Need for landfill sites will 'virtually disappear' (From The Argus)
Get involved: Send your news, views, pictures and video by texting SUPIC to 80360 or email us.
Need for landfill sites will 'virtually disappear'
8:50am Tuesday 5th March 2013 in News By Tim Ridgway, Local government reporter
Need for landfill sites will 'virtually disappear'
Landfill sites in Sussex will become a thing of the past after the drafting of a new blueprint.
After approving its new “green” proposal for dealing with waste and minerals across East Sussex and Brighton and Hove, town hall bosses believe the controversial method of dealing with rubbish will “virtually disappear” within three years.
Officials claim its one existing landfill site, at Pebsham, near Hastings, is not expected to be replaced once full.
With West Sussex County Council only having one active site to bury waste, this means only a small percentage of waste will be disposed of by burial in the county.
However, the East Sussex plan admitted the current trend of more than 50% of waste requiring landfill will continue to be exported in the near future.
Keith Glazier, deputy leader of East Sussex County Council, said: “Adoption of the plan is the culmination of several years’ work which has included extensive consultation with people and businesses.
“Importantly, the plan does not include any new landfill sites and will encourage much greater recovery of material and energy from waste from businesses in the near future.”
The blueprint, which talks about how to deal with about 1.75 million tonnes of solid waste every year, has now been adopted by East Sussex County Council, Brighton and Hove City Council and the South Downs National Park Authority.
Officials claim the plan, which outlines how authorities tackle waste through the planning process, has some of the most ambitious targets in the country for waste recovery.
By 2015/15, it wants recycling rates to be 45% with overall recovery rates 98%.
This means that taxpayers do not have to foot a bill of up to £80 for every tonne sent to the landfill.
Phélim MacCafferty, deputy leader for Brighton and Hove City Council, said: “In Brighton and Hove we are focused on reducing as much waste as possible and providing as much support as we can to encourage everyone to play their part in saving resources.”
Andrew Shaxson, chairman of the South Downs National Parks Authority's planning committee, said: “This plan will help to guide major waste and mineral developments away from protected landscapes.”
- Author Peter James 'lucky to be alive' following 70mph racing crash
- Hove murder: wanted man phones The Argus
- Shoreham Rugby Club holding charity barbecue and fun day
- Police investigate spate of car crime across Sussex
- Sussex Police get Chinese book of sayings as thank you gift
Comments(14)
s_james
says...
9:18am Tue 5 Mar 13
Tailgaters Anonymous
says...
9:21am Tue 5 Mar 13
Is waste to be exported from Sussex, EfW to be implemented or what?
Is there an unduly optimistic expectation for recycling?
ESCC rowed back from its 6 crackpot land-raise proposals, including the flood area in Piltdown to the east of the Ouse, so what bright ideas are now in prospect?
Phani Tikkala
says...
9:44am Tue 5 Mar 13
Crystal Ball
says...
9:56am Tue 5 Mar 13
MuammarQaddafi
says...
10:05am Tue 5 Mar 13
qm
says...
10:28am Tue 5 Mar 13
s_james wrote:Thank you for that - shall have to find out more about "energy recovery" which of course will only have value if it utilised in some way.
Recycling = recycling and composting. Overall recovery = recycling, composting and energy recovery (e.g what goes on at Newhaven)
Seem to recall some years ago of a town council that spent an awful lot of money on it's recycling projects only for it to all end up in landfill anyway because there was no economically viable outlet for the recovered materials, the scandal being the self-congratulations and backslapping among the participants etc. until the truth was revealed!
The meaning of the term "recycle" sometimes gets lost perhaps in the enthusiasm for "tickn' da box"!
Thanks again!
Charismatic Andrew
says...
10:30am Tue 5 Mar 13
Fight_Back
says...
10:58am Tue 5 Mar 13
Agree with the recycling wheelie bins as well. We could also do with green waste being collected and recycling being every week ( along with rubbish being moved to every other week ).
Morpheus
says...
11:35am Tue 5 Mar 13
Stripes
says...
2:35pm Tue 5 Mar 13
qm
says...
3:04pm Tue 5 Mar 13
s_james
says...
8:56pm Tue 5 Mar 13
Stripes wrote:Not true. These are for trains to take away the ash from the incinerator for recycling.
This would explain the new railway sidings being installed by National Rail alongside the Newhaven incinerator then.
Qm - the £80 per tonne tax is payable even if the waste is exported to landfills outside the area. Exported in this context just means outside East Sussex and Brighton & Hove. However, the council only pays the tax for household waste, and already virtually none of this goes to landfill because of faciliites at Newhaven, Hollingdean etc. The vast majority of waste still landfilled is commercial waste, and the landfill tax is paid by the company disposing of it, not the taxpayer
qm
says...
1:31pm Wed 6 Mar 13
s_james wrote:Thank you s_james, wish news articles were a bit more informative on complex issues instead of being so brief and glib! TVM!
Stripes wrote:Not true. These are for trains to take away the ash from the incinerator for recycling.
This would explain the new railway sidings being installed by National Rail alongside the Newhaven incinerator then.
Qm - the £80 per tonne tax is payable even if the waste is exported to landfills outside the area. Exported in this context just means outside East Sussex and Brighton & Hove. However, the council only pays the tax for household waste, and already virtually none of this goes to landfill because of faciliites at Newhaven, Hollingdean etc. The vast majority of waste still landfilled is commercial waste, and the landfill tax is paid by the company disposing of it, not the taxpayer
qm says...
9:08am Tue 5 Mar 13
Can some knowledgable person please explain the numbers quoted above?
i.e. the difference between the recycling rate and the overall recovery rate.
In anticipation - Thanks