Brighton couple jailed for fraud offences

Clifford Wake Clifford Wake

A married couple who claimed benefits while living off a life of crime have been jailed for a total of nine-and-a-half years.

Clifford and Julia Wake, aged 52 and 44, were jailed for seven years and two-and-a-half years respectively at Lewes Crown Court today (March 1).

They were convicted following a South East Organised Crime Unit investigation which revealed between 2003 and 2011 the Wakes lived their luxury lifestyle through money laundering and other illegal means.

Clifford Allen Wake’s businesses replaced windows in council houses in Brighton and Hove, took on multi-million contracts in south London and helped build a hospital in Tunbridge Wells with various companies.

But the 52-year-old declared earnings of just £31,000 in eight years while claiming £19,000 in benefits.

The Wakes, of Whitethorn Drive, Brighton, claimed they earned money honestly but a jury at Lewes Crown Court saw through their lies.

Verdicts

Clifford was found guilty of two offences of fraudulent trading, four of theft, five of money laundering, four offences of obtaining property by deception or dishonestly, and one offence of failing to disclose property whilst bankrupt.

He was found not guilty of one offence of money laundering.

Julia was found guilty of one offence of failing to disclose property whilst bankrupt, four offences of obtaining services by deception or dishonestly, and three offences of money laundering.

She was found not guilty of two offences of money laundering.

Following sentence, a Sussex Police statement said: “They enjoyed a comfortable, sometimes extravagant lifestyle with vehicles, boats, property, and travel not as a result of honest hard work but from using criminal money which they acquired in various different ways.

"For some of this period, they reported to the authorities that they were living off a modest or meagre income.

'Criminal lifestyle'

“They even received state benefits. That may well have been the extent of their legitimate income but the true picture was very different.

“Clifford Wake was the prime mover in providing this criminal lifestyle.

“His wife seemed happy to enjoy the fruits of his dishonest labour but also played her part in misleading the authorities and a number of money-lending institutions.

“Clifford Wake siphoned off money due to creditors of his business ventures, using it to try to fund other business projects, he disposed of property belonging to others, he obtained various loans dishonestly, he dealt in stolen goods and property, and generally was living a life which was so far above his legitimate means that he had to be financing it with the proceeds of crime whether by himself or by others.

“He tried to conceal his assets and converted money into property or income which he could then spend.

“Julia Wake applied for mortgages by lying about her income and assisted her husband in acquiring, using and concealing money, property and other things.”

See the latest news headlines from The Argus:

More news from The Argus

Follow @brightonargus

Daily Echo on Facebook - facebook.com/southerndailyecho Like us on Facebook

Google+ Add us to your circles on Google+

Comments(8)

Thetruth666 says...
6:19pm Fri 1 Mar 13

7 years! How come none of the MP's caught robbing the state blind got a sentence like this?I'm glad these people have been punished for their crime but surely we as people are governed by the same laws?One rule for them...

hubby says...
8:09am Sat 2 Mar 13

Stick a bottle in someones face and you'll get community service.
Crimes where nobody gets hurt are always punished more severely than those where it is people who get damaged.
This is a joke and designed to keep us downtrodden by the rich and powerful.

SmileyD says...
10:02am Sat 2 Mar 13

Quote "Clifford was found guilty of two offences of fraudulent trading, four of theft, five of money laundering, four offences of obtaining property by deception or dishonestly, and one offence of failing to disclose property whilst bankrupt" and "Julia was found guilty of one offence of failing to disclose property whilst bankrupt, four offences of obtaining services by deception or dishonestly, and three offences of money laundering. "
So neither of them was found guilty of 'benefit fraud' then. Makes one wonder why the article is headlined "Brighton couple jailed for benefit fraud" then.
Surely The Argus is not trying to perpetuate the impression that everyone & anyone on benefits is a fraudster and a scrounger - a myth propagated by successive governments and the rest of the right-wing media to justify the contiual attacks on the living standards of the very poorest in our society.
Shame on The Argus!

Corruptpolice says...
4:22pm Mon 4 Mar 13

I know these people and they are lovely,shows how scummy todays government is rape a kid and get off light,try and get by and get 7 years.
I hope they are allowed a retrial ACAB forever.

steve120 says...
12:42am Thu 7 Mar 13

SmileyD---are you blind?
The headline reads 'fraud' not benefit fraud you idiot!

SmileyD says...
4:55am Thu 7 Mar 13

steve120 wrote:
SmileyD---are you blind?
The headline reads 'fraud' not benefit fraud you idiot!
When I made the comment - last Saturday, as you can see above, I quoted the headline as it was on the Argus website at that time. Presumably you will be unaware that it is possible to edit the content of websites at a later date. I am neither blind nor an idiot - perhaps you should take a moment to think before you go throwing insults around!

Pikey-Biker says...
9:42am Wed 13 Mar 13

Corruptpolice wrote:
I know these people and they are lovely,shows how scummy todays government is rape a kid and get off light,try and get by and get 7 years. I hope they are allowed a retrial ACAB forever.
I hope they get a longer sentence

Pikey-Biker says...
10:30am Wed 13 Mar 13

SmileyD wrote:
Quote "Clifford was found guilty of two offences of fraudulent trading, four of theft, five of money laundering, four offences of obtaining property by deception or dishonestly, and one offence of failing to disclose property whilst bankrupt" and "Julia was found guilty of one offence of failing to disclose property whilst bankrupt, four offences of obtaining services by deception or dishonestly, and three offences of money laundering. " So neither of them was found guilty of 'benefit fraud' then. Makes one wonder why the article is headlined "Brighton couple jailed for benefit fraud" then. Surely The Argus is not trying to perpetuate the impression that everyone & anyone on benefits is a fraudster and a scrounger - a myth propagated by successive governments and the rest of the right-wing media to justify the contiual attacks on the living standards of the very poorest in our society. Shame on The Argus!
No the Argus isn’t saying everyone on benefits is a fraudster or scrounger, just Clifford and Julia

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree