Get involved: Send your news, views, pictures and video by texting SUPIC to 80360 or email us.
10:00am Thursday 12th February 2009 in
An MP has accused Sussex Police of deliberately intimidating patrons of a social club.
In a surprise intervention David Lepper, Labour MP for Brighton Pavilion, said the police’s decision to photograph people entering and exiting the Cowley Club in London Road for a meeting about the environment last week appeared designed to scare activists rather than prevent crime.
Mr Lepper has written to Chief Supt Graham Bartlett, the force’s divisional commander for Brighton and Hove, demanding why officers were posted opposite the venue on Friday.
Members of the Cowley Club, which was hosting a meeting of environmental protest group Earth First, were confronted with four uniformed officers outside the Somerfield store, opposite the venue, snapping visitors using a paparazzi-style lens.
Sussex Police has said the photography was part of ongoing police work to gather information to support future operations. But Mr Lepper yesterday dismissed the police’s response and said he wanted an explanation.
He said: “It looks more like an attempt to intimidate people going in and out of the Cowley Club rather than genuine surveillance. To have such a large number of uniformed officers with a camera with a telephoto lens seems like it’s meant to deter people from going in there.
“I accept that police need to gather information but this is a ham-fisted way of doing it.”
Cowley Club member David Biset, who described the club as a cafe and a meeting place for radicals, said the officers outside the building were acting in a “deliberately intimidating manner”.
Their actions were a worrying sign of a wider problem of authoritarian policing, he said. “Avenues of dissent are being closed down and police feel able to treat politics as a police matter.
“There was no suggestion of anything going on outside the building.
“The police have no reason to be there beyond intimidating people. You shouldn’t be put on a database simply for attending a meeting.”
A spokeswoman for Sussex Police said the force had nothing to add to its earlier comment.
Comments(39)
The Garden Slug
says...
10:15am Thu 12 Feb 09
bibble
says...
10:19am Thu 12 Feb 09
tilburyre
says...
10:35am Thu 12 Feb 09
Dickens Cider
says...
11:12am Thu 12 Feb 09
NoWaySeriously
says...
11:14am Thu 12 Feb 09
bibble wrote:But if you're law-abiding, you've got nothing to hide anyway...
Why do the police need to "gather information" on a legitimate meeting?
The police have turned themselves into political police, something like the Stasi or the KGB. Don't think because you are law-abiding you will not be targetted.
Mary Hinge
says...
11:35am Thu 12 Feb 09
NoWaySeriously wrote:This sort of comment sounds good as a soundbite until suddenly you find yourself at the end of a "misunderstanding" - e.g. if someone with a vendetta against you rang up the police and deliberately accused you of something you didn't do (which seems to be becoming more and more the case in this Stasi-like society).
bibble wrote: Why do the police need to "gather information" on a legitimate meeting? The police have turned themselves into political police, something like the Stasi or the KGB. Don't think because you are law-abiding you will not be targetted.But if you're law-abiding, you've got nothing to hide anyway...
Osama bin there
says...
11:36am Thu 12 Feb 09
bibble
says...
12:05pm Thu 12 Feb 09
NoWaySeriously wrote:I guess you've never heard of wrongful convictions...
bibble wrote:But if you're law-abiding, you've got nothing to hide anyway...
Why do the police need to "gather information" on a legitimate meeting?
The police have turned themselves into political police, something like the Stasi or the KGB. Don't think because you are law-abiding you will not be targetted.
bibble
says...
12:07pm Thu 12 Feb 09
Ronald
says...
12:13pm Thu 12 Feb 09
Scoomer
says...
12:22pm Thu 12 Feb 09
NoWaySeriously wrote:In that case, I assume you'd have no objection to having a video camera installed in every single room in your house?
bibble wrote: Why do the police need to "gather information" on a legitimate meeting? The police have turned themselves into political police, something like the Stasi or the KGB. Don't think because you are law-abiding you will not be targetted.But if you're law-abiding, you've got nothing to hide anyway...
Osama bin there
says...
12:37pm Thu 12 Feb 09
bibble wrote:We won't get any useful answers from you Babble, that's for sure.
Don't think you will get any useful answers from the police about this. Nor from their friends in the police authority. The police do more or less as they please. They have long forgotten that they are part of the society which they police, instead they want to be the lords and us the serfs.
g1mp
says...
1:16pm Thu 12 Feb 09
wellsyuk
says...
1:28pm Thu 12 Feb 09
Scoomer
says...
1:50pm Thu 12 Feb 09
g1mp wrote:If it's the usual Smash EDO lot, the police probably already have more footage and photos than they know what to do with. This smacks of intimidating possible newcomers away from a perfectly legitimate meeting.
Most of the people at the Cowley Club will be involved in the next SmashEDO protest, so I think its beneficial for the police to know the faces.
bibble
says...
2:19pm Thu 12 Feb 09
g1mp wrote:Any evidence to support that claim? Besides, even if that is the case, there is nothing illegal about attending a meeting. At least not yet.
Most of the people at the Cowley Club will be involved in the next SmashEDO protest, so I think its beneficial for the police to know the faces.
feline1
says...
2:48pm Thu 12 Feb 09
Charlie C
says...
2:48pm Thu 12 Feb 09
Dickens Cider
says...
3:12pm Thu 12 Feb 09
Albert Chisholm
says...
3:56pm Thu 12 Feb 09
Voice of the silent Majority
says...
5:16pm Thu 12 Feb 09
Voice of the silent Majority
says...
5:17pm Thu 12 Feb 09
Voice of the silent Majority wrote:There sould have been a "NEVER" in there
They are lucky they went unarmed and naked, Sussex Police would have shot them....
Acheron
says...
6:35pm Thu 12 Feb 09
Kickboxer
says...
6:42pm Thu 12 Feb 09
cheezburger
says...
7:27pm Thu 12 Feb 09
TheInsider
says...
8:11pm Thu 12 Feb 09
B G Gruff
says...
10:48pm Thu 12 Feb 09
getreal
says...
11:24pm Thu 12 Feb 09
g1mp wrote:Gathering evidence and intelligence in regard to the criminal damage caused by the scum who visited the business park the other week possibly. Time for the hippy lefties who go to the Cowley to get in the real world and get real jobs.
Most of the people at the Cowley Club will be involved in the next SmashEDO protest, so I think its beneficial for the police to know the faces.
chris elmes
says...
1:40am Fri 13 Feb 09
Carl Bugenhagen
says...
9:50am Fri 13 Feb 09
chris elmes
says...
12:05pm Fri 13 Feb 09
Carl Bugenhagen wrote:OK! I confess you've caught me out with a generalization. Its not a thousand years,it is in fact seven hundred and ninety six years since Magna Carta .
A thousand years of freedoms? Hmm. But what little we have is certainly going down the pan. This is very serious, if you complain to the police, they will just hole-punch your complaint and put it in your file now. The Police are now fingerprinting drivers too. We are not very far away from hooking up face recognition software to CCTV, the Nit Nurse will be putting GPS implants in our kids next. This is becoming an Orwellian nightmare.
What in the name of god do they think they are doing? Under Section 76 of the Counter Terrorism Act 2008 they can arrest you for photographing them in return.
Please keep on this story Argus..
chris elmes
says...
12:18pm Fri 13 Feb 09
puddingandpi
says...
12:55pm Fri 13 Feb 09
Carl Bugenhagen
says...
2:08pm Fri 13 Feb 09
TheInsider
says...
8:09pm Fri 13 Feb 09
karabuni
says...
12:50pm Sat 14 Feb 09
TheInsider
says...
9:45pm Sat 14 Feb 09
geewhizz
says...
12:26pm Mon 16 Feb 09
greeg
says...
11:12pm Tue 17 Feb 09
geewhizz wrote:Yep,try taking a few snaps of our boys in blue,see how far you get.Before you get your lens cap off you'll be shouting,what you arresting me for!
As of today, 16th February 09 - it is now Illegal for us the public to photograph the police. Interests me how this legisilation was so easily brought it. And I wonder how many of us know about it, let alone agree with it. GW
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Search for Jobs in Brighton, Hove, Lewes, Worthing, Crawley and more...
Search Now »
Find the right person in Brighton, Hove, Lewes, Worthing, Crawley...
Search Now »
Search for Homes in Brighton, Worthing, Hove, Lewes...
Search Now »
Search for Cars in Brighton, Hove, Lewes, Worthing, Crawley...
Search Now »
Comment now! Register or sign in below.
Log in with us
Fields marked with * are mandatory.
Or
Log in with