Questions asked over safety of Brighton seafront arches following A259 collapse

The hole leading up to the A259 from the Fortune of War

The hole leading up to the A259 from the Fortune of War

First published in News by , local government reporter

Serious questions are being asked about Brighton and Hove City Council’s management of seafront safety after papers show councillors had been made aware of major deficiencies last year.

Structural engineers have been working on the seafront’s historic arches after a section of it collapsed while workmen carried out repairs at a pub.

Earth and rock fell into the Fortune of War pub in the Kings Road Arches after a worker removed a piece of plywood at the back of the building, causing the road above it to sag.

The A259 eastbound remained closed at the weekend between West Street and Ship Street following Friday’s collapse as engineers carried out emergency work to stabilise the road and started an investigation into why it collapsed.

Despite four days of work, the council remains unable to confirm the extent of the problem and still has no idea how long the main road will remain closed.

But now questions are being asked about why the council failed to reinforce the road after a council report from November 2013 identified that sections of the arches had become “structurally defective”.

The report was presented to the council’s policy and resource committee as part of the contractual arrangements for strengthening the Kings Road Arches.

Another report written earlier in the year warned that parts of the seafront were reaching the end of their serviceable life.

It examined about 375 different structures and assets worth about £300 million along the seafront.

Councillors were told the vast majority of the structures are more than 120 years old and large sections of these are “at the end of their serviceable life.”

The report reads: “The reconstruction, strengthening and refurbishment of Kings Road Arches (numbers 36-61) between Alfresco’s Restaurant and the West Pier form part of this overall programme. Following recent surveys these arches have been found to be structurally defective.”

Warren Morgan, pictured below, Labour leader on the council, said the Green leadership had failed to invest in much-needed construction work despite knowing it was desperately needed.

He said: “The collapse of the structure under the A259 seafront road near the junction with West Street shows how critical the condition of our most important transport arteries is.

“It is vital for business, tourism and of course traffic and major disruption will do immense harm to our city’s economy.

“I believe that despite knowing that the city’s main seafront road and the arches below it are in need of tens of millions of pounds of investment, the council’s Green leadership has chosen to spend money on a series of other traffic and transport projects it has deemed more important and more in line with their political priorities. This has to end now.”

Brighton and Hove City Council is the lead custodian of the seafront, which involves both the maintenance of the historic infrastructure and development of key and iconic sites.

About five million people travel along the seafront every year and it is a key part of the city’s visitor economy.

In the 2013 report it was identified that not all parts of the area had received the investment needed to allow them to keep up with changing demand.

Under the Highways Act the council has a duty to ensure that highways are adequately maintained and as part of that work it must ensure that supporting structures are safe for use and fit for purpose.

The council’s report reads: “The heritage structures and infrastructure managed by the council along the seafront require significant investment.

“Not all existing assets have received the investment needed to meet the changing patterns and demands of usage.

“The arches, which house many of the seafront businesses, are intrinsic to the seafront’s commercial success and are part of the structural support for the city’s major highway the A259 road and footways.

"Many of the structures require significant refurbishment and are under constant monitoring.

“Madeira Terraces is another current example, where extensive additional financing and resources are needed to meet the refurbishment needs identified.”

Among the work that has been identified as being crucial for the seafront’s future is an arch repair programme, which is expected to be delivered over ten years and the commissioning of structural surveys in areas like Madeira Terrace and other structures.

In the past few months a new scrutiny panel on seafront infrastructure has been established to work with the local community and business groups to identify the main challenges for the ageing structures and establish the best ways to move forward.

The panel, headed by Labour’s Gill Mitchell, was warned last month that the council could face a repair bill of about £80 million. This includes at least £65 million for the arches, £10 million for retaining walls and £5 million for railings.

To pay for repair and restructuring works, councils are urged to put aside 1% of asset values – £3 million in Brighton and Hove’s case.

Councillors were also warned the authority could struggle to meet the increasing financial demands with a general government grant, which currently provides £78 million to the council, which could be cut to £2 million by 2020.

And last month, Leon Bellis, a senior engineer at the council, told the scrutiny panel that the current infrastructure required serious investment or the seafront could be forced to close.

He said: “We have a programme to address the situation but it needs a commitment and funding.

“The £3 million would only allow us to catch up to where we should be and allow us to programme in future works.

“We’ll do what we can to maintain the situation with the resources we have. We could be in a situation where the seafront slowly closes down, which no one wants.”

Adam Chinery, 44, the chairman of Brighton and Hove Seafront Businesses Association, said: “The council needs to give us information about whether the collapse at the Fortune of War was an isolated incident or if it was related to the bigger issue of structural weakness in the infrastructure of the arches that we already know about.

“I don’t understand why there seems to be such a massive lack of money available to deal with this problem.”

Laurence Hill, manager at the Fortune of War pub said the incident has affected business over the weekend with 30% of the pub being closed.

But other business owners at the arches said the collapse had not caused any concern. Mike Levy, owner of Castor and Pollux, said he was not worried about business.

And Aurelia Antkowiack, 25, manager at Coalition, added: “If the weather was good at the weekend then the collapse probably would have affected business, but I don’t think it was too bad and I really don’t think it will affect our future business.”

Coun Morgan said the recent collapse highlighted that the council had to carry out urgent surveys in the immediate area to check the stability of the road before further collapses occurred.

He said: “The council needs to urgently re-survey all of the arches in the vicinity of the Fortune of War to check the possibility of more collapses.

“Questions have to be asked as to how this was allowed to happen with no clear funding stream to address the problem.

“It is inconceivable that the Green administration were not warned about the state of the seafront structures when they took office and they should have made it a priority from day one.

“We are now in a situation where the A259 seafront road is collapsing and there is no identified funding to address the problem.”

Conservative group leader Geoffrey Theobald said the council should have seen the warning signs coming that the area may have been unsafe with some businesses having already closed down due to the same problem.

He said: “I’m very surprised that the problem hasn’t been picked up before given how many times this road has been closed for work by the various utilities and the fact that the nearby Riptide gym had to be shut down recently for just this reason.

“The council now needs to get this resolved as quickly as possible as we approach the busy summer season.

“We’ve just been awarded our highest ever allocation of Local Transport Plan funding from the Government and I’ve been saying for a while that more of this should be going on basic road maintenance.

“The income that the council will get from the i360 development, which we supported, will also help a great deal. It is not glamorous work but the coast road is vital to the continued success of the local economy.”

But Green councillor Ian Davey defended his party’s management of the seafront and accused coun Morgan of calling for money to be spent that the council does not have.

He said: “Currently there’s no evidence to suggest that the cause of the problem on the seafront is anything other than historic alterations to premises in the arches.

“Councillor Morgan voted for our spending plans in March, when we committed £2.6 million to the seafront in addition to the £2.2 million that was spent last year.

“This exceeds anything spent on the seafront when Labour were in charge and presided over a major collapse by the carousel.

“Unlike Coun Morgan we know we can only spend money that we have.

“He’s calling for us to divert money that we’re close to securing from central government for Valley Gardens in 2015. We don’t have it now, and it’s not ours to spend on anything else. If we were to try, it would be taken away from the city altogether.”

Brighton and Hove City Council has so far been unable to announce how long road closures will stay in place or how long it will take engineers to examine and fix the problem, but it is understood the work could last for weeks.

A council spokesman said: “Structural engineers have been working all day on a detailed evaluation of the site.

“They are now working on a plan of action that will specify what needs to be done and how long this is likely to take.

“We hope to be able to let residents know on Tuesday how long we think the disruption is likely to continue for.”

Comments (8)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

12:15pm Tue 29 Apr 14

paul76 says...

As a note to this, the traffic jams could be reduced on the now single carriageway roads by changing the squencing of the traffic lights at the junction of West Street and Kings Road, as traffic is no longer able to join Kings Road from West Street. Apart from the pedestrian crossing, it is pointless them keep changing and cars having to stop so non existant cars can join Kings Road.
As a note to this, the traffic jams could be reduced on the now single carriageway roads by changing the squencing of the traffic lights at the junction of West Street and Kings Road, as traffic is no longer able to join Kings Road from West Street. Apart from the pedestrian crossing, it is pointless them keep changing and cars having to stop so non existant cars can join Kings Road. paul76
  • Score: 19

12:29pm Tue 29 Apr 14

Joshiman says...

paul76 wrote:
As a note to this, the traffic jams could be reduced on the now single carriageway roads by changing the squencing of the traffic lights at the junction of West Street and Kings Road, as traffic is no longer able to join Kings Road from West Street. Apart from the pedestrian crossing, it is pointless them keep changing and cars having to stop so non existant cars can join Kings Road.
Totally agree.Unfortunately the traffic control engineers/planners/ dont see what we all see/.New England Rd /Arches/Blatchington Rd/Sackville Road/.Regency sq/Brighton Pier pedestrian lights/All along the A259 /Rottingdean .Old Shoreham Rd to name just a few badly sequenced traffic lights.
As regards the main article "Serious questions are being asked about Brighton and Hove City Council’s management of seafront safety after papers show councillors had been made aware of major deficiencies last year."If that is true then the Sunday Mail article on Brighton and the Greens makes sense.All the money has been spent on cycle/bus lanes/new traffic lights/Led street lights etc etc..Priorities right!!
[quote][p][bold]paul76[/bold] wrote: As a note to this, the traffic jams could be reduced on the now single carriageway roads by changing the squencing of the traffic lights at the junction of West Street and Kings Road, as traffic is no longer able to join Kings Road from West Street. Apart from the pedestrian crossing, it is pointless them keep changing and cars having to stop so non existant cars can join Kings Road.[/p][/quote]Totally agree.Unfortunately the traffic control engineers/planners/ dont see what we all see/.New England Rd /Arches/Blatchington Rd/Sackville Road/.Regency sq/Brighton Pier pedestrian lights/All along the A259 /Rottingdean .Old Shoreham Rd to name just a few badly sequenced traffic lights. As regards the main article "Serious questions are being asked about Brighton and Hove City Council’s management of seafront safety after papers show councillors had been made aware of major deficiencies last year."If that is true then the Sunday Mail article on Brighton and the Greens makes sense.All the money has been spent on cycle/bus lanes/new traffic lights/Led street lights etc etc..Priorities right!! Joshiman
  • Score: 21

1:09pm Tue 29 Apr 14

Terry K says...

Remove the collapsing arches, build up foundations, replace the road and put an east -west tram system in on the coast road, thus linking Shoreham park and ride to The pier Brighton and onto Peacehaven park and ride, no more jams, no slow buses, cheap fast travel for all, clean air, effortless travel along the seafront, easy isn't it. No car journey needed!.
Remove the collapsing arches, build up foundations, replace the road and put an east -west tram system in on the coast road, thus linking Shoreham park and ride to The pier Brighton and onto Peacehaven park and ride, no more jams, no slow buses, cheap fast travel for all, clean air, effortless travel along the seafront, easy isn't it. No car journey needed!. Terry K
  • Score: 12

1:29pm Tue 29 Apr 14

brightonaire says...

Ban cars from the town centre and that would help for a start.... and that includes taxis with single passengers..... make them use cycle rickshaws for single passengers...... and charge women £5 for bringing push chairs or prams into the town centre... they clog the place up as well
Ban cars from the town centre and that would help for a start.... and that includes taxis with single passengers..... make them use cycle rickshaws for single passengers...... and charge women £5 for bringing push chairs or prams into the town centre... they clog the place up as well brightonaire
  • Score: -12

1:52pm Tue 29 Apr 14

RobO. says...

How about we put a stop to any new cycle paths and so called "improvements" like messing around with Vogue Gyratory and focus on fixing the seafront instead?
How about we put a stop to any new cycle paths and so called "improvements" like messing around with Vogue Gyratory and focus on fixing the seafront instead? RobO.
  • Score: 16

5:32pm Tue 29 Apr 14

bug eye says...

I think it is right that some of the problem is the utility companies digging up the roads many times in recent years along with the council installing far too many traffic lights. The whole seafront is clearly in decay. The pavements and road surfaces area disgrace for a tourist city. Change the junctions mentioned by Joshiman into roundabouts with zebra crossings like seven dials, this is the only successful traffic scheme achieved by the Greens.
I think it is right that some of the problem is the utility companies digging up the roads many times in recent years along with the council installing far too many traffic lights. The whole seafront is clearly in decay. The pavements and road surfaces area disgrace for a tourist city. Change the junctions mentioned by Joshiman into roundabouts with zebra crossings like seven dials, this is the only successful traffic scheme achieved by the Greens. bug eye
  • Score: -2

6:28pm Tue 29 Apr 14

rolivan says...

I would like to know how much influence those that sit on the Boards of the Universities and other big institutions in the City have in changing it from a Tourist venue to one of an ever increasing Academic population.
I would like to know how much influence those that sit on the Boards of the Universities and other big institutions in the City have in changing it from a Tourist venue to one of an ever increasing Academic population. rolivan
  • Score: 4

8:04pm Tue 29 Apr 14

brighton bluenose says...

Joshiman wrote:
paul76 wrote:
As a note to this, the traffic jams could be reduced on the now single carriageway roads by changing the squencing of the traffic lights at the junction of West Street and Kings Road, as traffic is no longer able to join Kings Road from West Street. Apart from the pedestrian crossing, it is pointless them keep changing and cars having to stop so non existant cars can join Kings Road.
Totally agree.Unfortunately the traffic control engineers/planners/ dont see what we all see/.New England Rd /Arches/Blatchington Rd/Sackville Road/.Regency sq/Brighton Pier pedestrian lights/All along the A259 /Rottingdean .Old Shoreham Rd to name just a few badly sequenced traffic lights.
As regards the main article "Serious questions are being asked about Brighton and Hove City Council’s management of seafront safety after papers show councillors had been made aware of major deficiencies last year."If that is true then the Sunday Mail article on Brighton and the Greens makes sense.All the money has been spent on cycle/bus lanes/new traffic lights/Led street lights etc etc..Priorities right!!
Of course the problem is that disingenuous reporting by the Argus fails to provide the true picture! The section of the report that refers to arches being 'structurally defective' states that these are between Alfrescos and the West Pier - anyone who has walked along the lower prom for the last few months can see clearly that these arches are being strengthened and renovated providing much needed regeneration in this area and, in fact, this stfengthening and repair is continuing past the West Pier eastwards!! O e may understand a buffoon like Warren Morgan misleading the electorate with elections coming up next year but one must ask SERIOUS questions why Michael Davis and the Argus are giving a totally one-sided report on the subject that lacks both accuracy and balance?!
Maybe Mr Davis might read this and let us mere mortals have an insight into such poor journalism?
[quote][p][bold]Joshiman[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]paul76[/bold] wrote: As a note to this, the traffic jams could be reduced on the now single carriageway roads by changing the squencing of the traffic lights at the junction of West Street and Kings Road, as traffic is no longer able to join Kings Road from West Street. Apart from the pedestrian crossing, it is pointless them keep changing and cars having to stop so non existant cars can join Kings Road.[/p][/quote]Totally agree.Unfortunately the traffic control engineers/planners/ dont see what we all see/.New England Rd /Arches/Blatchington Rd/Sackville Road/.Regency sq/Brighton Pier pedestrian lights/All along the A259 /Rottingdean .Old Shoreham Rd to name just a few badly sequenced traffic lights. As regards the main article "Serious questions are being asked about Brighton and Hove City Council’s management of seafront safety after papers show councillors had been made aware of major deficiencies last year."If that is true then the Sunday Mail article on Brighton and the Greens makes sense.All the money has been spent on cycle/bus lanes/new traffic lights/Led street lights etc etc..Priorities right!![/p][/quote]Of course the problem is that disingenuous reporting by the Argus fails to provide the true picture! The section of the report that refers to arches being 'structurally defective' states that these are between Alfrescos and the West Pier - anyone who has walked along the lower prom for the last few months can see clearly that these arches are being strengthened and renovated providing much needed regeneration in this area and, in fact, this stfengthening and repair is continuing past the West Pier eastwards!! O e may understand a buffoon like Warren Morgan misleading the electorate with elections coming up next year but one must ask SERIOUS questions why Michael Davis and the Argus are giving a totally one-sided report on the subject that lacks both accuracy and balance?! Maybe Mr Davis might read this and let us mere mortals have an insight into such poor journalism? brighton bluenose
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree