The Big Interview: Student protester Hugo Redwood (From The Argus)
Get involved: Send your news, views, pictures and video by texting SUPIC to 80360 or email us.
The Big Interview: Student protester Hugo Redwood
5:50pm Monday 25th February 2013 in News By Ben James
Student protester Hugo Redwood
The occupation at the University of Sussex has hit the headlines over the past fortnight. The students have amassed huge support as well as the backing of a number of well known faces such as Noam Chomsky, director Ken Loach and comedian Frankie Boyle. As they enter their 16th day inside the university’s Bramber Building, student protester Hugo Redwood spoke to reporter Ben James about where to go from here
The Argus (TA): Why is this issue so important to you? Why should other people be bothered?
Hugo Redwood (HR): The issues we are facing here, we are also facing across wider society: Privatisation, the lack of transparency and loss of community.
These are big topics but it is impossible to tackle them head on.
With previous unsuccessful occupy movements, we have seen a lot of anti-capitalist rhetoric and talk of huge change across society.
With this we have a grassroots problem which we feel we can change.
This is our university and we need to make sure it remains that way. Hopefully this will send a message to wider society.
This is still in our hands and that is why we will continue.
TA: How can you realistically see this protest ending?
HR: This will end with a move from the university. They will either meet our demands or take legal action and evict us.
Obviously I would like to think that they will meet all our demands. I think that is perfectly realistic and reasonable.
Now that we pay even more in fees the university should have more control over these issues.
Personally I will only be content if all our demands are met.
But I can’t say how it will end. We have seen other occupy movements fail but also others succeed.
What I do know is that we have an immense amount of support from both on and off campus.
The ball is now in the university’s court.
It is unlikely that this will end by our campaign fizzling out.
The next move will be the university’s.
TA: How have you managed to attract so many well known supporters and what do they add to the campaign?
HR: It’s really down to the hard work of a few of our computer experts. They know the email addresses to send messages to and the support has not stopped coming in.
I think their support is extremely important.
It shows that this isn’t just about some jumped up students with warped perceptions of how things work.
We have received support from well known faces as well as academics who are regarded as experts in their field.
They are all well respected in wider society and have a different reach to us.
TA: How far are you willing to take this? Are you concerned about the impact on your studies and post university life?
HR: Obviously there is a risk and some people are worried about being pictured or filmed. But we all feel very strongly about this.
The university could launch legal action but we are prepared to face that.
I have a 2,000 word essay due next week and I really should be dedicating my time to that. But this is important to me so I’m fitting it in around the occupation.
What’s really nice about this action is the wide range of support.
We have seen all kinds of people involved, many who have never really been involved in this sort of thing before. I think that shows the strength of feeling.
TA: The most visible banner at one of your rallies belonged to a communist group. Are the more radical groups hijacking and damaging this campaign?
HR: In terms of that banner, I know the people who made it and they are close friends of mine.
The image of those guys is of super punks and radical Stalinists. But they aren’t demanding a Soviet state university, they just want to see a democratic decision making process.
Hopefully it will dispell some pre-conceptions people have against them. They are perfectly sensible people going about making themselves heard in a sensible manner.
You can’t tell people to not bring banners, it’s freedom of expression.
On the back is a phrase in Latin which translates as all things communal or something like that.
If we stick together we are far stronger.
TA: There has been a lot of talk about this ‘Sussex Spirit’. Is there anything in that and where does it come from?
HR: It’s hard to say, but I think there are a number of reasons.
In the sixties the university had a bit of a hippy image and was known as Cambridge by the sea. If you were alternative the university was where you would go. As a result there was a strong culture of activism.
I also think that the fact we are largely based on one campus has an effect. We live together and have a close relationships with staff and lecturers. There is that feeling of being one.
I think the layout also lends itself to togetherness. The library square has for a long time acted as a meeting place for marches and demonstrations. Everyone passes through it and if there is something you want to make happen, you can.
Finally, I think the structure of the courses has an effect. Many are vocational and there is the opportunity to try different subjects and visit different departments.
For example, I study anthropology but can do a module in art, economics or history.
TA: There are plenty of more important issues that need addressing in society. Why are you bothering with this? The university have said that no jobs are at risk, would your time and effort not be better spent elsewhere?
HR: First of all I don’t think all the jobs will be safe. They may well all be transferred but new contracts will be drawn up, some of them short term. This will give the new contractors greater flexibility to fire them. They will certainly lose their job security.
Secondly, I could spend all my time fighting against the wrongs of the world and get nowhere. Or I could find a grassroots issue such as this which also affects people in wider society.
There are so many important issues encapsulated in this. There’s everything from privatisation of education, to the lack of transparency in organisations and the reduction in community values.
I don’t think I can change society but I can make a difference here. That’s why I’m committed to this and that’s why I’ll continue.
TA: The University has played down the support you claim to have. If the 235 are behind your action, why aren’t they up in the conference room with you?
HR: They care very much about what is happening, but they are realistic. They have families and mortgages and are worried about the future. They can’t spend all their time protesting because they need to work to pay the bills and feed their families So to a degree they are restrained in that way.
I think to an extent they also feel intimidated by the university. But Thursday’s protest was a clear sign that they are fully behind this. We had a good number of them out with us on the rally.
They have said that they thought this was a done deal and that all avenues had been explored.
They have seen that this isn’t the case and that’s why we will continue to fight for them.
See the latest news headlines from The Argus:
- Texan cheerleaders' Brighton treat
- A27 closed in both directions near Worthing after serious accident
- Lose your head at Brighton Fringe - literally
- Sussex hospital gets blood recycling technology
- Sussex hospital boss backs calls for local food
Add us to your circles on Google+
Comments(17)
rolivan
says...
7:02pm Mon 25 Feb 13
Maxwell's Ghost
says...
7:54pm Mon 25 Feb 13
Well, you may wonder why few people in the city support your protest.
It's because for years we have lost our communities at the hands of your student colleagues wrecking our communities with their selfish, dirty, anti-social, noisy, behaviour.
Try cleaning up your own act and then you may get more support.
Meanwhile, I suppose you wont be restricting your future job applications to the public sector.
Idontbelieveit1948
says...
8:03pm Mon 25 Feb 13
Martha Gunn
says...
9:44pm Mon 25 Feb 13
First the likes of him despoil our local neighbourhoods and then they seek to control how we can go about earning a living as best we can. What arrogance.
Surely Hugo must just be his nom de guerre - in my mind he is and always will be a Tristram.
Somethingsarejustwrong
says...
7:00am Tue 26 Feb 13
Cave Johnson
says...
8:48am Tue 26 Feb 13
lordenglandofsussex
says...
9:43am Tue 26 Feb 13
These young prigs should be working while studying and live in the real world.
Morpheus
says...
9:50am Tue 26 Feb 13
Kiddon72
says...
11:00am Tue 26 Feb 13
he said "Do you want fries with that ?"
No wonder Hugo is concerned about the catering staff. He is looking to secure his future employment !
Fairfax Sakes
says...
11:19am Tue 26 Feb 13
whereisthe...?
says...
1:41pm Tue 26 Feb 13
Typical mental hypocrites. Did you vote Tory last time by any chance? Or perhaps UKIP? Lol.
Roundbill
says...
1:24pm Wed 27 Feb 13
whereisthe...? wrote:Maybe some of us work shifts?
I can't stop laughing at all the idiot forum posters here, like the one above, complaining the protesters should "go get a job"... at a time that only proves the POSTERS THEMSELVES obviously have no jobs!!
Typical mental hypocrites. Did you vote Tory last time by any chance? Or perhaps UKIP? Lol.
Hmarge
says...
2:49pm Wed 27 Feb 13
Your comments are riddled with assumptions about the occupiers, which attempt to undermine their cause. They are challenging values, and it appears none of you have ANY of those. Enjoy sweltering in the pit of your own ignobility you horrible gits.
Roundbill
says...
11:33am Thu 28 Feb 13
Hmarge wrote:Good use of the phrase "ad hominem", Hugo - have a gold star (even though you clearly have no idea what context to use it in). I'm not sure about the mangled grammar later on in your rant though, as your object and subject are confused: either you're claiming that the occupiers attempt to undermine their cause, or you're saying that our comments are challenging values.
What a surprise, the British public 'arguing' ad hominem from their computers and actually DOING nothing. Apparently it is more relevant to call this chap POSH, rather than listen to his points.
Your comments are riddled with assumptions about the occupiers, which attempt to undermine their cause. They are challenging values, and it appears none of you have ANY of those. Enjoy sweltering in the pit of your own ignobility you horrible gits.
In addition, "none" is singular, so it should be followed by "has", not "have".
Now run along and finish your essay, or Daddy won't be buying you those new skis for your birthday.
Hmarge
says...
10:14pm Thu 28 Feb 13
Roundbill wrote:I apologise, but I study physics so I do not get to write many essays, I hope you can forgive my occasional syntactic errors.
Hmarge wrote:Good use of the phrase "ad hominem", Hugo - have a gold star (even though you clearly have no idea what context to use it in). I'm not sure about the mangled grammar later on in your rant though, as your object and subject are confused: either you're claiming that the occupiers attempt to undermine their cause, or you're saying that our comments are challenging values.
What a surprise, the British public 'arguing' ad hominem from their computers and actually DOING nothing. Apparently it is more relevant to call this chap POSH, rather than listen to his points.
Your comments are riddled with assumptions about the occupiers, which attempt to undermine their cause. They are challenging values, and it appears none of you have ANY of those. Enjoy sweltering in the pit of your own ignobility you horrible gits.
In addition, "none" is singular, so it should be followed by "has", not "have".
Now run along and finish your essay, or Daddy won't be buying you those new skis for your birthday.
The occupiers are challenging the values that you are actively perpetuating. It must be tired and bored in your brain.
You just used the exact rhetoric and values that I was criticising in order to counter my argument. You seem to be a meta-phallus.
Ad hominem means 'to the man', for example; Hugo makes a point, 'education is not a commodity' and then you refute with 'Hugo, you might be wealthy, so I your argument is invalid'.
We shall give this another try, do you have anything valid to say?
Roundbill
says...
4:20pm Fri 1 Mar 13
AmboGuy says...
6:30pm Mon 25 Feb 13