News RSS Feed


Anger over home left empty for 18 months

10:25am Friday 8th August 2008

comment Comments (6)   Have your say »


A Grade II listed family house owned by a council has been left empty for 18 months.

The property in Kensington Place, North Laine, Brighton, has remained uninhabited since its tenant died in February 2007.

Brighton and Hove City Council came under criticism yesterday for failing to let the home while 8,000 people are on the housing waiting list.

A council spokesman said it was uneconomical for it to repair the dilapidated property and it was looking for “alternative investment options”.

Nearby properties have fetched in excess of £500,000 in recent months.

Ian Davey, a Green councillor for North Laine, said: “Empty homes represent waste, financial expense and missed opportunity.

“The property at 50 Kensington Place sits as a terrible indictment of the council’s failure to make the best use of its own housing stock. The country is in the midst of a housing crisis, with demand far outstripping supply but here in Brighton and Hove there are homes sitting empty.

“The Tories promised to speed up the letting of empty properties as one of their housing priorities, but Kensington Place has been empty for almost exactly the same length of time as the Tories have been running the council.

“Housing is now one of the single biggest drivers of inequality in Britain, opening up an unprecedented social divide.

“Allowing a home like this to lie empty for so long is an insult to the city’s homeless and poorly housed people.”

The council spokesman added: “The property was returned to us in May 2007.

“It had been occupied by the same tenant for a very long time and was in a serious state of disrepair.

“The dilapidation is so serious that in purely financial terms it’s not currently economic to repair.

“We are investigating alternative investment options for this house as part of our long-term strategy to manage our various assets.

“This house is problematic but we generally have a great record on empty homes and have even bought over 400 privately owned empty homes back into use in the last few years.”


Your Say YourThe Argus

Voice of the silent Majority, Hove says...
10:31am Fri 8 Aug 08

So this story is realy about how the last LABOUR council failed to maintain the housing stock, (the biggest asset of this City)whilst wasting almost a million pounds trying to give it all away to a housing assosiation so they could borrow money against the asset to bring it up to a habitable standard.

disgruntledHove, hove says...
11:22am Fri 8 Aug 08

Makes me laugh, I have recieved more than 3 letters in the past few months whilst I was refurbishing my flat in oorder to sell it. Despite telling the council that I had to do it as and when I could afford it, the letters continued arriving, with the underlying threat that they could claim my flat for their tennants, that I had spent 25years slogging away to pay the mortgage. **** nerve!!!

deanahove, hove says...
11:39am Fri 8 Aug 08

"We are investigating alternative investment options for this house as part of our long-term strategy to manage our various assets."
Means - sell it to a Developer.

CARTMAN, BRIGHTON says...
1:47pm Fri 8 Aug 08

So the council has been unable to finance the refurbishment of a town house valued at £500.000, or sell it on to an investor?

Assuming it is not sold to a cash buyer and brought with a mortgage, which on a mortgage debt this size would cost somewhere between £2.500 and £3,000 a month to service I can't say i find this surprising!

Never mind council tenants (or the council itself) struggling with that sort of debt, i suspect most of the cities London commuters in the financial service industry would struggle with that one!

It's not so much of a "Housing Problem" but more of an "Affordable Housing Problem" that is the issue here!

Something which is now correcting itself at the fastest rate in history if the city newspapers are anything to go by today, with house prices falling at a rate of 1.7% per month or just over 20% per year!

whateva, Brighton says...
5:20pm Fri 8 Aug 08

Well it certainly isn't empty whenever I walk past! It sounds like Squatters' Central in fact.

Henfield Hovite, Henfield says...
1:15am Sat 9 Aug 08

Its got to make sense for the council to sell the property. After all, the council will spend £1000's refurbishing, then get a tenant in "on benefits" so in effect the council pay the tenants rent and give them free council tax to live there. Then when the tenants trash the property and do a runner they have to spend further money refurbishing ready for another tenant not to pay. If the council sell the property to a private landlord, it may eventually be occupied by a tenant on benefit but at least the council receive the capital by selling.

Comments are closed on this article.

Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »