- Mobile site
- E-Newsletters
-
- News feed
- Find us on Twitter
@brightonargus
All the latest news and view from the Argus
@theargusoffers
The latest offers and competitions from the Argus
@theargusguide
The best events in Brighton, Hove and Sussex
@ArgusMagazine
Features, interviews, TV, travel and lifestyle from the Argus
- Find us on Facebook
The Argus
The Argus - news, sport and leisure for Brighton, Hove and Sussex
The Argus Offers and Competitions
Keep up to date with all the offers, events and competitions from the Argus
Plans to redevelop Brighton's 'ugliest building' postponed amid 'oversight' (From The Argus)
Get involved: Send your news, views, pictures and video by texting SUPIC to 80360 or email us.
Plans to redevelop Brighton's 'ugliest building' postponed amid 'oversight'
6:12pm Wednesday 13th March 2013 in News By Kimberly Middleton, Acting chief reporter
Image submitted by the developers of what the new development on the Anston House site could look like
A decision on plans to redevelop a building branded the ugliest in Brighton has been postponed.
The demolition of Anston House on Preston Road and plans to build flats and offices up to 15 storeys high on the site was due to be considered by Brighton and Hove City Council’s planning committee this afternoon (March 13).
But the application was pulled from the agenda earlier this week.
Selma Montford, honorary secretary of the Brighton Society, said concerns had been raised about a report on shadowing submitted by developer behind the scheme Urban Splash.
She said a civil engineer and architect, who are members of the society, then conducted their own shadowing report, which found shadows cast across Preston Park would be 30 to 50% longer than the developer’s report had shown.
Gill Mitchell, leader of the Labour and Co-operative Group, said: “I’m rather concerned that the planning department doesn’t seem to have checked this out.
“If where there’s such a big difference in height between the previous and proposed new building, for this question about shadowing not to have been examined thoroughly, I think is an oversight.”
The council’s head of planning Martin Randall said: “In order that everyone can be clear about the potential shadowing effects of the buildings, the applicants have agreed to submit revised information and we’re consulting residents on that.”
Mark Latham of Urban Splash said: “Last week we submitted a further report on overshadowing at Anston House to Brighton and Hove City Council.
“The council have decided that they would like to share this revised information and provide a further period of consultation for residents and statutory consultees to respond.
“Our plans for Anston House still fit within overshadowing requirements.”
- David Cameron rejects Caroline Lucas' Page 3 ban call
- Looking Back: Littlehampton fishermen's fight for livelihoods
- New report reveals Brighton seafront is the city's most pressing concern
- Speakers to debate gay marriage proposal
- Jeremy Forrest's 'caring nature' led to his troubles, his sister claims
Comments(10)
rolivan
says...
6:59pm Wed 13 Mar 13
ShorehamBeachcomber wrote:For Planning Department read Make it up as you go along and make sure it has to be changed in a few years because we will be retired on a nice Pension and will not affect Me
For Urban Splash read Urban Shade
vogon1
says...
7:09pm Wed 13 Mar 13
GIVE UP
says...
7:36pm Wed 13 Mar 13
vogon1 wrote:I must agree, it would have been a better story with a photo of Anatomy House next to the new design
So, the plan was to replace an ugly,square,soul less,high rise with an ugly,square,soul less high rise then?
NickBtn
says...
7:47pm Wed 13 Mar 13
Valerie Paynter
says...
9:06pm Wed 13 Mar 13
I hope questions will be asked internally about why such a serious error was not picked up by the planning department.
Very important to also note that the Regency Society apparently supported this application. Did their people not notice the inaccuracy of information supplied by the developer? They have professional expertise on their committee well capable of spotting it.
mustaphaLeeko
says...
10:04pm Wed 13 Mar 13
I honestly think it looks like another cr*p 1960's block of hi-rise flats, plain ugly, totally unimaginative, and looks like a load of cruddy shipping containers stacked on top of each other.
Call themselves architects? What is the world coming to?
bug eye
says...
11:03pm Wed 13 Mar 13
NickBrt
says...
12:01am Thu 14 Mar 13
teaboy
says...
11:16am Thu 14 Mar 13
nston
ShorehamBeachcomber says...
6:42pm Wed 13 Mar 13