Crackdown on rogue cyclists in Brighton and Hove

Cyclists are to blame for a third of the accidents they are involved in, a senior traffic policeman has said.

Police are pledging to crack down on cyclists who ignore red lights, ride on pavements irresponsibly and without lights in the dark and stray from cycle paths and routes marked out for them on spaces shared with pedestrians.

Last year in Brighton and Hove 131 cyclists were injured in collisions, 23 of them seriously.

Inspector Phil Clarke said: "In one third of these incidents the cyclist was at fault, which demonstrates two things.

"Firstly, cyclists need to exercise more care and be responsible and secondly they are vulnerable to the actions of other road users.

"There is an increasing problem in the city with some cyclists riding irresponsibly and sometimes unlawfully."

He said work is being done to make the city more cycle-friendly and make drivers aware of the risks they can pose.

He added: "The city has and continues to develop facilities for cyclists in an effort to make cycling safer and more enjoyable.

"Cyclists have a responsibility to do their bit by complying with the law, riding sensibly and showing the same level of consideration to other road users, that they expect from them.

"Those who wish to ride carelessly or contravene legislation that applies to them, can expect to be dealt with robustly."

Are police right to clamp down on cyclists? Tell us your views below.

Comments(54)

Alan G Skinner says...
3:13pm Tue 13 Jan 09

Yes cyclists should abide by the rules of the road. Is this a good use of Police resources; absolutely not. There are far more serious issues the Police should be concentrating on. It is obvious for all to see, this will be yet another revenue generating exercise, handing out fixed penalty notices to cyclists, which they will pay without fuss. A lot easier than dealing with real criminals who may not come so quietly.

Nick Brighton says...
3:19pm Tue 13 Jan 09

Which means that two thirds were not responsible for the accidents they were involved in. Given the relatively small numbers of accidents involving cyclists, is this the best use of police resources? Yes, I am a cyclist. Yes I do use lights on my bike, wear a helmet, observe all traffic lights and wear a high-vis jacket. Yet, I have been nearly knocked down twice this week, once by a driver turning into a side road on the wrong side of the road, and once by a driver who failed to stop at a pedestrian crossing (I was pushing my bike across). By the way, I am also a car driver, so I do see both sides of the coin. Given that the Council has been given money for cycling, perhaps they could do something about the poor design of many cycle lanes, and cycle priority.

wild berry says...
3:29pm Tue 13 Jan 09

About time too!
The amount of times I have had to jump out of the way of a speeding cyclist on the path....or so much worse , a cyclist on the road at night WITHOUT a light!!
Come on you cheap , tight , miserlycyclists , and dig deep to afford the £5.00 that a light costs.

oyl says...
3:31pm Tue 13 Jan 09

What a hilariously stupid article. It implies cyclists are bad, but the majority of accidents involving them are not their fault. And no, I am not a cyclist.

DougM says...
3:40pm Tue 13 Jan 09

So the upshot of this is that the MAJORITY of accident are caused not by cyclist but by other road users.
Every day I see cars, vans, taxis and buses breaking the law, more often than not jumping red lights.
These vehicles can and do kill people.
I know most road users are ignorant lazy slobs (obviously not me included), but wasting your breath and our money persecuting the harmless (yes harmless in comparison to the car-driving killers) minority that is cyclists is simply a past-time for pig-ignorant bone-idle losers.
Would you rather your child got hit by a bike or a car? And which is more likely - statistically the likelihood is that they would get hit by a car (by x1000 odds) - but you wouldn't mind this, no?

Peacehaven Paul says...
3:44pm Tue 13 Jan 09

"Police are pledging to crack down on cyclists who ignore red lights, ride on pavements irresponsibly and without lights in the dark and stray from cycle paths and routes marked out for them on spaces shared with pedestrians." - Nothing about riding the wrong way down one way streets then!!!!!

feline1 says...
3:46pm Tue 13 Jan 09

What brilliant scheme for tackling the causes of a minority of crimes will Sussex Police come up with next, one wonders?
What are less than 34% of burglaries caused by? Could they please clamp down on it, whatever it is?
And as for the people behind less than 4 out of 10 violent crimes, could they please devote some resources to them pronto?

(Mind you - to all the cyclists riding on pavements, seafronts, through red lights and up drainpipes - WILL YOU BLOODY WELL STOP IT!?!? PLEASE?!?)

davyboy says...
3:48pm Tue 13 Jan 09

Alan G Skinner wrote:
Yes cyclists should abide by the rules of the road. Is this a good use of Police resources; absolutely not. There are far more serious issues the Police should be concentrating on. It is obvious for all to see, this will be yet another revenue generating exercise, handing out fixed penalty notices to cyclists, which they will pay without fuss. A lot easier than dealing with real criminals who may not come so quietly.
alan, you are spot on. this should be what pcso's are used for, as they are out on the streets and appear to have no powers of arrest. just up their street. we have the same problem here in oxford, and they have a crackdown every few months for things like lights, cycling in pedestrian areas etc. it all stops for a short time, but then things get back to normal. the way i see it, cyclists should be made to register their bikes, and have insurance before being allowed on the road. in belgium, all bikes carry a small registration plate, so the ownwer can be identified.

DougM says...
3:58pm Tue 13 Jan 09

"cyclists should be made to register their bikes, and have insurance before being allowed on the road"

Ha ha - that'd be cheap to implement then wouldn't it? And it'd be SO worthwhile too...not.
I'm sure the treasury would just love that idea ...
"so the owner can be identified"
Yeah but what about the person RIDING the bike - consdiering how much bike theft there is I doubt most of the riders would be the registered owners... unless you'd like a photocard license and cycle lane cameras all over the country to make sure that those riding the bikes are the registered owners? Get real matey.

thensx says...
4:00pm Tue 13 Jan 09

To any cyclists reading this :- If you jump a red light and come anywhere near me when I am using a pedestrian crossing I promise I will kick you off your bike.

thensx says...
4:04pm Tue 13 Jan 09

To any cyclists reading this :- If you jump a red light and come anywhere near me when I am using a pedestrian crossing I promise I will kick you off your bike.

MzEden says...
4:08pm Tue 13 Jan 09

I am both car driver and cyclist. This morning I came very close to being knocked off my bike by a van driver who admitted he hadn't checked his mirror before escaping the traffic jam by zipping down a side street turning left across my path. I have high vis this and reflective that and am lit up like an xmas tree but none of this helps if people aren't looking in the first place.
By the same token, last night I didn't see the idiot dressed in black on a black bike without any lights until I was about to cycle past him!
One other thing, if someone 'lets you go' please don't assume it's safe, check that it's safe before going. I have seen a couple of people, pedestrians and cyclists, get hit when that happens.

davyboy says...
4:13pm Tue 13 Jan 09

DougM wrote:
"cyclists should be made to register their bikes, and have insurance before being allowed on the road"

Ha ha - that'd be cheap to implement then wouldn't it? And it'd be SO worthwhile too...not.
I'm sure the treasury would just love that idea ...
"so the owner can be identified"
Yeah but what about the person RIDING the bike - consdiering how much bike theft there is I doubt most of the riders would be the registered owners... unless you'd like a photocard license and cycle lane cameras all over the country to make sure that those riding the bikes are the registered owners? Get real matey.
the system works abroad, but then maybe they don't have the amount of cycle theft we do(lol). anyway, this system is in use for motor vehicles, so why not extend it to bikes. everyone is moaning about cyclists, so let's come up with solutions, matey!!!!! if a car driver cannot be identified, then the registered owner carries the can, so the same should work for cyclists. i also agree with thensx, who says he will kick cyclists off their bikes. all you do then is hold them down, claim you need an ambulance, and the police have toturn up. the clown on the bike can then be prosecuted.

DougM says...
4:19pm Tue 13 Jan 09

Coming up with solutions is one thing davyboy, hair-brained crackpot ideas that will never work and will cost millions in taxes for a relatively small problem is quite another.
As for your theory that the 'registered owner carries the can' I'm afraid you might need to do a little rethink on that one...

leedsnowfan says...
4:19pm Tue 13 Jan 09

make them all have licences and have the same points systems for motor vehicles- we'll have a LOT less "going thru red lights/driving thru pedestrians at crossings and going the wrong way down a one way street....mark my words- one day - someone will be killed or seriously injured by a cyclist going the wrong way down church street at the junction of jubilee street!

puddingandpi says...
4:21pm Tue 13 Jan 09

Cyclists on the pavement make me so angry - I can't even begin to tell how how infuriating I find them!
I always give them a telling, using the strongest language (as long as there's no little kids around) & sometimes it works. And I haven't been stabbed yet, so that's not bad, is it?

Fercri Sakes says...
5:00pm Tue 13 Jan 09

Cyclists can use pavements if the roads are dangerous.

I cycle on the pavement North up Dyke Road past the Tesco garage as the cycle lanes are always filled with cars. I ride responsibly and give pedestrians lots of room and the right of way.

A mile up when the cars disappear I go back to the cycle lane. If I didn't do this I doubt I'd be alive right now to be able to type this.

Also will we have to fine little children having their first cycle down Hove prom? You can't have one rule for some.

I think that cyclists should be fined for any cycling that endangers pedestrians. But not on an empty pavement where I couldn't hurt anybody.

pancaker says...
5:16pm Tue 13 Jan 09

I cycle regularly from Lewes to Brighton and agree with most of the above posters that cyclists without lights and the ones who jump red lights or cycle on pavements should be fined immediately. Two offences and have the bike confiscated. I can only assume that people who do this even though they know it is dangerous to other people are too stupid to realise their own idiocy.

Bryan taxi driver says...
5:30pm Tue 13 Jan 09

As a taxi driver in Brighton we are always getting criticised about our driving.
But cyclist never gets stopped for going down the street the wrong way or no lights or riding on the pavement etc.
But soon as we got a light bulb out we are stopped or at the moment if we do not have a seat belt on we are getting stopped
And find £30. On Saturday the police with the hackney carriage officer were targeting private hire taxis with these fines plus anything
Else they could find. But they would not bother with the hackney taxi drivers who were parking illegally in North Street on zig zag lines.
So my point is if you are going to target someone? Then target us all and punish us all by the same rules.
Plus a little something to think about! Why the police go on about safety why still do buses have no seat belts for all passengers?
How many passengers get injured every year when a bus stops suddenly for a cyclist and everybody fly’s forward.



Stu says...
5:48pm Tue 13 Jan 09

I'm still waiting for the Argus headline "Pedestrian killed by cyclist cycling wrong way down one way street". I see it happen EVERY time I am in town - fortunately I am aware and check but most people dont. Do we really have to for an innocent pedestrian to be killed before something is done about this? How about spikes that come out of the ground and puncture their tyres when the CCTV operators see them?

DougM says...
5:54pm Tue 13 Jan 09

Stu wrote:
I'm still waiting for the Argus headline "Pedestrian killed by cyclist cycling wrong way down one way street". I see it happen EVERY time I am in town - fortunately I am aware and check but most people dont. Do we really have to for an innocent pedestrian to be killed before something is done about this? How about spikes that come out of the ground and puncture their tyres when the CCTV operators see them?
And you'll be waiting a long time for your fix Stu, because in all likelihood it's not going to happen. If you're that keen to hear of some people dying, look at the headlines under 'car crash'.
Wouldn't your energies be better spent trying to reduce road deaths caused from car accidents?
Surely if you care about peoples lives that much you ought to get up and do something about it, instead of wasting your energy worrying about people on push-bikes?

Scoomer says...
6:10pm Tue 13 Jan 09

Do you suppose the police will also clamp down on the fat, stupid tourists who wander all over the seafront cycle lane which runs between the piers, and who refuse to get out the way or even pick a fight with anyone who asks them to move? They make the whole route unusable to cyclists for most of the summer.
Or do rogue pedestrians not count?

davyboy says...
6:36pm Tue 13 Jan 09

Bryan taxi driver wrote:
As a taxi driver in Brighton we are always getting criticised about our driving.
But cyclist never gets stopped for going down the street the wrong way or no lights or riding on the pavement etc.
But soon as we got a light bulb out we are stopped or at the moment if we do not have a seat belt on we are getting stopped
And find £30. On Saturday the police with the hackney carriage officer were targeting private hire taxis with these fines plus anything
Else they could find. But they would not bother with the hackney taxi drivers who were parking illegally in North Street on zig zag lines.
So my point is if you are going to target someone? Then target us all and punish us all by the same rules.
Plus a little something to think about! Why the police go on about safety why still do buses have no seat belts for all passengers?
How many passengers get injured every year when a bus stops suddenly for a cyclist and everybody fly’s forward.


some fair points, bryan, but they don't stop all of you with lights out. i have seen literally dozens with lights missing, some hackney, some private. a lot seem to have these problems for months, as the same ones are seen day after day, maybe until mot time. i agree with the same fines across the board, and equal time targeting each mode of transport.

NoWaySeriously says...
6:57pm Tue 13 Jan 09

I pushed a cyclist on Church Road in Hove this evening who was on the pavement weaving through the road works by the town hall. He hit grazed my leg, I pushed him, and he then the bus stop, full on. Serves him right. It's illegal to ride on the pavement.

Nick Brighton says...
7:04pm Tue 13 Jan 09

Further to my comment above. On my way home tonight, I was cycling on the road, up Stanford Avenue, across its junction of Preston Park Avenue, my lights were on, and I was nearly knocked off my bike by a Renault Clio going from Preston Road into Preston Park Avenue. They had to brake sharply. My fault? Obviously! Because I was cycling, and thus invisible.

TheInsider says...
8:03pm Tue 13 Jan 09

I ride a bike, a motorbike and drive cars.
These are my observations: van drivers and taxi drivers tend to be too fat to move in their seats to be able to use their mirrors efficiently; women in 4x4s are a death trap as they have no spacial awareness and spend their time driving so close to you, you can see the baby sick on their clothes...if you asked a woman to take the wheel of a Transit she would wet herself, but put some windows in it and an air freshener and they think they can drive, but they can't.
Taxi drivers drive too close, too fast and ignore every road rule...if they were on bikes, they would be the ones without lights riding on the pavement..having a crafty fag en route....and taking the long route to get somewhere.
I was knocked down by a mum on the school run who ploughed into the back of me on my motorbike....she got out and cried as I lay in the road saying that she wasn't paying attention as her kids were distracting her.
I also ride a bike and to be honest I can't make head nor tail of the cycle markings which lead you up onto pavements and then stop...what do they mean?
As for the drivers on the Lewes Road who use the bike lane as a car park.... there were 12 cars parked in it last week, two of them untaxed, I tend do "do a Taxi" on my bike and clip all the mirrors off.
I hate to say it, but the bus drivers are not too bad considering the load they are moving but that's probably because they have some training.



grabur says...
9:36pm Tue 13 Jan 09

Quote:
"someone will be killed or seriously injured by a cyclist going the wrong way down church street at the junction of jubilee street!"

That sums it up, perfectly. Because this was such a common cut for cyclists (take at least a minute to think why!) they finally put a contra-flow cycle lane in, great. But at the same time, they narrowed the road, making it a nightmare for cyclist going up the road.

Cycle lanes are full of pit holes and obstacles, and almost suggest to the motorists, that we should be swept to the side off of roads. As someone else pointed out the Dyke Road cycle lanes are ridiculous. I have a FOAF who was violently knocked off his bike at the top of that road and died as a result, that was not his fault.

It's pretty darn simple. Pedestrians always have right of way.

I'm from the crazy school of thought that thinks you should pass a cycle test to get on a motorbike. A motorbike test to get in a car. And so on.

You have to give cyclists and motorcyclists plenty of room. Cars are murderous.

There is nothing wrong with cyclists using pavements, a lot of the time it's the only sensible option. Though they need to always slow down and give pedestrians space.

Those with no lights that's different. One way streets, that might be one for the town planners (but please don't make it any worse).

If I see a large vehicle with momentum i.e. a bus, as a cyclist I'll always give them room to maneuver.

Shame bad cycling, motorbiking and driving. But do not put people off getting on their bikes.

It's the needless, thoughtless car journeys into town, that should be targeted. While money and resources go into teaching people how to ride/drive carefully.

What ever happened to common sense?

jooj says...
2:09am Wed 14 Jan 09

From several quotes above it's quite clear that one of the biggest problems is that people do not know the law and the highway code...

Riding on the pavement (i.e., a pedestrian walkway not indicated as being partly or in whole a cycle path) is against the law, Section 64 of the Highway code states this quite clearly. There's no exception, if it is unsafe on the road, get off and walk.

Personally it seems I break the law quite often, as I like to ride up the cliff walkway, and also on possibly the biggest pavement in England on Hove seafront... although the only time I get some idiot shouting obscenities at me is when I use the clearly marked cycle path along the sea front when they walk in or across the lane. Go figure.

Strugg Lynn says...
9:31am Wed 14 Jan 09

One day I will poke the eyes out of thoses arrogant people cycling on the pavements, tutting because I won't get out of the way for them and looking at me as if I am surrounded in fog when I state they are breaking the law - like they care! If they are too scared to use the roads and cycle lanes they shouldn't be riding a vehicle at all.

trolleydolly says...
11:55am Wed 14 Jan 09

I was recently knocked over by a cyclist coming the wrong way down a one-way street. I stumbled and fell thankfully on the pavement it could have been the road as there were cars coming up. I also could have been an old lady and broken something. Cyclists niggle me when they do this and when they don't abide by traffic laws i.e. traffic lights. Otherwise they are ok.

deanaprior says...
12:13pm Wed 14 Jan 09

Short of news, need to fill a space, roll out the old cyclist crack down story. Are there really people out there who care that I cycle through red lights and the wrong way down one way streets.
Sometimes I cycle through Brighton on sunny mornings going to work and its pure joy.

thensx says...
12:26pm Wed 14 Jan 09

Yes Deanaprior, I do care about you jumping red-lights and going the wrong way down a one way street and if you or anyone else puts me in any danger by doing so you will suffer the consequences, it won't be such a joy then will it? Scoomer, Brighton is a tourist town, tourists don't know or care about the cycle lane by the Palace Pier, here's an idea rather than belting into a crowd of tourists at 20 miles an hour and then getting irate when they don't magically move how about having some respect for other people and getting OFF your cycle for 100 yards, I do.

DougM says...
1:33pm Wed 14 Jan 09

Thensx,
You sound exactly like the type of aggressive knuckle-dragger that is the scourge of our society.
Never mind the odd cyclist committing a very minor misdemeanour every now and again, what the police need to crack down on is people like you.
Our society would be ineffably better were it not for your type.

thensx says...
2:34pm Wed 14 Jan 09

Thanks for the words of encouragement DougM, you described me perfectly! Even better, you managed to get the word ineffably in to a sentence! Well done Dougie, you must be very proud of yourself. But just remember next time you cycle through a red light, it might be me who you are cutting up and consequently you might be coming off your bike the hard way very shortly thereafter. ;-)

DougM says...
2:43pm Wed 14 Jan 09

Good one kiddywink, shame I'm not a cyclist isn't it?
If your internet posturing were to become reality (which I doubt,) it does however suggest that you will either end up quite rightly with a criminal record (or a longer one?), costing the decent law-abiding taxpayer more money, or a bicycle wrapped around your face.

thensx says...
2:44pm Wed 14 Jan 09

Hey DougM, I just noticed that you have a very large number of posts on here. You must have an AWFUL lot of time on your hands Dougie, may I make the constructive suggestion that you get a job, some friends or ideally both?

DougM says...
2:49pm Wed 14 Jan 09

Well thanks for the advice, but as I sit here doing both my tax return and VAT return I do like to look at the Argus, so it would be quite apparent that another job is one thing I don't need. As for friendship - I hope you're not grooming me?

thensx says...
2:58pm Wed 14 Jan 09

Hey, sorry Dougie was that too close to home? I didn't mean to upset you. By the way, if you are doing your own Self-Assessment and VAT return then you must only have a TINY little business, I have a Chartered Acountant who does mine. God bless you Dougie. ;-)

deanaprior says...
3:02pm Wed 14 Jan 09

How can people be so grumpy and aggressive about a few cyclists breaking traffic regulations. Smell the roses

Made In Sussex says...
3:39pm Wed 14 Jan 09

"How can people be so grumpy and aggressive about a few cyclists breaking traffic regulations. Smell the roses"

Yeah I reckon we should give all road users a bit of space to bend the rules after all its not like anyone is going to get hurt is it..

grabur says...
4:27pm Wed 14 Jan 09

Looks like this is going of topic, with the petty squabbles.

A third of cyclists are responsible. The other two thirds?

The cycle lane on the front. It doesn't work well. There is so much room, I don't see why there isn't just a lane on the side of the road, perhaps protected.

As for cycling on the seafront. I love to cycle there as I don't need to worry about traffic, it's a joy, but supposedly I'm not allowed. Why not just ban cyclists during the peak months. Or just let us use pavements sensibly. That's what needs to be drummed into kids (especially) and adults.

Would you let your kids cycle on the road?

Why should I have to get off and walk every time I pass the Vogue gyratory? And many other spots, that have clearly been designed in favour of a motor car.

The city got loads of money to make it cycle friendly. Where did it go? Painting parts of the pavement red, does not constitute a cycle lane, especially when there are bloody great lamp posts and bollards in the way.

It's a waste of money. Spend it on education. And Parents, teach your kids how to cycle properly. A policeman taught me, and it was invaluable. Best thing I learnt at school.



















zamo28 says...
6:13pm Wed 14 Jan 09

Tax them hard.They should pay to use the road.The car rules.

caeos says...
7:13pm Wed 14 Jan 09

isn't this the same officer who a few months ago said pedestrians were lethal with their 'jay' walking into the road without care and attention? and a few months before that said that taxi and bus drivers were aiming at pedestrians who happened to walk out into the road without looking?
either he is bored, or wants ever moving thing removed.
Perhaps the nice people from Bricycles or sustrans would like to stand at the front of a bus and watch the aboslute horror caused by some of these two wheel road users.
"Those who wish to ride carelessly or contravene legislation that applies to them, can expect to be dealt with robustly."
by being run over, driven at harshly, hit by people with bags and brollies while cycling on the pavement etc

BrightonBoy says...
9:58pm Wed 14 Jan 09

I walk, cycle, drive, use trains and planes - all regulary.

The problem here is the great British Public and in many a serious lack of social skills, values and beliefs - not how they are transporting them selves around.

Its these that need to be adddressed by being responsive before we do our usual and try to be reactive - which rarely works.


black123 says...
9:38pm Thu 15 Jan 09

A man believed to have vital information about a fatal stabbing in Brighton is being sought by police.

Officers investigating the murder of Stuart Slade released a picture on Wednesday of 24-year-old Michael Bishop, a resident of the city.

Sussex Police's Det Ch Insp Steve Johns has appealed for Mr Bishop to come forward as soon as possible.

Mr. Kipling says...
4:19pm Fri 16 Jan 09

deanaprior wrote:
How can people be so grumpy and aggressive about a few cyclists breaking traffic regulations. Smell the roses
Only problem is the roses smell of manure

Mr. Kipling says...
4:21pm Fri 16 Jan 09

black123 wrote:
A man believed to have vital information about a fatal stabbing in Brighton is being sought by police.

Officers investigating the murder of Stuart Slade released a picture on Wednesday of 24-year-old Michael Bishop, a resident of the city.

Sussex Police's Det Ch Insp Steve Johns has appealed for Mr Bishop to come forward as soon as possible.
Well this *is* the Argus

rusky says...
11:56am Sat 17 Jan 09

I cycle & sometimes drive in Brighton & Hove.
The only law I break is cycling on the pavement, but only when it's safe to do so.
There are certain areas that, in my opinion, it is not safe to cycle on the road, the bottom of the Old Shoreham Road up to BHASVIC being one. When I cycle home I cycle on the pavement but only if there's no pedestrians around, if there is, I stop & wait for them to pass (I welcome the rest for a minute or so!).

I have also seen cyclists riding around 7 dials roundabout at night, in dark clothes, with no lights & on a mobile! There are some bad cyclists but most are law abiding.

I have to say that bus & taxi drivers are the worst offenders for endangering cyclists.

Oh, anyone know what the consequences are of not being able to pay an on the spot fine??

Stan Z says...
5:03pm Sat 17 Jan 09

I can't defend all cyclists or the third in question here but from experience taxi drivers are the worst offenders.

Some taxi drivers' attitudes are awful (noticeable when in a taxi).
Many are unable to use indicators control speed or use their mirrors.

Taxi driver complacency in being a "professional" driver has led many to think they own the road (plus safety in number etc.) and I have experienced too many near misses with me and others on the road. Sometimes taxi drivers acknowlegde their mistake or apologise but mostly they are ignorant anything has happened or rude. It is no excuse for cyclists but I can see why some people move onto the pavement at times.

Personally, I feel more reporting of taxis and a stricter process for punishing them would increase safety for everybody.

If the Council ever properly sorted out the cycle paths (incl removing broken glass) and linked them to each other rather than to pavements or middle of the road (e.g. at old steine/edward street) then this would be of great help.

For cyclists, I understand the best contact to get in touch with about your issues re: cycle routes and transport planning is Jo.Brooksbank@Bright
on-Hove.gov.uk


Mr. Kipling says...
10:24am Sun 18 Jan 09

All I can say is thank goodness there are no bendy buses in Brighton

Tonsim says...
2:35pm Sun 18 Jan 09

Cyclists are by far the worst danger to pedestrians in Brighton. It is just not safe for elderly people or toddlers to walk on the pavement. The safest place to walk along the seafront is ON the cycle track 'cos that's the only place the cyclists don't use!! I saw a Japanese girl Knocked down by a cyclist in North St. She waited until thelights turned red for traffic before starting to cross to Ship St. and this cyclist coming down from the Clock Tower didn't even slow down at the red light and went straight into her. If cars can be impounded for illegal parking then cycles should be impounded until a £50 fine is paid when their rider ignores a red light or cycles at speed on the pavement.

Ming says...
1:02pm Mon 19 Jan 09

This debate amuses me... There are bad cyclists, bad motorists and bad pedestrians too. I used to ride a bike to work every day and the biggest problem I had was that I nearly killed pedestrians on a regular basis.... but before you tut and label me as a 'rogue cyclist' it was purely becuase of the stupidly high amount of people who just walk out into Western/Church road without even looking, with their back to the traffic. Even mothers with prams would just randomly walk into the road right in front of me. My point is that you cant point the finger of blame at one group of people when there are so many stupid people in each group... What is the argus going to report when that person killed by a cyclist, dies after being hit in the road? Rogue pedestrians?

Osmo says...
5:45pm Thu 29 Jan 09

Everyday I see at least one cyclist on the pavement, running a red light, going the wrong way down a one-way street, or not having any lights on at night.

The other evening a man cycled toward me on the pavement by Preston Park, with no lights. He must have needed glasses too because the clearly marked cycle path was less than 6ft away to his right. I've also seen cyclists illegally using the A23 rather than the cycle path.

It's about time enforcement is used but education on proper road use would bring greater benefits in the long run.

Whatever happened to cycling proficiency?

rusky says...
6:38pm Tue 3 Feb 09

Osmo,
Why do you say the cyclist was "illegally using the A23 rather than the cycle path."?

The use of cycle paths are not mandatory.

I agree that there are some cyclists that routinely break the law but they are in the minority.


click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree