News RSS Feed


£8K a day on consultants

6:59am Monday 14th May 2007

comment Comments (5)   Have your say »


Town hall spending on private consultants has soared to almost £8,000 a day, an investigation by The Argus has revealed.

Brighton and Hove City Council paid £2.9 million to consultants in 2006 - 62 per cent more than in the 2004-05 financial year.

Critics say a "consultancy culture" has led to expensive firms being brought in when council staff could do the job.

The Conservatives, the largest group on the council following the local elections, have promised a review of payments to outside advisers under the ousted Labour administration.

Tory leader, Councillor Brian Oxley said: "It is one of the issues we have been raising over the past year and we're now looking at it very closely."

He said the use of consultants during the controversial ballot on the future of the city's housing stock had angered tenants and council taxpayers.

He said: "A lot of people felt money could have been spent on the work that needed doing on council properties.

"You clearly need to use consultants where specific expertise is required but I think there is a consultancy culture."

The council drew criticism from groups such as the North Laine Community Association and the Brighton Society over its use of London-based planning consultant Urban Initiatives last year.

The firm was brought in to report on the regeneration of the London Road and Lewes Road areas.

According to the residents' groups, its staff failed to show even a basic knowledge of the sites, their history and their importance in the city.

Tory councillor Ann Norman said details of spending under the Labour group had not always been easy for opposition councillors to scrutinise.

She said: "It is one of the things I know we plan to review - to look at it very closely and see what the money has been spent on. I believe we have officers in the council who would be perfectly capable of carrying out some of these consultations.

"There are examples where an awful lot of money has been spent, with no obvious benefit for the council taxpayer."

Coun Norman said the consultation over a park-andride scheme for Brighton had been particularly expensive.

Spending on consultants by councils across Sussex increased to more than £22.2 million last year.

But Lewes District Council's bill fell from more than £300,000 in 2004-05, to just £13,000 last year.

Council leader Ann de Vecchi said the amounts councils spent could vary according to the type of projects carried out.

She said in previous years work towards a housing stock transfer ballot in Lewes had been particularly expensive.

She said: "It can be the case that you're just not big enough to have in-house specialists to do the work.

"There are so many areas of specialist work and requirements from central government where you are, to some extent, compelled to employ consultants to give you advice."

East Sussex County Council almost doubled its bill, from £3.7 million in 2004-05 to £7.3 million in 2006.

Council leader Peter Jones said the figures included money spent on all private contractors, not just consultants.

West Sussex County Council's spending on consultants fell from £11.8 million to £8.6 million in the same period.

A spokesman said the money included spending on management consultancy, as well as contractors.


Your Say YourThe Argus

Dave B, Saltdean says...
1:26pm Mon 14 May 07

Perhaps a list of spending and the results of "expert" advice should be published to assess the value. I suspect many reports were very lengthy and stated the obvious.

ray ellerton, portslade says...
9:01pm Mon 14 May 07

well its all coming out now...more of 'new labours' jobs for the boys i expect. perhaps now they have been deposed we can also look forward to a significant reduction in the number of 'non-jobs' that proliferated during the last regime...

Sue, Hove says...
9:21pm Mon 14 May 07

About time,far too much money is wasted on consultations. Why do they employ people if they do not have the experience?

The same is happening with PCTs wasting NHS money - they have been holding meetings for ages consulting but lunch or sandwiches are always provided. The people who attend are professional and service users but mainly professionals opting out of work. The list of those attending gets longer everytime - professionals spend far too much time in meetings instead of working. Maybe it is the time to get rid of PCTs too.

It is about time mangers managed and used their own experiences.

What happened to common sense?

Jim, Hove says...
8:48am Tue 15 May 07

I work for the council and I can tell you that much more money is wasted in other areas other than consultants / contractors. From my experience it is the consultants / contractors that are actually doing most the work. In the councils you will find you have a lot of dead wood , employees simply taking the pay cheque and reaping the company benefits until they retire , In my opinion these people are far more costly as their output is minimal. Lets also not forget the amount of money that gets spent on councillors as well. I work in IT and all councilers across the county have a ridiculous amount of free IT equipment and services which is above and beyond that of the normal employee working from home. Like I say , contractors are not the issue here !

Don, Brighton says...
12:03pm Thu 17 May 07

Dave B wrote:
Perhaps a list of spending and the results of \"expert\" advice should be published to assess the value. I suspect many reports were very lengthy and stated the obvious.
I agree with Dave B.
It is well known that most consultants are a waste of money and I look forward to reading a proper assessment of the
results of their work.
Argus - don't stop probing!

Comments are closed on this article.

Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »