Sussex Police commissioner slammed for 'soft approach' on yobs (From The Argus)
Get involved: Send your news, views, pictures and video by texting SUPIC to 80360 or email us.
Sussex Police commissioner slammed for 'soft approach' on yobs
1:50pm Wednesday 20th March 2013 in News By Emily Walker, Chief Reporter
Sussex Police and Crime Commissioner Katy Bourne
Sussex’s police commissioner has been criticised for supporting softer punishments for antisocial yobs.
Police and crime commissioner Katy Bourne has said she would like to see antisocial behaviour orders replaced with community punishments that would see offenders spared criminal records.
However, opponents have condemned Mrs Bourne’s “soft” stance and said that hooligans, street drinkers and vandals needed to be tackled “with a big stick”.
Mrs Bourne said: “Asbos don’t work because they’re too complicated and often impossible to enforce. I am determined to address antisocial behaviour, which blights the lives of local people and communities.
“The Government has proposed a new system that gives PCCs a central role in ensuring that victims of low-level crime and antisocial behaviour can have a say in the punishment of the offender.”
Under the new Community Remedy approach PCCs would consult with victims and the public and agree with the Chief Constable a menu of sanctions for low level crime and antisocial behaviour. This would then be used when such crimes were dealt with out of court.
Magistrate and East Sussex county councillor Godfrey Daniel said Mrs Bourne had failed to understand the scale of the problem. He said: “Sometimes you need to wield a big stick.”
'Ignorance of practicalities'
He added: “Asbos have been very useful because offenders don’t get a criminal record unless they breach them.”
“Katy Bourne has demonstrated a total ignorance of the practicalities. She is just taking the Tory line of being soft on crime and soft on the causes of crime.”
The Government’s plans for community remedies would see people who admit low level offences ordered to make amends to their victims. However the system would only work if suspects admit their crimes.
Conditional cautions order people admitting summary only offences to comply with a range of rehabilitative or financially punitive conditions in exchange for being spared a criminal record.
Sussex’s yobs are more likely to breach their asbos than almost anywhere else in the country.
Breached asbos
Figures released by the Home Office last October showed that of the 510 asbos issued since their introduction, 256 had been breached at least once.
Barbara Denyer, of Black Dog Walk, Crawley, suffered more than 20 years of antisocial behaviour at the hands of her neighbour Gordon Clarke.
Clarke ignored warnings from police and the council and breached a restraining order before being given an asbo in 2001.
Mrs Denyer said yesterday (March 19): “I would want to see harsher, not softer penalties for people like that.”
Talking point: To what extent do you believe asbos work? Share your views by commenting below or write in to The Argus letters pages letters@theargus.co.uk
See the latest news headlines from The Argus:
- Victim "fabricated" sex assault story - day eleven of Albion players' trial
- Dad-of-two was visiting brother and nephew when he was gunned down in Hove
- UPDATE: A27 closed in both directions near Worthing after serious accident
- Brighton Half Marathon places are selling in record time
- TV comic Hugh will open new school buildings
Add us to your circles on Google+
Comments(10)
StillHateBellotti
says...
3:33pm Wed 20 Mar 13
Crystal Ball
says...
3:37pm Wed 20 Mar 13
mimseycal
says...
6:02pm Wed 20 Mar 13
The last temptation of crisps
says...
6:12pm Wed 20 Mar 13
The small resulting fall will be paraded before the election. Their supporters aren't very bright, so they'll be happy.
Next they'll be claiming anyone who uses the loo has a job and claim they've generated millions of jobs in the 'private' sector.
Geoffrey Madden
says...
7:39pm Wed 20 Mar 13
mimseycal
says...
7:44pm Wed 20 Mar 13
qm
says...
10:25pm Wed 20 Mar 13
mimseycal wrote:Too true . . . .
Victims are only secondary to the process. Their role is purely to act as witnesses and to pick up the tab for damages considered too hefty for the perpetrator to pay.
Maxwell's Ghost
says...
11:02pm Wed 20 Mar 13
When is a crime not a crime? When Sussex Police are involved with managing it.
whereisthe...?
says...
12:46pm Thu 21 Mar 13
Question clearly should have been "Do you agree with this woman's views?"
The answer would then obviously have been an unequivocal 'NO'!
But spinning it this way means they can claim victory for her, make MORE cuts, and SCREW the public once again.
But again we find the Argus toadying to anyone with any power willing to give them an interview. Pathetic.
RottingdeanRant says...
3:03pm Wed 20 Mar 13