News RSS Feed


Hove cycle lane is 'waste of cash', says councillor

10:36am Wednesday 21st May 2008

comment Comments (106)   Have your say »


More than £700,000 has been spent on constructing a one-mile stretch of cycle freeway.

The £250-a-metre cost of creating the lane along Hove's Grand Avenue and The Drive has been condemned by one councillor as "an extravagant waste of money".

Residents have also complained the route is dangerous, unnecessary and unsightly.

The cost has been revealed following a freedom of information request to the council by Councillor Paul Elgood.

He said: "We are delighted so much investment is being made in cycling - it is vital to develop safe cycle routes and encourage people out of their cars.

"However, the cycle freeway in Grand Avenue and The Drive is an extravagant waste of money.

The construction and route has attracted huge disruption, with delays caused by the work and the loss of driving lanes.

"The new layout is dangerous in parts, with parking bays stuck out into the middle of the road.

"It has also formalised parking bays, reducing the number of cars able to park."

"The new freeway and traffic islands are entirely tarmac but the opportunity should have been taken to plant more trees and greenery along the route.

"This may be part of a national scheme and cycling is certainly a good cause but it is still public money they are using.

"There must be better ways of encouraging cycling than spending massive sums of money for large road building projects and relaying yet more environmentally unsustainable tarmac."

Brighton and Hove is a cycling demonstration town, attracting £3 million of external funding over three years.

The Liberal Democrats say better use of the money could have been made to benefit cyclists by reopening the cycle access at the Clock Tower, dealing with dangerous junctions in the city centre, offering free safety gear, or spending the cash on 10,000 new bikes for school children. Work on the segregated cycle lane began earlier this year as part of the Hangleton to Hove cycle freeway.

Consultation at the time of the decision to build the route found that 76% of the 204 people interviewed were in favour of the scheme. But in a series of letters to The Argus since the work began, neighbours, drivers and cyclists have complained the new lane increases congestion and makes cycling more dangerous.

What do you think of the cycle lane and the £700,000 cost? Comment below.


Your Say YourThe Argus

Marcus, Grand Avenue says...
11:02am Wed 21 May 08

The Council have wasted on a fortune on these cycle lanes, and no-one uses them. It is just more tarmac which has ruined Grand Avenue. we all support cycling but the cost of this project is a scandal.

Jez, Hove says...
11:06am Wed 21 May 08

Yes to more cycle lanes across the city, but what on earth have the council done to Grand Avenue? They've ruined it. The new 'cycle freeway' is more dangerous to bike users, not safer. Cyclists need to see the main junctions across the city made safer and the Clock Tower sorted out. Imagine how else this massive sum of money could have been spent to really help cycling, especially in schools.

mark, hove says...
11:09am Wed 21 May 08

So now having spent the money disrupted Hove, created considerable danger to pedestrians anc drivers.

Whats the proposal? I would suggest restoring the original but that would cost money. The council including tyhe Lib Dems will in due course propose the introduction of a congestion charge when the inevitable lines of traffic have been with us for a while.

Hindsight id a wonderful thing.

Foresight is something those playing with public money are required to possess or resign.

Cllr Elgood?

AT, Hove says...
11:09am Wed 21 May 08

Give them a chance !! The route isn't finished yet. Poor old cyclists get £700K spent on them and everyone is up in arms. Think about all the money spent on roads so people can do pointless journeys. At least this will get used over the years, taking cars off the roads so that all you people who can't do without driving to the shops 1 mile away can have more space on the roads. Brighton has too many cars you just need to see all the streets that have double parking. Something needs to get done, so this is a brave move which in time will be seen as a good move !

Jude, Hove says...
11:09am Wed 21 May 08

Sort out Seven Dials. Also, the cycle lane on the front is lethal most weekends when visitors either don't know or don't care about not walking in it.

Roger Tilbury, Worthing says...
11:09am Wed 21 May 08

What makes Marcus think we 'all support cycling'? I don't. Too many cyclists ignore traffic lights and one-way streets, ride without lights at night, cycle on the pavement etc. They pay no road tax, have no insurance, pass no test, have no safety checks on their 'vehicles' and expect part if the road to be reserved for their exclusive use!

It amazes me the number of 'respectable middle-class people' who cycle on Wothing 's promenade past a large number of No Cycling notices. And the tirade of abuse you get if you point this out to them or fail to get out of their way on the narrow path towards Goring.

Jayne, Brighton says...
11:11am Wed 21 May 08

These cycle lanes have reduced the number of car parking spaces in an area already short of parking spaces.

You really have to wonder what the council was thinking of laying yet more ugly tarmac down. Very few cyclists use those roads anyway, they go on the adjacent and quieter residential roads.

What we really need is a 20MPH zone.

The money should have bene used sorting out those dangerous junctions on Church Road and Western Road. This would have made the roads safer all residents.

Bob Spoon, Shoreham says...
11:12am Wed 21 May 08

A despicable waste of money, spending it on residents' needs. This money could have been far better spent on bottled water for council meetings.

Iggle Piggle, brighton says...
11:17am Wed 21 May 08

Our councillors very much enjoy imposing schemes and spending our money, when they rarely practice what they preach. If they were serious about cycling being the preferred method of transport then they would give away their own free car parks for social housing.

I really do think they should concentrate their time on refuse collection etc rather than constantly meddling.

anne, Goldsmid says...
11:18am Wed 21 May 08

I had a leaflet through my door this weekend from Labour.

They say the Tory Councillors for our area haven't turned up to any meetings and isn't fighting for our needs.

It is titled:
'Missing - have you seen this Councillor?'

Dirty politics perhaps, but these cycle lanes seem to prove that we aren't being looked after. Our Councillors should have stopped this wasteful nonsense.

Will there be a Goldsmid by-election?

Arnold, Brighton says...
11:19am Wed 21 May 08

This new cycle lane is the most stunning example of a complete waste of time and our, yes OUR, council tax I have EVER seen.

It has turned Grand Drive into a single track road, no doubt contributing to congestion, and will inconvenience tens of thousands of drivers to benefit a small number of cyclists.

At least now people can see what Brighton & Hove will become if the greens get into power - you have been warned. You can forget about bringing your car into town, or having visitors from afar.

If you haven't seen it for yourself, I recommend you go and have a look. It is the most amazing example of what a bunch of so-called "representatives of the people" will do when they get the taste for power. All sense seems to go out of the window.

Surely there should be a rule that Councillors have to pass some sort of intelligence test before taking their seats? If they did, then about 90% of the current encumbents would be ineligible, surely?


penny, pavilion says...
11:23am Wed 21 May 08

Great more cycling lanes and now lets see them actually joining up so more people will be encouraged to use them.
As for you lot whinging about loss of car park spaces and a little inconvenience because you have to walk a couple of steps further from your car to the pavement.........ahh
hhhhhhhhhhh, poor souls. Ask yourselves do you need a car at all in this city? I gave up on cars about 5 years ago and now walk, cycle or use public transport. And guess what I meet my neighbours and get to know more people too.

Paul, Brighton Seafront says...
11:26am Wed 21 May 08

AT wrote:
Give them a chance !! The route isn\\\'t finished yet. Poor old cyclists get £700K spent on them and everyone is up in arms. Think about all the money spent on roads so people can do pointless journeys. At least this will get used over the years, taking cars off the roads so that all you people who can\\\'t do without driving to the shops 1 mile away can have more space on the roads. Brighton has too many cars you just need to see all the streets that have double parking. Something needs to get done, so this is a brave move which in time will be seen as a good move !
Amen to that AT.

I use it and can now cycle safely from the top of Brighton to the seafront.

Dyke Road has potentially decent cycle lanes, but everybody parks in them!

Brighton & Hove is dominated by cars. How much is being spent of King's Road for 1,000s of cars to sit idly for 30 minutes pumping out fums.

More cycle lanes. Power to the cyclists.

Steve, The Drive says...
11:30am Wed 21 May 08

I live on the drive, and can say 1st hand, what a waste of money and road! I can count on one hand the amount of cyclists that use the lanes daily.

The council asked us as residents if we owned and rode bikes, after they had built the lanes.

Parking is now even harder, as people drive up so you can't parallel park.

The bin men now cause a long tailback, and ambulances have to park on the pavement, or over entries/exits.

Why they did this on one of Hove's main carridgeways, escapes me!

Alex, Preston Park says...
11:37am Wed 21 May 08

Probably going to make a fool out of myself now because my maths is not great, but:
1 mile = 1609.344 metres
1609.344m = £700,000

is that not =£434.96 per metre not £250?


Nick, Hove says...
11:41am Wed 21 May 08

Everyone agrees, it's dangerous and a farce, so why did the council do it? Surely not to use up some unspent budget before the end of last financial year? (and in doing so, ensure that that similar funds are allocated in the next budget).
Utter, incompetence and even more laughable are the bike racks that have appeared in the central reservation!

The Stirrer, Brighton says...
11:42am Wed 21 May 08

I reckon that if cyclists want cycle lanes then they should be paid from tax paid by cyclists, instead of penalising the already-taxed-to-the
-hilt motorists and other non-cycling council tax payers.

Lets see how much they REALLY want cycle lanes in stupid places when they are told to stump up £150 a year for a bike licence!!

C Bennett, Hove says...
11:43am Wed 21 May 08

This is an unbelievable amount of public money for something that is little used and not welcome by the majority of the electorate. . If you've not seen the monsterous destruction of Grand Avenue and The Drive go and have a look - but not by car. There are TWO cycle lanes - one either side of the roads, with a small paved section seperating them from the road . Then there are marked parking bays for cars leaving a single lane in each direction for moving traffic along the major access route to the centre of Hove. No sane person in their wildest imagination could have dreamt up this scheme and if they were aware of the total cost first that should have stopped the project dead on the spot.

Lethal seafront, Brighton says...
11:44am Wed 21 May 08

Jude wrote:
Sort out Seven Dials. Also, the cycle lane on the front is lethal most weekends when visitors either don't know or don't care about not walking in it.
it's only a matter of time before someone crossing from the road onto the promenade steps backwards out of the way of a cycle back into the path of an oncoming car. Whoever put the cycle lane where it is really deserves jail or mental-problem medications...or both ideally.

Mary Hinge, Brighton says...
11:48am Wed 21 May 08

It should be pointed out that this farce of a cycle lane was put forward in 2006 i.e. when the previous Labour "administration" (if you can call it that) was in power... still, the Tories could have stopped the madness but hey, that's politics for ya.

Rev. Ponge, brighton says...
11:50am Wed 21 May 08

Remember Councilors, the more you spend on cycling,the less you can slip in the old sky rocket for expences.

Cyclist, Brighton says...
11:54am Wed 21 May 08

Steve wrote:
I live on the drive, and can say 1st hand, what a waste of money and road! I can count on one hand the amount of cyclists that use the lanes daily.


Perhaps you need something else to fill your day other than sitting at the window counting cyclists.

Bernard Thighbone, Brighton says...
11:56am Wed 21 May 08

However much has been spent here is a gnat's-wee in the ocean compared to the amount that is spent on motorists each year. Cyclists pay council tax too and motorists do not own the city.

Bob, Brighton says...
11:56am Wed 21 May 08

Whether it's a good thing or not, let's get one thing clear -it was NOT paid for by Council Tax. It was paid for by external funding awarded to B&H as a cycling demonstration town. The money is ringfenced for cycling facilities and therefore does not detract from budgets elsewhere.

Bob, Brighton says...
11:56am Wed 21 May 08

Whether it's a good thing or not, let's get one thing clear -it was NOT paid for by Council Tax. It was paid for by external funding awarded to B&H as a cycling demonstration town. The money is ringfenced for cycling facilities and therefore does not detract from budgets elsewhere.

Booby, Kings House Cycle Team says...
12:03pm Wed 21 May 08

Bob wrote:
Whether it's a good thing or not, let's get one thing clear -it was NOT paid for by Council Tax. It was paid for by external funding awarded to B&H as a cycling demonstration town. The money is ringfenced for cycling facilities and therefore does not detract from budgets elsewhere.
Still public money then?

Pete, Hove says...
12:06pm Wed 21 May 08

The current administration has loudly proclaimed it is for "Value for Money", so why didn't they stop this waste of money. Maybe someone from the previous administration that was responsible in commissioning this white elephant can explain why so much has been spent on so few. So far it doesn't seem to have encouraged the additional cyclist (singular intended) which was one its aims.

resident, says...
12:15pm Wed 21 May 08

The construction of the those cycles lanes have been made without any propoer thought whats-so-ever.

Any vehicle, such as a taxi or delivery, that stops outside one of the propeties, will bring the traffic to a halt.

Will this keep the cyclist of the main road of The Drive or Grand Avenue.. absolutely not. The cyclists I have seen recently have not used this didicated lane... and they still zoom through the red lights at the junction of The Drive and Eaton Rd.

The other day I witnessed a near accident that was actually quite ironic (no one was hurt) of a cyclist heading west along Eaton Road through a red light at The Drive junction, and another cyclist going through an amber light zooming down The Drive at such speed he couldnt stop. There must have been only a fag paper between them. The look on their faces would have been fantastic on a photo!

td, Brighton says...
12:22pm Wed 21 May 08

Bob wrote:
Whether it\'s a good thing or not, let\'s get one thing clear -it was NOT paid for by Council Tax. It was paid for by external funding awarded to B&H as a cycling demonstration town. The money is ringfenced for cycling facilities and therefore does not detract from budgets elsewhere.
Bob.
It is still taxpayers money no matter what fund it has come from. Personally, I think the promotion of cyclying is great. Its healthy, reduces traffic etc BUT we do need to address some of the issues that are causing so much negativity about cyclists such as the disregard for pedestrians and indeed other road users. Lastly, when there are cycle lanes- USE THEM!

xavier young, Hove says...
12:31pm Wed 21 May 08

As a motorist and cyclist (and tax payer) I am really happy that there is now 1 cycle lane in the city that is up to European standards. I use this route for cycling and it is a joy now, I also use it every day as a motorist and have experienced no real inconvenience, just minor pauses if someone has to reverse into a space. More like this and I might even persuade my wife that it is safe for children to cycle in Brighton.

steve, Hove says...
12:31pm Wed 21 May 08

I travel up and down Grand Avenue and the Drive (I use my car as i work outside of Hove and need to travel about during the day with my job.
So I do need it Penny) The Drive is now a lot more difficult takes longer as there is usaly a bus stopping,a car parking a Vehicle dropping off/delivering they usual have no where to to pull in to and a line of traffic that can not get passed especialy if it the bin waggon making several stops.
all this for the sake of the possiable 3 cyclist i might see using the lanes.As was said eairlier i would be a different story if it had to be paid for by cyclist. Maybe make then toll cycle road and lets see if they are happy to put money back into the system....!!

Trev, Hove says...
12:34pm Wed 21 May 08

There is one positive..you dont see many boy racers hurtling along The Drive now it's single lane traffic. I reckon the owner of a black Porsche registration RAJ 1 must be bitterly disappointed as he cannot exceed 60 mph along there anymore.

bob, lewes says...
12:36pm Wed 21 May 08

"It amazes me the number of 'respectable middle-class people' who cycle on Wothing 's promenade past a large number of No Cycling notices. And the tirade of abuse you get if you point this out to them or fail to get out of their way on the narrow path towards Goring."

This was an excellent cylce route then closed years ago some one old biddy wasnt looking where she was going and was struck by a cyclist leading to its closure.

Hey Andy R from hove -blame culture again, messing it up for the many.




Topper Turvey, Brighton says...
12:50pm Wed 21 May 08

xavier young wrote:
As a motorist and cyclist (and tax payer) I am really happy that there is now 1 cycle lane in the city that is up to European standards. I use this route for cycling and it is a joy now, I also use it every day as a motorist and have experienced no real inconvenience, just minor pauses if someone has to reverse into a space. More like this and I might even persuade my wife that it is safe for children to cycle in Brighton.
And from henceforth this cycle lane shall forever be known as "The Xavier Young Cycle Lane".

bobby bigballs, Brighton says...
12:52pm Wed 21 May 08

The only reason the council put these cycle lanes in is to cover themselves. Due to the increase in cyclist's in the city and accidents with cyclist's on the road the council put the cycle lanes in and if the cyclist dose'nt use them and they get knock off their bikes the council are not liable, hence the cyclist can't make an insurance claim.

Penny Farthing, Brighton says...
12:55pm Wed 21 May 08

Brighton and Hove desperately needs and deserves more cycle lanes. The amount spent on them so far is a trifle and arguing against them denies the rights of cyclists. It is also futile continuing to argue motorist vs cyclist as both should be supported to travel side by side and cycle lanes can help. HOWEVER, the new cycle lane in the Drive is not a high volume cycle route but it is a main artery for cars. It was a bad choice although it has been well built. Better would have been a high volume route but taking cyclists away from heavy traffic by using secondary streets. Such a cycle network exists in London built on that basis but sadly that forethought hasn't been used here. A wise move would be to put an actual cyclist in charge next time.


tumble, weed says...
12:59pm Wed 21 May 08

Alex wrote:
Probably going to make a fool out of myself now because my maths is not great, but:
1 mile = 1609.344 metres
1609.344m = £700,000

is that not =£434.96 per metre not £250?

Yep,but who's suprised that the councils sums dont add up ? not me.

£435 a meter!


'thankyou,come again!' said the Councillor's happy contractor cousin.

Stroller, Hove says...
1:00pm Wed 21 May 08

An absurd place for a cycle lane.

Cyclists go along the flat roads. These are the ones that should have been used.

Paul, Brighton says...
1:02pm Wed 21 May 08

They are a total eyesore, they should be removed

me, brighton says...
1:05pm Wed 21 May 08

i would suggest that the person who designed this lane (with separation) isnt a cyclist..... there are several instances where the so called cycle lane is farcical to say the least, no thought is sometimes given to the actual practicalities of using the lanes.....
the seafront for an example.... weekends is veyr busy with pedestrians, who walk on the lanes.......

Vic, Hove says...
1:10pm Wed 21 May 08

I speak as a motorist and cyclist. Let's get this into perspective. The Drive and Grand Avenue has been turned in to a complete laughing stock all for the sake of 1 mile of cycle paths. I use a bike around town a lot of the time and this was not needed.
The council has made a complete **** up and I hope someone will be made accountable for this.
I cycled down there yesterday and I was the only one whilst the traffic congestion was embarrassing.
As someone said in a previous post, the Council must have had money to use up and came up with this.
Something as massive as this should have been put to the vote but they knew it would have been 99% against.

What a mistake you have made! Idiots.

Leroy, NYC says...
1:10pm Wed 21 May 08

Jez wrote:
Yes to more cycle lanes across the city, but what on earth have the council done to Grand Avenue? They've ruined it. The new 'cycle freeway' is more dangerous to bike users, not safer. Cyclists need to see the main junctions across the city made safer and the Clock Tower sorted out. Imagine how else this massive sum of money could have been spent to really help cycling, especially in schools.
How is it now more dangerous for cyclists in Grand Avenue?

bobby bigballs, brighton says...
1:45pm Wed 21 May 08

Alex wrote:
Probably going to make a fool out of myself now because my maths is not great, but: 1 mile = 1609.344 metres 1609.344m = £700,000 is that not =£434.96 per metre not £250?
So cleaver - I bet you dont work for the council. Can you believe that £435 a metre wow, thats half of someones council tax per year which they struggle to pay - disgusting.

Nigel, Hove says...
1:49pm Wed 21 May 08

I have seen no mention in the Argus of the cyclist in the new cycle lane that was hit by a car turning into one of the flats.
It was an accident waiting to happen, and it has.
The next will be a car heading southbound, coming over the railway bridge and being skewered by that black post stuck RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE OF THE ROAD.
Total ruddy madness.

AA, 160-332 says...
1:50pm Wed 21 May 08

what a load of people moaning about something before it's been given a chance. Lets see how many people are using it in a years time before complaining. Also I drive up and down Grand Ave in the morning rush hour and it's not that much worse than before. Don't any of you moaning minnies realise the more and more cars we have in Brighton the worse the traffic becomes.

Cyclist, Hove says...
1:50pm Wed 21 May 08

Jayne wrote:
These cycle lanes have reduced the number of car parking spaces in an area already short of parking spaces. You really have to wonder what the council was thinking of laying yet more ugly tarmac down. Very few cyclists use those roads anyway, they go on the adjacent and quieter residential roads. What we really need is a 20MPH zone. The money should have bene used sorting out those dangerous junctions on Church Road and Western Road. This would have made the roads safer all residents.
You know what the answer is then Jayne....?

Get a bike!

Then you won't have to worry about parking, NCP ticketing your car, road tax, MOT, increasing fuel prices and rising insurance costs.

I surrendered my car and bought a bike and have never looked back.

Maybe if car drivers, especially taxi drivers, were a bit more considerate and paid attention to speed limits and courteous driving then there wouldn't be a need for dedicated cycle lanes.

Unfortunately now, car drivers think they own the road and it doesn't matter how they drive.

Roger Tilbury says "Too many cyclists ignore traffic lights and one-way streets, ride without lights at night, cycle on the pavement etc. "

Well what about the drivers who ignore red traffic lights, are still using their mobile phones whilst driving, cause obstructions by double parking, speed around like there's no tomorrow and drive like idiots?

Good on you BHCC. Lets have more cycle lanes and lets have a congestion charge in Central Hove and Brighton to cut down on the amount of cars .

Rupe de Poop, Brighton says...
1:55pm Wed 21 May 08

There is only one sure-fire way to reduce the number of cycle accidents...

Stop cycling and DRIVE!!!!

Flat Foot Soozie, Brunswick Square says...
2:05pm Wed 21 May 08

Has anybody ever seen Councillor Elgood on a bike? What are his credentials for speaking on the matter?

Sounds as if he's angling for a few Central votes!

Roland Rat, Brighton says...
2:15pm Wed 21 May 08

Elgood's far too fat to get on a bike.

Funny how he's only got interested in this now when I assume (like all cycle issues) it went to the Environment Committee for approval - a committee on which he sits! Unfortunately since the new cabinet system came in we can't find the minutes of the meeting in question to see whether he voted against....

Alastair, Hove says...
2:18pm Wed 21 May 08

One of the charms of Hove has always been its wide open avenues. The new cycle lanes have ruined the Drive and Grand Avenue at great cost and probably little real benefit to cyclists. It is an act of vandalism by our council and depressing that they have shown so little imagination. Like many people I both cycle and drive a car. I support better cycle routes but not schemes like this. Shame on those respionsible .

Andy, Hove says...
2:20pm Wed 21 May 08

If ignorant, lazy car drivers got out of their cars and onto bicycles then the cycle lanes would be better used and more money would be saved tackling laziness issues like obesity and heart disease. Well done the council for putting cyclists first!

aa, Hove says...
2:24pm Wed 21 May 08

Alastair wrote:
One of the charms of Hove has always been its wide open avenues. The new cycle lanes have ruined the Drive and Grand Avenue at great cost and probably little real benefit to cyclists. It is an act of vandalism by our council and depressing that they have shown so little imagination. Like many people I both cycle and drive a car. I support better cycle routes but not schemes like this. Shame on those respionsible .
These lovely wide open avenues would look even better if we dramatically cut the number of cars across Brighton and Hove. It's the same old story, people saying yes let reduce the number of cars so long as it's not mine as I need to drive to the shops which are a massive 0.5 miles away.

Franco, Seven Dials says...
2:34pm Wed 21 May 08

bobby bigballs wrote:
Alex wrote: Probably going to make a fool out of myself now because my maths is not great, but: 1 mile = 1609.344 metres 1609.344m = £700,000 is that not =£434.96 per metre not £250?
So cleaver - I bet you dont work for the council. Can you believe that £435 a metre wow, thats half of someones council tax per year which they struggle to pay - disgusting.
The cycle lane runs in both directions and the road is 1500 metres long, so £250 a metre is about right.

Richard, Hove says...
2:35pm Wed 21 May 08

Grand Avenue looks like an ugly car park now. But surely that's because of the cars, not the cyclists? If you don't like cars blocking up the street, tell their owners, not cyclists!

Bob, Brighton says...
2:39pm Wed 21 May 08

If the council have wasted so much momey on a cycle lane ,how about spending another £100,000 on a survey to see how many of these dangerous two wheeled twats use the Grand Avenue cycle lane.
Then employ more "parking attendents" enpower them to "police" the prom and spot fine all the two wheeled twats who are breaking the LAW by cycling along there .
That will pay for all the wasted money the council have shelled out.

Roly Poly, Brighton says...
2:39pm Wed 21 May 08

If ignorant, sanctimonious cyclists got off their bikes and into cars then the cycle lanes wouldn't be needed and more money would be saved tackling housing the homeless, feeding the poor, and improving life for ALL residents of Brighton & Hove. Shame on the council for putting cyclists first!

Grumps, LANCING says...
2:39pm Wed 21 May 08

Many are complaining about the wide Grand Avenue being spoiled by narrowing. In my opinion the charm of this road is spoiled by the masses of parked cars that congregate there. So the solution must be to return it to its pre-motor age state by banning all parking.

Robert, Hove says...
2:42pm Wed 21 May 08

I am a resident of the Drive and I can confirm that very few cyclists even use these lanes, they seem to now prefer the pavement. Righteous cyclists on the pavements/roads coupled with the wierdos who take collapsable bikes on my train to London every day I SAY BAN BIKES, ALL OF THEM, JUST BAN THE THINGS. PATIO HEATERS ARE THE FUTURE!

bike user, hove says...
2:45pm Wed 21 May 08

Its a good idea, Ive almost hit car doors a few times on Grand Avenue, thanks to selfish careless motorists who i presume didnt check their mirrors before flinging car doors open, unless they were trying to knock me off my bike because of the 'hate anyone else on the road' syndrome thats going around these days.

Hopefully in the future there will be many more cyclists, and these new lanes will be as well used as the seafront lane, so give it a chance!

As for the price (£434.96 a metre!) thats just absurd for few bits of road paint and some narrow concrete pavements, as usual with B+H council ideas, somebody was laughing all the way to the bank.

eddy, hove says...
3:09pm Wed 21 May 08

i live in grand avenue and as others have said the amount of people using the lane can be counted on one hand and that is in the decent weather. Absolute waste of money and i am sure that it will cause more accidents. I didnt vote liberal i wish i had they seem to have wanted to use the money for better things !

me, brighton says...
3:22pm Wed 21 May 08

eddy wrote:
i live in grand avenue and as others have said the amount of people using the lane can be counted on one hand and that is in the decent weather. Absolute waste of money and i am sure that it will cause more accidents. I didnt vote liberal i wish i had they seem to have wanted to use the money for better things !
decent weather are you having a laugh......

but i do agree, the cost is a little exorbitant.... i wonder how many teabags the workmen crews got through.....!

Flat Foot Soozie, Brunswick Square says...
3:22pm Wed 21 May 08

eddy wrote:
i live in grand avenue and as others have said the amount of people using the lane can be counted on one hand and that is in the decent weather. Absolute waste of money and i am sure that it will cause more accidents. I didnt vote liberal i wish i had they seem to have wanted to use the money for better things !
This poor mug eddy has fallen for the Elgood ruse. Wake up, man. The LibDems are powerless.

jayne, hove says...
3:40pm Wed 21 May 08

HOORAY the council have finally admitted this is a total waste of money time and is quite dangerous and congesting, ruining one of Hoves best avenues. Since brighton and hove merged, hove has become an extension of the worst bits of brighton. Yes there should at least of been some planting to offset the environmental impact on using so much more concrete and hard landscaping, this is no way environmentally friendly. It will not stop cars just cause more congestion and cyclists will cycle anyway, but not on this dangerous stretch where you have to watch yourself for cars entering and exiting all the driveways along there.

Residents should demand a refund of this money to be spent on measures that would make a real difference and make grand avenue GRAND again. This waste makes me so angry.

204 people consulted that is more like insulted.

Jayne, Brighton says...
3:50pm Wed 21 May 08

Grand Avenue, The Drive, London Road and Lewes Road only Dyke Road to go and then all major roads in and out of the city from the North will be snarled up. Congratulations to the council traffic department that should kill Brightons major source of income the tourist trade!

mary, hove says...
3:54pm Wed 21 May 08

HOORAY a councillor admitting this is an absolute big mistake. Not environmentally friendly after all the congestion it is causing and all the concrete that has been used, lack of planting etc. It looks ugly is dangerous as the cycle path crosses many driveways and are blind spots. Why is Hove being turned into the worst aspects of brighton. Hove is supposed to be quieter and wider roads and more green, now we have congestion, ugly roads an ugly skate park on hove lagoon, more concrete replacing grass, it all beggers belief. This will cause the same fiasco as the bus lanes on the steine just wait for the first fatality. This will have to change so why not change it now.

campaign for grand avenue to be GRAND again now... the residents deserve a refund where it can be used on the seafront cycle lane or where it will actually be used and be beneficial to all. how pathetic only 204 residents consulted that means the rest of us have been insulted.

Why did this administration not stop this white elephant. this administration promised to stop built out bus stops etc. well it better act quick before another quick exit, and I am a tory voter.

Keynes, Brighton says...
3:56pm Wed 21 May 08

Jayne wrote:
Grand Avenue, The Drive, London Road and Lewes Road only Dyke Road to go and then all major roads in and out of the city from the North will be snarled up. Congratulations to the council traffic department that should kill Brightons major source of income the tourist trade!
Yes, well done Jayne, a few cycle lanes are going to destroy the tourism economy of the whole city. Shrewd analysis, you're not an economist are you?

Keynes, Brighton says...
3:58pm Wed 21 May 08

Jayne wrote:
Grand Avenue, The Drive, London Road and Lewes Road only Dyke Road to go and then all major roads in and out of the city from the North will be snarled up. Congratulations to the council traffic department that should kill Brightons major source of income the tourist trade!
Yes, well done Jayne, a few cycle lanes are going to destroy the tourism economy of the whole city. Shrewd analysis, you're not an economist are you?

Brian, B'ton says...
4:08pm Wed 21 May 08

Stop moaning and enjoy life!

Snodgrass, Brighton says...
4:30pm Wed 21 May 08

You want "an extravagant waste of money"? Well how about New Road - £1.2m for a couple of hundred yards. The fancy benches-with-lights are largely occupied by tramps, there's chewing gum and car oil all over the expensive granite blocks that make up the road, the stainless steel bins are all wonky and scratched, I could go on....

It must be the most expensive stretch of road in Britain, and guess what - they want to do more of them, using our council tax!!

As they say, "A foolish bunch of councillors and our money are easily parted".

Voice of Reason, Brighton says...
4:49pm Wed 21 May 08

All this vitriol and nothing will change. When did 200 people = a consultation? The council could do with a consultation website where this type of feedback can be received.

Me, Ditchling says...
4:49pm Wed 21 May 08

The Stirrer wrote:
I reckon that if cyclists want cycle lanes then they should be paid from tax paid by cyclists, instead of penalising the already-taxed-to-the
-hilt motorists and other non-cycling council tax payers.

Lets see how much they REALLY want cycle lanes in stupid places when they are told to stump up £150 a year for a bike licence!!
Not all cyclists want lanes. Most of us know how dangerous they are and that riding sensibly in the road is much safer.

I love cycling round the Brighton area... until I get into town and to all those paths and lanes. What a dangerous nightmare!

freddy, Brighton says...
4:57pm Wed 21 May 08

Some poor soul will be killed in that cycle lane within a year. Those that designed it and/or passed it need sacking.

freddy, Brighton says...
5:00pm Wed 21 May 08

Some poor soul will be killed in that cycle lane within a year. Those that designed it and/or passed it need sacking.

Kickboxer, Worthing says...
6:01pm Wed 21 May 08

Roger Tilbury wrote:
What makes Marcus think we 'all support cycling'? I don't. Too many cyclists ignore traffic lights and one-way streets, ride without lights at night, cycle on the pavement etc. They pay no road tax, have no insurance, pass no test, have no safety checks on their 'vehicles' and expect part if the road to be reserved for their exclusive use!

It amazes me the number of 'respectable middle-class people' who cycle on Wothing 's promenade past a large number of No Cycling notices. And the tirade of abuse you get if you point this out to them or fail to get out of their way on the narrow path towards Goring.
If I get off my bike and push it along the narrow path at goring I would take up twice the space and no one would be able to get past me, so I cycle at walking pace or slower in order to be courteous, but you would be amazed at the amount of people that still moan! most of whom are people with dogs not on a lead. These rude, ignorant people will certainly get a mouth full from me if they give it the attitude problem.

bell boy, brighton says...
6:25pm Wed 21 May 08

bob wrote:
"It amazes me the number of 'respectable middle-class people' who cycle on Wothing 's promenade past a large number of No Cycling notices. And the tirade of abuse you get if you point this out to them or fail to get out of their way on the narrow path towards Goring." This was an excellent cylce route then closed years ago some one old biddy wasnt looking where she was going and was struck by a cyclist leading to its closure. Hey Andy R from hove -blame culture again, messing it up for the many.
belt up you grinch,moan moan moan.thats all you post

oh no, hove says...
6:27pm Wed 21 May 08

Flat Foot Soozie wrote:
Has anybody ever seen Councillor Elgood on a bike? What are his credentials for speaking on the matter? Sounds as if he's angling for a few Central votes!
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzzzz

evon, hove says...
7:01pm Wed 21 May 08

Why is it that this council is so set upon wasting all this money on cycle lanes? from the Logoon too the Meeting cafe cycle lines were put on the pavement by side of the road, BUT all these cyclist ride on the prom, every day all day I see this happening and they speed without any thought for people walking on the prom.CCTV camera's are in operation, why are these cyclist not fined? None of them use the cycle lanes. since they have been put in the Drive, how many people do you see using them? I've counted 3. well done for wasting yet another load of our our money. Why dont the Council ask the people of Brighton what they suggest the money gets spent on

Matt, Grand Ave says...
8:10pm Wed 21 May 08

oh no wrote:
Flat Foot Soozie wrote: Has anybody ever seen Councillor Elgood on a bike? What are his credentials for speaking on the matter? Sounds as if he's angling for a few Central votes!
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzz
The Greens are working Central Hove ward.

We want to ditch the two lazy Tories who have imposed this on us.

worried, the drive says...
10:30pm Wed 21 May 08

This was agreed at the Council's Environment Committee last September. One of the local Resident's Associations tried lobbying our local Councillors on the Committee. Of all the central hove wards (Brunswick, Central Hove, Standford and Goldsmith) only one Councillor actually sat on the Committee - Labour's Melaine Davies. She never replied to our concerns and then went ahead and voted it through.

She is a big let down. And where are the Tory Councillors for Goldsmith?

I'll be voting Green next time.

Haw-twee, says...
11:00pm Wed 21 May 08

The residents of Eaton Manor hate them.

Edward, Hove says...
11:30pm Wed 21 May 08

This new cycle lane is great. My first time cycling on it I couldn't believe how safe I felt. Not constantly checking for people opening their car doors on you or cars cutting you up. Not wondering if a pedestrian is about to come out from a stationary vehicle without checking for us cyclists, the list could go on and on. And further, as a car-driver as well I prefer the single lane.

Ronaldo, Brighton says...
8:59am Thu 22 May 08

Matt wrote:
oh no wrote:
Flat Foot Soozie wrote: Has anybody ever seen Councillor Elgood on a bike? What are his credentials for speaking on the matter? Sounds as if he's angling for a few Central votes!
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzz
The Greens are working Central Hove ward. We want to ditch the two lazy Tories who have imposed this on us.
I'd have thought the tories should be out campaigning against the Greens - after all, this is a green policy and they'd be more than happy to spend even more of our cash on stupid, idiotic ideas like this. DON'T VOTE GREEN UNLESS YOU WANT MORE MADNESS LIKE THIS

Jayne, Brighton says...
10:19am Thu 22 May 08

Keynes wrote:
Jayne wrote: Grand Avenue, The Drive, London Road and Lewes Road only Dyke Road to go and then all major roads in and out of the city from the North will be snarled up. Congratulations to the council traffic department that should kill Brightons major source of income the tourist trade!
Yes, well done Jayne, a few cycle lanes are going to destroy the tourism economy of the whole city. Shrewd analysis, you're not an economist are you?
No not an economist but total grid lock will destroy the tourist trade, day trippers will just go else where and before you start banging on about the train they are already over crowded at weekends and the darling of Brighton Roger French does not run buuses from areas like Croydon so on you blinkered bike Keynes!

Soozie, says...
10:40am Thu 22 May 08

The real tragedy is that this cycle lane is not even helpful to cyclists. People park on it and you have dismount and carry your bike over the island protecting you from the road, squeeze between the parked cars (carrying your bike overhead) and then cycle on the now very narrow road. You would also get really frustrated if you got stuck behind a slow cyclist as there's no room to overtake - but thankfully I seem to be the only person who ever uses it except during that very hot week in May.

anthony, the drive hove says...
10:54am Thu 22 May 08

last week a cyclist braked as a taxi turned into the flats where i live.the end result was the cyclist went over his handle bars & broke both his elbows...the taxi & bike never touched.......but his Insurance company will have to pay out to compensate the Cyclist....they have right of way!!!!!! absolute madness.....when will cyclists be made to take out Insurance & be accountable & abide by traffic regulations......wel
l done the Council !!!!
it is also dangerous for cars exiting the flats on to the drive as our view is blocked by trees ,parked cars & only one lane now.
I have to drive due to disabilities........
..

gloria parks, says...
1:18pm Thu 22 May 08

The Stirrer wrote:
I reckon that if cyclists want cycle lanes then they should be paid from tax paid by cyclists, instead of penalising the already-taxed-to-the -hilt motorists and other non-cycling council tax payers. Lets see how much they REALLY want cycle lanes in stupid places when they are told to stump up £150 a year for a bike licence!!
8 Drive Lodge
68-70 The Drive
Hove East Sussex
BN3 3PS
Telephone: 01273 323127
Mobile: 07766405822
Email: gloria472@btinternet
.com
16th May, 2008
Dear Sirs,

The Drive Cycle Path, East Side - Cromwell Road to Eaton Road

When in the planning stage, I went down to Hove Town Hall to sign in opposition to the above cycle path. Now it is in place I was annoyed because it is very underused and obviously cost about a quarter of a million plus. However we are now looking at a much more serious problem which must be resolved and which has triggered this letter to everyone who has any influence in this City.
Please, please take action.

.During the last two weeks I had heard of three accidents, one needing an ambulance to be called. On Monday, 12 May I was driving down, signalling left realising that one is unable to see a cyclist because of the parked cars, when one is stopped at the white line. In order to get a view of the cycle lane one has to edge slowly forward peering left. At this point a cyclist travelling downhill very fast, jammed on his brakes turn to shout obscenities at me only to hit a tree and was pitched off his bike. Luckily both my passenger and some one on a balcony saw this and despite the cyclist calling me a ”f-------silly cow” over and over because he felt I was to blame I clearly was not. His bike was a bit damaged but he rode off shouting further obscenities, but he was in a state of shock. I was shaking for about three hours after at the thought, that but for his helmet he could have been killed.Will it take a fatality to realise what a mistake has been made? I reported this incident to Hove Police.

There are too many hazards to mention for all the road, path and pavement users.
This cycle path which gives the cyclist right of way crossing a dozen or more driveways lulls them into a false sense of security and they come down very fast. At night very few cyclists have lights. Visitors that I have spoken to do not seem to be aware there is a cycle path behind the parked vehicles.

This situation is: (a) potentially fatal for the cyclist,
(b) stressful beyond measure for the residents, because on going out one has to cross the cycle lane, stop to try and see if any car is coming down (these speed) before edging out into the traffic and if going left the bigger cars have to turn into the north oncoming lane, putting all car drivers at risk. The lanes are of minimum width and any service vehicle blocks the road. If there is a large van parked this visibility is totally obscured.

(c) This is frustrating for following and oncoming cars because they see a car signalling, presume that once they start moving they will continue into the driveway, and don’t realise that we have to stop to try and check the cycle lane. This results in excessive horn blowing and exasperation because there could be a collision..

Was no research done before this expensive potentially lethal cycle path was put into operation. I invite anyone to come and sit in my car and realise for themselves how hazardous this situation is, especially for the cyclist. Does one have to be killed before some action is taken?.

Yours faithfully, Copies to: Benedict Stride - Highway Engineering and Projects,
Mary Mears, Leader of Council,; Road Safety Manager, Celia Barbour, MP
Mrs. Gloria Parks , Hove Police Station, Argus ,Southern Counties Radio

EC, bton says...
2:30pm Thu 22 May 08

think you will find the new road development cost 4 million, not 1.2.

matthew, Hova Villas says...
3:31pm Thu 22 May 08

The Cenral Hove Councillors Younger and Older have been silent on this, but then we never hear from them anyway.

Kickboxer, Worthing says...
5:09pm Thu 22 May 08

The problem is most cyclists only cycle in the gutters, when in fact they should cycle in the middle of their side of the road like the law allows, this give the motorist a better view of the cyclist and it also assures the motorist has to leave adequate space to overtake as opposed to squeezing past with inches to spare, cycling in this fashion also ensures that you will not be hit by a car door opened without looking. If motorists drove with more patients and understood they are not the only people entitled to use the roads then maybe we would not need as many cycle lanes!.

peter thomas, brighton says...
5:16pm Thu 22 May 08

Wonderful stuff - "poor old cyclists", "cyclists pay council tax too" etc etc.
Yes, but they pay no road tax, take no notice of any road regulations,and behave like the protected, ill disciplined, holier than thou "speacial "set that the vote seeking politicians have reinvented them as, and as such deserve no special treatment. Why do they need cycle lanes , they cycle where they want to anyway.
Perhaps the council could concentrate on getting the obscene levels of food waste off of the streets before mid morning rahter than waste crazy amounts of money on pointless cycle lane schemes.

Sarah, Brighton says...
7:00pm Thu 22 May 08

Most of the anti-cyclists seem to be missing the point about cycle lanes, believing that the Council builds them only for the benefit of cyclists. This is not true: they are built for the benefit of all Brighton and Hove residents and visitors, in order to try to reduce the number of people using cars. This is obviously good for everybody who has no choice and has to use a car, and good for visitors who would have even more trouble parking if no residents used bikes. I am a car driver and bike rider and am very law-abiding at both. When I am in my car I tend to notice all the cyclists who run red lights (a suicidally stupid sport), but when I am on my bicycle I notice the number of car drivers using mobile phones.


Emma, Hove says...
10:39pm Thu 22 May 08

I witnessed the taxi/cyclist incident last week and i felt exceptionally angry after the initial shock. This cycle lane is a DEATH TRAP to cyclists. I would feel safer cycling on the pavement myself. Who designed this cycle lane? There are so many potential hazards it is a joke!
- There are numerous driveways that cut across the cycle lane - it doesn't take a rocket scientist to work out the danger there.
- The parked cars block the view for cyclists and drivers.
- The number of parking spaces has been reduced.
- There is a hazard for drivers with the cars parked so far out into the road, my mum nearly crashed into a parked car the other day thinking it was moving!
- The roads have narrowed creating more blockage.
- This is a HUGE waste of tax payers money
- The whole process has been an enormous disruption to traffic!
- Cyclists are at risk
- Motorists are at risk
- It looks ODD and badly designed.
- I just can't understand these days why councils spend so much time and energy trying to improve systems which already work well enough!

liz, brighton says...
10:59pm Thu 22 May 08

I'm a fair weather cyclist, with a distinct preference for downhill cycling. I think the at least one of the rather pointless cycle lanes on The Drive could be put to good use with a cycle lift (like a ski lift). I'd be far more likely to cycle more if I knew I could get a lift back up the hill ...

Councillor Rachel Fryer, Brighton says...
11:11pm Thu 22 May 08

Just to correct a few things: The money for this isn't from council tax, it's from money for our cycling demonstration town.

I use the cycle route and it's great and it's not finished yet.

How else are we going to encourage new cyclists to brave the roads? And it's a great way of getting from the seafront up towards Hove station.

Why doesn't anyone ever ask how much tax is being spent on building new roads - it makes this cycle lane look like a drop in the ocean. And with rising oil prices we have to address the fact that more people will need to cycle and less to drive.

sensibility, hove says...
2:11pm Fri 23 May 08

The Stirrer wrote:
<span> I reckon that if cyclists want cycle lanes then they should be paid from tax paid by cyclists, instead of penalising the already-taxed-to-the
-hilt motorists and other non-cycling council tax payers.

Lets see how much they REALLY want cycle lanes in stupid places when they are told to stump up £150 a year for a bike licence!! </span>
I agree with a lot of the comments that cycle lanes are a waste of money (though probably for very different reasons to you), but it has to be made clear that everyone pays taxes that pay for your roads, both locally and nationally. Just because you drive doesn't mean 'you' have paid for the road that you are on, or a daft cycle lane. We all foot the bill, car drivers or not.

Judge Nutmeg, Hove says...
3:38pm Fri 23 May 08

sensibility wrote:
The Stirrer wrote: <span> I reckon that if cyclists want cycle lanes then they should be paid from tax paid by cyclists, instead of penalising the already-taxed-to-the -hilt motorists and other non-cycling council tax payers. Lets see how much they REALLY want cycle lanes in stupid places when they are told to stump up £150 a year for a bike licence!! </span>
I agree with a lot of the comments that cycle lanes are a waste of money (though probably for very different reasons to you), but it has to be made clear that everyone pays taxes that pay for your roads, both locally and nationally. Just because you drive doesn't mean 'you' have paid for the road that you are on, or a daft cycle lane. We all foot the bill, car drivers or not.
No you don't. Motorists pay for the roads by paying fuel duty and something callled 'road tax'. Cyclists and pedestrians don't.

Kickboxer, Worthing says...
6:25pm Fri 23 May 08

Judge Nutmeg wrote:
sensibility wrote:
The Stirrer wrote: &lt;span&gt; I reckon that if cyclists want cycle lanes then they should be paid from tax paid by cyclists, instead of penalising the already-taxed-to-the -hilt motorists and other non-cycling council tax payers. Lets see how much they REALLY want cycle lanes in stupid places when they are told to stump up £150 a year for a bike licence!! &lt;/span&gt;
I agree with a lot of the comments that cycle lanes are a waste of money (though probably for very different reasons to you), but it has to be made clear that everyone pays taxes that pay for your roads, both locally and nationally. Just because you drive doesn't mean 'you' have paid for the road that you are on, or a daft cycle lane. We all foot the bill, car drivers or not.
No you don't. Motorists pay for the roads by paying fuel duty and something callled 'road tax'. Cyclists and pedestrians don't.
Yes cyclists and pedestrians do pay for the roads as well! look at the breakdown of your council tax bill and you will see a proportion of that goes to highways (roads and footpaths) , also you do not pay "road tax" it is called vehicle excise licence, so get your facts right.

Howard Cain, says...
7:57pm Fri 23 May 08

I always find the anti-cyclist rants from your typical militant motorist, usually citing "road-tax" (it's not - it's vehicle excise duty and nothing to do with highway funding), insurance and cyclist bad behaviour as if they are somehow linked. Are they really suggesting that if cyclists paid tax and insurance then their behaviour would magically change? Where's the evidence? Or are they suggesting that if tax/insurance payments are actually a licence to behave badly - as evidenced by your typical motorist. Bad behaviour is endemic among motorists and they know it. That's why we get these feeble attempts to divert attention to other types of road user. Just remember which group of road users causes the most damage, injury and death on the roads. And then remember who has to pay to clean up after them. The rest of us taxpayers, that's who. And be sure that the cost of doing so is likely to far exceed to total revenue from motoring taxation. One road death =£1 million. Typical cost of NHS treatment of a serious road casualty = £100,000. 3300 dead and 50,000 seriously injured; 300,000 other injuries needing hospital treatment. That's every year. Then add on the cost of police and emergency services. Motorists are getting a bargain.

Roger, Hove says...
9:07am Sat 24 May 08

This is an appalling waste of our money (and by the way, ''external funding'' is actually EU money, but then who gave the EU the money in the first place! This country gives more to the EU than it receives back). Hove was built with the wide avenues for which it is famous and the council, who having received a positive response to a mere 204 residents who they claim to have consulted, have wrecked Grand Avenue and the Drive. It has caused traffic congestion by effectively reducing two lanes to one, a consequence of which is that parking in the centre area is a nightmare, whilst for the cyclist, of whom there are very few to warrant this aberration, the lanes are dangerous. This is just another example of council arrogance and stupidity and it seems that we are powerless to do anything about it.

Nigel, Not From Hove says...
2:59pm Sat 24 May 08

I'm not from Hove, and not seen the cycle lane in question so can't comment on its safety or usefulness. But one thing is clear to me. Cycling is part of the future. It has to be. We can't keep putting more and more cars on the road and hope that the problem that creates can be solved by building more and more roads. The experience from the past 60 years of massive expansion of car ownership has shown that. Cycling is ideal urban transport for many reasons. A bike takes up little space, uses no fuel so non-polluting, requires little in the way of parking space, and last but not least, gives the rider a healthy work-out as part of the deal! Too many people in Britain are anti cycling and only see the negative side when they come into contact with the bad element. But as others have stated, there are plenty of badly behaved people using other forms of transport too. The answer to that problem is surely better training and law enforcement. Now, to get more people to take up cycling we must make cycling easier and more convenient. Experience in places like Amsterdam and Copenhagen shows that putting QUALITY cycling facilities in place encourages more people to ride. The more people using bikes on these facilities the more worthwhile those facilities become. The added bonus is that everyone gets a cleaner, quieter town with more fitter and healthier people living there putting less strain on the health care services. When we need to use a car the streets will be less congested and a better chance of finding a parking space at your destination! Wins all round. So, don't knock cycling. Give it a try - you might even like it.

Have a look at this blog: http://www.copenhage
nize.com/ and see how your town could look with a bit of positive thinking and a little less moaning.

On your bikes - and have a nice life!

Paul, Brighton Seafront says...
8:53am Tue 27 May 08

Councillor Rachel Fryer wrote:
Just to correct a few things: The money for this isn't from council tax, it's from money for our cycling demonstration town. I use the cycle route and it's great and it's not finished yet. How else are we going to encourage new cyclists to brave the roads? And it's a great way of getting from the seafront up towards Hove station. Why doesn't anyone ever ask how much tax is being spent on building new roads - it makes this cycle lane look like a drop in the ocean. And with rising oil prices we have to address the fact that more people will need to cycle and less to drive.
Unfortunately Coun Fryer, you are preaching to those that are not interested in sense or logic.

Amazed, Hove says...
10:09am Tue 27 May 08

Amazing.

Councillors Older and Younger have suddenly emerged in today's Argus preaching about the environment.

These are the two who pesoanlly saw off the Grand Avenue wind turbine scheme.

They must now be worried(panicing?) about holding their seats, this sudden conversion to Green issues.

Judge Nutmeg, Hove says...
11:14am Tue 27 May 08

So says Stephen Hynd in today's Argus:

"Slowly we are beginning to realise that continuous road expansion is not sufficient to deal with issues of congestion."

We wouldn't know, would we, seeing as ewe haven't had any real road expansion since the 1950s thanks to the loony left idea that the number of cars will always rise to fit the number of roads.
Try going to Spain and see how congested it is on the roads.

But back to the original point: cycling is very nice but is no good for journeys of more than a couple of miles, no good for the disabled, no good for tradesmen or anyone who needs to carry luggage. Cyclists can go on the road like everyone else. They would be safer on it than on this crazy cycle lane in Hove.

mad green, B&amp;H says...
1:10am Wed 28 May 08

Older and Young are about as low calibre councillor as you can get.

Residents in central Hove deserve far, far better than this hapless pair.

Lee, The Drive, Hove. says...
11:15pm Mon 2 Jun 08

As a resident on The Drive I (as others) do not recall ever receiving a letter/correspondenc

e about the then 'proposed' cycle path along Grand Avenue / The Drive being constructed !! The small proportion of people (just over 200) represents a small percentage of the total population lining this area. Maybe a number of other residents, as I, were not made aware of the council's intentions on this matter!

I am disappointed, frustrated & disgruntled (as others) with what has happened along The Drive & agree that not only will there be accidents for both cyclists & motorists alike it has ruined the characteristic of The Drive & it's once 'avenue' type look. The road still is as busy as before but now squeezed into one, slowing traffic further when people want to park alongside. Plus also trying to avoid any cyclists!

Rob Kent, Hove says...
10:43am Sun 13 Jul 08

Cyclists can go on the road, but whether it is the best place for them is another matter.

Motorised road users need to be more aware and considerate of cyclists and cyclists need to be the same for pedestrians.

There are multiple north-south roads parallel to the Drive that drivers can use to avoid congestion - in fact it is a good thing if the traffic is distributed in this way.

The new cycle track is a good thing but I think it might have been a better design to have both lanes on one side. That way cyclists could overtake each other.

The cycle track is only dangerous if cyclists behave as if they are the only users of the road and if car drivers are not aware and careful when crossing it. Also, other drivers need to be aware that the car in front has to pause before turning in to driveways.

But this is true of every cycle track in the world that is crossed by traffic. It's an education issue not a road design issue.

Some bus, taxi, and public drivers are still dangerously aggressive towards cyclists. Some cyclists are still dangerously aggressive towards pedestrians.

They all need to stop thinking that the roads are there for them to go whereever they want at whatever speed they want, regardless of everyone else.

Only when everyone becomes aware of the real dangers involved will people change.

When the roads are safe enough for children to cycle to school en masse, as in Holland, will I believe we've solved the engineering and cultural problems associated with the road use.

In Holland, car drivers always give way to bikes and treat them with deference, giving them a wide berth, not skimming their hips like they do here.

I've had buses aggressively try to force me onto the side of the road and miss my shoulders by a whisker. It will probably take a cyclist's death before they change their stupid mentality.

The same for cyclists stupidly and aggressively riding on pavements or treating the promenade cycle path as if no pedestrian is allowed to cross it or wander on to it.

Comments are closed on this article.

Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »