News RSS Feed


Dimas banner

Council is slammed over door decision

3:53pm Tuesday 19th August 2008

comment Comments (11)   Have your say »


An independent trader has been told to change the door of his shop because planners say it is not in keeping with the area.

John Wright, opened Needful Things, an antique furniture and art business, in St James’s Street, Kemp Town, Brighton, two months ago and put in a recovered wooden door with a giant door knocker.

But council officers have demanded he put back the old front door.

The news has angered members of the Stop Starbucks campaign after the coffee shop opened a store in St James’s Street, despite the council refusing its application for a change of use for the shop that would enable it to sell food and drink.

Last week, Mr Wright received a letter from the council planning department telling him he needed permission to replace the door of his shop.

Mr Wright phoned the council and was told that even if he applied for retrospective planning permission he would not get it and the door would have to be replaced.

He said: “I have got until October 1 to replace it. The new one is a proper, old original door and it looks amazing.

“You have got Starbucks trading down the road, even though they are not meant to be. It’s one rule for them and another rule for us.

“I have put so much effort in, to make the shop eye-catching and quirky, which is what Brighton is all about. It’s a secure safe door and looks a lot nicer than any of the other shop doors in the street.”

Starbucks opened its controversial café in St James’s Street in May and residents have been protesting outside every Saturday.

The coffee chain has until November to appeal against the council’s decision to reject its application to open at the site.

Jon Barrenechea, 31, of New Steine, Brighton, started the Stop Starbucks campaign on Facebook, which now has more than 1,500 members.

He said: “I think this case highlights the double standards the council has when it comes to small, local businesses compared to big corporate giants.

John is trying to set up a business on his own and in this current economic climate he should be given all the help he can get from the local authorities.

“It is a beautiful door and it fits in with the shop and the area.

“People who support the Stop Starbucks campaign are really angry about this.”

A council spokesman said: “Such notices are typically issued in conservation areas or listed buildings to stop historic areas or buildings losing their character.

“The rules are administered without fear of favour – if a retailer is breaking rules we will pursue them regardless of whether they’re a national chain or not.

“The Starbucks issue is not resolved yet.”


Your Say YourArgus

Acheron, Hove says...
4:39pm Tue 19 Aug 08

I suppose that if an antique shop isn't allowed an antique door to be in keeping with the shop, it stops the doors of the council office being made of................

Please fill in your answer as appropriate!

davyboy, abingdon, oxon says...
6:16pm Tue 19 Aug 08

typical, one rule for starbucks, one rule for everyone else. no consistency at all. well done council. hit the small business, let the multinationals get away with flouting regulations.

spencer1973, brighton says...
6:52pm Tue 19 Aug 08

I wouldnt argue with a tatoo clad thug like that. Keep your door mate, put up a fly screen if you want!

darrowby1972, horsham says...
7:42pm Tue 19 Aug 08

The issue "hinges" on the council at the end of the day!

davyboy, abingdon, oxon says...
8:56pm Tue 19 Aug 08

spencer1973 wrote:
I wouldnt argue with a tatoo clad thug like that. Keep your door mate, put up a fly screen if you want!
bit rich to call him a thug. not all tattooed people are that way inclined. he seems like a genuine guy trying to keep his business going, and he doesn't need petty people annoying him like this.

caeos, sussex says...
10:38pm Tue 19 Aug 08

Has anyone actually been checked what starbuscks is actually selling as promised.
Regarding the door, i think the knocker is an apt term for this situation

bug eye, hove says...
11:22pm Tue 19 Aug 08

the council need to get rid of all the naff alluminium shopfronts along st. james st. before asking this door to be removed. the door is individual and suits the shop, i thought st. james st. was all about individuality.

jyan, says...
6:20am Wed 20 Aug 08

I think the council should get a handle on the situation and not worry about old knobs and knockers. I'm sure there's plenty a back passage that's more unsightly.

artlover, Brighton says...
12:59pm Fri 22 Aug 08

Needful Things is simply the best shop in town, no way should the handsome owner be persecuted by the small minded council bigots. The council should look at bigger issues in Kemp Town, like closing down Zone Bar (aka Star Wars Bar) what a hole. Anyway, power to the people, keep the door and keep selling fantastic stuff! Peace!

artlover, Brighton says...
1:31pm Fri 22 Aug 08

spencer1973 wrote:
I wouldnt argue with a tatoo clad thug like that. Keep your door mate, put up a fly screen if you want!
No you really shouldn't argue with him! Instead you should get yourself down to his shop and buy yourself something nice, there's so much choice!

Angela Brighton, Brighton & Hove says...
1:33am Wed 17 Sep 08

COUNCILS WORK IN STRANGE WAYS - Im sure John will get formal permission for his magnificent looking door - i certainly hope so.

BUT THE STARBUCKS THING. There is a group of people (actually a very small group) that are claiming to represent the views of all the Kemptown residents (when they dont) regarding the presence of Starbucks. They are on extremely dangerous ground by all accounts in attempting to convince people, via the distribution of flyers (am I correct in saying a licence is required to do that?), the placement of posters in public places, and of course a Facebook website begging support, that Messrs Starbucks are an underhand bad practicing employer with no morals and acting illegally (quote) in trading from their premises, when in fact they are doing absolutely nothing whatsoever illegal, and merely following the normal cause of appeal applicable to the situation. LET ME REPEAT THAT - THEY ARE NOT TRADING ILLEGALLY AS THE ORGANISER/S OF THIS 'PROTEST' ARE TELLING EVERYONE, AND ARE ACTUALLY VERY WELL REGARDED AS A COMPANY. They dont have the 'rubber stamp' on the paperwork as yet, but they are QUITE LEGALLY ENTITLED to carry on trading as they are, which is not an unusual situation when a minor change of use is involved - how many shops do you know that have never changed from one trade to another! If they dont finally get that 'rubber stamp' they will have to cease trading - its thats simple.

I think we all like the 'individual nature' of many of the shops in the area, but it doesnt mean the residents should be misled over what is involved here, particularly as everyone I talk to believes all this effort should be put towards sorting out the real problems of St James Street, namely beggars, drunks living in shop doorways, open use and dealing in drugs, violent and threatening behaviour etc etc. Why on earth do certain people care about Starbucks when there are far more important things to sort out. Perhaps you know the answer.

To quote from another posting: WHICH WOULD YOU RATHER HAVE IN THESE SHOPS INSTEAD OF STARBUCKS - ANOTHER OFF LICENCE? A PAWN SHOP? A DIRTY NEEDLE EXCHANGE MAYBE?

Its about time certain people started to come clean here i think.

Your sayYourArgus

comment Add your comment

Register for a FREE The Argus account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in below to continue.




Forgotten your password?
John Wright next to his door John Wright next to his door

Sponsored Links


Local Services


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »