£15m scheme for Brighton's Lanes is unveiled

PLANS: How the scheme for Brighton Square could look PLANS: How the scheme for Brighton Square could look

A £15 million scheme to reshape Brighton’s famous Lanes has been unveiled.

Property developer Centurion Group and the RBS Global Restructuring Group have submitted plans for a comprehensive overhaul in the heart of the old city.

The two schemes, if approved, will create more than 115 new jobs and will feature the first new lane in the area for more than 30 years.

A new chapter RBS is seeking the council’s permission to build a new lane, to be called Hanningtons Lane, between Brighton Place and Meeting House Lane, replacing the old, part-derelict Hanningtons Department Store service yard and providing new links to North Street and Brighton Square.

The Timpson locksmith and shoe repair shop on North Street will be demolished and rebuilt on a smaller scale to make way for the new lane.

The scheme also features the Centurion Group’s plans for new residential and office accommodation with 15 new shops and a boutique hotel on Brighton Place.

Ed Allison-Wright, director at Centurion Group in Brighton Square, said: “After a year of due diligence and a successful pre-application consultation with traders and other key local stakeholders, providing valuable feedback that has enabled us to inform our design, we have submitted plans for a regeneration scheme that is aimed at marking the start of a new chapter for the heart of The Lanes.

“Brighton Square has lost some of its vibrancy and attraction, partly due to the success of the cultural quarter and North Laine, but also due to the lack of evolution and adaptation to the part derelict service yard, which has somewhat lost its spark in today’s market.

“Centurion Group’s connection with Brighton Square has spanned generations, as its original developer in the 1960s was Charles Hunnisett, the grandfather of our current executive chairman, Charles Draycott.

“We therefore seek to meet life-long ambitions for the group in relation to the Brighton Square portfolio, through implementing this scheme.”

Joss Brushfield, director in RBS Global Restructuring Group, said: “The proposed development will bring disused storage and service areas into economic use, generating jobs, attracting shoppers and tourists and creating economic and physical regeneration in the heart of Brighton.

“The design and quality needs to be of the highest standards in order to make this work with the rest of the Lanes and we are working in close co-operation with architects, Morgan Carn, agents Ellis & Partners and development managers Landid to ensure that we deliver the very best development, as Brighton deserves.”

Comments(27)

wexler53 says...
5:50pm Wed 6 Mar 13

Phew!! For a moment, I thought it was another crackpot green party scheme...

charlie smirke says...
6:07pm Wed 6 Mar 13

wexler53 wrote:
Phew!! For a moment, I thought it was another crackpot green party scheme...
So did I !! Let's hope it will be a quality build for that area.

pperrin says...
6:15pm Wed 6 Mar 13

Me three!

Dreading to see what was planned... but not green party nonsense at all!

First look at this seems good!

So where will the council provide affordable parking for customers of these new shops?

HJarrs says...
6:22pm Wed 6 Mar 13

wexler53 wrote:
Phew!! For a moment, I thought it was another crackpot green party scheme...
I thought the Greens were ruining business 'last one turn the lights out' ...obviously not.

This should fit nicely with the bike and pedestrian priority scheme for the area and fits with the Lewes rd and propsed victoria gardens cycle path developments.

Hove Actually says...
6:23pm Wed 6 Mar 13

Why does everyone have grand schemes but no pot to p1ss in when it comes to Brighton & Hove?

How about a scheme for Hove or Kemptown London Road or Lewes Road?

No just trying to shoe horn much of a muchness into an area that is already full of shops and shoppers most of the time

HJarrs says...
6:29pm Wed 6 Mar 13

wexler53 wrote:
Phew!! For a moment, I thought it was another crackpot green party scheme...
I thought the Greens were ruining business 'last one turn the lights out' ...obviously not.

This should fit nicely with the bike and pedestrian priority scheme for the area and fits with the Lewes rd and propsed victoria gardens cycle path developments.

pperrin says...
6:30pm Wed 6 Mar 13

Err.... you can't cycle through the laines, they are busy with pedestrians... so where you going to leave your bike?

And if there is no parking is it just the people in the surrounding couple of miles who are going to support all these new shops?

Surely not! says...
6:36pm Wed 6 Mar 13

The more I read the comments on here the more I think I might put pencil to paper and mark my cross next to the Greens. Not because I think they are support them, but if they get up the noses of you sad ignorant lot they must be doing something right.

mrroddis says...
6:41pm Wed 6 Mar 13

Surely not! wrote:
The more I read the comments on here the more I think I might put pencil to paper and mark my cross next to the Greens. Not because I think they are support them, but if they get up the noses of you sad ignorant lot they must be doing something right.
Here here! Does this comments section only exist to make the Mail Online look reasonable?

kkj says...
6:46pm Wed 6 Mar 13

mrroddis wrote:
Surely not! wrote:
The more I read the comments on here the more I think I might put pencil to paper and mark my cross next to the Greens. Not because I think they are support them, but if they get up the noses of you sad ignorant lot they must be doing something right.
Here here! Does this comments section only exist to make the Mail Online look reasonable?
Where? Where?

leobrighton says...
7:12pm Wed 6 Mar 13

Why should the council provide cheap parking in the area?

Why should the developers spend £15 million in areas like London Road instead of this popular area?

Good to see a scheme like this in our city but still the petrol heads and anti-progress brigade moan.

HJarrs says...
8:43pm Wed 6 Mar 13

Somethingsarejustwro
ng
wrote:
HJarrs wrote:
wexler53 wrote:
Phew!! For a moment, I thought it was another crackpot green party scheme...
I thought the Greens were ruining business 'last one turn the lights out' ...obviously not.

This should fit nicely with the bike and pedestrian priority scheme for the area and fits with the Lewes rd and propsed victoria gardens cycle path developments.
The green party village idiot has contributed her usual nonsense. LOL
I am a bit disappointed at your Trolling rate. It is has seriously declined.

However, have you any point to make regarding the article?

Hove Actually says...
8:50pm Wed 6 Mar 13

leobrighton wrote:
Why should the council provide cheap parking in the area?

Why should the developers spend £15 million in areas like London Road instead of this popular area?

Good to see a scheme like this in our city but still the petrol heads and anti-progress brigade moan.
The council should provide affordable parking so the travelling public can pay towards the excessive business rates charges to the shops.

A small shop in the centre of Brighton
will cost thousands of £s

Harry Shand says...
11:23pm Wed 6 Mar 13

Looks like an exciting scheme for an area suffering from neglect.

jyan says...
2:06am Thu 7 Mar 13

While you're at it, knock down Chuchill Square and replace that with more lanes and nice little interesting shops - that's want tourists want who bring in the money to Brighton not the shops you get everywhere else.

chrisso says...
4:51am Thu 7 Mar 13

For 'boutique hotel' read over- priced hotel with a crazy colour scheme.

monkeymoo says...
5:00am Thu 7 Mar 13

Have any of you read the article?

This is a scheme for building flats and office blocks.
As with all proposals these days, the company has to show what it will bring to the area in return for permission to build.
Companies do not have to carry out their commitment if it is deemed they will suffer economically from doing so. The flats will be built, then they (might) pull out of everything else and claim "economic hardship".
Just as in other developments in B&H, Lancing, Seaford, and Lewes.

Hector66 says...
5:38am Thu 7 Mar 13

so many developers' schemes yet so little real development.

chilliman says...
7:16am Thu 7 Mar 13

jyan wrote:
While you're at it, knock down Chuchill Square and replace that with more lanes and nice little interesting shops - that's want tourists want who bring in the money to Brighton not the shops you get everywhere else.
Strangely, I've been asked many times "where are the proper shops like M&S, Primark and BHS" when I've been in The Lanes but never the other way round. When I've suggested they explore the smaller shops the comment is "Oh no, they don't interest us, we've got them where we live".

It's also a bit ironic that the only shop in that part of North St/The Lanes that I use is Timpsons and that could be demolished - OK, with a replacement built.

s_james says...
9:22am Thu 7 Mar 13

upsidedowntuctuc wrote:
HJarrs wrote:
wexler53 wrote:
Phew!! For a moment, I thought it was another crackpot green party scheme...
I thought the Greens were ruining business 'last one turn the lights out' ...obviously not.

This should fit nicely with the bike and pedestrian priority scheme for the area and fits with the Lewes rd and propsed victoria gardens cycle path developments.
Ha Ha Ha Which part of this article has anything to do with the green party??
How does this fit with the Lewes Road cycle path???
MUPPET!
It doesn’t directly, but I take the comment to be a response to numerous other silly comments on other articles on this site which have suggested that there would be no further private sector investment in Brighton due to the policies of the Green Party. This proposed scheme is one of many schemes in the pipeline that proves such claims are completely ludicrous.

HJarrs says...
9:23am Thu 7 Mar 13

upsidedowntuctuc wrote:
HJarrs wrote:
wexler53 wrote:
Phew!! For a moment, I thought it was another crackpot green party scheme...
I thought the Greens were ruining business 'last one turn the lights out' ...obviously not.

This should fit nicely with the bike and pedestrian priority scheme for the area and fits with the Lewes rd and propsed victoria gardens cycle path developments.
Ha Ha Ha Which part of this article has anything to do with the green party??
How does this fit with the Lewes Road cycle path???
MUPPET!
There are proposals from falmer through to the laines for improved cycle, bus and pedestrian facilities and access. I thought you read the argus? Hence, for many people there is a reasonable, practicle and cost effective alternative to the private car. The above development is in that area, that is how it all fits together.

heathgate says...
9:30am Thu 7 Mar 13

jyan wrote:
While you're at it, knock down Chuchill Square and replace that with more lanes and nice little interesting shops - that's want tourists want who bring in the money to Brighton not the shops you get everywhere else.
What a foolish comment, how about the people of Brighton? Whilst tourism is important, the people who actually live there need 'regular' shopping outlets, a good balance between independant and standard shopping offerings is the right way to go, best for all interest groups.

billy goat-gruff says...
10:25am Thu 7 Mar 13

Oh dear, the Lanes has lost some of its vibrancy!

jyan says...
11:48am Thu 7 Mar 13

heathgate wrote:
jyan wrote:
While you're at it, knock down Chuchill Square and replace that with more lanes and nice little interesting shops - that's want tourists want who bring in the money to Brighton not the shops you get everywhere else.
What a foolish comment, how about the people of Brighton? Whilst tourism is important, the people who actually live there need 'regular' shopping outlets, a good balance between independant and standard shopping offerings is the right way to go, best for all interest groups.
No stuff the people of Brighton everyone shops online anyway. What everyone wants are little over-priced shops that look posh not your chavvy big shops,

jyan says...
11:50am Thu 7 Mar 13

chilliman wrote:
jyan wrote:
While you're at it, knock down Chuchill Square and replace that with more lanes and nice little interesting shops - that's want tourists want who bring in the money to Brighton not the shops you get everywhere else.
Strangely, I've been asked many times "where are the proper shops like M&S, Primark and BHS" when I've been in The Lanes but never the other way round. When I've suggested they explore the smaller shops the comment is "Oh no, they don't interest us, we've got them where we live".

It's also a bit ironic that the only shop in that part of North St/The Lanes that I use is Timpsons and that could be demolished - OK, with a replacement built.
Go to Crawley if you want those sort of low market shops .

Jimmy Stewart's Imaginary Rabbit says...
12:56pm Thu 7 Mar 13

Surely not! wrote:
The more I read the comments on here the more I think I might put pencil to paper and mark my cross next to the Greens. Not because I think they are support them, but if they get up the noses of you sad ignorant lot they must be doing something right.
I must admit I might do the same! Being an intelligent person with a rational, analytical mind I obviously don't support the 'think so far and then stop' Greens, but some of the anti-Green party rubbish on these comments pages is beyond belief.

Anyway, my default position is to believe that 'all development is good', and this sounds reasonable so I hope it goes ahead.

rolivan says...
4:42pm Thu 7 Mar 13

There is a great mix of retail office and residential property in this relatively small area The Development of Brighton Sq was a brilliant idea it is a pity more of this couldnt be achieved a little further north in the area now known as North Laine I must say I was very impressed with the new building that runs the length between North Rd and Church St reminded me of an Ocean Liner Bond st and Gardner St could do with a complete revamp with another storey added to increase residential occupancy

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree