Get involved: Send your news, views, pictures and video by texting SUPIC to 80360 or email us.
10:21am Friday 21st November 2008
A little over a year ago a campaign was started to rid the streets of Brighton and Hove of chewing gum. So has it worked? SIOBHAN RYAN reports.
IT’S unsightly, expensive to remove and the bane of Brighton and Hove.
Yet thousands of people across the city are continuing to dump chewing gum on the ground instead of a bin.
The end result is a mess of congealing gum splattered across pavements with the city centre the worst hit.
Despite the threat of an on-the-spot fine of £75 if caught dropping litter, there have been no reports of cases yet involving gum, despite the obvious evidence.
The city council spends thousands of pounds a year cleaning up the mess but removing it is time consuming and costly and the battle a continuous one.
It is urging people to do their bit and take responsibility.
Although city residents agree people should take their share of the blame, they also argue the council should be out cleaning more often, especially in the busy city centre.
In the course of just one hour in one morning this week, The Argus spotted wads of gum spattered across pavements along Church Road in Hove and Western Road, North Street, West Street, Ship Street and Cranbourne Street in Brighton.
It was difficult to walk more than a few yards without spotting pieces of gum.
Ironically, some of the highest concentrations of gum were found around litter bins while other hot spots included bus stops outside M&S in Western Road.
“Disgusting”, “horrible” and “it makes the place look rough”
were among some of the comments from passers-by.
Megan Guy, 19, a student from Brighton studying at the Brighton Institute of Modern Music, chews gum herself but insists she always puts it in the bin.
She said: “The simple answer is don’t throw it in the street. It’s disgusting. I can understand why people get angry at the state of the place and I agree it should be kept cleaner.
“But this area is used by so many people each day and it is expensive to use those special cleaners so I can see why it might get like this.”
Pensioners Doug and Alison Davis from Hove were horrified by the state of some of the pavements.
Mr Davis said: “Every time I see it I am embarrassed at how it looks. We get so many visitors to Brighton and it is not nice.
“We pay a lot of money to the council to keep the streets clean so I’d like to see more of it.”
Mrs Davis said: “I’ve been to other cities in England and I often notice just how clean the pavements seem to be there.
“If they can do it there, why can’t they do it here as well?”
Shop owners also highlighted their concerns.
Hubert Flavius is the manager of the recently opened Hotel Chocolat in Duke Street.
He said: “I’ve recently come from London and up there you would see those specialist cleaners out in force almost every morning.
“We’ve been here for two or three weeks now and I haven’t seen anything.
“This is a busy place and there are shops and a restaurant around. It doesn’t really give a good impression.”
Bus passenger Pamela Carsaniga, 77, from Brunswick Square, Hove, was scathing about the mess.
She said: “It looks disgusting and the pavements should be cleaned up far more often. They should not be allowed to get in this state.
“People should be made to pick up their gum and put it in a bin if they are caught doing so.
If they keep doing it they should be made to go around the city and clean up other areas.”
The city council says it spends thousands of pounds on cleaning up gum but there is only so much it can do.
A year ago it began a campaign to target specific areas of the city including North Road and West Street.
It involved posters and vinyl pavement adverts to warn gum chewers that dropping their litter could result in a fixed penalty fine.
The council has a special steam clean machine to tackle the pavements but to do the work on all the city’s streets would cost millions.
Each year the council cleans up the equivalent of 2.2 million pieces of gum, covering more than 48,000sqm of pavement.
This equates to 46 pieces of gum per square metre and costs the city’s taxpayers more than £25,000 a year.
A city council spokesman said: “Cleaning gum from streets is a specialist and expensive process.
“From time to time specialist contractors are used but to clean gum off every pavement in the city would cost around £4.5 million.
“We appreciate this is an issue which annoys and concerns people. Clearly the onus has to be on users not to litter the streets.
“Last year the council joined the Chewing Gum Action Group campaign to encourage people to dispose of gum responsibly and it is really this sort of national action which can help to change attitudes.”
What do you think should be done to stop people dropping gum in the street? Tell us below
davyboy, abingdon, oxon says...
11:47am Fri 21 Nov 08
Charismatic Andrew, Patcham says...
11:49am Fri 21 Nov 08
Redbeard, Brighton says...
11:55am Fri 21 Nov 08
quedula, brighton says...
12:08pm Fri 21 Nov 08
Arther Daley, all over the manor says...
12:21pm Fri 21 Nov 08
Bubblejet, Brighton says...
12:32pm Fri 21 Nov 08
bibble, London (but visit Brighton regularly) says...
12:35pm Fri 21 Nov 08
Arther Daley, all over the manor says...
12:57pm Fri 21 Nov 08
bibble wrote:The only thing Rover should be held responsible for is producing naff cars in the 1970's 80's 90's and until 2005 when they went bust
Charismatic Andrew, you have just made the perfect example of why a DNA database is flawed. Yes, "Dave" might have chewed the gum, but that does not mean he put the gum on the street. He might have put it in a bin, the bin men might have dropped some of the contents while emptying it. Your idea could and would see innocent people convicted. quedula, you're wrong as well. If a car is used in a robbery, should Rover be held responsible? If a pen is used to write a poison pen letter, should Papermate be held responsible? The people who throw the gum are responsible, nobody else.
miss_lad_pink, brighton says...
1:21pm Fri 21 Nov 08
Pontop Pike, Cowley says...
1:36pm Fri 21 Nov 08
miss_lad_pink wrote:Rover as in the name is actually now owned by Ford. MG is now owned by the Nanjing Automotive Company of China, and had been since mid 2005 - buffoon!
up until summer 08 when another car firm bought Rover again and are bringing it back oh - no!!as for the chewing gum sagga well.... its up to ppl who chew the gum that should be more considerate you can chew for hours so chew up until the point where a bin is!! Breaking news - robbery took place in brighton wheres the headlines
Conor, Sussex says...
1:40pm Fri 21 Nov 08
Andre Spooner, Brighton says...
3:53pm Fri 21 Nov 08
bug eye, hove says...
7:32pm Fri 21 Nov 08
stan bailey, brighton says...
6:55am Sat 22 Nov 08
Rocky Brighton, says...
4:38pm Thu 27 Nov 08
Add your comment
Register for a FREE The Argus account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.
Please register now or sign in below to continue.
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Search for Jobs in Brighton, Hove, Lewes, Worthing, Crawley and more...
Search Now »
Find the right person in Brighton, Hove, Lewes, Worthing, Crawley...
Search Now »
Search for Homes in Brighton, Worthing, Hove, Lewes...
Search Now »
Search for Cars in Brighton, Hove, Lewes, Worthing, Crawley...
Search Now »
feline1, Brighton says...
11:40am Fri 21 Nov 08
Surely the solution is to get ASBO kids and make them lick it off.