Sussex Police morale at all time low (From The Argus)
Get involved: Send your news, views, pictures and video by texting SUPIC to 80360 or email us.
Sussex Police morale at all time low
1:00pm Friday 8th March 2013 in News By Anna Roberts, Crime reporter
Half of police officers and support staff in Sussex believe the force doesn’t care about them, an internal |survey has revealed.
The satisfaction study reveals morale has been hit by red tape, equipment problems and a lack of promotion opportunities – with a third saying they don’t think they’d get a good service if they reported a crime.
Anna Roberts reports.
THOUSANDS of Sussex Police officers and staff from across the county picked up their pens in the summer and confidentially shared their views on how they were feeling.
By-and-large the results were negative.
Officers and staff in their droves complained about senior management, red-tape and even safety.
A total of 59 per cent of all staff responded – this amounting to 3,247 people.
Alarmingly, half of all people surveyed disagreed with the comments: “Sussex Police cares about its staff”.
Forty-eight percent disagreed with the comment: “I feel valued for the work I do”.
This was 11% more than in 2010, the last available survey.
Fifty-six per cent disagreed with the comment: “I have clear development opportunities within Sussex Police”.
In 2010, just a third disagreed with this comment.
The Argus was initially alerted to the results of the survey in the autumn but when we asked Sussex Police for a copy they refused.
We obtained the survey after submitting a Freedom of Information request.
Other results revealed that 30% said they disagreed that health and safety was “given a high priority” within the force and 40% said they disagreed they had an appropriate work/life balance.
Senior management were also criticised by 40% of respondents for not being visible enough and nearly a third said they “did not have confidence” in their leaders.
However, a Sussex officer, who asked to remain anonymous, told The Argus: “People are upset not because of what Sussex is doing but because of what the Government is doing.
“We are having massive reductions in pay and we are being asked to do more for less.
“I think the police probably care but if someone comes and says, ‘I’m really hard up because my wages are down’ what can you do?’
'Paid quite well'
“There is national pay bargaining and you can’t change that locally.
“You are stuck in Sussex Police. You can’t go to the Met because the Met aren’t hiring and the pay won’t be that different.
“But truthfully we do have quite a good job and we get paid quite well.”
Mark White, secretary of Sussex Police Federation – representing officers, said: “The answers given by Sussex police officers are indicative of how officers are feeling across the country. We are being subjected to a sustained attack by this Government and morale is at an all-time low.
“The Government seem to want more and more from police officers but seem to value us less and less.
“The fact that more than 45,000 police officers this week voted for the right to strike should tell you what the mood is and it is no surprise that this was reflected in the survey.”
Marion Fanthorpe, director of human resources at Sussex Police, said: “Staff and officers have experienced massive change as a result of both national policy and the far- reaching local changes we are making to modernise Sussex Police by 2015.
"It’s important that we keep in touch with the views of frontline officers and staff as we do this.
“We will use the results of the survey to help us manage the impact of these changes on staff and on the service we provide to the public.
"Serving Sussex 2015 is the programme of work that will significantly change how we deliver policing in the future.
“The first phase focused on how we could deliver cost savings of £52 million by 2015. The second phase will focus on modernising our force to keep pace with technology, changing crime patterns and the expectations of the public.
“We are aiming to improve the service we provide to the public, give our officers and staff the systems and equipment they need to do an effective job, and provide good value for tax payers’ money.
“Sussex Police is a responsible employer and hugely values its staff who do a difficult job in often difficult circumstances.
“However we understand that many staff feel that their terms and conditions are being affected by the changes and financial constraints.
“There are a number of schemes in place to provide advice and support to help manage the impact of changes on individuals.
“Many staff believe that chief officers have a clear vision for Sussex Police in 2015.
“They are modernising the force, improving the service it provides to the public and will give its officers and staff the modern systems and equipment they need to do an effective job.
“But at a time when the force has to find significant savings, tough choices have had to be made.
“It is understandable that staff and officers who have experienced major changes over the last two years will be affected.”
- Fears development is harming badger community in Hove
- What a stink! Oil, fat and grease cost sewers more than £11m a year
- Free health check offered for Crawley residents
- Ex-Albion player due in court on anti-gay charges
- Author Peter James 'lucky to be alive' following 70mph racing crash
Comments(32)
emma_barnes
says...
1:13pm Fri 8 Mar 13
Crystal Ball
says...
2:06pm Fri 8 Mar 13
kopite_rob
says...
2:29pm Fri 8 Mar 13
a) policing by the consent of the people
b)a policeman or women being able to use their discretion
to
a)top down policing by direction of the government
b)target driven policing
When the public see no visibility of officers on the street and have a general perception of lawlessness and anti-social behaviour in our town centre both day and night, see no action taken against trespassers in our public spaces and don't feel safe in their own homes, but are then recipients of punitive penalties by anonymous officers for minor traffic offences it erodes public support and confidence that the police are capable of doing their jobs of upholding law and order, and are just "going for the easy option".
Unfortunately it now appears the police themselves don't feel capable of upholding either the law or public order.
Perhaps its time for the streets of Brighton to be flooded with foot & bike patrols.Chicago PD effectively policed their G8 conference using police in shorts & shirts on bikes, gainst hundreds of protestors. So leave the cars at the station and meet the public.
Whatever happened to the broken windows vision of policing?
BiggerH
says...
2:42pm Fri 8 Mar 13
1. some people don't like their job
2. some people don't like their boss
Astonishing!! (you could always go go and get a job at Innocent Smoothie)
spa301
says...
2:55pm Fri 8 Mar 13
kopite_rob wrote:Good intelligent set of comments (rare on this site)
It all went horribly wrong from the moment it changed from a) policing by the consent of the people b)a policeman or women being able to use their discretion to a)top down policing by direction of the government b)target driven policing When the public see no visibility of officers on the street and have a general perception of lawlessness and anti-social behaviour in our town centre both day and night, see no action taken against trespassers in our public spaces and don't feel safe in their own homes, but are then recipients of punitive penalties by anonymous officers for minor traffic offences it erodes public support and confidence that the police are capable of doing their jobs of upholding law and order, and are just "going for the easy option". Unfortunately it now appears the police themselves don't feel capable of upholding either the law or public order. Perhaps its time for the streets of Brighton to be flooded with foot & bike patrols.Chicago PD effectively policed their G8 conference using police in shorts & shirts on bikes, gainst hundreds of protestors. So leave the cars at the station and meet the public. Whatever happened to the broken windows vision of policing?
This is developing into a very worrying situation for all of us. We definitely need to see more police getting out of their cars or from behind their desks and interacting with the public they supposedly serve. This may also have the side effect of improving their morale.
ICantThinkOfAName
says...
3:22pm Fri 8 Mar 13
Kiddon72
says...
3:30pm Fri 8 Mar 13
BiggerH wrote:Good to see you could get time away from sitting under a bridge scaring billy goats.
I'm absolutely shocked that:- 1. some people don't like their job 2. some people don't like their boss Astonishing!! (you could always go go and get a job at Innocent Smoothie)
Old Ladys Gin
says...
3:58pm Fri 8 Mar 13
risingphoenix
says...
4:01pm Fri 8 Mar 13
Funnily enough that's probably what most of the general population thinks too!
AmboGuy
says...
4:08pm Fri 8 Mar 13
risingphoenix wrote:Why do you think that? Have you asked most of the general population?
"Half of police officers and support staff in Sussex believe the force doesn’t care about them"....
Funnily enough that's probably what most of the general population thinks too!
Thought not, now go home troll.
BornInBrighton1968
says...
5:05pm Fri 8 Mar 13
Just say 'No' to multiculturalism and diversity!
That way, the Police will protect law-abiding, tax-paying, hard-working citizens instead of obsessing about the 'rights' of drug dealers, burglars and criminal scum!
risingphoenix
says...
5:10pm Fri 8 Mar 13
AmboGuy wrote:Have YOU asked most of the general population?
risingphoenix wrote:Why do you think that? Have you asked most of the general population?
"Half of police officers and support staff in Sussex believe the force doesn’t care about them"....
Funnily enough that's probably what most of the general population thinks too!
Thought not, now go home troll.
Thought not...
I guess that makes you the troll...
AmboGuy
says...
5:34pm Fri 8 Mar 13
risingphoenix wrote:Of course I haven't you imbecile but then I'm not the one making stupid claims on the Internet.
AmboGuy wrote:Have YOU asked most of the general population?
risingphoenix wrote:Why do you think that? Have you asked most of the general population?
"Half of police officers and support staff in Sussex believe the force doesn’t care about them"....
Funnily enough that's probably what most of the general population thinks too!
Thought not, now go home troll.
Thought not...
I guess that makes you the troll...
Try to engage your brain think a bit before you click on the submit button next time.
risingphoenix
says...
5:44pm Fri 8 Mar 13
AmboGuy wrote:First rule in identifying a troll...
risingphoenix wrote:Of course I haven't you imbecile but then I'm not the one making stupid claims on the Internet.
AmboGuy wrote:Have YOU asked most of the general population?
risingphoenix wrote:Why do you think that? Have you asked most of the general population?
"Half of police officers and support staff in Sussex believe the force doesn’t care about them"....
Funnily enough that's probably what most of the general population thinks too!
Thought not, now go home troll.
Thought not...
I guess that makes you the troll...
Try to engage your brain think a bit before you click on the submit button next time.
Watch out for the originator of the first insults, as it shows a total failure to put forward a reasonable argument...
I guess that sucks for you ambo...
Alan G Skinner
says...
6:54pm Fri 8 Mar 13
AmboGuy
says...
6:57pm Fri 8 Mar 13
risingphoenix wrote:Second rule:
AmboGuy wrote:First rule in identifying a troll...
risingphoenix wrote:Of course I haven't you imbecile but then I'm not the one making stupid claims on the Internet.
AmboGuy wrote:Have YOU asked most of the general population?
risingphoenix wrote:Why do you think that? Have you asked most of the general population?
"Half of police officers and support staff in Sussex believe the force doesn’t care about them"....
Funnily enough that's probably what most of the general population thinks too!
Thought not, now go home troll.
Thought not...
I guess that makes you the troll...
Try to engage your brain think a bit before you click on the submit button next time.
Watch out for the originator of the first insults, as it shows a total failure to put forward a reasonable argument...
I guess that sucks for you ambo...
People make claims without being able to back up their 'fact'. Naturally this is done just to try and get a reaction off people.
Third rule is of course that theyll go under new usernames all the time. How long have you been on this website risingphoenix? Not long is it?
You're an obvious troll.
risingphoenix
says...
7:34pm Fri 8 Mar 13
AmboGuy wrote:Questioning the questioner when you have nothing further to add eh amboguy?
risingphoenix wrote:Second rule:
AmboGuy wrote:First rule in identifying a troll...
risingphoenix wrote:Of course I haven't you imbecile but then I'm not the one making stupid claims on the Internet.
AmboGuy wrote:Have YOU asked most of the general population?
risingphoenix wrote:Why do you think that? Have you asked most of the general population?
"Half of police officers and support staff in Sussex believe the force doesn’t care about them"....
Funnily enough that's probably what most of the general population thinks too!
Thought not, now go home troll.
Thought not...
I guess that makes you the troll...
Try to engage your brain think a bit before you click on the submit button next time.
Watch out for the originator of the first insults, as it shows a total failure to put forward a reasonable argument...
I guess that sucks for you ambo...
People make claims without being able to back up their 'fact'. Naturally this is done just to try and get a reaction off people.
Third rule is of course that theyll go under new usernames all the time. How long have you been on this website risingphoenix? Not long is it?
You're an obvious troll.
Such an old troll trick...lol
So amboguy...You tell me
How long have I been on this site?
And you can of course list my alleged other 'usernames' which can be verified?
You're still the one who has answered a post with insults, so as I said...
You are the troll !
AmboGuy
says...
8:45pm Fri 8 Mar 13
I can't believe I've broken the oldest rule and I've started to feed the troll by giving him the attention he so clearly craves.
Run along now son and get back to making your 'controversial' yet utterly hilarious posts about the police and why everyone hates them. They were a hoot.
Idontbelieveit1948
says...
8:45pm Fri 8 Mar 13
a troll is defined as someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as a forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response
I'm with you risingphoenix and agree Amboguy is the troll here through his inflammatory posts, not uncommon from him as many of his other posts will exemplify.
Thought the original post by risingphoenix was perfectly reasonable.
Somethingsarejustwrong
says...
9:26pm Fri 8 Mar 13
You would do well to 'jog on'...
Bye then!
AmboGuy
says...
9:39pm Fri 8 Mar 13
Idontbelieveit1948 wrote:Hmm yet another brand new username appears tonight to defend his 'mate'.
Given that ;-
a troll is defined as someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as a forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response
I'm with you risingphoenix and agree Amboguy is the troll here through his inflammatory posts, not uncommon from him as many of his other posts will exemplify.
Thought the original post by risingphoenix was perfectly reasonable.
Nice try though. It's quite sad that you're bothered enough to have 2 (at least) usernames on the website. Now get a life.
Spx
says...
8:24am Sat 9 Mar 13
thommy
says...
9:29am Sat 9 Mar 13
AmboGuy
says...
9:53am Sat 9 Mar 13
Spx wrote:Thanks for your your input Sparky. Good to see at least there's no racist or homophobic remarks this time.
The Police need to adapt to a changing world, the same as everyone else and in my opinion "Ambumgay" is a troll!
hubby
says...
11:21am Sat 9 Mar 13
Nobody forced them to join the police!
risingphoenix
says...
11:39am Sat 9 Mar 13
AmboGuy wrote:Oh dear...
Oh Jesus it's like arguing with a 5 year old.
I can't believe I've broken the oldest rule and I've started to feed the troll by giving him the attention he so clearly craves.
Run along now son and get back to making your 'controversial' yet utterly hilarious posts about the police and why everyone hates them. They were a hoot.
So you even can't back up your wild accusations...lol
And given some of the other comments aimed at you, it appears that your vitriolic posts have led others to come to the same conclusion as I have...
http://www.youtube.c
om/watch?v=wV4ZCU7tX
rY
clubrob6
says...
12:39pm Sat 9 Mar 13
george smith
says...
7:51am Sun 10 Mar 13
AmboGuy
says...
11:44am Sun 10 Mar 13
george smith wrote:Paperwork and severe lack on numbers of Police means that they are constantly 'tied' to their desk.
Where have the police gone, you no longer see them on foot or in patrol cars. You don't even see the pcso's any more. You occasionally see one flash past with its blue lights.
To book someone in at custody and go through the interview and evidence process takes hours.
A lack of of numbers mean that as they each have an increasingly large area to cover cars are the best option for getting to somewhere quickly.
Unfortunately saddo internet trolls like risingphoenix (and all his other aliases) don't understand this very important fact.
chris elmes
says...
11:29pm Sun 10 Mar 13
spa301 wrote:ACPO (In my opinion) don't give a monkeys as long as their palms are well greased, also Cameron dosen't give two h'apperths either. His agenda is for police to be privatised so his bankster pals make a killing.
kopite_rob wrote:Good intelligent set of comments (rare on this site)
It all went horribly wrong from the moment it changed from a) policing by the consent of the people b)a policeman or women being able to use their discretion to a)top down policing by direction of the government b)target driven policing When the public see no visibility of officers on the street and have a general perception of lawlessness and anti-social behaviour in our town centre both day and night, see no action taken against trespassers in our public spaces and don't feel safe in their own homes, but are then recipients of punitive penalties by anonymous officers for minor traffic offences it erodes public support and confidence that the police are capable of doing their jobs of upholding law and order, and are just "going for the easy option". Unfortunately it now appears the police themselves don't feel capable of upholding either the law or public order. Perhaps its time for the streets of Brighton to be flooded with foot & bike patrols.Chicago PD effectively policed their G8 conference using police in shorts & shirts on bikes, gainst hundreds of protestors. So leave the cars at the station and meet the public. Whatever happened to the broken windows vision of policing?
This is developing into a very worrying situation for all of us. We definitely need to see more police getting out of their cars or from behind their desks and interacting with the public they supposedly serve. This may also have the side effect of improving their morale.
nocando
says...
7:59pm Mon 11 Mar 13
Perhaps they should be better at their jobs before they burst into tears because no one likes them.
hyram77 says...
1:07pm Fri 8 Mar 13