Brighton News RSS Feed


Schools strike threat over pay


Thousands of children could be turned away from school in a new wave of strikes.

Union leaders confirmed talks with council bosses over a pay deal for school support staff had broken down.

The GMB and Unison unions will ballot for industrial action after the Easter holidays.

Their members have indicated they are overwhelmingly in favour of a walkout.

If no resolution is reached strikes will be staged within weeks, probably in late May.

The unions predicted all schools with workers involved would be forced to close.

The dispute involves more than 200 people working for 16 faith schools in Brighton and Hove who have been excluded, on a technicality, from payouts of up to £25,000 that have been made to their equivalents at non-faith schools.

Mark Turner, GMB branch secretary for Brighton and Hove, said: “We have asked Brighton and Hove City Council to address this situation but they have chosen not to. We are now facing industrial action and a disruption to the education system that nobody wants.”

The council is in the process of redressing a historical imbalance in the amount paid to unskilled workers in different departments, forced by equalities legislation introduced in 2003.

Staff have been able to claim compensation for being underpaid in comparison to others with the same abilities.

In many cases this has meant workers in schools, libraries and elsewhere have compared themselves with binmen, who are unskilled but have relatively high wages.

In the past few weeks the council has made “single status” pay-outs to hundreds of workers, including teaching assistants, cleaners and office staff at the city’s non-faith schools.

However, no offers have been made to their equivalents at the Catholic and Church of England schools because they are technically employed by their governors – even though the funding comes from the council.

Those workers are furious at the situation and regard it as an insult because they have always accepted pay restructuring in line with the other city schools.

Mr Turner said: “For most of them it’s not about the money, although they’d obviously welcome it. They are upset at the way they have been treated. They have been loyal to the council, and in some cases have accepted pay cuts when restructuring was carried out in 2005, and now it seems like the council is pulling a trick on them.”

One Catholic school teaching assistant, who asked not to be named, said: “We will be going on strike, there’s no doubt about it. What they have done is hugely unfair.”

Senior staff who oversee the faith schools for the Arundel and Brighton Catholic diocese and the Chichester Church of England diocese are also reported to be angry money will be deducted from their budgets to fund the council’s payments despite their workers missing out.

The dispute involves staff at 15 primary and junior schools and Cardinal Newman Catholic School – the largest secondary in Brighton and Hove, with more than 2,000 pupils. They make up a quarter of the city’s 64 schools.

The strikes would be the second time in just over a year industrial action has forced closures, following a teachers’ pay row in April 2008.

Two more days of classes were lost when snow closed the city’s schools in February.

A council spokesman said: “We cannot make single status offers to staff at faith schools simply because they are not employed by the council.

“We are aware of all the potential issues surrounding this situation and we have taken them into account.”

He said 93% of those offered pay-outs had accepted them.

Those who have not can either return to accept the offer or mount legal challenges for higher payments.

The unions said there were about 1,000 workers, including those at faith schools, who had not been offered a payment on technicalities.

They are preparing legal test cases to challenge the system.


Your Say YourArgus

Brap Brap, Innit... says...
11:02pm Sun 5 Apr 09

Now is not the time to be crying about your pay. Be thankful you've GOT pay.

feline1, Brighton says...
11:18pm Sun 5 Apr 09

Hey, the Lord giveth and the Lord taketh away!

colavey, Brighton says...
4:57am Mon 6 Apr 09

I thought it was you work hard to earn it and the Council sit idly by and taketh away.

LB, Hove says...
7:38am Mon 6 Apr 09

I'd be more than happy for these workers to be given the extra money.

As long as all the faith schools were under council control and their places allocated in he same way as all the other state funded schools.

All the time these schools choose to accept a special status then the staff who work their must also accept the consequences of that status.

Lil, Worthing says...
7:44am Mon 6 Apr 09

They do have a point though (wow this is the first time I've sympathised with teachers!) as being excluded on a technicality for gender equalised wages is hardly a bad thing in 2009! What B&H CC did in excluding these pay outs on a techicality is very underhand and quite frankly I'd like to slap whoever came up with that idea whilst lawful, as a go-er.

Maybe we'll lop off 25% of their pay because regardless of whether they have a penis or vagina between their legs.

I think this is one of those cases where this is legally OK (due to not being employed by the council) but morally it is looking rather bankrupt.

Oi, Mary Mears, fancy a 25% cut in your wages because you're a woman? Oh, right. I see. I thought not.

Osama bin there, Brighton says...
8:43am Mon 6 Apr 09

The way I read it, these aren't teachers, but unskilled workers.
If they don't like it, sack them and get some more. Simple.
Anyone can do their job. They ought to remember that in these troubled times.

Txa, B&H says...
10:08am Mon 6 Apr 09

colavey wrote:
I thought it was you work hard to earn it and the Council sit idly by and taketh away.
Keeping on the feline's lines. The council is just the "God"'s temple reception. :O

feline1, Brighton says...
10:36am Mon 6 Apr 09

Well these people should look at the birds of the field. Do they get payrises? Or the lillies? But they do alright.
Perhaps they should write to the Pope, I hear he's a Catholic too.

Brap Brap, Innit... says...
10:50am Mon 6 Apr 09

Oh and once again, Union Leaders kicking up a fuss... SCRAP ALL UNIONS

feline1, Brighton says...
11:03am Mon 6 Apr 09

Brap Brap wrote:
Oh and once again, Union Leaders kicking up a fuss... SCRAP ALL UNIONS
Yes, this country has been a filthy mess ever since the namby-pamby liberals banned little boys from working as chimney sweeps.

Brap Brap, Innit... says...
11:53am Mon 6 Apr 09

feline1 wrote:
Brap Brap wrote:
Oh and once again, Union Leaders kicking up a fuss... SCRAP ALL UNIONS
Yes, this country has been a filthy mess ever since the namby-pamby liberals banned little boys from working as chimney sweeps.
You don't need Unions for that.

What have Unions ever done? Ruined industry, ruined everything. You can't demand more pay and no staff losses if the money isn't there. I've had the misfortune of dealing with Union members in the past (retail) and they just don't get it. If they're on £5.05 an hour and the company can afford a rise to £5.75ph without losses, great. If the Union demand £7ph, the company will turn round and say "ok, but we'll lose 20% of staff". THe union will pipe up "no, £7 and no job losses, or we'll strike". THe company will then respond; OK. £7ph, no job losses. However, in ayear there will be no company so we will have no responsibility for 100% job losses... OK? Right.

feline1, Brighton says...
12:06pm Mon 6 Apr 09

Brap Brap, perhaps you need to watch the splendid film "Carry On At Your Convenience" starring Sidney James and Kenneth Williams?

Andy R, Hove says...
3:02pm Mon 6 Apr 09

Brap Brap wrote:
feline1 wrote:
Brap Brap wrote: Oh and once again, Union Leaders kicking up a fuss... SCRAP ALL UNIONS
Yes, this country has been a filthy mess ever since the namby-pamby liberals banned little boys from working as chimney sweeps.
You don't need Unions for that. What have Unions ever done? Ruined industry, ruined everything. You can't demand more pay and no staff losses if the money isn't there. I've had the misfortune of dealing with Union members in the past (retail) and they just don't get it. If they're on £5.05 an hour and the company can afford a rise to £5.75ph without losses, great. If the Union demand £7ph, the company will turn round and say "ok, but we'll lose 20% of staff". THe union will pipe up "no, £7 and no job losses, or we'll strike". THe company will then respond; OK. £7ph, no job losses. However, in ayear there will be no company so we will have no responsibility for 100% job losses... OK? Right.
What a load of nonsense. Brap Brap's forelock is dangling in front of his eyes - a consequence of a working life spent tugging it to the bosses.

bambina, Brighton says...
10:41pm Mon 6 Apr 09

Once again Brighton & Hove Council have cocked it up big time. In an effort to make everything 'equal' they have applied some kind of formula (" that no sensible person who had applied his mind to the question to be decided could have arrived at it.”) There are now swathes of angry employees, who quite rightly feel cheated and are being forced into one course of action -- The Employment Tribunal! Come on Brighton & Hove - behave like the pragmatic employer that you profess to be -- TALK TO YOUR STAFF - this wall of silence will get you nowhere.

LB, Hove says...
7:54am Tue 7 Apr 09

errm bambina, the whole point is that these people aren't staff of or employed by Brighton & Hove Council.

Malibu1963, Portslade says...
8:53pm Tue 7 Apr 09

I am one of these workers being excluded. I have a contract from Brighton and Hove Council, I have a pension with the Council and my pay slip is from the Council. Everything is the same as any other school in the area except tat I am in a Faith school. I do the same work under the same conditions as every other school support worker. Where's the difference?

Comments are closed on this article.


Local Advertisers

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »