Trio operated drug factory in Saltdean (From The Argus)
Get involved: Send your news, views, pictures and video by texting SUPIC to 80360 or email us.
Trio operated drug factory in Saltdean
1:30pm Saturday 9th March 2013 in News By Kimberly Middleton, Acting chief reporter
Bulford and McCall
Two men and a woman from Brighton had £63,000 of drugs in their illegal factory in Saltdean.
Police found enough MDMA to make 6,663 ecstasy pills, 55g of high purity cocaine, more than 2kg of ketamin, a pill making machine and more than £41,000 in cash in raids in September 2012.
After raiding the address in Bannings Vale, Saltdean police arrested self-employed Paul Bulford, 44, of Bannings Vale, disc-jockey Gavin McCall, 44, of Abinger Road, Woodingdean and 39-year-old Kerry Worms of Bannings Vale.
More than 2kg of Ketamine and 5kg of drug adulterants were also found in a vehicle in Saltdean linked to Bulford.
The total estimated potential street value of the recovered drugs was £63,612.
All three were sentenced at Brighton Crown Court yesterday (March 8).
Bulford had previously pleaded guilty to production of MDMA, possession of cocaine with intent to supply, possession of Diazepam, possession of Ketamine, and money laundering of £32,000. He was sentenced to a total of nine years imprisonment.
McCall had pleaded guilty to production of MDMA, and was sentenced to eight years imprisonment.
Worms had pleaded guilty to allowing premises to be used for the production of MDMA and was sentenced to 12 months imprisonment suspended for two years and 200 hours of unpaid work.
Detective Inspector Till Sanderson said; "We continue to actively target those involved in the drugs trade, particularly those profiting from it.
"We will now be seeking a court order under the Proceeds of Crime Act to confiscate the criminal proceeds and profits of Bulford and McCall.
"We also remind people tempted to buy illicit powders and pills that these substances are not subject to any form of quality control and are mixed with all manner of adulterants - some of which can have serious adverse, or even fatal, side effects.
"Taking them is tantamount to trusting a person you don't know to gamble with your health."
- Victim "fabricated" sex assault story - day eleven of Albion players' trial
- Dad-of-two was visiting brother and nephew when he was gunned down in Hove
- UPDATE: A27 closed in both directions near Worthing after serious accident
- Brighton and Hove enjoys overseas visitor boost of £12m
- Plant could be fighting germs
Comments(11)
mimseycal
says...
7:38pm Sat 9 Mar 13
freewheelingdom wrote:You are not serious are you. Please don't tell me you are being serious when you ask the above.
So, what've they done wrong? Hard working men being hassled for earning an honest living.
farang
says...
10:40pm Sat 9 Mar 13
Revenue could be collected from sales.
Law enforcement would be significantly less costly.
Clearly it is alcohol which does the most harm and, unlike most pharmaceuticals, is toxic in small quantities.
mimseycal
says...
11:03pm Sat 9 Mar 13
Whether alcohol does more harm or not is neither here now there really.
You can get off your pro-legalisation of recreational drugs soap box now.
greeg2
says...
11:41pm Sat 9 Mar 13
farang wrote:You're obviously a junkie or just sympathetic to them,but not everyone is.Apropos,alcohol's a drink and not treated as a drug.
If drug use were decriminalised the quality of the product would be properly controlled, meaning people who decided they want to use them would not be risking serious health problems induced by the addition of adulterants.
Revenue could be collected from sales.
Law enforcement would be significantly less costly.
Clearly it is alcohol which does the most harm and, unlike most pharmaceuticals, is toxic in small quantities.
farang
says...
11:57pm Sat 9 Mar 13
mr punch
says...
2:25am Sun 10 Mar 13
mimseycal
says...
8:47am Sun 10 Mar 13
farang wrote:No what?
No!
farang
says...
9:23am Sun 10 Mar 13
mimseycal
says...
9:54am Sun 10 Mar 13
farang wrote:Unsubstantiated assumptions? About you being pro-legalisation of recreational drugs? Okay ... but your post certainly makes it appear so. And, in all fairness, I personally think that there is a strong case to be made for legalising and regulating the whole recreational drug business.
to what you and greeg said- and stop making unsubstantiated assumptions!
But it is neither here nor there, nor is the relative harm of alcohol vs recreational drugs.
What is the issue, with regards to this article at least, is that some unregulated, unregistered procurers and manufacturers of illegal recreational drugs have been brought to book and are off the streets. Well, two of them are off the streets.
The third was rather leniently dealt with in my opinion but then again, I don't have all the details of the evidence as presented to the court so am in no real position to determine whether her sentence is necessarily lenient or given to her because to do otherwise would penalise innocent parties.
Maxwell's Ghost
says...
10:05am Sun 10 Mar 13
freewheelingdom says...
6:50pm Sat 9 Mar 13