The ArgusChildren being stopped and searched by police (From The Argus)

Get involved: Send your news, views, pictures and video by texting SUPIC to 80360 or email us.

Children being stopped and searched by police

The Argus: Children being  stop and searched by police Children being stop and searched by police

Nearly 30,000 under 18-year-olds were stopped and searched by the police.

Sussex Police is the force with the fifth highest amount of young people stopped and searched in the country according to a report by the All Party Parliamentary Group for Children. In total 28,198 youths were stopped and searched - which is 25.6% of the 110,156 total for all age groups – between 2009 and 2013.

The percentage figure is the third highest of the 12 forces that provided data.

A Sussex Police spokesman said: “Stop and Search is a valuable public protection tool helping to keep those who live and work in Sussex safe from criminal activity.

“We have a responsibility to ensure we use Stop and Search powers effectively and fairly and being held accountable over what we do is fundamental to the trust and confidence people place in us.

“Police officers have the power to stop and search individuals under a range of legislation, including Section 1 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE) which allows an officer who has reasonable grounds for suspicion to stop and search a person or vehicle to look for stolen or prohibited items.”

Additional data put the figure of children under-10 stopped by the force to be 454 – almost half of the total figure nationwide.

A spokesman however said this figure was reported in error and dismissed it as “completely inaccurate”.

He said: “The section of the data which appears to show that 454 of the under-18 searches were of under-10s, appears to be completely inaccurate, as a result of systematic data entry issues, and we will be looking into this to try to establish the true picture.

“However at this time we do not know the accurate figure and this will take careful research.

“Clearly we try to avoid, as much as we possibly can, the stopping and searching of children of such tender years and the inaccurate data should not have been provided.”

More information about stop and search is available by typing the phrase into the force website at www.sussex.police.uk.

Comments (4)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

6:25am Fri 4 Jul 14

menowhere says...

**** who forgot to fiddle the figures before they were released?
**** who forgot to fiddle the figures before they were released? menowhere
  • Score: -3

9:13am Fri 4 Jul 14

still waiting says...

Terrific piece of journalistic innuendo. Which figures are we supposed to be reading about? The way the article is written it's all totally uncertain. I see the writer has realised at the end that he has even confused himself (let alone the luckless readers) and suggests people check for themselves on the force's website. Curious....
Terrific piece of journalistic innuendo. Which figures are we supposed to be reading about? The way the article is written it's all totally uncertain. I see the writer has realised at the end that he has even confused himself (let alone the luckless readers) and suggests people check for themselves on the force's website. Curious.... still waiting
  • Score: 5

10:44am Fri 4 Jul 14

yummie12 says...

The website pages run into double figures. It would have been informative had your report stated what percentage of those stopped were found to be in breach of the law. May we know ?
The website pages run into double figures. It would have been informative had your report stated what percentage of those stopped were found to be in breach of the law. May we know ? yummie12
  • Score: 3

4:38pm Fri 4 Jul 14

Goldenwight says...

"The section of the data which appears to show that 454 of the under-18 searches were of under-10s, appears to be completely inaccurate, as a result of systematic data entry issues"

Then how do we know (since the Police THEMSELVES do not) that the figure was not significantly higher? Is not the misrecording of crime and policing statistics in itself grounds for a headline story?

In any event, this fails to take into account the number of completely illegal searches undertaken by Sussex Police which are not even recorded.
"The section of the data which appears to show that 454 of the under-18 searches were of under-10s, appears to be completely inaccurate, as a result of systematic data entry issues" Then how do we know (since the Police THEMSELVES do not) that the figure was not significantly higher? Is not the misrecording of crime and policing statistics in itself grounds for a headline story? In any event, this fails to take into account the number of completely illegal searches undertaken by Sussex Police which are not even recorded. Goldenwight
  • Score: -1
Post a comment

Remember you are personally responsible for what you post on this site and must abide by our site terms. Do not post anything that is false, abusive or malicious. If you wish to complain, please use the ‘report this post’ link.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree