Brighton and Hove's £300,000 compensation payouts

Uneven paving at Inwood Crescent, Brighton Uneven paving at Inwood Crescent, Brighton

More  than £330,000 has been paid out because of defects on Brighton and Hove’s pavements and roads – including a single bill of more than £54,000.

Figures obtained by The Argus show there were 699 claims for compensation filed to Brighton and Hove City Council between 2009 and 2012.

There have been 61 payouts with the highest being £54,758 after a cyclist collided with a kerb on The Drive at the junction with Wilbury Avenue in Hove.

Accidents on uneven pavements cost the taxpayer a total of £183,348 over the three year period alone, with most people claiming to have slipped or tripped on the paving.

Snow and ice has also contributed to the council’s bill and the report shows two claims were made in 2009 for slipping in adverse weather conditions.

Someone slipping on a tree stump on Hartington Road cost the council £5,770.

Residents said a tree on the street near the junction with Bonchurch Road has roots breaking through pavement for a length of about six feet and is a frequent tripping hazard.

Saira Lalja’s home overlooks the tree, which she said was cut down two weeks ago.

The 20-year-old said: “Even I tripped over it when it snowed, I fell backwards and grazed my hand.

“It’s quite bad – I think they need to get rid of it.”

Wonky slab

The roots of an elm tearing up the pavement at Seven Dials were one of the reasons the tree was listed for the chop, a decision which saw protestors sleep in its branches last week in an attempt to save it.

A wonky slab on Inwood Crescent left the council with a bill of £14,066.

Resident Matt Lewis, 22, said: “The slabs do lift up slightly and it’s always particularly bad where the trees are.

“You have to be quite wary when you are walking along.”

Cars being damaged by potholes in the road cost the council £7,505 in 12 claims.

The council said that settlement figures include legal and other fees, as well as compensation, and may not include damages.

Regular inspections

The majority of highway and footpath claims pursued against the council are successfully defended - 84% over the last three years.

Council documents show the amount paid out by the local authority between 2009 and 2012 starts at £30, from a claimant who slipped to tripped on an uneven surface in Rottingdean High Street.

A spokeswoman said: “Every public road and pavement in the city is inspected on a regular basis depending on its use and location.”

According to personal injury website claims4neglience, someone with severe whiplash could get a payout of between £15,000 and £90,000 while a bank injury may see between £7,500 and £120,000 paid out.

See the latest news headlines from The Argus:

More news from The Argus

Follow @brightonargus

Daily Echo on Facebook - facebook.com/southerndailyecho Like us on Facebook

Google+ Add us to your circles on Google+

Comments(11)

rolivan says...
1:38pm Mon 11 Mar 13

I wonder how much of the £300,000 was legal fees?Oh and what is a Bank Injury exactly?

Crystal Ball says...
1:40pm Mon 11 Mar 13

Were any of the claims relating to an elm tree near Seven Dials?

MegA69 says...
1:40pm Mon 11 Mar 13

BHCC would rather se people break their necks than manage the elm trees effectively. The elms should be cut down when they mature and the roots start breaking up the pavement or the highway and replaced with adolescent tress – on a 10-15 year cycle. This is commonplace in Australia – they get to have nice trees but safely.

RottingdeanRant says...
1:55pm Mon 11 Mar 13

I rather see people looking at where they walked and take responsibility for their own actions.

upsidedowntuctuc says...
1:56pm Mon 11 Mar 13

They have 1.5 Million to waste on a blanket 20MPH over the top scheme to pay for white paint BUT allow more and more pot holes to appear.
This cost will continue to increase and of course be manner from heaven when a pot hole causes a car to injure someone. However what if Davey falls off his Raleigh? Pops his cycle clips?

8273661 says...
2:14pm Mon 11 Mar 13

See you all down at Bonchurch Road then :)

Crystal Ball says...
2:31pm Mon 11 Mar 13

What is a "wonky slap"? Being punched in a shoddy manner?

RottingdeanRant says...
2:47pm Mon 11 Mar 13

I prefer the ‘bank injury’ for £7.5k plus. Seems very topical………..

Hoarder12345444 says...
2:57pm Mon 11 Mar 13

Where theres a blame there's a claim culture? Going crazy. Those lawyers must be rubbing their hands in glee.

MegA69 says...
5:02pm Mon 11 Mar 13

RottingdeanRant wrote:
I rather see people looking at where they walked and take responsibility for their own actions.
I am thinking of blind people. Seen a few takle a tumble in my time on the uneven pavements in this town.

RottingdeanRant says...
9:16am Tue 12 Mar 13

MegA69 wrote:
RottingdeanRant wrote:
I rather see people looking at where they walked and take responsibility for their own actions.
I am thinking of blind people. Seen a few takle a tumble in my time on the uneven pavements in this town.
Good point. I want the pavements to be kept in a good state of repair I just don’t support the ‘blame culture’ where everything is someone else’s fault and is therefore an opportunity to make money. Every time someone sues the council it is our money they take.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree