Brighton News RSS Feed


Brighton and Hove City Council draft secret plan to sack 821 workers


A council has drafted a secret plan to sack 821 workers if they refuse to take pay cuts of up to £8,000 each.

A confidential document seen by The Argus sets out Brighton and Hove City Council's latest move in its attempts to stave off compensation pay-offs which cost it more than £23 million this year.

It sets out proposals to terminate the contracts of 821 workers who are mostly employed either as binmen and street cleaners in its CityClean waste department or in the city's parks service.

Their jobs would be lost on January 1, 2010, unless they accept new lower wage deals.

The document proposed the plan as a contingency if negotiations with trade unions over the pay cuts fail.

Senior council officers are due to meet with union leaders on July 28.

Mark Turner, Brighton and Hove branch secretary for the GMB union, said: "If they are going to use language like this, that they are going to terminate contracts, it doesn't fill me with confidence going into negotiations.

"It sounds as if they are only planning to pay lip service to us and will go ahead and do what they want anyway."

The council has been trying to deal with a historical inequality in its pay structure which has left it vulnerable to legal action.

Almost three thousand unskilled workers based at schools, libraries and other departments accepted cheques of up to £20,000 each in March.

The windfall was used to compensate them for being underpaid by comparison to others, mostly binmen, who have similar skills but have been paid significantly more by the council for a number of years.

They also signed away the right to make legal claims until January 1, 2010.

The Argus revealed last month that to avoid making more payouts in future, the council was preparing to ask the higher paid workers to take pay cuts of between £2,000 and £8,000 a year each.

The GMB spoke of their fears they would not be able to stop CityClean staff staging week-long wildcat strikes this summer if the move went ahead and added a ballot for formal industrial action was likely.

Mr Turner said: "We will go into meetings with an open mind, we are ruling nothing in and nothing out but the council must realise they are dealing with people's livelihoods here."

He said more than 200 teaching assistants at the city's 16 faith schools, who were left out of the compensation payouts on a technicality, were also poised to strike but were not now likely to do so until the new academic year in September.

The latest move has been criticised by opposition councillors.

Liberal Democrat group leader Paul Elgood said he was glad the pay problems were being tackled by the council but described the latest moves as "extremely controversial".

He said: "It is a big ask for many members of staff to reduce their salaries and it will be particularly hard to take in a time of recession."

Labour group leader Gill Mitchell said: "It is an incredibly poor way to treat people. This approach doesn't demonstrate any commitment to working particularly hard to achieve the best possible outcome for the staff."

The council yesterday said it could not discuss confidential information but did not repudiate the leaked facts.

A Brighton and Hove City Council spokesman said: “The council has a legal and moral duty to pay each of its staff fairly. We are entering into talks with the unions to try to implement equal pay by negotiation and we are hopeful that this will be successful.”


Your Say YourArgus

davyboy, abingdon, oxon says...
4:23pm Sat 11 Jul 09

if the council has a duty to pay their workers fairly, why not INCREASE the pay of poorly paid members, instead of expecting people to take a pay cut. like anyone would do so voluntarily. what a way to treat your staff. despicable!!!!

CeeBee, Hove says...
4:27pm Sat 11 Jul 09

Oh please, this is utter rubbish. Why does anyone believe a word the Argus writes?

yorkie44, Woodingdean says...
4:45pm Sat 11 Jul 09

This is the consequence of equal pay. There is only a certain amount of money for wages in any organisation. If some get a pay increase because of equality laws in the longer term everybody will get less. The price of services and goods cannot keep rising to pay for higher wages and if it did people will just not pay the price or will look elsewhere for a better deal. The real issue here is that the cost of housing is still too high and when this has fallen more wages will be at a level where people are not demanding increases to enable them to get on the housing ladder.

abinman, says...
6:16pm Sat 11 Jul 09

It’s the council’s workforce that keeps the front line services in operation, as we have an inadequate management. Unfortunately it looks like a lot of action will be taken in the future to protect our pay. We don’t want to strike but we see no other alternative. All we want is to carry on working with our pay intact!!
Working families wont really feel the impact as their wage should compensated by working tax credits whilst young couples without children and those with a single relationship status, might have to sell their homes as they wont be able to afford their mortgages. Employee's renting will have to down size.
The only thing this will achieve is another huge reduction in the lack of morale which is almost none existent now. Where other councils have carried out the 'Single Status' stress councillors had be called in, to deal with huge amounts of financial worries the workers had. Other councils have opted out, due to the amount of devastation it will cause.

greenpaws, Brighton says...
6:20pm Sat 11 Jul 09

If the council set a rent cap in the area and then paid all council employees including the Chief Executive the same amount per hour worked, then we could afford a great council for the local people. If the Chief Executive doesn't like the £200,000 pay cutt needed to achieve this then I will do his job for the same amount as cleaners get now.

Jim BB, Brighton says...
6:39pm Sat 11 Jul 09

When you cut someone's pay, what incentive do they have to do a good job –especially if they're busy worrying about how to make ends meet?

Chicken and Beans, says...
7:28pm Sat 11 Jul 09

Here's an idea: Performance Related Pay.

I would imagine that the call centre staff would be on a higher wage than the bin men and the top brass if PRP was brought in...

SW: lazy-yeah

Pebbles, Brighton says...
8:53pm Sat 11 Jul 09

There's no winning with the GMB. They will attack whatever the circumstances. They don't give a **** about long term consequences. Its just about getting the monthly subs from the members. God help the council!

puddingandpi, Brighton says...
10:09pm Sat 11 Jul 09

As long as the pay cuts start at the top rather than the bottom...that's not what they're planning though, is it?

Dave At Home, Brighton says...
11:11pm Sat 11 Jul 09

How much do they earn to take an 8 grand pay cut for petes sake?

Fight Back, Hove says...
10:16am Sun 12 Jul 09

For hevens sake - teaching assistants get paid what that role is worth and binmen get paid what that role is worth. Both unskilled but completely different conditions so they shouldn't get the same pay. If the council had some back bone and employed decent lawyers then it would have been easy to put a sensible constructive arguement against any legal action for pay inequality. The people that should be sacked are the councillors and council lawyers not the binmen. Common sense should be used rather than PC laws that this pathetic government has produced.

Preston_Parked, Preston Park says...
11:43am Sun 12 Jul 09

I am curious as to how we can put a value on teaching assistants or binmen without thinking about what we're saying. Whilst I think that generally, our local binmen and street cleaners do a good job in difficult conditions, teaching assistants are involved in educating our children - how can this not be valued? Some binmen are completely overpaid and I think that pay should be equal. I think it's a shame that this council has spent too long putting it off and now those on the lowest wage in the city will be affected. Whether or not the money is the right level, cutting anyone's income now is not going to be easy for anyone. It's about time people stopped judging all of our local binmen on a small minority of overly unionised muppets. Most of them work really hard, take pride in what they do and for relatively low pay.

bug eye, hove says...
2:11pm Sun 12 Jul 09

just get rid of the dead wood, there are many who get a job with the council not to work but for security and skiving. the mess of our roads and roadschemes if a prime example of a department that needs overhauling. whoever is responsible for the paving needs sacking too, a mish mash of grey and red paving and tarmac no continuity. having had dealing with the sport and leisure department many of them are deadwood, I am sure the list goes on. more pay less loonies.mary mears says that the seafront arches have to have a rent increase over 300% to get in line with current markets, well thats ok if you want to get rid of our individuality that makes this area so successful. at higher rents we will end up with coffee shops and other naff shops on any high st. she has not got a clue she could save the city a hell of a lot of money by standing down and going back to rottingdean.

rayellerton, portslade says...
3:30pm Sun 12 Jul 09

Its strange that the Council in its wisdom decides to attack the pay of the operatives at the sharp end who actually carry out the services that we want and pay for. The number of penpushers and non-jobs on the Council has mounted over the last ten years..wouldnt make more financial sense to shed some of these high paid staff who contribute little for the tax payers pound?

Tye, Brighton says...
5:14pm Sun 12 Jul 09

Maybe these guys should decide just to leave their jobs?
I'm told that if someone gets their solicitor to write their letter of resignation for themthe Council will give them half a million quid to which they have no legal rights.
Or is it one rule for us (the gobsha*ts)and one rule for the workers who actually make a difference to the people of Sussex

Tye, Brighton says...
4:44pm Mon 13 Jul 09

CeeBee wrote:
Oh please, this is utter rubbish. Why does anyone believe a word the Argus writes?
SO whay waste your precious time reading it every day?

and to make it worse spend even more time commenting on it:)

Comments are closed on this article.


Local Advertisers

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »