News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Starbucks boss defends Brighton planning row


Coffee giant Starbucks’ victory in its controversial planning battle with Brighton and Hove City Council to run a coffee shop in St James’s Street, Brighton, caused anger among traders and residents. Here Darcy Willson-Rymer, managing director of Starbucks UK and Ireland, tells The Argus that his company is committed to the city - and the community.

His views are sure to court controversy. Let us know what you think by leaving a comment below.

As a business and as an employer, Starbucks is committed to the Brighton community and has been for ten years.

Recently there has been much reported about our coffee house on St James’s Street. I want to take this opportunity to respond to you directly, and offer my view on how we work in Brighton and the positive contribution we believe we make.

tarbucks has been credited with leading the growth of the coffee house culture in this country and this has created a whole industry and many new businesses. Many of these are independent operators and I truly believe that big brand names can comfortably sit alongside these to deliver significant benefits to local customers and the broader business community.

Darcy Willson-Rymer, managing director of Starbucks UK and Ireland

First and foremost, to address the planning issue concerning our St James’s Street coffee house, whilst we accept there are always lessons that can be learnt, it needs to be stated that we operated entirely within the existing planning laws and have experts in place to ensure we do just that.

We have been inspected, we have co-operated fully throughout the appeal process and as a result the Inspectorate ruled in our favour.

One of the key criticisms we face surrounds our size.

There is no denying that we are a global company, we are not an independent operator, but being big isn’t a bad thing particularly for our customers.

It means we have global standards to ensure consistently high quality coffee and a great experience for each of our customers in our coffee houses.

It also means we’re accountable for doing business in a responsible and ethical way both in coffee growing communities across the globe and, much closer to home, in the communities we’re a part of here in the UK.

We are also a local employer and each of our coffee houses play an important part in their local communities.

Specifically in the Brighton area, where we have seven coffee houses, we employ more than 100 people from the community.

Each of these Starbucks partners, our employees, share our vision to support the Brighton community. Many of them have volunteered their free time to support, or fundraise for, a number of local organisations including the Royal Sussex County Hospital, The Sussex Beacon, Downs View School, Cocaine Anonymous and the Sussex branch of MacMillan Cancer Support to name but a few.

We also have nationwide partnerships, which we support at a local level, alongside The Prince’s Trust and the National Literacy Trust to help transform the lives of thousands of young people throughout the UK.

Beyond this involvement in our local communities, I personally feel that in Brighton - as elsewhere in the UK - our continued investment in shopping districts is valuable and positive.

It is particularly important in this difficult economic climate. Starbucks has been credited with leading the growth of the coffee house culture in this country and this has created a whole industry and many new businesses.

Many of these are independent operators and I truly believe that big brand names can comfortably sit alongside these to deliver significant benefits to local customers and the broader business community.

High street names can bring large-scale employment and investment to an area as well as attracting customers to places that wouldn’t ordinarily draw high numbers.

Our customers in Brighton like to hang-out in our coffee houses either before or after they have shopped. Local workers will come in for a coffee or a lunch break, and some people will use our space to congregate or catch up on work. Most, if not all, regular customers will also visit other shops, restaurants and indeed coffee houses in the surrounding area.

I believe that independent shops bring much needed diversity to local areas along with a small business network that is always important to the local economy. These smaller retailers often provide products and services that can’t be found elsewhere.

I also feel strongly about our responsibility to invest in local communities as well as the distant communities in coffee growing regions. For example, as the largest purchaser of Fairtrade certified coffee in the world, we work directly with farmers to ensure they receive an equitable price for their coffee, enabling them to enhance coffee quality and the lives of their families and communities. This is part of our global work but I know that local people care about how we source our coffee.

I hope this article goes some way to explain how we work and addresses some of the concerns being raised. We don’t want to dominate here but rather operate alongside others and continue contributing to this vibrant area. We know that members of the community care hugely about maintaining the vitality and diversity of Brighton as do we. We hope there is room for everyone, big and small, so that in these tough trading times we can help to keep our high-streets alive and thriving.


Comments(17)

Tye says...
8:06am Tue 14 Jul 09

Committed to the community?

what does that meaningless quote mean?

Lets make money out of mugs paying pounds and pounds for some disgusting brown water that is not even an approximation of real coffee ?

pun master says...
8:25am Tue 14 Jul 09

This is hardly an article - it's just the Argus printing what is in essence merely a statement. I don't personally have an opinion either way, but I would expect more balance from the journos on this - where are they challenging him, or his companies actions - where are they challenging any flaws they may find in his 'statement.' I guess he felt as though he was too important to actually conduct an interview with our 'beloved' local rag, which may tell you something about the man... Come on Argus editorial team, we deserve better reporting than this, surely...

Old Ale Man says...
8:26am Tue 14 Jul 09

Who pays the money makes the choice Tye old chappie!!
I much prefer an old ale to what you describe as brown water, more body and quantity to it.
Cheers

censored says...
9:01am Tue 14 Jul 09

Seven shops on Brighton? Would you like to comment on the reported policy of "clustering".

You see, as a global chain it doesn't much matter if your St James St shop isn't profitable. It can take a hit while it dilutes the business in the area. Only so many people want coffee.

The independents can't take that hit and go out of business. Then your new shop has done it's job and either closes, sending people off to other branches, or has ridden out the storm and finally moves into profit.

Jo Wadsworth says...
9:53am Tue 14 Jul 09

That's a good point, just running this statement would not be good journalism - so I've added links to the other articles we've run since Starbucks won the appeal.

This piece is actually one of our daily analysis pieces, where we often ask one person to comment on a running news story. But as we knew it would attract so much interest, we've also put it in the main news stream today.

Osama bin there says...
10:39am Tue 14 Jul 09

At the end of the day, everyone has a choice. If you don't like Starbuck's (as I don't) don't go there. If you like what they serve - fine.
The people I have a problem with are those so called "protestors" who try to deny ordinary people their democratic right to free choice.
We all like different things. Calm down!

Murgatroyd says...
12:22pm Tue 14 Jul 09

Will the Argus be giving local independents a chance to promote themselves for free in the name of 'news'?

I didn't think so.

Dizd says...
12:58pm Tue 14 Jul 09

I travel up and down St James street several times a day. Bearing in mind how long Starbucks has been trading there I have yet to see any negative effects of it's business that the so called protesters claim wold take place.

puddingandpi says...
1:27pm Tue 14 Jul 09

They do need to sort out the loos. At the moment, both toilets are uni-sex but that just results in women paddling through puddles of **** & having to clean the toilet before they can use it.
Make the disabled loo into the ladies & everything would be perfect!

mark 62 says...
2:19pm Tue 14 Jul 09

puddingandpi wrote:
They do need to sort out the loos. At the moment, both toilets are uni-sex but that just results in women paddling through puddles of **** & having to clean the toilet before they can use it. Make the disabled loo into the ladies & everything would be perfect!
cant do that, disabled toilets are not to be multi-use, not sure what the people who want it shut are on about? had it been run by a local gay couple no one would say a word! does seem we dont want jobs in this town, i expect people to challenge amex for their rebuild and extension. as for the article, whats the point to it? obviously he will be pro starbucks.

Uncle_Meat says...
2:46pm Tue 14 Jul 09

Frankly I'm happy to see any shop in the ghetto that is St James's Street in use rather than empty, although this useless, spineless council did roll over too easily when it came to the planning appeal.
Anyway, I can't imagine why anyone would want to visit Fourbucks for a coffee when Redroaster is just down the road!

Mel Hove says...
6:39pm Tue 14 Jul 09

"It means we have global standards to ensure consistently high quality coffee and a great experience for each of our customers in our coffee houses." Who are you trying to kid? Starbucks coffee is as revolting as dishwater and expensive to boot. "Coffee culture"? Do us a favour! The resemblance to coffee is almost non-existant, and as for culture, people sitting around chatting, in ugly furniture and surroundings is hardly evidence of that.


andyatit says...
6:42pm Tue 14 Jul 09

Funny thing is I know a majority of the protesters outside the shop, all on the dole, paid for by the employees of Starbucks taxes and company tax paid by Starbucks... personally I don't like the big chain, but firstly don't like the band wagon protesters... St James's street is mainly a s**t hole where I have to battle my way past fighting school children, junkies and and defunkt supermarket, fair play to em if they can make business there amongst the ten or so other places selling coffee there.

puddingandpi says...
8:19pm Tue 14 Jul 09

mark 62 wrote:
puddingandpi wrote:
They do need to sort out the loos. At the moment, both toilets are uni-sex but that just results in women paddling through puddles of **** & having to clean the toilet before they can use it. Make the disabled loo into the ladies & everything would be perfect!
cant do that, disabled toilets are not to be multi-use, not sure what the people who want it shut are on about? had it been run by a local gay couple no one would say a word! does seem we dont want jobs in this town, i expect people to challenge amex for their rebuild and extension. as for the article, whats the point to it? obviously he will be pro starbucks.
The disabled toilet already is multi-use, being the baby changing room as well. It's not nice, wading in there.
I never did understand the protesters. They were yapping on about supporting local businesses but there's so many chains on St James St that it was just silly!
Now maybe they'll all bog off & do something useful.

greenpaws says...
7:08pm Fri 17 Jul 09

Local people didn't want it. The council voted against it. It should have been forcibly shut. Where was local democracy and Strabuck's respect of local people?

If people on benefits wants to add their time to the campaign then I applaud that.

It's a shame the Tory controlled council went limp at the end and allowed an injustice.

The majority in Brighton feel self-sustainability is a must and yet this big chain was allowed to trade, and pump resources out of the area.

People of St. James Street area should have the last say otherwise laws have brought an injustice and not added local democracy and a right to free speech and thus ideology in people's own areas.

greenpaws says...
7:13pm Fri 17 Jul 09

Local people didn't want it. The council voted against it. It should have been forcibly shut. Where was local democracy and Strabuck's respect of local people?

If people on benefits wants to add their time to the campaign then I applaud that.

It's a shame the Tory controlled council went limp at the end and allowed an injustice.

The majority in Brighton feel self-sustainability is a must and yet this big chain was allowed to trade, and pump resources out of the area.

People of St. James Street area should have the last say otherwise laws have brought an injustice and not added local democracy and a right to free speech and thus ideology in people's own areas.

HoveHound says...
10:32pm Fri 24 Jul 09

Why do some people think that its all people on benefits who are protesting! More likely working, politically aware people. Would it be better that Starbucks opened ilegally and no one questioned it? As the council was clearly to weak to refuse, or more likely someone got a back hander for allowing it to open. Money talks. Support the local coffee shops instead or all we will have to choose from in the future is starbucks or tesco! theyre taking over!


CONTROVERSIAL: The Kemp Town Starbucks CONTROVERSIAL: The Kemp Town Starbucks

Most popular






Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses