The ArgusRelatives of care home victims say report into scandal must be 'blueprint for change' (From The Argus)

Get involved: Send your news, views, pictures and video by texting SUPIC to 80360 or email us.

Relatives of care home victims say report into scandal must be 'blueprint for change'

The Argus: Relatives of care home victims say report into scandal must be 'blueprint for change' Relatives of care home victims say report into scandal must be 'blueprint for change'

THE families of “institutionalised abuse” victims at a Sussex care home say a new report into the scandal must be a “blueprint for change”.

The relatives of Orchid View residents say that the serious case review into the home must bring about reform of the care industry.

And Irwin Mitchell lawyers, representing seven victims’ families have called for a public inquiry into care industry regulations.

The serious case review commissioned by the West Sussex Adult Safeguarding Board will be published on Monday.

An inquest last October into the deaths of 19 former residents at the home in Copthorne, near Crawley, found there was a culture of “institutionalised abuse”.

The coroner concluded five deaths were contributed to by neglect and all 19 care residents were given “suboptimal” care.

Family members have formed the Orchid View Relatives Action Group to put pressure on the Government to bring about change in regulation.

The Southern Cross run-home closed down in October 2011 and reopened as Francis Court under new management in February 2012.

Linzi Collings’ mother Jean Halfpenny died in 2010 after being administered three times her regular dose of the blood thinning drug Warfarin over the course of 17 days at Orchid View.

She said regulators need to ensure care homes have welfare as their core value rather than business.

She said: “It is nearly eight months since the conclusion of the inquest yet we continue to see a high number of stories in the press about other care homes failing Care Quality Commission inspections or being investigated for putting residents at risk.

She said the families agree with lawyers “that a full independent public inquiry should now follow, using evidence from the serious case review, to ensure that every care home across the country is performing to a high standard and providing quality care”.

Medical law experts at Irwin Mitchell are representing a number of relatives including the families of Jean Halfpenny, Jean Leatherbarrow, Doris Fielding, Enid Trodden, Bertram Jerome, Wilfred Gardner and John Holmes.

The firm’s medical law expert Laura Barlow said: “Whilst we welcome the publishing of the serious case review into Orchid View which promises to identify failings and draw up recommendations so that the same mistakes cannot be repeated, we believe the horrific scale of neglect warrants a completely independent inquiry.

“A public inquiry must be convened to ensure that the elderly and vulnerable are protected against unsafe and unacceptable practice across the care home industry and to ensure that the safeguarding authorities are fit for purpose.”

Comments (2)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

11:55am Sat 7 Jun 14

wippasnapper says...

“blueprint for change” when I was 16 I did work replacement in two elderly homes and even though most where treated with respect some care nurses didn’t shear that respect even back all those years ago I remember seeing care nurses pulling and prodding elderly people around a total disgrace yes its not an easy job at times but you dote go into a cares perfection to have an easy time of it your there to care and help people live out there lives as gracefully as possible so why treat these people any different to how you would treat your own elderly parents.
“blueprint for change” when I was 16 I did work replacement in two elderly homes and even though most where treated with respect some care nurses didn’t shear that respect even back all those years ago I remember seeing care nurses pulling and prodding elderly people around a total disgrace yes its not an easy job at times but you dote go into a cares perfection to have an easy time of it your there to care and help people live out there lives as gracefully as possible so why treat these people any different to how you would treat your own elderly parents. wippasnapper
  • Score: 3

4:16pm Sat 7 Jun 14

getThisCoalitionOut says...

The whole care industry is a disgrace. So many homes are only run for profit first and they are disgustingly badly run. The prices charged are horrendously high - £650 per week is the average!

No wonder Thatcher didn't go into a care home - she went into the best hotel in London but then she could afford that on the pension she gave herself.

Something has to change to stop the elderly being cruelly treated. They need good care, good food and a clean home.
The whole care industry is a disgrace. So many homes are only run for profit first and they are disgustingly badly run. The prices charged are horrendously high - £650 per week is the average! No wonder Thatcher didn't go into a care home - she went into the best hotel in London but then she could afford that on the pension she gave herself. Something has to change to stop the elderly being cruelly treated. They need good care, good food and a clean home. getThisCoalitionOut
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree