News RSS Feed


Eco plan to make city the greenest in the land

7:38am Friday 14th September 2007

comment Comments (31)   Have your say »


New homes will be powered by sun, wind and water under radical proposals to turn Brighton and Hove into the greenest city in the country.

Under new building guidelines, any development of three or more homes must be carbon neutral or offset emissions by improving the energy efficiency of the city's current stock of Regency, Victorian and post-war homes.

Millions of pounds in grants will be generated to plough into insulation in lofts and cavity walls to improve heating systems and reduce draughts in exisiting properties.

The planning policy, which is at the forefront of ecological thinking, was approved last night by councillors on the environment committee and will now be put out to consultation.

Every new building project, apart from the very smallest, will be required to cut 25 per cent of its overall heating and electricity consumption from fossil fuels.

Council bosses want developers to reach the target by using renewable energy like solar panels, wind turbines and water power as well as low carbon options through the grid and mains gas to generate heat and power more efficiently.

And the overall project must also be carbon neutral in terms of energy use.

This means that if the development is creating CO2, it must offset it by improving other properties at a cost of up to £2,500 per tonne of the green house gas.

With 11,000 new homes to be built across Brighton and Hove in the next 20 years, these new planning guidelines will produce millions of pounds in payoffs to improve current homes in Brighton and Hove that are 10 years old or more.

Medium and large commercial developments as well as residential extensions, conversions and changes of use involving three or more flats will also be required to cut energy consumption by 20 per cent by using low or carbon neutral technology.

The Sustainable Building Design report reveals: "The ability to achieve net annual zero carbon emissions from energy use may be affected by technical and or financial factors.

"In such cases, contributions could be made to enable energy savings in the vicinity of the development site to deliver outstanding on-site carbon emissions and give the developer due credit."

Martin Randall, Brighton and Hove City Council's head of planning, said the contribution would be available to homes in the development's neighbourhood.

He said: "It is radical and innovative but we do not believe we have pushed beyond the boundaries of what is acceptable.

"I believe we are at the forefront of sustainable building."

Mr Randall added that planning guidelines on the positioning of wind turbines and solar panels were also being issued to ensure that conservation areas were protected.

New housing developments will also have to contribute towards the planting of 64,000 new trees the council want to see introduced across the city in the next 50 years.

On hot days, town and city temperatures are up to 60 per cent higher than the surrounding countryside due to a phenomenon called the urban heat island effect.

This can be reduced by planting vegetation and shrubs and trees and helps to curb the need for air-conditioning.

The council's environment committee also agreed last night on tougher restrictions on developments of one or two homes.

Conservative councillors and council officers wanted to set the policy at the lowest level of the national code for sustainable homes to avoid putting off developers.

Tory councillor Garry Peltzer Dunn said: "I would hate to think we might lose some developers or some homes just because we are insisting on a certain standard."

But Green and Labour councillors banded together to vote to abide by level three of the code - a tougher set of demands that requires builders to allow only 105 litres of water per householder per day, reduce standard domestic carbon emissions by 25 per cent and choose from a selection of other environmental measures under a complicated points system.

Green councillor Paul Steedman said: "This is absolutely great. It is going to put us in a real leadership position as a city on green issues over the coming years."

Labour's Gill Mitchell, who chaired the environment committee before the city council elections, said the policy was an "incredible achievement".

She said: "This is a really proud day. I think it will inform Government policy as I don't think it has been done anywhere else."

What do you think of the proposals? Tell us below.


Your Say YourThe Argus

Stroller, Hove says...
8:37am Fri 14 Sep 07

So why weren't stricter criteria used for the proposed King Alfred buldings?

spiked-out, BN0 says...
9:00am Fri 14 Sep 07

unholy alliance between labour and greens, which will set back the local economy years and will make homes even more unaffordable.

Paul, Brighton Seafront says...
9:02am Fri 14 Sep 07

There has to be a definite cut off date, Stroller. Schemes that have been drawn up would have to be re-written and so on.

As it happens, the KA scheme has incorporated a decent level of sustainability.

HiDeHi, Brighton says...
9:18am Fri 14 Sep 07

So the council support a stadium on a greenfield site in AONB for the commercial benefit of a small minority, and then bang on about green issues?

Rank hypocrisy.

Paul, Brighton Seafront says...
9:26am Fri 14 Sep 07

HiDeHi wrote:
So the council support a stadium on a greenfield site in AONB for the commercial benefit of a small minority, and then bang on about green issues? Rank hypocrisy.
Yawn. The greenfield site would be better descirbed as farmland and part brownfield. The stadium HAD to be built somewhere and the site selected offers the maximisation of sustainable transport.

Incidentally, the stadium will also be the first to attain a 'Very Good' status from BREEAM.


Stuart, Brighton says...
10:27am Fri 14 Sep 07

Water power in Brighton? I await the details with interest.

No Name, Brighton says...
10:28am Fri 14 Sep 07

Very good, but personally I would prefer that the more energy is spent by B&HCC getting the basics right such as getting through their backlog of planning apps. Six months and waiting, effectively it is my fault really, I naively put in a planning app without a legal team ready to go.

Chris, Worthing says...
11:15am Fri 14 Sep 07

Paul wrote:
There has to be a definite cut off date, Stroller. Schemes that have been drawn up would have to be re-written and so on. As it happens, the KA scheme has incorporated a decent level of sustainability.
A decent level of sustainability? Surely if you are taking more from the earth (ie building materials etc) than you are giving you can't be living sustainably.

You are either sustainable or not.

Peter, Saltdean says...
12:15pm Fri 14 Sep 07

I wonder how many years it will take before we see the Law of Unintended consequences manifest itself.I can see these measures increasing the cost of developments and thus reducing the number of new dwellings, which in turn increases the value of the existing market housing. Great idea then, my property value will increase even faster !

Seagull, Brighton says...
1:30pm Fri 14 Sep 07

HiDeHi wrote:
So the council support a stadium on a greenfield site in AONB for the commercial benefit of a small minority, and then bang on about green issues? Rank hypocrisy.
Yes - so beautiful that it was left out of the south downs national park plans beacuse its a corner plot sandwiched by a 6 lane dual carriage way and a university -Get over it.

Rick, Brighotn says...
1:33pm Fri 14 Sep 07

I've never understood why this isn't already the rule for new builds. Direct Solar Heating isn't very much more expensive than standard heating and uses up to 70% less gas. And yes new homes often don't even have good insulation!

Henry Law, says...
1:43pm Fri 14 Sep 07

Interesting. Then I wonder why they would not let me replace low efficiency single glazing with new Upvc double glazing in my 1961 block flat?

The reason given was it is in a Conservation Area, but that regulation was intended to protect the Victorian architecture. Since the planning department appears to be full of people who don't know what they are supposed to be doing, the mind boggles when one thinks about how this will be applied in practice.

john b, says...
2:40pm Fri 14 Sep 07

This is the noughties equivalent of the "nuclear free zone" rubbish the loony lefties tried to instigate in the eighties. While these idiots placate the ludicrous demands of the Green Party the cost of homes on the south coast continues to rocket. Well done.

Rick, Brighton says...
3:30pm Fri 14 Sep 07

Forget green issues. Properly insulated homes which generate their own power cost substantially less to run than others. Insulation alone can cut bills by hundreds.

Why would you want to live in a new home that cost you £500 a year to heat, when you could pay maybe £2000 more initially but heat it for £100?

Pete, Brighton says...
5:02pm Fri 14 Sep 07

Shame the greens supported a schools admissions plan that will result in tons of extra CO2 due to parents carting kids to all parts of the city!

confused newhaven, newhaven says...
5:15pm Fri 14 Sep 07

brighton going green?quotes from the argus, councillor paul steedman "this is absolutely great"councillor gill mitchell "incredible achievement" why then do they also plan to incinerate brighton rubbish in newhaven & process brighton sewage in peacehaven is that going green?or have i missed something

Dave, Hove says...
5:19pm Fri 14 Sep 07

I'd have thought processing sewage was a **** sight greener than pumping it untreated into the sea.

Alan, Hove says...
5:23pm Fri 14 Sep 07

If i read this right anyone who buys a new home must also pay to insulate their neibours home as well... All this in an area of overpriced homes anyway, You really dont want the working class here do you

M, Brighton says...
5:30pm Fri 14 Sep 07

I think in principle it's a good idea, we all need to do our bit but as with most things, new rules and regulations go from one extreme to the other so lets hope a sensible happy medium is found. Perhaps the council could also consider building refuse and recycling areas that seaguls and other animals can not pull rubbish out of bins and create the horrible mess in the streets we have at the moment. My flat in Seaford has them and it saves so much hassle (they were built in 1975). I have not seen them anywhere else

Dave in Brighton, Brighton says...
9:40pm Fri 14 Sep 07

Surely the priority of B&H Council should be using available cash to ease the massive crisis in affordable and decent housing in this city. Whilst environmentally sustainable housing is a laudable idea, there are thousands of people, including many with young children who are living in insecure, over crowded, often unhealthy and very expensive housing in Brighton and Hove. Perhaps the balance needs to be more toward quantity when it comes to the current housings situation.

JH, Brighton says...
9:45pm Fri 14 Sep 07

GOING GREEN?What about to start recycling at ALL schools,convenience stores, etc? Easy and cheap!

GREYRUN, HOVE says...
10:32pm Fri 14 Sep 07

JH wrote:
GOING GREEN?What about to start recycling at ALL schools,convenience stores, etc? Easy and cheap!
What about making businesses having to recycle but the council picking it up free of charged.

charles townley, hove says...
11:53pm Fri 14 Sep 07

So once again our wonderful band of councillors and planners think they are leading the world in defeating climate change.This folly hasn't been attempted in the ludicrously titled New England quarter where there appears to be no green space just lots of environmentally unfriendly Benidorm blocks for the very people who buy this boloney from the council.

markc, hove says...
11:55pm Fri 14 Sep 07

Yes the so-called Green Party and Labour are doing their bit in the relentless gentrification of Brighton.

nightowl, Brighton Marina says...
9:32am Sat 15 Sep 07

Have 'green roofs' and 'green walls' been considered in the proposals? If all suitable existing roofs and all new roofs would be covered in planting combined with solar panels and wind turbines we could indeed have a very GREEN CITY.

sucram, Hove says...
6:01pm Sat 15 Sep 07

BRIGHTOJN AND HOVE CITY COUNCIL HAS DOUBLE STANDARDS, they have no credability left, look at the way they tax car drivers, ruthless idiots

Nick, Brighton says...
7:56pm Sat 15 Sep 07

lets face it we are all going to hell in a handcart...albeit with an internal combustion engine. I'm with you lot...Me! Me! Me! til it all burns...can't wait

Paul, Brighton Seafront says...
12:19am Sun 16 Sep 07

Chris wrote:
Paul wrote: There has to be a definite cut off date, Stroller. Schemes that have been drawn up would have to be re-written and so on. As it happens, the KA scheme has incorporated a decent level of sustainability.
A decent level of sustainability? Surely if you are taking more from the earth (ie building materials etc) than you are giving you can't be living sustainably. You are either sustainable or not.
Perhaps sustainability is a misleading term. If we are talking Zero Carbon, then KA is not that, but it does include measures to offset its emissions. It is certainly better performing than a great deal of new builds and thankfully so.

Mike, Marine Parade says...
1:57pm Tue 18 Sep 07

Brighton seems to be existing in some strange parallel universe where all the unpopular schemes that will have a negative impact on the local environment were voted in by the old Labour-Green alliance council (the King Alfred, the Hollingdean incinerator, the mindless over-development and hideous 60's revival that is the New England quarter, the shocking new school admissions system) and the new Conservative administration seem to be pulling out all the stops on environmentally friendly schemes (stricter eco-focused planning, the new environmentally friendly Albion staduim, planting more trees, reprogramming traffic lights to ease traffic jams, putting the roads on Old Steine together to create alogn expanse of green garden all the way into Brighton, and cleaning-up local parks and public areas) - at least according to what I've read in The Argus in recent months. I'm an eternal cynic and not a fan of David Cameron, but you've got to give the old Tories credit for their performance since they took control in May!

Pebbles, Hove says...
6:39pm Fri 21 Sep 07

Dear Mike of Marine Parade and others. It's really tedious to see all the political squabbling, slandering and point scoring on these Argus comments boards. First, there was not a 'Green-Labour Alliance' during the last council and on the subjects mentioned voted differently (King Alfred, the Greens were always strongly opposed to the incinerator). The plans to create a big garden on the Old Steine and plant 64,000 trees are visionary but have been around a while. I'm not sure who can really lay claim to it, but I'm sure it ain't the Tories - most likely tireless work of community groups. For the sake of transparency I'll admit to some anti Tory bias here, but really, from what I've seen it looks like anything good happening right now is despite, not because of the new blue administration. Indeed some of their antics recently (King Alfred is a good example) have been embarrassing and they scare the willies out of me.

We should celebrate the new planning regime, but it's not all that radical and long overdue. Any idea that tackles the serious obstacles to upgrading home insulation has to be genius. I've seen precious few other ideas despite its seriousness. The role of government (and us) is to respond to ever changing challenges like global warming and indeed high housing costs as mentioned above. I hope our national government finally starts to wake up to it and has a good look at the banks' reckless lending and disincentives for Buy to Let / Second Homes, reinvestment in council housing stock etc, not-for-profit home builders etc.

I hope the Tories really do start to tackle global warming seriously, but it looks like greenwash to me - don't be sucked in. They seem to be rather stuck in the 80s still, self-interested and bloated from all that property investment.

daniel hill, brighton says...
5:05pm Sun 23 Sep 07

i run a recycling project in Newhaven called Tiger Enterprise Ltd where we collect unwanted building materials for free rarther than them being sent to landfill. We cover Brighton but i am trying to set up a new project some where in the city. Even though Brighton And Hove council like my project and they think im doing well, they cant offer me a yard. if i was given the chance i think i could solve the proble of wasting unwanted building materials in East Sussex. Which would increase the chance of us reaching our goal of a sustainable construction industry

Comments are closed on this article.

Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »