News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Lewes MP slams council's recycling efforts


An MP has rubbished a council for not doing enough to promote recycling.

Norman Baker, MP for Lewes, has called for East Sussex County Council to be “pulled out of the stone age” and slammed its efforts to increase recycling rates.

Mr Baker told Environment Secretary Hilary Benn that Lewes District Council was being stopped from increasing the amount of waste it recycles because the county authority wants a “waste stream” to feed its incinerator.

He said the county council was refusing to issue recycling credits - a claim which Mr Benn promised to investigate.

During Commons question time, Mr Baker said: “The Government rightly promotes recycling, but are you aware that Lewes District Council's recycling levels have effectively been capped at 27% by East Sussex County Council - who won't provide further recycling credits because they want a waste stream to feed their incinerator.

“Isn't it about time East Sussex County Council was pulled out of the stone age, and those councils who want to recycle more - such as Lewes who think they can increase recycling by 50% - are allowed to get on with it.”

Mr Benn asked Mr Baker to write to him with details so he could investigate the matter.

A spokeswoman for East Sussex County Council said: “It’s wrong to suggest the county council is stopping district or borough councils from recycling more.

“Our priority is to recycle as much as possible and only waste that can’t be recycled, and would otherwise go to landfill, will be taken to the Newhaven Energy Recovery Facility where it will be converted into electricity.

“Districts and boroughs have the choice to either recycle material through our waste contract at no cost; or go to third parties to recycle the waste, pay the cost of doing so and keep any income.

“If they go to a third party they receive a waste credit payment.

“There is a ceiling on these payments which was set at a time when overall recycling was much lower and it was not expected to be reached.

“It is great news the public is now recycling more, and in light of this the way these payments are made is being reviewed.”

Comments(9)

Wivvy Dave says...
2:40pm Fri 3 Jul 09

I'm sure that is not the first (or indeed second) time that NB has made such comments. At least he is leading by example, recycling justifiable and well direct critisism at the County. Perhaps he should also target the lamentable efforts of LDC to recycle waste effectively. As house holders we have to wash the rubbish before we put it out, (uses hot water gas electricity washing liquid etc) great but why? When the metal cans are then smelted down, this removes all traces of waste. Incidentally has anyone worked out the carbon foot print of the LDC recycling vehicles, with their multiple staff, large batteries and electricity needs etc etc etc and thats before we use any enery to actually recyle the items (or as I suspect just store vast quantities in warehouses awaiting its transfer to the far east- again how much energy does that use)

Cherry Pie says...
3:08pm Fri 3 Jul 09

They don't get credits above a certain threshold, it's that simple. I think you may find they choose not to recycle over the levels they get credits for. It's about keeping income - they could recycle as much as they like for free according to the report but they wouldn't get the money for it. Makes you think, hmmm?

To produce food grade products from ali cans for example requires a very, very clean input material. Unwashed materials just wouldn't cut it and they would either end up getting landfilled as they're too dirty to process, or used in products where the quality doesn't matter so much and therefore a worse price is paid. These companies have an input spec that must be met as they too are regulated...

Txa says...
5:43pm Fri 3 Jul 09

Wivvy Dave wrote:
I'm sure that is not the first (or indeed second) time that NB has made such comments. At least he is leading by example, recycling justifiable and well direct critisism at the County. Perhaps he should also target the lamentable efforts of LDC to recycle waste effectively. As house holders we have to wash the rubbish before we put it out, (uses hot water gas electricity washing liquid etc) great but why? When the metal cans are then smelted down, this removes all traces of waste. Incidentally has anyone worked out the carbon foot print of the LDC recycling vehicles, with their multiple staff, large batteries and electricity needs etc etc etc and thats before we use any enery to actually recyle the items (or as I suspect just store vast quantities in warehouses awaiting its transfer to the far east- again how much energy does that use)
Still taxpayers has to pay for recycling it does not matter if is cost effective or not. For recycling to work has to be run by council as a services not for private companies for profits, then we could take recycling more seriously.

Txa says...
5:49pm Fri 3 Jul 09

For the record, we are fully dedicated to recycle for more than 12 years, we even recycle all our kitchen waste, and haven't got a garden. So we are for recycling if than in the right way.

Txa says...
5:58pm Fri 3 Jul 09

After reading the article, Wivvy Dave, add the energy/water needed to incinerate the rest of the waste. Never mind, we still will have to pay for it for a bit of by-product(electrici
ty)?

senseless-business

John Steed says...
6:13pm Fri 3 Jul 09

Stormin Norman is right about this, this norman is why you are the elected MP, now make sure that ESCC change their policy and adopt a responsible attitude in this matter, they should be leading the change in enviromental responsibility, not having to be dragged kicking and screaming towards common sense.

FrankKeys says...
10:30pm Fri 3 Jul 09

WivvyDave - We have to wash stuff as separated, cleaned recyclate is worth more than the unclean unseparated stuff many councils put up with. That's why our stuff in Lewes District doesn't get dumped in some warehouse or go to landfill. Most of our rubbish will be burned at a massive cost to us though if this isn't resolved.

King from Hove says...
8:28am Sun 5 Jul 09

Does recycling mean that the resident has to seperate waste so that it can all be dumped together and sent to waste sites in third world countries.

Txa says...
9:55am Sun 5 Jul 09

Well say King, and we, residents have to dearly pay on health, environmentally and financially, for this mess. Personally recycling lost all the real meaning when ESCC started (so wrongly) to deal with it.


Most popular






Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses