Get involved: Send your news, views, pictures and video by texting SUPIC to 80360 or email us.
1:14pm Wednesday 30th July 2008
The King Alfred development was last night hanging by a thread after its financial backer walked away.
Dutch Bank ING said the volatility of the money and property markets had forced it to pull out of what would have been Frank Gehry’s first major development in England.
Ted Kemble, Brighton and Hove City Council’s cabinet member for major projects, said he was very disappointed at the bank’s decision, which was revealed exclusively on The Argus website.
Josh Arghiros, the managing director of developer Karis, said he remained committed to the Hove seafront scheme and was in negotiations with two potential financiers, including a sovereign wealth fund.
He said: “We were obviously disappointed but we understand why ING has decided to pull out with the housing market as it is.
“We are now talking to other investors and we are having to look at how to make the scheme viable. They have an opportunity to invest in a scheme where most of the hard work is already done and £13 million has already been spent.
“We want to have Frank Gehry on board to amend the scheme and I think this could give us the opportunity to get the best of this.
“We now need to sit down with the council and discuss viability.
“We have lost many little battles along the way and we will not give up without a fight.”
Karis has until November to firm up alternative investors before the development agreement between the council and Karis Holdings, the company set up jointly by ING and Karis, ends.
ING Real Estate confirmed last night it had withdrawn its funding from Karis Holdings. Mr Arghiros said he would be buying ING’s share of the firm.
Guy Parker, the country manager of ING Real Estate for Development UK, said: “The volatility of the money markets, along with the escalating material and construction costs, and the downturn and uncertainty in the residential market, have had a major negative impact on viability of the scheme.
“It is with regret that we have decided to withdraw.”
Coun Kemble said: “At present Brighton and Hove City Council has a legal agreement, which includes ING, to deliver this scheme. That stands until November.
Karis is due to come back with an update on progress towards delivering it, which our cabinet will consider in September.
“In principle we still support getting excellent sports facilities on the site, which could also provide much-needed housing.
Because funding must come from private partners, the credit crunch could well cause a hiccup with schemes like the Brighton Centre and King Alfred. But that doesn’t change the long-term ambition to see the city’s most important schemes built.”
The King Alfred scheme, which was given planning permission in March last year, comprises 751 homes in 11 buildings, including two towers up to 98 metres high.
An £80 million sports centre, small shops, a police office, a GP surgery, cafes, restaurants and public spaces are part of the plans.
Glenda, Hove says...
8:39pm Wed 30 Jul 08
localread, Hove says...
12:10am Thu 31 Jul 08
ABC1, Brighton says...
7:25am Thu 31 Jul 08
King from Hove, Hove says...
7:56am Thu 31 Jul 08
ABC1, Brighton says...
8:20am Thu 31 Jul 08
Lindy, Hove says...
2:18pm Thu 31 Jul 08
Glenda wrote:I can assure you Glenda, that it has never been the residents of Hove who have wanted this dire overdevelopment - most of us are totally opposed to it. Most of the support has been noticeably from people who wouldn't have to live with it!
I was thinking how strange it is that cycling on Hove seafront was viewed so unfavourably by Hove residents whilst the King Alfred overdevelopment was viewed as an urgent need for our small city.This lead me to think of the signs on the prom around the KA reading: NO CYCLING.We can now change this to NO ****ING.
NoWay, Brighton says...
3:44pm Thu 31 Jul 08
Glenda, Hove says...
6:25pm Thu 31 Jul 08
william of orange, Brighton says...
7:36pm Thu 31 Jul 08
Mr Muffin, Brighton says...
10:47pm Thu 31 Jul 08
william of orange wrote:Falmer next? Why? It's not really in the same league as the King Alfred developement - it's been well designed, it won't be towering over people's homes and it is needed for our 'city'
"King Alfred dream threatened" - good - looks more like a nightmare to me!One down...Falmer next!
deanahove, hove says...
11:16am Fri 1 Aug 08
Add your comment
Register for a FREE The Argus account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.
Please register now or sign in below to continue.
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Search for Jobs in Brighton, Hove, Lewes, Worthing, Crawley and more...
Search Now »
Find the right person in Brighton, Hove, Lewes, Worthing, Crawley...
Search Now »
Search for Homes in Brighton, Worthing, Hove, Lewes...
Search Now »
Search for Cars in Brighton, Hove, Lewes, Worthing, Crawley...
Search Now »
Glenda, Hove says...
8:26pm Wed 30 Jul 08
Can we justify keeping a 'regeneration' department at council tax payers expense.
The recession is here, will get worse, its time to make cut backs. What is the point of a regeneration department that is unable to regenerate but offers help to developers who cannot perform? How much is the cost of this department that cannot perform in the current global financial situation?
If this post is removed do we live in communist Russia?