Trio operated drug factory in Saltdean

Bulford and McCall Bulford and McCall

Two men and a woman from Brighton had £63,000 of drugs in their illegal factory in Saltdean.

Police found enough MDMA to make 6,663 ecstasy pills, 55g of high purity cocaine, more than 2kg of ketamin, a pill making machine and more than £41,000 in cash in raids in September 2012.

After raiding the address in Bannings Vale, Saltdean police arrested self-employed Paul Bulford, 44, of Bannings Vale, disc-jockey Gavin McCall, 44, of Abinger Road, Woodingdean and 39-year-old Kerry Worms of Bannings Vale.

More than 2kg of Ketamine and 5kg of drug adulterants were also found in a vehicle in Saltdean linked to Bulford.

The total estimated potential street value of the recovered drugs was £63,612.

All three were sentenced at Brighton Crown Court yesterday (March 8).

Bulford had previously pleaded guilty to production of MDMA, possession of cocaine with intent to supply, possession of Diazepam, possession of Ketamine, and money laundering of £32,000. He was sentenced to a total of nine years imprisonment.

McCall had pleaded guilty to production of MDMA, and was sentenced to eight years imprisonment.

Worms had pleaded guilty to allowing premises to be used for the production of MDMA and was sentenced to 12 months imprisonment suspended for two years and 200 hours of unpaid work. 

Detective Inspector Till Sanderson said; "We continue to actively target those involved in the drugs trade, particularly those profiting from it.

"We will now be seeking a court order under the Proceeds of Crime Act to confiscate the criminal proceeds and profits of Bulford and McCall.

"We also remind people tempted to buy illicit powders and pills that these substances are not subject to any form of quality control and are mixed with all manner of adulterants - some of which can have serious adverse, or even fatal, side effects.

"Taking them is tantamount to trusting a person you don't know to gamble with your health."

Comments(11)

freewheelingdom says...
6:50pm Sat 9 Mar 13

So, what've they done wrong? Hard working men being hassled for earning an honest living.

mimseycal says...
7:38pm Sat 9 Mar 13

freewheelingdom wrote:
So, what've they done wrong? Hard working men being hassled for earning an honest living.
You are not serious are you. Please don't tell me you are being serious when you ask the above.

farang says...
10:40pm Sat 9 Mar 13

If drug use were decriminalised the quality of the product would be properly controlled, meaning people who decided they want to use them would not be risking serious health problems induced by the addition of adulterants.
Revenue could be collected from sales.
Law enforcement would be significantly less costly.
Clearly it is alcohol which does the most harm and, unlike most pharmaceuticals, is toxic in small quantities.

mimseycal says...
11:03pm Sat 9 Mar 13

Yes, maybe ... however these are most definitely not regulated manufacturers, subject to quality control, with proper accounts leading to appropriate revenue collection.

Whether alcohol does more harm or not is neither here now there really.

You can get off your pro-legalisation of recreational drugs soap box now.

greeg2 says...
11:41pm Sat 9 Mar 13

farang wrote:
If drug use were decriminalised the quality of the product would be properly controlled, meaning people who decided they want to use them would not be risking serious health problems induced by the addition of adulterants.
Revenue could be collected from sales.
Law enforcement would be significantly less costly.
Clearly it is alcohol which does the most harm and, unlike most pharmaceuticals, is toxic in small quantities.
You're obviously a junkie or just sympathetic to them,but not everyone is.Apropos,alcohol's a drink and not treated as a drug.

farang says...
11:57pm Sat 9 Mar 13

No!

mr punch says...
2:25am Sun 10 Mar 13

Typical! The woman gets off light. She was probably the Mrs Big.

mimseycal says...
8:47am Sun 10 Mar 13

farang wrote:
No!
No what?

farang says...
9:23am Sun 10 Mar 13

to what you and greeg said- and stop making unsubstantiated assumptions!

mimseycal says...
9:54am Sun 10 Mar 13

farang wrote:
to what you and greeg said- and stop making unsubstantiated assumptions!
Unsubstantiated assumptions? About you being pro-legalisation of recreational drugs? Okay ... but your post certainly makes it appear so. And, in all fairness, I personally think that there is a strong case to be made for legalising and regulating the whole recreational drug business.

But it is neither here nor there, nor is the relative harm of alcohol vs recreational drugs.

What is the issue, with regards to this article at least, is that some unregulated, unregistered procurers and manufacturers of illegal recreational drugs have been brought to book and are off the streets. Well, two of them are off the streets.

The third was rather leniently dealt with in my opinion but then again, I don't have all the details of the evidence as presented to the court so am in no real position to determine whether her sentence is necessarily lenient or given to her because to do otherwise would penalise innocent parties.

Maxwell's Ghost says...
10:05am Sun 10 Mar 13

A 44 year old DJ and a woman called Worms. Funny.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree