Premier Inn plan for Lewes Magistrates' Court rejected for being out of character with town

The Argus: Premier Inn plan for Lewes Magistrates Court rejected for being out of character with town Premier Inn plan for Lewes Magistrates Court rejected for being out of character with town

A Lewes court building will not be turned into a 62- bedroom hotel – because the plans from a national chain are not in keeping with the “jewel of the South Downs”.

Premier Inn wants to take over the building, which would also be used for shops.

But the South Downs National Park Authority planning committee rejected plans to convert the Lewes Magistrates’ Court yesterday afternoon, despite officers recommending the plans be given the go-ahead.


MORE:


The authority’s committee agreed unanimously that the design of the building was not in keeping with the character of the town.

Campaigners who had opposed the plans said the decision was a victory for people power and that the proposal failed to do justice to the “jewel of the South Downs”.

Property developers Quora had hoped the committee meeting in Midhurst yesterday would rubber-stamp its plans to convert the magistrates’ court site into a 62-bed hotel above a promenade of shop fronts.

It was revealed earlier this year that the disused building is costing taxpayers £10,000 a month on security and maintenance.

A vociferous campaign raised fears that one of the ground-floor units could be used to house a chain pub and threaten the livelihood of the town’s thriving pub industry.

Margaret Paren, chairman of the South Downs National Park Authority, said: “The decision was unanimous and was based entirely on the building’s design.

“We believe the design of the building could have gone further to match the distinctive character of the historic town of Lewes and the extensive conservation area.”

Tony Leonard, landlord of the Snowdrop Inn, who joined other pub owners in the town to oppose the plans, was celebrating the decision last night.

He said: “The decision was unanimous and the feeling among the committee was that the design needs to be better, that it really wasn’t good enough.

“Amore sympathetic design would be acceptable although any chain pub would not be.

“Twenty-six pubs are closing nationally a week but in Lewes we have been really fortunate that we have lost just one in five years, but bringing in a chain pub could change all that.

“The committee listened to the people of Lewes. That came out very strongly in the meeting.”

A spokesman for Premier Inn said the firm was considering its position following the decision.

Comments (5)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

1:20pm Fri 13 Dec 13

Goldenwight says...

One wonders whether this decision would have gone differently had the building been occupied by squatters and a new occupant required to aid eviction? "Not in character" my a***
One wonders whether this decision would have gone differently had the building been occupied by squatters and a new occupant required to aid eviction? "Not in character" my a*** Goldenwight

5:49pm Fri 13 Dec 13

Roundbill says...

Goldenwight wrote:
One wonders whether this decision would have gone differently had the building been occupied by squatters and a new occupant required to aid eviction? "Not in character" my a***
I think what the planning committee is saying is "We've always thought this is a ghastly modern carbunkle and we're going to reject every application which DOESN'T propose knocking it down and replacing it with something that looks like it was built by mediaeval artisans."
Pretentious ponces: I bet they despise the Tescos there.
[quote][p][bold]Goldenwight[/bold] wrote: One wonders whether this decision would have gone differently had the building been occupied by squatters and a new occupant required to aid eviction? "Not in character" my a***[/p][/quote]I think what the planning committee is saying is "We've always thought this is a ghastly modern carbunkle and we're going to reject every application which DOESN'T propose knocking it down and replacing it with something that looks like it was built by mediaeval artisans." Pretentious ponces: I bet they despise the Tescos there. Roundbill

8:04pm Fri 13 Dec 13

pwlr1966 says...

Short sighted inbreds
Short sighted inbreds pwlr1966

10:15am Sat 14 Dec 13

Alison Smith says...

Just looked at it on Google Earth. It's surrounded by new build offices & shops. So how can a Premier Inn be "out of keeping"?
Just looked at it on Google Earth. It's surrounded by new build offices & shops. So how can a Premier Inn be "out of keeping"? Alison Smith

12:34pm Sat 14 Dec 13

s_james says...

Roundbill wrote:
Goldenwight wrote:
One wonders whether this decision would have gone differently had the building been occupied by squatters and a new occupant required to aid eviction? "Not in character" my a***
I think what the planning committee is saying is "We've always thought this is a ghastly modern carbunkle and we're going to reject every application which DOESN'T propose knocking it down and replacing it with something that looks like it was built by mediaeval artisans."
Pretentious ponces: I bet they despise the Tescos there.
The article is wrong - the proposal DID involve knocking it down. Classic shoddy Argus reporting.

I think the new building looked ok
[quote][p][bold]Roundbill[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Goldenwight[/bold] wrote: One wonders whether this decision would have gone differently had the building been occupied by squatters and a new occupant required to aid eviction? "Not in character" my a***[/p][/quote]I think what the planning committee is saying is "We've always thought this is a ghastly modern carbunkle and we're going to reject every application which DOESN'T propose knocking it down and replacing it with something that looks like it was built by mediaeval artisans." Pretentious ponces: I bet they despise the Tescos there.[/p][/quote]The article is wrong - the proposal DID involve knocking it down. Classic shoddy Argus reporting. I think the new building looked ok s_james

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree