Police slam bar for 42-shot drinks promotion

Police slam bar for 42-shot drinks promotion

Police slam bar for 42-shot drinks promotion

First published in News
Last updated

A POTENTIALLY lethal drinking challenge to down more than 40 shots of alcohol has been withdrawn following strong criticism from police.

Officers called on Brighton bar Oxygen to end the promotional offer after customers were encouraged to splash out £105 for 42 shots.

The West Street venue asked revellers: “Do you have the balls to handle Big Woody’s 42 shots?”

Police said it was “a flagrant breach” of the bar’s licensing agreement and condemned the name of the drinks as “sexually aggressive” and “demeaning to women”.

They also warned drinking so much alcohol would leave customers extremely ill in a “best case” scenario.

The bar’s management said the offers had been running for several weeks but were withdrawn following contact with Sussex Police.

Another promotion offered punters a “Family Pack” containing four vodka mixers, one Jäger megabomb, four Jäger grenades and four shots.

The minimum of 13 units of alcohol costs £30 between Sunday and Thursdays or £40 on a Friday or Saturday.

Jean Irving, Sussex Police licensing and public safety manager, said the “shocking” deal could be lethal depending on the strength of the alcohol.

She said: “The posters and flyers contain drinking challenges and deeply offensive terminology.

“How can any responsible licensee possibly think this is acceptable? “The venue has been contacted by licensing officers and told to remove these promotions immediately, and we are still considering our options regarding the flagrant breach of the Licensing Act 2003 mandatory Code for licensees which bans irresponsible drinks promotions.”

A manager, who did not wish to be named, said the challenge was aimed at a large group of “ten to 12 people at least” – not one person.

Brighton and Hove City Council confirmed police were investigating.

A spokeswoman said: “If they discover licensing offences, as the responsible authority, the police could initiate their own enforcement action and apply to us as the licensing authority for a licence review.”

Comments (36)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

8:09am Mon 14 Jul 14

chrismilo says...

The top row challenge has been around for years.
Have the Police no real criminals to catch ?
The top row challenge has been around for years. Have the Police no real criminals to catch ? chrismilo
  • Score: -52

8:38am Mon 14 Jul 14

monkeymoo says...

I think Stevo!!'s mum must have drunk a few of these when she was pregnant with him.
It's the only thing that can explain how he turned out!
I think Stevo!!'s mum must have drunk a few of these when she was pregnant with him. It's the only thing that can explain how he turned out! monkeymoo
  • Score: 139

9:29am Mon 14 Jul 14

Max Ripple says...

Just close it. Simple. These people have no right whatsoever to hold a licence - personal or premises. I ran a pub in Brighton some years ago and we knew that if we broke the rules we would have our licence reviewed. We played by the rules. Drinking promotions like this are unacceptable. It's why Brighton gets it's image of being one of the most out of control drinking cities in the country. We've all seen what happens when people, young and old, get out of control because they've been stupid and drunk vast quantities of spirits (in particular).
Close it now.
Just close it. Simple. These people have no right whatsoever to hold a licence - personal or premises. I ran a pub in Brighton some years ago and we knew that if we broke the rules we would have our licence reviewed. We played by the rules. Drinking promotions like this are unacceptable. It's why Brighton gets it's image of being one of the most out of control drinking cities in the country. We've all seen what happens when people, young and old, get out of control because they've been stupid and drunk vast quantities of spirits (in particular). Close it now. Max Ripple
  • Score: 39

9:48am Mon 14 Jul 14

Maxwell's Ghost says...

Maybe the club can give the money made from the promotion to the A&E department at the county where the young people end up when becoming ill.
A nice charitable donation should see things right.
Maybe the club can give the money made from the promotion to the A&E department at the county where the young people end up when becoming ill. A nice charitable donation should see things right. Maxwell's Ghost
  • Score: 37

9:59am Mon 14 Jul 14

voiceofthescoombe says...

Yes the top row "challenge" has exsisted for years god knows I got to visit the porcelin pulpit after trying it.
But most normal bars will show you the door if you try it not advertise and encourage stupidity.
Yes the top row "challenge" has exsisted for years god knows I got to visit the porcelin pulpit after trying it. But most normal bars will show you the door if you try it not advertise and encourage stupidity. voiceofthescoombe
  • Score: 11

10:02am Mon 14 Jul 14

s&k says...

Is this what we want Brighton to be? Magaluf? Let's have nightlife which can compete with the best cities in the world not an 18-30 resort.
Is this what we want Brighton to be? Magaluf? Let's have nightlife which can compete with the best cities in the world not an 18-30 resort. s&k
  • Score: 34

11:14am Mon 14 Jul 14

stevo!! says...

It's illegal to sell alcohol to those who are intoxicated, right?

Most people would be in that state after 20 shots, so the very fact that they are selling shots totalling 42 is a clear breach of the terms of their licence AND a breach of the law.

This investigation should result in prosecutions regardless of any self-inflicted injuries the drinkers received.
It's illegal to sell alcohol to those who are intoxicated, right? Most people would be in that state after 20 shots, so the very fact that they are selling shots totalling 42 is a clear breach of the terms of their licence AND a breach of the law. This investigation should result in prosecutions regardless of any self-inflicted injuries the drinkers received. stevo!!
  • Score: -25

11:15am Mon 14 Jul 14

spa301 says...

It just sums up the attitude of these bars. Get the punters in, get them as drunk as possible, empty their wallets and then send them back out onto the streets and **** the consequences.
It just sums up the attitude of these bars. Get the punters in, get them as drunk as possible, empty their wallets and then send them back out onto the streets and **** the consequences. spa301
  • Score: 34

11:33am Mon 14 Jul 14

spa301 says...

spa301 wrote:
It just sums up the attitude of these bars. Get the punters in, get them as drunk as possible, empty their wallets and then send them back out onto the streets and **** the consequences.
Argus since when was d a m n considered a swear word? Queen Victoria's reign?
[quote][p][bold]spa301[/bold] wrote: It just sums up the attitude of these bars. Get the punters in, get them as drunk as possible, empty their wallets and then send them back out onto the streets and **** the consequences.[/p][/quote]Argus since when was d a m n considered a swear word? Queen Victoria's reign? spa301
  • Score: 10

11:37am Mon 14 Jul 14

stevo!! says...

monkeymoo wrote:
I think Stevo!!'s mum must have drunk a few of these when she was pregnant with him.
It's the only thing that can explain how he turned out!
And you're unable to discuss the posts of someone who you claim was born with brain damage.

How impressed should we be with your lack of intelligence?
[quote][p][bold]monkeymoo[/bold] wrote: I think Stevo!!'s mum must have drunk a few of these when she was pregnant with him. It's the only thing that can explain how he turned out![/p][/quote]And you're unable to discuss the posts of someone who you claim was born with brain damage. How impressed should we be with your lack of intelligence? stevo!!
  • Score: -67

11:42am Mon 14 Jul 14

stevo!! says...

spa301 wrote:
spa301 wrote:
It just sums up the attitude of these bars. Get the punters in, get them as drunk as possible, empty their wallets and then send them back out onto the streets and **** the consequences.
Argus since when was d a m n considered a swear word? Queen Victoria's reign?
Sung to the tune of 'YMCA', lol

I get your point, though.
[quote][p][bold]spa301[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]spa301[/bold] wrote: It just sums up the attitude of these bars. Get the punters in, get them as drunk as possible, empty their wallets and then send them back out onto the streets and **** the consequences.[/p][/quote]Argus since when was d a m n considered a swear word? Queen Victoria's reign?[/p][/quote]Sung to the tune of 'YMCA', lol I get your point, though. stevo!!
  • Score: -28

11:58am Mon 14 Jul 14

s&k says...

spa301 wrote:
It just sums up the attitude of these bars. Get the punters in, get them as drunk as possible, empty their wallets and then send them back out onto the streets and **** the consequences.
Well put! And what happens if one of these punters should die of alcohol related causes?
[quote][p][bold]spa301[/bold] wrote: It just sums up the attitude of these bars. Get the punters in, get them as drunk as possible, empty their wallets and then send them back out onto the streets and **** the consequences.[/p][/quote]Well put! And what happens if one of these punters should die of alcohol related causes? s&k
  • Score: 9

12:09pm Mon 14 Jul 14

Gratro says...

Perhaps those two reporters who got ill with the burger last week might like to try this for an encore!
Perhaps those two reporters who got ill with the burger last week might like to try this for an encore! Gratro
  • Score: 29

1:29pm Mon 14 Jul 14

FatherTed11 says...

Here's a good drinking game - Down a shot every time Argus uses the word 'slam' in an article. I bet you won't last long.
Here's a good drinking game - Down a shot every time Argus uses the word 'slam' in an article. I bet you won't last long. FatherTed11
  • Score: 6

1:42pm Mon 14 Jul 14

Man of steel says...

Quite apart from intentionally selling that many shots in one go potentionally to one person. how can the name "Big Woody’s 42" be “sexually aggressive” and “demeaning to women”, and since when have the police been in charge of PC wording?
Or does PC now mean police controlled?
Quite apart from intentionally selling that many shots in one go potentionally to one person. how can the name "Big Woody’s 42" be “sexually aggressive” and “demeaning to women”, and since when have the police been in charge of PC wording? Or does PC now mean police controlled? Man of steel
  • Score: 2

1:53pm Mon 14 Jul 14

stevo!! says...

Man of steel wrote:
Quite apart from intentionally selling that many shots in one go potentionally to one person. how can the name "Big Woody’s 42" be “sexually aggressive” and “demeaning to women”, and since when have the police been in charge of PC wording?
Or does PC now mean police controlled?
I suspect that the term Big Woody's 42 is a reference to the deal as a whole, and includes shots that are named in a salacious manner.
[quote][p][bold]Man of steel[/bold] wrote: Quite apart from intentionally selling that many shots in one go potentionally to one person. how can the name "Big Woody’s 42" be “sexually aggressive” and “demeaning to women”, and since when have the police been in charge of PC wording? Or does PC now mean police controlled?[/p][/quote]I suspect that the term Big Woody's 42 is a reference to the deal as a whole, and includes shots that are named in a salacious manner. stevo!!
  • Score: -25

1:56pm Mon 14 Jul 14

qm says...

42 shots? Just goes to show the mentality of some of those running these places. Juvenile idiots who's only interest is making money and to hell with the consequences be it criminal behaviour or severe health issues!
42 shots? Just goes to show the mentality of some of those running these places. Juvenile idiots who's only interest is making money and to hell with the consequences be it criminal behaviour or severe health issues! qm
  • Score: 6

1:59pm Mon 14 Jul 14

stevo!! says...

qm wrote:
42 shots? Just goes to show the mentality of some of those running these places. Juvenile idiots who's only interest is making money and to hell with the consequences be it criminal behaviour or severe health issues!
And they know that they won't ever serve those shots, despite taking money for them.

They aren't stupid.....but those who attempts these 'feats' clearly are.
[quote][p][bold]qm[/bold] wrote: 42 shots? Just goes to show the mentality of some of those running these places. Juvenile idiots who's only interest is making money and to hell with the consequences be it criminal behaviour or severe health issues![/p][/quote]And they know that they won't ever serve those shots, despite taking money for them. They aren't stupid.....but those who attempts these 'feats' clearly are. stevo!!
  • Score: -28

3:04pm Mon 14 Jul 14

Ambo Guy says...

monkeymoo wrote:
I think Stevo!!'s mum must have drunk a few of these when she was pregnant with him.
It's the only thing that can explain how he turned out!
Ha yeah that would explain a lot.

Most of his right wing nazi loving mates are probably a bit 'challenged' in that department!
[quote][p][bold]monkeymoo[/bold] wrote: I think Stevo!!'s mum must have drunk a few of these when she was pregnant with him. It's the only thing that can explain how he turned out![/p][/quote]Ha yeah that would explain a lot. Most of his right wing nazi loving mates are probably a bit 'challenged' in that department! Ambo Guy
  • Score: 117

3:08pm Mon 14 Jul 14

stevo!! says...

Ambo Guy wrote:
monkeymoo wrote:
I think Stevo!!'s mum must have drunk a few of these when she was pregnant with him.
It's the only thing that can explain how he turned out!
Ha yeah that would explain a lot.

Most of his right wing nazi loving mates are probably a bit 'challenged' in that department!
Ah, Ambro Gay.....the racist!

Thanks for proving me right three times the other day.
[quote][p][bold]Ambo Guy[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]monkeymoo[/bold] wrote: I think Stevo!!'s mum must have drunk a few of these when she was pregnant with him. It's the only thing that can explain how he turned out![/p][/quote]Ha yeah that would explain a lot. Most of his right wing nazi loving mates are probably a bit 'challenged' in that department![/p][/quote]Ah, Ambro Gay.....the racist! Thanks for proving me right three times the other day. stevo!!
  • Score: -66

3:44pm Mon 14 Jul 14

TIMBURRY says...

Most drink promotions are aimed at student union card holders, not for joe public.. Rip Off Brighton.
Most drink promotions are aimed at student union card holders, not for joe public.. Rip Off Brighton. TIMBURRY
  • Score: 1

3:59pm Mon 14 Jul 14

Voice of Brighton says...

monkeymoo wrote:
I think Stevo!!'s mum must have drunk a few of these when she was pregnant with him.
It's the only thing that can explain how he turned out!
No I think he was more of a 'Methodone Baby'! There's some serious issues going on there.

Seriously though, when did this website become the mouthpiece of the far right?
[quote][p][bold]monkeymoo[/bold] wrote: I think Stevo!!'s mum must have drunk a few of these when she was pregnant with him. It's the only thing that can explain how he turned out![/p][/quote]No I think he was more of a 'Methodone Baby'! There's some serious issues going on there. Seriously though, when did this website become the mouthpiece of the far right? Voice of Brighton
  • Score: 89

4:07pm Mon 14 Jul 14

stevo!! says...

Voice of Brighton wrote:
monkeymoo wrote:
I think Stevo!!'s mum must have drunk a few of these when she was pregnant with him.
It's the only thing that can explain how he turned out!
No I think he was more of a 'Methodone Baby'! There's some serious issues going on there.

Seriously though, when did this website become the mouthpiece of the far right?
How many posts on here have you seen that extol far-right views?
[quote][p][bold]Voice of Brighton[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]monkeymoo[/bold] wrote: I think Stevo!!'s mum must have drunk a few of these when she was pregnant with him. It's the only thing that can explain how he turned out![/p][/quote]No I think he was more of a 'Methodone Baby'! There's some serious issues going on there. Seriously though, when did this website become the mouthpiece of the far right?[/p][/quote]How many posts on here have you seen that extol far-right views? stevo!!
  • Score: -64

4:26pm Mon 14 Jul 14

Voice of Brighton says...

About 90% of what you post is just ignorant racist filth.

You do not represent the views of most decent people who come on this forum. This is why everybody votes your posts down - you're just not liked and not wanted here.
About 90% of what you post is just ignorant racist filth. You do not represent the views of most decent people who come on this forum. This is why everybody votes your posts down - you're just not liked and not wanted here. Voice of Brighton
  • Score: 89

4:42pm Mon 14 Jul 14

stevo!! says...

Voice of Brighton wrote:
About 90% of what you post is just ignorant racist filth.

You do not represent the views of most decent people who come on this forum. This is why everybody votes your posts down - you're just not liked and not wanted here.
Quote three posts from anyone on here which contains 'ignorant racist filth'.

Otherwise you're simply admitting to be an ignorant bigot you gets upset with people just because they are more intelligent than you.
[quote][p][bold]Voice of Brighton[/bold] wrote: About 90% of what you post is just ignorant racist filth. You do not represent the views of most decent people who come on this forum. This is why everybody votes your posts down - you're just not liked and not wanted here.[/p][/quote]Quote three posts from anyone on here which contains 'ignorant racist filth'. Otherwise you're simply admitting to be an ignorant bigot you gets upset with people just because they are more intelligent than you. stevo!!
  • Score: -60

5:01pm Mon 14 Jul 14

Voice of Brighton says...

Unlike others like AmboGuy I won't engage in a long drawn out conversation with you as you are beneath me. I have seen first hand the violence of the MFE supporters. I have seen the outright racism and ignorance of your organisation.
As I have said, you are beneath me and not worth my effort.
I'm sure you'll think you're going to come back with a brilliant response (I'm guessing it will be along the lines of me not giving examples) but you must understand that I am the one allowing you to have the final say.
Knock yourself out.
Unlike others like AmboGuy I won't engage in a long drawn out conversation with you as you are beneath me. I have seen first hand the violence of the MFE supporters. I have seen the outright racism and ignorance of your organisation. As I have said, you are beneath me and not worth my effort. I'm sure you'll think you're going to come back with a brilliant response (I'm guessing it will be along the lines of me not giving examples) but you must understand that I am the one allowing you to have the final say. Knock yourself out. Voice of Brighton
  • Score: 77

5:09pm Mon 14 Jul 14

stevo!! says...

Voice of Brighton wrote:
Unlike others like AmboGuy I won't engage in a long drawn out conversation with you as you are beneath me. I have seen first hand the violence of the MFE supporters. I have seen the outright racism and ignorance of your organisation.
As I have said, you are beneath me and not worth my effort.
I'm sure you'll think you're going to come back with a brilliant response (I'm guessing it will be along the lines of me not giving examples) but you must understand that I am the one allowing you to have the final say.
Knock yourself out.
Yes, you failed to provide examples of racism, so you admit to being an ignorant bigot.

As for my 'organisation', I don't have one, but if you have issues with someone you know who has been involved in violence of any kind, you are free to take the matter up with them.

I'm glad you're not having a drawn out convo like AmboGay, but the end result is the same as that enjoyed by him......you're both exposed as being bigots.

It also means that those of us with the intelligence to discuss the topic can continue to do so unhindered by pathetic trolls like you.

Toodles!
[quote][p][bold]Voice of Brighton[/bold] wrote: Unlike others like AmboGuy I won't engage in a long drawn out conversation with you as you are beneath me. I have seen first hand the violence of the MFE supporters. I have seen the outright racism and ignorance of your organisation. As I have said, you are beneath me and not worth my effort. I'm sure you'll think you're going to come back with a brilliant response (I'm guessing it will be along the lines of me not giving examples) but you must understand that I am the one allowing you to have the final say. Knock yourself out.[/p][/quote]Yes, you failed to provide examples of racism, so you admit to being an ignorant bigot. As for my 'organisation', I don't have one, but if you have issues with someone you know who has been involved in violence of any kind, you are free to take the matter up with them. I'm glad you're not having a drawn out convo like AmboGay, but the end result is the same as that enjoyed by him......you're both exposed as being bigots. It also means that those of us with the intelligence to discuss the topic can continue to do so unhindered by pathetic trolls like you. Toodles! stevo!!
  • Score: -63

5:22pm Mon 14 Jul 14

Roundbill says...

Don't feed the troll, people.
Don't feed the troll, people. Roundbill
  • Score: 5

6:12pm Mon 14 Jul 14

Hove Ex-Pat says...

The fact that this promotion was even announced surely breaks the law. The licensees have therefore proved that they are not fit & proper persons to hold a drinks licence. I hope the police & magistrates will remember this when renewal time comes around.
The fact that this promotion was even announced surely breaks the law. The licensees have therefore proved that they are not fit & proper persons to hold a drinks licence. I hope the police & magistrates will remember this when renewal time comes around. Hove Ex-Pat
  • Score: 7

7:27pm Mon 14 Jul 14

monkeymoo says...

The way that Stevo!! always refers to Ambo Guy as 'Ambo Gay'.....

Just goes to show what a pathetic little child he is.

Such a shame he doesn't realise this.
The way that Stevo!! always refers to Ambo Guy as 'Ambo Gay'..... Just goes to show what a pathetic little child he is. Such a shame he doesn't realise this. monkeymoo
  • Score: 41

7:30pm Mon 14 Jul 14

monkeymoo says...

stevo!! wrote:
monkeymoo wrote:
I think Stevo!!'s mum must have drunk a few of these when she was pregnant with him.
It's the only thing that can explain how he turned out!
And you're unable to discuss the posts of someone who you claim was born with brain damage.

How impressed should we be with your lack of intelligence?
Please can you state exactly where in my post did i claim you were born with brain damage?
I read it over and over, and i really cant find those words anywhere!

I guess if you just make things up to try and make yourself feel better, then you are truly very sad.
#pathetic kid.
[quote][p][bold]stevo!![/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]monkeymoo[/bold] wrote: I think Stevo!!'s mum must have drunk a few of these when she was pregnant with him. It's the only thing that can explain how he turned out![/p][/quote]And you're unable to discuss the posts of someone who you claim was born with brain damage. How impressed should we be with your lack of intelligence?[/p][/quote]Please can you state exactly where in my post did i claim you were born with brain damage? I read it over and over, and i really cant find those words anywhere! I guess if you just make things up to try and make yourself feel better, then you are truly very sad. #pathetic kid. monkeymoo
  • Score: 53

7:49pm Mon 14 Jul 14

stevo!! says...

"A manager, who did not wish to be named, said the challenge was aimed at a large group of “ten to 12 people at least” – not one person."

Classic wriggling.

Four shots per person is hardly a case for having 'the balls' referred to in the advert.

Let's hope the authorities take this seriously and commence prosecutions for the idiots who sanctioned these promotions.
"A manager, who did not wish to be named, said the challenge was aimed at a large group of “ten to 12 people at least” – not one person." Classic wriggling. Four shots per person is hardly a case for having 'the balls' referred to in the advert. Let's hope the authorities take this seriously and commence prosecutions for the idiots who sanctioned these promotions. stevo!!
  • Score: -38

8:24pm Mon 14 Jul 14

stevo!! says...

monkeymoo wrote:
stevo!! wrote:
monkeymoo wrote:
I think Stevo!!'s mum must have drunk a few of these when she was pregnant with him.
It's the only thing that can explain how he turned out!
And you're unable to discuss the posts of someone who you claim was born with brain damage.

How impressed should we be with your lack of intelligence?
Please can you state exactly where in my post did i claim you were born with brain damage?
I read it over and over, and i really cant find those words anywhere!

I guess if you just make things up to try and make yourself feel better, then you are truly very sad.
#pathetic kid.
"]Please can you state exactly where in my post did i claim you were born with brain damage? I read it over and over, and i really cant find those words anywhere! "

First of all, your wriggling is pathetic. You know what you wrote and why you wrote it.

It was a typical response from someone who is too stupid to present a reasoned discussion and who resents being corrected by his intellectual superiors.

OED 'claim'......"State or assert that something is the case, typically without providing evidence or proof"

You claimed that excessive alcohol consumption on several occasions by a woman caused behavioural problems in her as-yet unborn offspring. The only way that could have occurred was if the alcohol had damaged the foetus's brain, because it is that organ which governs behaviour. Had the damage been restricted to the limbs, for example, any behavioural problems would not be apparent merely in the written word.

So, you made a claim that a child had suffered brain damage before birth that led to behaviour that you have perceived. You don't know any of the people involved. Your comment was based on ignorance, prejudice and hatred, all arising from what I stated earlier.

You're welcome.
[quote][p][bold]monkeymoo[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]stevo!![/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]monkeymoo[/bold] wrote: I think Stevo!!'s mum must have drunk a few of these when she was pregnant with him. It's the only thing that can explain how he turned out![/p][/quote]And you're unable to discuss the posts of someone who you claim was born with brain damage. How impressed should we be with your lack of intelligence?[/p][/quote]Please can you state exactly where in my post did i claim you were born with brain damage? I read it over and over, and i really cant find those words anywhere! I guess if you just make things up to try and make yourself feel better, then you are truly very sad. #pathetic kid.[/p][/quote]"]Please can you state exactly where in my post did i claim you were born with brain damage? I read it over and over, and i really cant find those words anywhere! " First of all, your wriggling is pathetic. You know what you wrote and why you wrote it. It was a typical response from someone who is too stupid to present a reasoned discussion and who resents being corrected by his intellectual superiors. OED 'claim'......"State or assert that something is the case, typically without providing evidence or proof" You claimed that excessive alcohol consumption on several occasions by a woman caused behavioural problems in her as-yet unborn offspring. The only way that could have occurred was if the alcohol had damaged the foetus's brain, because it is that organ which governs behaviour. Had the damage been restricted to the limbs, for example, any behavioural problems would not be apparent merely in the written word. So, you made a claim that a child had suffered brain damage before birth that led to behaviour that you have perceived. You don't know any of the people involved. Your comment was based on ignorance, prejudice and hatred, all arising from what I stated earlier. You're welcome. stevo!!
  • Score: -38

9:10am Tue 15 Jul 14

monkeymoo says...

stevo!! wrote:
monkeymoo wrote:
stevo!! wrote:
monkeymoo wrote:
I think Stevo!!'s mum must have drunk a few of these when she was pregnant with him.
It's the only thing that can explain how he turned out!
And you're unable to discuss the posts of someone who you claim was born with brain damage.

How impressed should we be with your lack of intelligence?
Please can you state exactly where in my post did i claim you were born with brain damage?
I read it over and over, and i really cant find those words anywhere!

I guess if you just make things up to try and make yourself feel better, then you are truly very sad.
#pathetic kid.
"]Please can you state exactly where in my post did i claim you were born with brain damage? I read it over and over, and i really cant find those words anywhere! "

First of all, your wriggling is pathetic. You know what you wrote and why you wrote it.

It was a typical response from someone who is too stupid to present a reasoned discussion and who resents being corrected by his intellectual superiors.

OED 'claim'......"State or assert that something is the case, typically without providing evidence or proof"

You claimed that excessive alcohol consumption on several occasions by a woman caused behavioural problems in her as-yet unborn offspring. The only way that could have occurred was if the alcohol had damaged the foetus's brain, because it is that organ which governs behaviour. Had the damage been restricted to the limbs, for example, any behavioural problems would not be apparent merely in the written word.

So, you made a claim that a child had suffered brain damage before birth that led to behaviour that you have perceived. You don't know any of the people involved. Your comment was based on ignorance, prejudice and hatred, all arising from what I stated earlier.

You're welcome.
Actually Stevo!!.....

I just think you are retarded! Is that plain and simple enough for you?

Your right wing, homophobic, bigoted, narrow minded views are just pathetic.
It clearly shows just how 'out of touch' you are with the real world by the amount of Thumbs Down you get with each of your posts.

I have tried to lower my standards to enter into a conversation with someone who has such limited intelligence, and i am afraid i cannot do it.
It's not your fault Stevo!!, It's mine. I just cant communicate with a lesser being like yourself.

I do hope you enjoy your life in your own little, self centered bubble.

Take care

You're Welcome!
[quote][p][bold]stevo!![/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]monkeymoo[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]stevo!![/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]monkeymoo[/bold] wrote: I think Stevo!!'s mum must have drunk a few of these when she was pregnant with him. It's the only thing that can explain how he turned out![/p][/quote]And you're unable to discuss the posts of someone who you claim was born with brain damage. How impressed should we be with your lack of intelligence?[/p][/quote]Please can you state exactly where in my post did i claim you were born with brain damage? I read it over and over, and i really cant find those words anywhere! I guess if you just make things up to try and make yourself feel better, then you are truly very sad. #pathetic kid.[/p][/quote]"]Please can you state exactly where in my post did i claim you were born with brain damage? I read it over and over, and i really cant find those words anywhere! " First of all, your wriggling is pathetic. You know what you wrote and why you wrote it. It was a typical response from someone who is too stupid to present a reasoned discussion and who resents being corrected by his intellectual superiors. OED 'claim'......"State or assert that something is the case, typically without providing evidence or proof" You claimed that excessive alcohol consumption on several occasions by a woman caused behavioural problems in her as-yet unborn offspring. The only way that could have occurred was if the alcohol had damaged the foetus's brain, because it is that organ which governs behaviour. Had the damage been restricted to the limbs, for example, any behavioural problems would not be apparent merely in the written word. So, you made a claim that a child had suffered brain damage before birth that led to behaviour that you have perceived. You don't know any of the people involved. Your comment was based on ignorance, prejudice and hatred, all arising from what I stated earlier. You're welcome.[/p][/quote]Actually Stevo!!..... I just think you are retarded! Is that plain and simple enough for you? Your right wing, homophobic, bigoted, narrow minded views are just pathetic. It clearly shows just how 'out of touch' you are with the real world by the amount of Thumbs Down you get with each of your posts. I have tried to lower my standards to enter into a conversation with someone who has such limited intelligence, and i am afraid i cannot do it. It's not your fault Stevo!!, It's mine. I just cant communicate with a lesser being like yourself. I do hope you enjoy your life in your own little, self centered bubble. Take care You're Welcome! monkeymoo
  • Score: 4

9:26am Tue 15 Jul 14

stevo!! says...

"Actually Stevo!!.....

I just think you are retarded! "

I know you do, hence your comment about me being brain-damaged, the one that you claimed you hadn't made.

It confirms what I said earlier, about you being unable to debate the posts of those who you claim are 'retarded' because they are too clever for you.

"Your right wing, homophobic, bigoted, narrow minded views are just pathetic. "

Posts which contravene the rules should be reported when you see them.

Funny how when I request details of anyone, no-one is able to quote them. As I said, your comments about me are based on ignorance, bigotry and hatred, and to that we can add derogatory comments about those suffering mental issues. Oh, and you're a proven liar, too.

You seem so proud of who you are - trust me, you say nothing to be proud about.

As for all the thumbs down, as I've said before, I consider them an acknowledgement that I'm correct, because they come from people who aren't able to discuss the contents of my posts. Personal attacks also fall into that category.

I shall continue posting knowing that I upset so many thick, angry, nasty, ignorant people who cannot help but read my opinions.

You're welcome ;-)
"Actually Stevo!!..... I just think you are retarded! " I know you do, hence your comment about me being brain-damaged, the one that you claimed you hadn't made. It confirms what I said earlier, about you being unable to debate the posts of those who you claim are 'retarded' because they are too clever for you. "Your right wing, homophobic, bigoted, narrow minded views are just pathetic. " Posts which contravene the rules should be reported when you see them. Funny how when I request details of anyone, no-one is able to quote them. As I said, your comments about me are based on ignorance, bigotry and hatred, and to that we can add derogatory comments about those suffering mental issues. Oh, and you're a proven liar, too. You seem so proud of who you are - trust me, you say nothing to be proud about. As for all the thumbs down, as I've said before, I consider them an acknowledgement that I'm correct, because they come from people who aren't able to discuss the contents of my posts. Personal attacks also fall into that category. I shall continue posting knowing that I upset so many thick, angry, nasty, ignorant people who cannot help but read my opinions. You're welcome ;-) stevo!!
  • Score: -5

11:06am Tue 15 Jul 14

Fairfax Aches says...

Go Stevo!
Go Stevo! Fairfax Aches
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree