying along, like a faithful puppy that's been waiting for it's master. Then they'll settle down, get fat, and nag you til you die.

Maybe this pearl of wisdom reflects the kind of women you associate with - like attracting like?

Presumably you like your women all 'girlie' and submissive so you can pretend to be a 'real' man.

Peteinblack wrote:

PorkBoat wrote:

Peteinblack wrote:

rubberflipper wrote:
While I do think that this idea is daft I couldn't help notice this input:

"A member of the university’s Women’s Group"

Surely they mean, a member of the University's feminine, Marxist, Communist or lesbian group.

If such a group existed called the University's Men's Group, it would be labelled as sexist!

I think your post is at least as daft.

So all women who object to being sexually harrassed or subjected to lewd comments by boorish men must be 'Communists' or 'Lesbians'?

I think you reveal far more about yourself and your narrow-minded views with such a ridiculous comment.

The type of men who slag of Feminism are precisely the kind of men who make Feminism necessary - an irony which, I suspect, most such men don't have the wisdom to appriciate!

What "men" like you don't realise, is that you think you will make women like you, by sucking up to them and grovelling and toadying to their every whim. In reality, women detest wimps like you, they laugh at you and your pathetic attempts to ingratiate themselves. What they really want, even if they won't admit it themselves, is a **** who treats them like ****. They'll go back time and time again to men like this,and when they are all shagged out, in 20 years time, they'll click their fingers, and someone like you will come scurrying along, like a faithful puppy that's been waiting for it's master. Then they'll settle down, get fat, and nag you til you die.

Meanwhile, for those of us who have evolved, left the cave behind, and progressed to the 21st Century..........

Women like a "caveman". The only ones that don't are lesbians and Communists who don't know what Cognitive Dissonance is.

Feminism definition - "EQUALITY for BOTH sexes." Look it up.


Anything else is sexist, whether you call yourself a 'feminist' or not.

Simple.

That may well be the definition however there is no doubt that in practise Feminism tends to be more partisan.

rubberflipper wrote:
While I do think that this idea is daft I couldn't help notice this input:

"A member of the university’s Women’s Group"

Surely they mean, a member of the University's feminine, Marxist, Communist or lesbian group.

If such a group existed called the University's Men's Group, it would be labelled as sexist!

There is less need for a Men's Group because that is called society. Pretty much every avenue is mostly male dominated, politics, music, theatre, sport and business. Also, have you not heard of gentlemen's clubs?

Too much over-sensitivity. I'd be far more inclined to see gender equality as an overall aim if there were less feminist groups and more humanity groups.

Feminist this and feminist that only serve to highlight a divide which in turn cannot be addressed because the groups themselves carry the divide on.

Humanity against Violence
Humanity for Equal Pay

Etcetera and so forth.