New NHS table highlights Brighton hospital crisis

Royal Sussex County Hospital under fire in new report Royal Sussex County Hospital under fire in new report

A Sussex NHS trust has been revealed as one of the worst in the country in a new report showing patients how hospitals measure up against each another.

Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, which runs the Royal Sussex County Hospital in Brighton, was ranked 142nd out of 146 trusts assessed in a report by the independent health consultancy MHP Health Mandate.

Royal Sussex’s accident and emergency department has been hit by an overcrowding crisis during the past month.

Yesterday (March 14) The Argus revealed that nurses feared patients could die unless the problems are solved.

The report looked at ten standards which the authors believe matter most to patients, including the risk of MRSA, cancelled operations, written complaints and whether patients feel they have experienced good care.

Mixed sex wards, the percentage of patients who said they got better after an operation, the length of time people had to wait for an operation, the risk of being harmed and proportion of patients who said they were involved in decisions about their care were also in the assessment.

Authors used data compiled from reports by trust boards, the Health Protection Agency and Care Quality Commission inpatient and staff surveys.

Quality index

Brighton scored 2.92 overall on the Mandate’s Quality Index, below the national average just under four.

East Sussex Healthcare also performed poorly with 3.51, placing it among the 20 worst trusts in the country.

Western Sussex Hospitals NHS Trust was the best performing trust in the county, with an overall rating of 5.43.

However East Sussex Healthcare and Western Sussex were both in the bottom 20 trusts in a separate assessment by the consultancy that specifically looked at the treatment of lung cancer patients.

Government reports

A Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals spokeswoman said: “There are a large number of reports published by the government, NHS regulators and third parties regarding the quality of care within NHS hospitals and across the majority of these we perform well, particularly on important measures such as timely access to surgery and mortality rates.

“The methodology used by this report is, as far as we can tell, entirely new and today is the first time we have seen it. We will be better placed to comment once we have had a chance to look at it in more detail.”

A spokesman for the Patient Action Group in Sussex said: “It is a bit worrying to see two trusts in Sussex in the bottom 20 in the country.

“It is something we hope the hospitals will be looking into and trying to improve.”

See the latest news headlines from The Argus:

More news from The Argus

Follow @brightonargus

Daily Echo on Facebook - facebook.com/southerndailyecho Like us on Facebook

Google+ Add us to your circles on Google+

Comments(6)

raymondo999 says...
5:21pm Fri 15 Mar 13

Just scanned through this report. It provides no information on individual performance indicators by trust hospitals, just summary statistics so difficult to see where and by how much SUHT is supposed to be failing. Also usual perplexing aggregate data eg no relationship between aggregate measures of quality and mortality.

Boing Boing. says...
5:44pm Fri 15 Mar 13

Still got my complaint to come via Health Ombudsman!

No surprise from my experiences.
( Dec 2012- early March 2013)

HJarrs says...
8:39pm Fri 15 Mar 13

All the more reason why Kirby and Weatherely should break their silence and back the NHS, our local hospital and its redevelopment.

Bt'n-breezy says...
9:40pm Fri 15 Mar 13

Perhaps this idea is simply nonsense but if all the people who work in the NHS had shares in it like the John Lewis Partnership the NHS might perform better? Discuss.

50 Shades of Grey Mortuary Services Inc. says...
8:31am Sat 16 Mar 13

Privatising the NHS seems the only way to sort out the pension crisis and stay in political power. Use media stooges to blame the extra deaths on overworked staff whilst making a mint for your financial backers. Plebs will die younger, cost less, and can blame each other whilst the pilfering continues.

Furball32 says...
11:51am Sat 16 Mar 13

We hear about numerous reports but is anything ever done about them?

My husband died of lung cancer last year and the treatment he received from the RSCH and the local health service was nothing short of disgusting. He had most of his treatment in London, where the care was very good, but when he got too ill to travel, we were left at the mercy of people who didn't seem to know the meaning of the words 'dignity', 'respect' or 'care' and the inefficiency of the entire service was beyond belief. The horrors are too many to list here but suffice it to say that I'm planning to leave the area, in case I suffer the same fate.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree